EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

I'm cross-posting this to Logic TDM and the EXS24 lists, since I 
think it's worth knowing:

On the EXS Users list, Jerry Olson posted that if you insert an I/O 
plug-in on a DTDM channel (even if it's bypassed), all the plugs on 
that channel go over to the other processor.

That's a very useful tip. I can run two stereo->stereo Altiverbs in 
Logic if I do that - along with literally a dozen host-based samplers 
(EXS24s and Halions) - but only one in PT if I'm using a lot of RTAS. 
Part of that may be just that the HTDM version takes more horsepower.

But if anyone else mixes in Pro Tools with Logic running in the 
background with OMS IAC, this means that if there's a choice, you 
want to try and use ASIO Altiverbs on HTDM auxes in Logic rather than 
in Pro Tools.
-- 

Nick Batzdorf
818/905-9101, cell 590-9101, fax 905-5434

Is there an echo in here? Sorry, couldn't help it... ;-) Jer

> On the EXS Users list, Jerry Olson posted that if you insert an I/O
> plug-in on a DTDM channel (even if it's bypassed), all the plugs on
> that channel go over to the other processor.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I wrote:

>I'm cross-posting this to Logic TDM and the EXS24 lists, since I
>think it's worth knowing:
>
>On the EXS Users list, Jerry Olson posted that if you insert an I/O
>plug-in on a DTDM channel (even if it's bypassed), all the plugs on
>that channel go over to the other processor.
>
>That's a very useful tip. I can run two stereo->stereo Altiverbs in
>Logic if I do that - along with literally a dozen host-based samplers
>(EXS24s and Halions) - but only one in PT if I'm using a lot of RTAS.
>Part of that may be just that the HTDM version takes more horsepower.
>
>But if anyone else mixes in Pro Tools with Logic running in the
>background with OMS IAC, this means that if there's a choice, you
>want to try and use ASIO Altiverbs on HTDM auxes in Logic rather than
>in Pro Tools.


Sorry, that should have been "ASIO Altiverbs on *DTDM* auxes.

Oh, and it was Jer Olsen, not Olson, who pointed out that I/O 
plug-ins force the plug-ins onto the other processor.



>Is there an echo in here? Sorry, couldn't help it... ;-) Jer

Is there an echo in here? Sorry, couldn't help it... ;-) Jer

Is there an echo in here? Sorry, couldn't help it... ;-) Jer

Is there an echo in here? Sorry, couldn't help it... ;-) Jer
-- 

Nick Batzdorf
818/905-9101, cell 590-9101, fax 905-5434

:) I can't take all the credit. Someone else was kind enough to point it out
to me, prior to my post to the list. Thanks for the props though! -Jer

> Oh, and it was Jer Olsen, not Olson, who pointed out that I/O
> plug-ins force the plug-ins onto the other processor.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

At 08:02 AM 4/2/03 -0800, you wrote:

> >On the EXS Users list, Jerry Olson posted that if you insert an I/O
> >plug-in on a DTDM channel (even if it's bypassed), all the plugs on
> >that channel go over to the other processor.
>Oh, and it was Jer Olsen, not Olson, who pointed out that I/O
>plug-ins force the plug-ins onto the other processor.

But I like the Jerry part, it has a Seinfeld ring to it.

Garth Hjelte
Sampler User

Speak for yourself, Garth. My thanks to the author for correcting the name.
I don't care for Jerry. ;)

> But I like the Jerry part, it has a Seinfeld ring to it.
> 
> Garth Hjelte
> Sampler User




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]