----- Original Message -----
From: itsjustimpossible
To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 4:29 AM
Subject: [lpc2000] Re: LPC2294 External Bus Speed
Hi
In an ideal world I would like to achieve number 2...
2) " Finish 15 bytes with in 1 uS after the edge that causes FIQ"
However I appreciate that may be a tall order when taking interrupt
latency into account.
At a push I would settle with being able to transfer 15 bytes in
less than 1uS. Not including the interrupt latency of the FIQ.
best regards
Simon
--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "donhamilton2002" <hamilton@d...>
wrote:
> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "itsjustimpossible" <simonjh@b...>
wrote:
>
> I would like to clarify your request.
>
> > Hi
> > There have been a few messages about this, but I can't find
anything
> > explicit so I thought I would ask a quick question.
> >
> > In an FIQ I need to transfer 15 bytes to an external device in
less
> > than 1uS.
> >
>
> Does this mean :
>
> 1) " Start transfering 15 with 1uS after the edge that causes
FIQ"
> 2) " Finish 15 bytes with in 1 uS after the edge that causes
FIQ"
>
>
> > Is this possible? Unless I am completely off track (probable),
it
> > looks like it should be.
> >
>
> As you can see the timing of these two cases is very dramatic.
>
>
> > The bus is 8-bit with no wait states. We are using the PLL to
give a
> > 60MHz core clock and the peripheral clock is set equal to the
core
> > clock. The MAM is enabled.
> >
> > I can't seem to achieve anywhere near this figure.
> >
> > Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > many thanks
> > Simo
>
>
> Thanks
>
> donhamilton
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
a.. Visit your group "lpc2000" on the web.
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
lpc2000-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]