RE: [motm] Re: Another thought
2006-01-02 by John Loffink
S&H Correlation is typically implemented as a lag circuit prior to the sample and hold. This restricts the range of S&H over time, or correlation. John
Messages
Browse messages
Page 163 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Re: Another thought
2006-01-01 by strohs56k
Am I wrong on this or did someone state that the source of uncertainty works by feeding noise into a S&H and mixing a portion of the S&H output back into the
Re: With apologies...
2006-01-01 by Mike Marsh
That would work but requires a number of modules. Plus, I don t have a whole lot of logic stuff in my rig. I can do this with my P-SIM pretty easily, but it
Front panel express?
2006-01-01 by Paul Schreiber
If anyone has used the US version of these guys *recently*, please contact me off-list. Paul S.
RE: [motm] With apologies...
2006-01-01 by John Loffink
Reading this again, I see that all you need is a divider and AND gates. Divide by 2, 4, 8, etc., then logically AND each output with the input gate for every
Re: [motm] With apologies...
2006-01-01 by Geoff
So, what would the difference be between the 730 pulse divider and this? Duration of proper gate as opposed to simply sending a pulse, eh? I wonder if
Re: [motm] MOTM Cabinet #3
2006-01-01 by Robert van der Kamp
... Mine is also aprox. 8.5 inches deep, and I have the same problem. Did you mount the MOTM PSU in the back? Even with 10 inches and the .75 inch resessed
RE: [motm] MOTM Cabinet #3
2006-01-01 by John Loffink
The orange patch cord rack is a Pomona part. The black patch cord rack is a Raxxess CBLD, available from Sweetwater Sound for $11.97. I prefer the Raxxess as
RE: [motm] MOTM Cabinet #3
2006-01-01 by John Loffink
Cabinet #3 is 10 inches deep with an inset 1/4 inch back panel and front panels recessed ~.75 inches from the front. Cabinet #1 was 8.5 inches deep and I
Re: [motm] MOTM Cabinet #3
2006-01-01 by Robert van der Kamp
... Very nice! Could you tell me how deep this one is please? - Robert
Re: [motm] MOTM Cabinet #3
2006-01-01 by Michael Zacherl (aka TonTaub)
... a *very* nice system! BTW, the patch cord rack in the background, what is it exactly? Happy New Year n stuff, :-) Michael.
Oops
2006-01-01 by Mike Marsh
I forgot: Happy New Year!
With apologies...
2006-01-01 by Mike Marsh
...I have another unoriginal module idea. I don t know if it is possible, but here goes. GATE IN, then 4 OUTS. The 1st is the GATE OUT, the 2nd is GATE OUT
Re: MOTM Cabinet #3
2006-01-01 by Mike Marsh
Now *DAT* be a synthesizer...
Re: [motm] MOTM Cabinet #3
2006-01-01 by groovyshaman
Very nice! -George ... From: John Loffink To: MOTM List Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 4:25 PM Subject:
Email me your photos!
2005-12-31 by Paul Schreiber
I need to make up a new catalog and jazz up the website. Please email me you cabinet photos. The more, the merrier (Scott J.,especially). I know there are lots
RE: [motm] MOTM Cabinet #3
2005-12-31 by John Loffink
You re right about #4. I already have most of the spaces in Cabinet #3 allocated for backlogged DIY or MOTM kits. :-D John Loffink The Microtonal Synthesis
Re: [motm] MOTM Cabinet #3
2005-12-31 by Scott Juskiw
... Looks great. I especially like those multiples with front mounted power switch. Me thinks you ll be getting another slanted cabinet someday (#4).
MOTM Cabinet #3
2005-12-31 by John Loffink
http://www.wavemakers-synth.com/motm/motm_cab3.html John Loffink The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com The Wavemakers
Re: Interest in a MOTM-102 module?
2005-12-31 by Koos Fockens
Whatever you come up with Paul, a 1 unit module would have my preference, I have limited space but would like to put as much high quality modules in that space
Re: [motm] Re: Interest in a MOTM-102 module?
2005-12-31 by Oakley Sound
... Also Stereo patches. Try it for extra wide wind/surf effects and a wicked snare drum. Tony www.oakleysound.com
Re: [motm] Tire kicking on the S&H module
2005-12-31 by Scott Juskiw
... So this would output voltages in the chromatic scale? Is this actually of any use to anybody? I currently use a miniwave with the scale prom for
Re: Another thought
2005-12-31 by Mike Marsh
If it could be cascaded to another 102, then three outs is fine. I d pay the $50 for 14 bit. Actually, I d pay $100 for it and more outputs, too, but I
RE: [motm] Another thought
2005-12-31 by Dave Halliday
And if Paul does it this way, it would be nice to have the noise module have several sources of uncertainty. I like using several random low freq. signals to
RE: [motm] Another thought
2005-12-31 by Adam Schabtach
FWIW: I agree that: 1) using several noise sources sounds different than using one noise source in several places 2) you shouldn t have to buy a ring mod every
Re: [motm] Another thought
2005-12-31 by Paul Haneberg
My personal preference would be to split this thing up at this point. Make a noise source with multiple types of noise outputs including the uncertainty
RE: [motm] Another thought
2005-12-31 by John Loffink
Agreed. Aren t the 820 VC Lag and 700 VC Router pitch accuracy in that range also, for the very same reason? John Loffink The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
Re: [motm] Another thought
2005-12-31 by Scott K Warren
Hey, it s *MOTM* we re talking about! Give me the 14-bit accuracy and don t worry about the $100. If I want cheap stuff, well, I know where to get it.
Another thought
2005-12-31 by Paul Schreiber
I caould do a $50 retail difference by only having 3 outputs, but they are 14-bit. Paul S.
Tire kicking on the S&H module
2005-12-31 by Paul Schreiber
a) I can design a version that is good enough for sampling noise (not keyboard voltages). I can still add quantizing to the 88-note scale, but the pitches will
Re: Interest in a MOTM-102 module?
2005-12-30 by Mike Marsh
What Moe said but add an Improbability Drive. I have enough noise sources, too, so the S&H functionality only would get my vote. But only because I have all
Re: [motm] Re: Interest in a MOTM-102 module?
2005-12-30 by ac
Very interesting!! So if I feed two S&H from a single noise source and clock them from the same gate/LFO (or whatever) i ll more-than-likely get the same held
**PHONE # CHANGING!!**
2005-12-30 by Paul Schreiber
Remember, as of Monday the phone number is changing to: 817-281-7776 There is supposed to be a recording on the old # for 90 days. Paul S. ohhh....Frac Moog
Re: Interest in a MOTM-102 module?
2005-12-30 by mate_stubb
... Noise is just a weighted probability distribution of voltage over time. Two different sources will have the same distribution over a period of time, but
Re: [motm] Re: Interest in a MOTM-102 module?
2005-12-30 by jwbarlow@aol.com
In a message dated 12/30/2005 11:13:58 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, analoghell@gmail.com writes: ... Interesting. I don t understand why. Care to explain Moe?
Re: [motm] Clocking a sample and hold at audio rates -- Why?
2005-12-30 by jwbarlow@aol.com
You re right. I do this sometimes (and I think someone else likes this too; maybe it was Ken T. ?). It s just another (different) way of adding harmonic
Re: [motm] Re: Interest in a MOTM-102 module?
2005-12-30 by ac
... Interesting. I don t understand why. Care to explain Moe? I realise that theoritically they are different, but why would they sound different? Could we
Re: Interest in a MOTM-102 module?
2005-12-30 by mate_stubb
Multiple noise sources in a system can be useful. For one thing, two noise sources feeding different audio chains sound different than one feeding both. They
Re: [motm] Interest in a MOTM-102 module?
2005-12-30 by groovyshaman
Yes! And make the switch voltage controlled. Very cool. This is what I was hinting at with my VC Ring switch suggestion. One could accomplish this with a
RE: [motm] Future Module Round Up?
2005-12-30 by John Loffink
I believe the poll I conducted last year has the most comprehensive listing of proposed modules. I have copied the results below: POLL QUESTION: Which of
FW: [motm] Clocking a sample and hold at audio rates -- Why?
2005-12-30 by Tkacs, Ken
I think that was me -- I asked how many shift registers I would need to make an audio delay line. I wasn t the least bit serious, though... that would be a
RE: [motm] Interest in a MOTM-102 module?
2005-12-30 by John Loffink
With a little more intelligence this could be turned into an arpeggiator. Have a switch for Sample On/Off, when On the module has the normal S&H/ASR type
Clocking a sample and hold at audio rates -- Why?
2005-12-30 by Richard Brewster
Someone mentioned the ability to clock the sample & hold at audio rates. People have talked about this with the CGS Analog Shift Register too, and I have
Re: [motm] Interest in a MOTM-102 module?
2005-12-30 by Jason Proctor
i can see the need for multiple S&Hs within a system, but not multiple noise generators. my vote would be for an extensive S&H in 1U.
Future Module Round Up?
2005-12-30 by djthomaswhite
OK, I am back in the Modular mode and wanted to gather together the latestlist of upcoming modules from MOTM. The following modules are what I have heard of
RE: [motm] Interest in a MOTM-102 module?
2005-12-30 by Adam Schabtach
I use microtonal scales, so yes, my input would be pre-quantized. It would be fun to feed it pitch voltages so you could clock them through to create
Re: [motm] Interest in a MOTM-102 module?
2005-12-30 by groovyshaman
Yes S&H only please. This is MOTM - 6 stages with ASR design. ASR Mode switch: position 1 = 1- 3- 5 and 2- 4- 6, position 2 = 1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6 VC Ring switch:
FS: MOTM-490 uVCF Moog ladder filter
2005-12-29 by Michael
I have a 490 for sale, I use my state variable and my steiner way more and it s just not seeing any real use as I already have way too many synths with moogish
Re: [motm] Interest in a MOTM-102 module?
2005-12-29 by Paul Schreiber
I think the +/- edge triggering is a good function of the switch. Paul S.
Re: [motm] Interest in a MOTM-102 module?
2005-12-29 by Scott Juskiw
... I agree with Richard in that having the same output on all 4 outputs at once would not be all that useful (in NORMAL mode), since we can do that with a