PersingEP@... wrote > The Lowpass filters sound different to me.....I wonder are they the same? The > EXS MkI sounds fatter to me....just my first impression, maybe I'm nuts. The > HP and BP filters are a great addition, wish the FAT function worked > though...only seems to have an effect on 24db Low Pass. On the ES2 the Fat > function seemed to work on all the filters. You are right, I did a test (bouncing, importing, inverting and crossplaying the same songfile in 5.0 and 5.5) and the filters aren't identical. Seems as if the MK I filter is resonating a bit more. Unlike you, I ain't no Mr. Golden Ears (I am serious about that), so eventually I might not even have noticed this, but in an A/B comparison of the files the differences just became pretty much apparent, even without the phase cancellation test. I also agree with you that the ease of editing the most important parameters is gone now - not because of the simple lack of proper sliders (as Ben said, it's all there once you recall the EXS Mk I settings) but because of the tiny-ness of the new modulation sliders. IMO It'd be nice if one could switch between "classic" and "MK II" GUI modes. Regards, Sascha > > So overall....more Powerful Great.....not as easy to use...not Great. > > my 2 cents. > > EP > > I suppose that's the price of flexibility > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send a blank email to: > exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com > For a list of places to get free samples please see: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/exs-users/links/ > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Re: [exs] EXS24 MKII
2002-11-22 by Sascha Franck
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.