Hello!
I don\ufffdt understand what you mean I have all my EXS sounds made for all my
tracks so I don\ufffdt understand what you mean my EXS instruments are not at all
song specific!
The best,
Alvaro Villalobos.
>From: <HELP@...>
>Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
>To: <exs-users@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [exs] Reopening EXS (resending under original header)
>Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 10:54:08 -0500
>
>We were all missing the point here. What he wants is two songs to access
>the
>EXACT same EXS24 instruments. This is not possible as all VST/Logic
>Instruments are song-specific and not a global resource. The same exact
>instruments can't possibly be accessed in this way. As nice as this would
>be, it's more important for me to be able to save every parameter per song.
>If both ways of doing things were permitted, that would be great. But if I
>have to choose one way or the other, the current system is better for me.
>What is being requested here is really multiple sequences (subsongs)
>accessing a single song file's resources. No one does this from any company
>as far as I know. You could use various songs in packed folders. Actually,
>that might work very well. Write a song, pack the folder in the arrange
>window. And Mute the songs you don't want to trigger. Always keep a
>generic,
>ready-to-go packed folder to start new songs. You'd have a lot of midi data
>in your file (make lots of frequent back ups since you would have so much
>riding on this single file). This method would enable you to access the
>same
>resources from multiple songs (the packed folders within a single logic
>song
>file). Hope this helps. It's the only way your idea will work. -Jer
>
> > From: Edward Malia <tkpass@...>
> > Organization: Nimble Productions
> > Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 09:52:10 -0500
> > To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [exs] Digest Number 512
> >
> > Wouldn't doing a save as from the first song, giving it a new name then
> > just deleting any recorded sequences do the trick? You could even use
> > the subsequent file as a template. I have a folder that I call templates
> > that I put templates per client or kind of session (such as rap, rock,
> > orchestral....) it just gives me a quick jumping off point where things
> > are where I can find them quickly. Hope this helps.
> >
> > Ted
> >
> > Actually, what I was trying to describe is a bit different- when I open
> > one song, I close another, but with both using the same exs instruments,
> > is there a way I don't have to reload all the instruments again...a way
> > to, in a sense, keep exs open to the same patches while opening a new
> > logic song? Anybody else doing this? Thanks.
> > kurt
> >
> >
> > To be more specific, when two songs are open with a lot of DSP pumping
> > in
> > each song, the screen draw can really slow down. At least, I've seen
> > this
> > happen on a G4-400 Mac. It adds a lot of load to the CPU. You may have
> > to
> > put up with the close & open process if your experiencing performance
> > problems with both songs open. You can open your system performance
> > monitor
> > to see how much load is on the CPU once you load one and then the other
> > song. I imagine the meter will jump up a bit as a result. You could try
> > allocating more RAM to Logic if your on a Mac. -Jer
> >
> >
> >>> From: <HELP@...>
> >>> Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> >>> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 04:55:18 -0500
> >>> To: <exs-users@yahoogroups.com>
> >>> Subject: Re: [exs] Reopening exs
> >>>
> >>> Yes, it makes a big difference.
> >>>
> >>
> >>>>> From: "Kurt Heinecke" <kurt.heinecke@...>
> >>>>> Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> >>>>> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:54:59 -0600
> >>>>> To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> >>>>> Subject: [exs] Reopening exs
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've set up an orchestra template with hundreds of megs of
> >>>
> > instruments.
> >
> >>>>> I'm using the same set up for multiple projects, often jumping
> >>>
> > between
> >
> >>>>> projects in an evening. Each time I open up a new song, I close the
> >>>>> other, but it seems to take time to, I assume, reopen all the
>sampler
> >>>
> >
> >>>>> instruments. Any way to keep these open to save time? Does it make
> >>>
> > a
> >
> >>>>> difference if I don't close the other song?
> >>>>> Thanks for any thoughts!
> >>>>> Kurt Heinecke
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
_________________________________________________________________
H\ufffdmta MSN Explorer kostnadsfritt p\ufffd http://explorer.msn.se/intl.asp
