Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Thread

bug in JTAG implementation?

bug in JTAG implementation?

2005-11-14 by Bhanu Nagendra Pisupati

When a value is shifted into the scan select register of the Embedded ICE
module of the lpc parts (through JTAG), ARM7TDMI documentation specifies
that the binary value '1000' needs to be shifted out. However, after much ado I
discovered that this is not the case in my lpc2214. This does not seem to
affect any other aspect of JTAG debugging though. Has anybody else seen
similar behaviour?
-BNP

Re: [lpc2000] bug in JTAG implementation?

2005-11-14 by Dominic Rath

I've seen similar behaviour on a LPC2294 I've used to test with. I asked 
philips support, and they told me they don't know about any problems...

Anyway, as you said, it doesn't affect debugging, and during Capture-IR, the 
correct value of b0001 is being loaded, so that's fine and can be used to 
validate the communication.

Regards,

Dominic
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Monday 14 November 2005 22:27, Bhanu Nagendra Pisupati wrote:
> When a value is shifted into the scan select register of the Embedded ICE
> module of the lpc parts (through JTAG), ARM7TDMI documentation specifies
> that the binary value '1000' needs to be shifted out. However, after much
> ado I discovered that this is not the case in my lpc2214. This does not
> seem to affect any other aspect of JTAG debugging though. Has anybody else
> seen similar behaviour?
> -BNP

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.