Re: [motm] Help Selecting Midi -CV converters
2005-02-26 by Paul Schreiber
Well, the MOTM-650 has the most features, is a module (not external) and has FLASH-loadable firmware over MIDI. Shipping: mid-May. If you *have* to get
Messages
Browse messages
Page 203 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Re: Help Selecting Midi -CV converters
2005-02-26 by cormallen
Well, I can t say much about the Encore since I don t have one, or the MOTM, since it isn t out yet, but here are my thoughts on the Kenton Pro-2000. PROS:
Help Selecting Midi -CV converters
2005-02-26 by Don Ojeman
I need help on deceding what Midi-CV converter to use with my MOTM syth. 1. Encore Electronics Expressionist 2. MOTM-650 3. Kenton Comparing features and specs
Re: [motm] Aleotoric
2005-02-25 by Mike Estee
I like it :) I have to say, modulars in general are very rewarding when you just sit down in front of them and doodle . i got a little hard drive recorder for
Re: [motm] Aleotoric
2005-02-25 by Jeff Laity
I meant Envelopes to fire.
Aleotoric
2005-02-25 by Jeff Laity
I finished soldering together my 390 uLFO tonight. To celebrate, and since the wife is out of town, I decided to make a bunch of noise with free-running
OT: CS80 shipping.
2005-02-25 by cormallen
Hi there, guys. Sorry for the off-topic post, but I know a bunch of MOTM owner also have CS80s. I ve just bought one whilst on holiday in California, and need
Re: LFO mod of VCO (was Using Velocity)
2005-02-24 by cormallen
... If you haven t already got a MIDI-CV converter, can I recommend the Kenton Pro-2000? That provides a couple of (digital) LFOs internally, the amplitude of
Re: LFO mod of VCO (was Using Velocity)
2005-02-23 by tontaub
Hi, ... Yes. ... Yes. ... Yes. ... Not to my knowledge. Whenever you want to change the level of a signal you need an attenuator and/or amplifier. Both CV
Re: LFO mod of VCO (was Using Velocity)
2005-02-23 by tontaub
Hi, ... ... one never can have too many VCAs ;-) I d consider an Oakley Multimix anyway. As Larry stated it s an reversing attenuator. And with the change of
Re: LFO mod of VCO (was Using Velocity)
2005-02-23 by tontaub
Hi, ... ... one never can have too many VCAs ;-) I d consider an Oakley Multimix anyway. As Larry stated it s an reversing attenuator. And with the change of
Re: [motm] Re: LFO mod of VCO (was Using Velocity)
2005-02-23 by Jeff Laity
I should have been more specific – I want to use the mod wheel to control LFO depth for vibrato. I ll use the pitch wheel for pitch changes and the mod
Re: [motm] Re: LFO mod of VCO (was Using Velocity)
2005-02-23 by Dino Leone
Thanks so much! It does indeed answer my question. I also got a very good answer from Larry (shown below). It seems I probably need both solutions - a simple
Re: LFO mod of VCO (was Using Velocity)
2005-02-23 by tontaub
If it s just attenuation without any time dependency you virtually can do that whereever you want (mostly depending on the rest of the patch). If you want to
Re: [motm] Re: MOTM review and demo
2005-02-22 by Jeff Laity
Yes, three tracks of MOTM. The bass hit is panned center, just a simple 1 VCO-VCF-VCA patch. There might have been some resonance, I can t remember. There are
RE: [motm] MOTM 485
2005-02-22 by Aardvark
Excerpt from one of Paul s recent updates. b) the MOTM-485 kits are next in line BUT....I am *delaying* them until April so I can focus on VCO
Re: MOTM review and demo
2005-02-22 by chad_kettering
Great littel demo!! I was wondering if the opening attack sound was coming from the MOTM. It sounds like an electric bass pluck. Chad
LFO mod of VCO (was Using Velocity)
2005-02-22 by Dino Leone
I ve been thinking about the same issue and I m wondering whether it s necessary to waste a VCA just to attenuate the CV of the MOTM380 LFO to feed into the
MOTM 485
2005-02-22 by allanjhall
Haven t heard any news on the MOTM-485 filter delivery situation lately, just wondering if the kits are shipping yet....... Allan
Re: MOTM review and demo
2005-02-22 by Mike Marsh
Hey Jeff - This is a very nice demo! I love the loping along rhythm and the synth sounds GOOD... Mike
Re: Using Velocity
2005-02-22 by tontaub
You also could use a stooged Oakley Multimix summing up all the CVs and feed the resulting CV into the VCA. That made it even more versatile since you could
Re: MOTM review and demo
2005-02-22 by tontaub
Aahh - I can see the beginning of an addiction!
Re: [motm] Using Velocity
2005-02-22 by john mahoney
... My understanding is that you ll get less noise by using the EG-driven VCA last. When the envelope is off its VCA will cut off *all* the sound, including
Re: [motm] Using Velocity
2005-02-22 by Jeff Laity
Is this also the method for varying the amount that an LFO controls VCO vibrato?
Re: [motm] MOTM review and demo
2005-02-22 by Jeff Laity
When can I order? Of course there are Stooge cables and a 440 in my future. (And a 480, and...)
Re: [motm] MOTM review and demo
2005-02-22 by groovyshaman
Jeff, if you think the 490 has nice bass (and it does), wait till you get a 440 - it s jaw dropping. (notice that I assume you will be getting one.. this is
RE: [motm] MOTM review and demo
2005-02-22 by J. Larry Hendry
Here s a picture of my system so far: http://www.jefflaity.com/gallery/studio_0205/IMG_9540 Looks like you re off to a good start. Of course, you need some
MOTM review and demo
2005-02-22 by Jeff Laity
I got my first batch of MOTM modules soldered together and passing audio this weekend. I have a bare minimum system so far, with one 300 VCO, one 490 Moog
Re: [motm] Using Velocity
2005-02-22 by imorpheusl@aol.com
You could use 2 VCAs in series - the first with an envelope generator attached to it s CV in and the second with a CV velocity signal going into its CV in
Re: [motm] Using Velocity
2005-02-21 by Paul Schreiber
You need the lower VCA of the 190, that one is DC coupled. Paul S. ... From: Jeff Laity To: MOTM List
RE: [motm] More on foreign shipping
2005-02-21 by Wheaton, Simon
I much prefer USPS, it is a lot cheaper, and I have never had any problems with it. I don t need my gear to arrive the next day, I just want a cheap reliable
Using Velocity
2005-02-21 by Jeff Laity
How do I use velocity to control a VCA? What I would like to do is have the velocity CV from my MIDI/CV converter control the amount that the envelope affects
Re: [motm] favorite MOTM filter
2005-02-21 by groovyshaman
The 475! :) But until then, the 440. Close runner up is two 420 s linked together in a BP configuration. --George
RE: [motm] favorite MOTM filter
2005-02-21 by Adam Schabtach
440 is my all-around favorite. The 410 is possibly more interesting but the 440 is more useful overall. --Adam
Re: [motm] favorite MOTM filter
2005-02-21 by ben vehorn
Yep. 440 here too. ...
RE: [motm] favorite MOTM filter
2005-02-21 by J. Larry Hendry
MOTM-440 for me. Larry ... From: controlexsanguinate [mailto:garrgal@pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 3:29 AM To: motm@yahoogroups.com Subject:
Re: *** Important Foreign Shipping Issues ***
2005-02-21 by ivancu@aol.com
I haven t used it to ship, but a lot of foreign shipment that I receive are sent DHL. Has anyone used them for shipping within and from the USA? Ivan
Re: [motm] More on foreign shipping
2005-02-21 by Robert van der Kamp
... So far I am totally happy with the current (non-express) shipping method from the US to the Netherlands. Every package made it, and in one piece as well.
RE: [motm] Re: *** Important Foreign Shipping Issues ***
2005-02-21 by Paul Wagorn
We have 2 issues here: 1. what is easiest & cheapest to ship 2. what is cheapest & easiest to receive UPS may very well be the easiest to ship with, but that
favorite MOTM filter
2005-02-21 by controlexsanguinate
Hello, I was wondering what is your favorite MOTM filter? Take care, Thomas
More on foreign shipping
2005-02-21 by Paul Schreiber
a) if you want station-to-station tracking, meaning every step there is a scan, you can see it, there are *2* options: UPS and Fed-Ex. b) since Paul H. is
Re: *** Important Foreign Shipping Issues ***
2005-02-21 by paulhaneberg
Okay, first off, I had no intention of demeaning anyones profession, I was merely trying to explain what the problems were in shipping outside the US. I have
Re: *** Important Foreign Shipping Issues ***
2005-02-21 by Charles McQuillan
At the risk of going severly OT, here s *my* two cents: USPS does indeed pick up packages. See www.usps.com for details. All this can be transacted through the
RE: [motm] Poll results for motm
2005-02-21 by John Loffink
POLL QUESTION: Which of these proposed MOTM modules would you like to see first? Multiple votes are allowed. Levels refer to the current level of completion.
Poll results for motm
2005-02-21 by motm@yahoogroups.com
The following motm poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: Which of these proposed MOTM modules would you like to see first? Multiple
Re: [motm] MOTM module poll closing Sunday
2005-02-21 by groovyshaman
You make a fair point John. I just didn t want these ideas to be forgotten over the longer term. In any case, you really never know what pleasant surprise is
RE: [motm] MOTM module poll closing Sunday
2005-02-21 by John Loffink
I think it is safe to say all but the 540 Decimator and Dual Delay have fallen off the near term roadmap. I haven t heard anything on them in several years.
Re: [motm] MOTM module poll closing Sunday
2005-02-21 by groovyshaman
Just updated my vote. I realize it s literally the last hour but I noticed a few missing modules that have been tossed around in the past: MOTM-125 Pulse
RE: [motm] Re: *** Important Foreign Shipping Issues ***
2005-02-21 by Paul Wagorn
Bad advice. For Canadians anyways. As someone on the receiving end, UPS is by *far* the wost company to ship goos internationally to a private residence.
Re: [motm] 310 - Shape Control
2005-02-21 by Paul Schreiber
... Each end of a 100K pot end goes to the signals. The wiper has a 1M resistor to ground, followed by an simple TL072 voltage follower. Paul S.