EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

Hi all

Using Translator to xfer Roland S-760 files to EXS, when using 
combine stereo option, the sounds come out as if both sides panned to 
centre, i.e.2 monos of combined files.  When using Do not combine to 
stereo, stereo separation fine, and indistinguishable from original. 
Anyone else had this, or found a way round? I suppose it doesn't much 
matter, but just curious.  Regards Brian

At 10:26 AM 9/5/02 +0100, you wrote:

>Using Translator to xfer Roland S-760 files to EXS, when using
>combine stereo option, the sounds come out as if both sides panned to
>centre, i.e.2 monos of combined files.  When using Do not combine to
>stereo, stereo separation fine, and indistinguishable from original.
>Anyone else had this, or found a way round? I suppose it doesn't much
>matter, but just curious.  Regards Brian

Send Chicken Systems an example .rol file, or e-mail the name of a patch or 
patches and name the CD(s) they are off of. I just tried a couple of Roland 
dual-mono patches that could combine to stereo interleaved files, and they 
sounded the same either way - single stereo samples files or two mono files 
panned hard left and hard right.

This is either PC or Mac - make sure you are using the latest.

Garth Hjelte
Sampler User

At 10:26 AM 9/5/02 +0100, you wrote:

>>Using Translator to xfer Roland S-760 files to EXS, when using
>>combine stereo option, the sounds come out as if both sides panned to
>>centre, i.e.2 monos of combined files.  When using Do not combine to
>>stereo, stereo separation fine, and indistinguishable from original.
>>Anyone else had this, or found a way round? I suppose it doesn't much
>>matter, but just curious.  Regards Brian
>
>Send Chicken Systems an example .rol file, or e-mail the name of a patch 
>or patches and name the CD(s) they are off of. I just tried a couple of 
>Roland dual-mono patches that could combine to stereo interleaved files, 
>and they sounded the same either way - single stereo samples files or two 
>mono files panned hard left and hard right.
>
>This is either PC or Mac - make sure you are using the latest.

Sorry - my fault. This was a bug with build 9, I wasn't checking my 
versions carefully enough. Just with Roland stuff. There'll be a new build 
up today, with some interface improvements and other things. Thank you!


Garth Hjelte
Sampler User

Woa-

Anyone check out making new sample inst. With 5.3? It sucks.... The load
multiple samples window doesn't work the way the os9 version does in respect
to the loading multiple samples window. You can only choose from samples in
the same folder by shift clicking. The second you double cliclIn os9 you can
navigate through all drives and add from anywhere.

Anyhow even in os9 I use cdxtract for making all my exs patches. It works
more efficiently and is easier to organize.

Where is xtract or translator for X. This needs to come out today. Even if
some of the fringe formats aren't working 100%, I bet akai to exs works
cool.

Let's see it!


DJ SkYYlite in San Francisco

I second that. I hope to be 100% OSX in 6 months. -Jer

> From: "djskyylite@..." <djskyylite@...>
> Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 11:20:34 -0700
> To: "exs-users@yahoogroups.com" <exs-users@yahoogroups.com>, "Rubber Chicken
> Software Co." <support@...>
> Subject: [exs] Translator or cdxtract for OSX, now please!!
> 
> Where is xtract or translator for X. This needs to come out today. Even if
> some of the fringe formats aren't working 100%, I bet akai to exs works
> cool.
> 
> Let's see it!

Is there a way to see cdXtract on OS X at Apple Expo / Paris ??
M.Bernard can you hear us :)

Igor