At 10:21 AM 10/07/02 -0500, you wrote: >> The rest of your post is exactly the sort of Kool-Aid inspired crap that >> has just been banned from the LUG. >> >> It has nothing to do with the EXS24. > >Down boy... but I agree with the rest of your points. Hi Jer, Thanks for your other post. I wrote that because I thought it is a little insensitive to post advocating that Jobs move to shaft PC users even more than he already has. I really like the whole cross platform thing. I really like that we are a group of people with a shared interest -- who despite being spread all over the world are able to share information and help each other in our work/creative pursuits. I couldn't care less what platform floats your boat. The points in the post I was referring to about M$ stealing the GUI from Mac --they don't hold water. There is a GUI like the Xerox/Windows/Mac GUI on every operating system for the last 10 - 12 years -- Unix had X-Windows etc , Linux has several, GEM was available on PC and other 680x0 platforms. Xerox PARC invented the GUI it in the first place. As Steve Jobs once said: "Good ideas are copied; the best ideas are stolen." M$ cut a few corners in developing their GUI -- what is the effect of that? Bugger all. They could have bought GEM -- they would have got a Xerox style GUI from somewhere. Coding Word for it would have been more work that's all. There was no other option than to develop a modern graphical interface. OS/2 2.0 had it's own GUI in this style in 1992 so if it wasn't Windows sweeping all before it in the 90's, it would have been OS/2. If OS/2 had ended up on top, M$ would have still been in partnership with IBM -- therefore no Apple-IBM-Motorola troika. PowerPC was largely the IBM Power architecture with a few minor Motorola bits tacked on. Where would Apple be now if M$ hadn't ratted on IBM? My Point? The idea that any of this ancient history is a moral justification for shafting musicians who use PC hardware is rubbish.. >This list is notorious >for OT subject matter. I've often thought of the list name as a misnomer. It >seems more like a group of talented people who talk about whatever it is >they want to talk about it. I'm not a member of LUG, nor do I have a desire >to be. I like this list for what it has been over the last year. A forum of >pro users who talk about all the issues affecting such a niche. Admittedly, >however, the Logic/Mac/PC has dominated our collective psyche lately. That is interesting -- that you aren't on the LUG. The LUG has been a train-wreck since the announcement and the moderators have been deluged by 2500+ messages. The LUG descended into a huge platform war the like of which we have never seen. This move by Apple has split what has been a fairly harmonious community. The Moderators have taken a stand in the last couple of days explicitly banning this stuff. Below I have pasted what they posted to the LUG. Regards, Murray __________________________________ Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 01:27:35 -0000 From: "lug_moderators" <lug_moderators@...> Subject: [ADMIN] Our New Moderation Policy Due to the extremely volatile situation lately here on the LUG, an abnormal amount of platform wars have been started. Because of this, Windows "PCs" and Macintoshes will no longer be directly compared on this list, as this just creates a never ending debate. As of right now, *any* message that argues Mac vs. PC will either be rejected, or edited by the admins to remove the offensive comments. We will also edit or reject any messages that are even *likely* to start yet another Mac vs. PC debate, -or- are generally inflammatory in nature and non constructive. Please be careful what you post! It is unfortunate that we have had to take such drastic measures, but the moderating team has been overwhelmed by the flood of messages debating platforms, and this cannot continue. For what it is worth, we moderators are an even mix of Mac and Windows users, so no means is this a decision biased because of the individual platform we happen to use. Everyone has had a full week now to express their opinions on Apple buying Emagic, as well as explain exactly why or why not switching to a Mac may or may not be a good idea, so there really is no point in repeating what has already been said many times before. We will eventually remove this "rule", so by no means will this be effect forever - just until everything calms down in a few weeks or months or however long it takes. We are very much looking forward to returning to a more casual moderation policy, but that's just not possible right now. On the other hand, advice on choosing PC or Mac hardware is still more than welcome, as is comparisons between Logic and other sequencers. This group is an invaluable resource to over 8,000 of us now, using both platforms, and that we are only trying to keep it that way. Thanks for your understanding, the LUG Moderators
Message
Re: [exs] Some reasons why Steve Jobs bought Emagic
2002-07-10 by Murray McDowall
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.