EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

On a fine day, 18-08-2003, teddybut wrote:

>  > On a fine day, 17-08-2003, HJV wrote:
>
>  > I didn't automate by moving the EXS faders, but by
>  > hyperdrawing in Arrange.  Still shouldn't make a difference though.
>[...]
>
>aha, now it's all starting to make sense. To me, automating means you are
>moving the controls and recording the automation. Hyper drawing is Hyper
>drawing. Ah, modern terminology.

:-)  Well, to me automating is making the software do something 
automatically that I'd otherwise have to do by hand.  So that 
includes both 'turning dials' and 'hyperdrawing'.

>We, therefore, have the same results.

Yup.

>  > I guess by 'downbeat' you mean bar 1, tick 1, right?
>
>yes, old school musician terminology.
>2, 3, 4, BOOM, it's a downbeat.

Confusing imo, as every bar has a downbeat, and you specifically 
meant the downbeat of bar 1.  'Bar 1 tick 1' is less ambiguous.  But 
who cares? :-)

>  >  See above: I
>>  can delete this one, but Logic insist on recreating it as soon as you
>>  do anything to the track automation.
>
>yup, same here. strange. I guess SOMETHING has to be there or the logic god
>doesn't smile.

Weird indeed, esp. since this is the 1st time I encounter a parameter 
that _has_ to have an automation event at the very 1sttick of the 
song.

Anyway, glad we got this one sorted out alright.

-- 
Hendrik Jan Veenstra   h @ k n o w a r e . n l
Omega Art: http://www.omega-art.com/