Re: [motm] Round We Go Again
2001-12-06 by Scott Juskiw
... This showed up several months ago as a possible sequencer module (I have the GIF saved with a date of July 15, 2001). It was thoroughly dissed for the
Messages
Browse messages
Page 419 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Paul is a trickster WAS: u-LFO
2001-12-06 by J. Larry Hendry
Here is riddle for you all. Q: How do you stop an entire group of rabbid MOTM fans from starting a never ending discussion on micro-misxer functions? A:
Re: [motm] Paul is a trickster WAS: u-LFO
2001-12-06 by George Kisslak
... to ... already ... I also hope for something complementary. But how does this jive with I need utilitarian, cheap. I also need strange, but not for this
Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO
2001-12-06 by sikorsky
hello all, what on earth have i stumbled into..? anyway, my only thoughts on the amazing microlfo, would be that it would be nice for it to be able to perform
My failed experiment
2001-12-06 by Thomas Hudson
I had this bright idea for creating an envelope follower from the current offering of modules, and while it does work somewhat, it is not quite there, and
MOTM-390 uVCO
2001-12-05 by elefohuk
Here is a simple(?) entry: Pots: Coarse Freq (0) Fine Freq (0) FM (0) Shape (0) Jacks: (FM) (Shape) (Sin Out) (Var Out) The point of the Coarse Freq is to set
Re: [motm] Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO
2001-12-05 by George Kisslak
Well, now that Paul has shot down JH s award winning (IMHO) design due to complexity/cost/strangeness (bummer), I thought maybe I should reduce the cost of my
Re: Animation LFO (was: Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO)
2001-12-05 by Scott Gibbons
Jurgen, you rock! I want one!!
eBay - another modular
2001-12-05 by Gert Jalass
Dear all, have a look at this one : http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1493385769&indexURL=5 #ebayphotohosting Not exactly cheap but a
back to the 390 uLFO drawing board!!
2001-12-05 by mark@indole.net
... OK :) ... (jacks cost less than pots, LED s draw current and make noise) 1) RATE 2) FM 3) OFFSET 6 jacks: 1) FM IN 2) LFO 2 IN 3) TRI 1 4) TRI 2 5) SQ 1 6)
Re: [motm] Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO
2001-12-05 by mark@indole.net
... Wouldn t that need a larger PCB than the MOTM-320?? ... Quadrature is 90 degrees out of phase. ... So you might as well just get a 320 and regain all of
Re: [motm] Animation LFO (was: Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO)
2001-12-05 by mark@indole.net
... I couldn t possibly agree more. ... JH, that is clever!! I like this idea very much, but I d rather have it include VC control. If it were 2U, and
Re: Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO
2001-12-05 by Skin Matrix
Hi everyone, I don t own a MOTM (yet :^) ). But I figured I would give the design a try. It s essentially just a ripped down version of the original in u-form.
Re: Animation LFO (was: Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO)
2001-12-05 by mate_stubb
I agree, Jurgen s idea is brilliant. Moe ... OK, Jurgen wins. ...
RE: [motm] Animation LFO (was: Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO)
2001-12-05 by Fahl, Romeo
Of course this opens the door for the uComparator module - 4 comparators in one 1U module, so if you want a square wave version of this lfo... you can have
Re: [motm] Animation LFO (was: Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO)
2001-12-05 by Paul Schreiber
... Shhhh....this is *another* module idea :) or 2, even. I need utilitarian , cheap . I also need strange , but not for this homework assignment. Paul S.
Re: Animation LFO (was: Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO)
2001-12-05 by mmarsh100
OK, Jurgen wins.
Re: [motm] Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO
2001-12-05 by George Kisslak
I like Ken s idea for a multi-phased LFO. So I ve added a bit to it. Ok, here s my humble attempt... c) 3 pots, 1 switch, 1 LED, 4 jacks: RATE (O) FM (O)
Re: Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO
2001-12-05 by mmarsh100
Here s another idea based on b) 4 pots, 4 jacks: * Two LFOs * One PAIR of knobs per LFO: SHAPE (TRI to SAW? to SQUARE?) and Rate * One PAIR of jacks per LFO:
Re: [motm] Round We Go Again
2001-12-05 by Dave Trenkel
... It looks like a mockup to me, but seems like a brilliant idea. The concept of there being no specific start/end point would probably make for a different
Animation LFO (was: Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO)
2001-12-05 by jhaible@t-online.de
IMO, the uLFO should not be a scaled down version of the big one, but something to complement it. So here s a completely different idea: What about an
Re: [motm] proposed MOTM-390 uLFO
2001-12-05 by mark@indole.net
You could also build it with separate THRESH inputs for rising and falling, lets call them RISE and FALL, and lose the SLEW output. Just trying to get a lock
FW: [motm] Re: Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO
2001-12-05 by Tkacs, Ken
Or have the three outputs as part of an LFO array, a set phase apart. You know, 120-degrees apart... poor man s quadrature LFO. I ve seen EXTREMELY simple
proposed MOTM-390 uLFO
2001-12-05 by mark@indole.net
... (jacks cost less than pots, LED s draw current and make noise) 1) UP 2) DOWN 3) HOLD 6 jacks: 1) UP 2) DOWN 3) HOLD 4) THRESH 5) OUT 6) SLEW The time set
Re: [motm] Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO
2001-12-05 by mark@indole.net
... Three Big Questions: 1) Is it stable like the 320?? It makes a big difference in what features would be useful. Considering the range of the 310, you are
Re: Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO
2001-12-05 by mmarsh100
OK, so I like the idea of many LFOs. My idea uses a) 3 pots, 6 jacks. Each pot controls the RATE of one of three LFOs, each jack PAIR is the output, one is
Round We Go Again
2001-12-05 by thomas white
Anybody think this thing is cool? Have you seen this before? Who made this? http://www.mkv.mh.se/staff/per/diy/MOTM4USEQ_2.gif Thomas White
Re: [motm] Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO
2001-12-05 by Craig Critchley
Ok, here goes. This pretty much a skinny 320. I ll do layout C: Pots: Rate FM (reversing) Shape LED Switch Jacks: (FM IN) (Sync) (Shape) (Out)
uModule Pricing and a new mania begins
2001-12-05 by thomas white
I, for one, am quite excited with this new micro series. I can now plan on adding that 2nd VCO per voice, Moog Ladder filter per key held down and I m sure the
RE: [motm] Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO
2001-12-05 by psygfx@yahoo.com
Any chance we can have a sample and glide waveform? Or is that too much? -----Original Message----- From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@airmail.net] Sent:
Mock up the MOTM-390 uLFO
2001-12-05 by Paul Schreiber
OK, it s contest time. Winner gets something, I ll dig up a goodie. Mockup (text or graphics) a proposed uLFO. You have 3 basic configs to choose from a) 3
uModule Pricing
2001-12-05 by Paul Schreiber
Messing with the spreadsheet, trying to squeeze as much as MOTMly possible, I have concluded: MOTM-390 uVCF $109 kit/$159 assembled MOTM-890 uMixer $89
Re: [motm] MOTM-890 uMixer
2001-12-05 by J. Larry Hendry
Now there is a spiffy idea. LH ... From: John Loffink To: Paul Schreiber ; motm group
Clearing the air
2001-12-05 by thomas white
Hi all, I want to clear the air about a recent comment that was wrong on my part to have said out to the list. I was relating to the problem with Tentochi
RE: [motm] MOTM-890 uMixer
2001-12-05 by John Loffink
Not to throw a monkey wrench into this, but I think having the pots for 1/2 and 3/4 being mix level, in other words, crossfade between 1 & 2 and 3 & 4, could
Re: [motm] JH-5 demo/new look
2001-12-05 by jhaible@t-online.de
... It s 3 VCOs with my Linear Detune feature. (There s some text about the VCOs at http://www.oldcrows.net/~jhaible/jh5/jh5.html , too.) ... Yes, a Schaeffer
Re: [motm] MOTM-890 uMixer
2001-12-05 by J. Larry Hendry
OK Paul. Don t keep us playing the guessing game. Tell us about the 1U uMixer. You know that nothing generates more feature discussion than a mixer.
Re: MOTM-890 uMixer
2001-12-05 by doc@trocarrecords.com
h3y paul, ... do we get at least hints as to the other 4?? due to recent allusions of multiple VCA s to be released next year, i am guessin that may account
Re: [motm] MOTM-890 uMixer
2001-12-04 by Paul Schreiber
... Yes, there are 6 MicroModules (tm) in the works right now. I remains to be seen what I get done for NAMM. Getting the badges sorted out took 1hr on the
MOTM-890 uMixer
2001-12-04 by George Kisslak
Wow, another module in the works. For NAMM?? ... Huh?? Here s my guesses after consulting my secret decoder ring: input #1 for CV, GAIN pot is -5 to 5 input
RE: [motm] 490 filter.
2001-12-04 by George Kisslak
... IF another Moog filter is in the works, MIGHT it be possible that it would be a dual-LPF as in the JH-5 (and Big Briar Voyager)?? I ll be praying westward
Re: [motm] JH-5 demo/new look
2001-12-04 by George Kisslak
The demos of that Moog ladder filter sound awesome and have me drooling (damn, not again!). A couple of questions: Is it only one VCO, cause it sounds fatter
RE: [motm] 490 filter.
2001-12-04 by Tkacs, Ken
I agree with this thinking. On modules where you ALWAYS need to mix inputs, the convenience of a dedicated mixer is a good idea. And when there were only one
Re: [motm] Quantec
2001-12-04 by jhaible@t-online.de
... The QRS XL. Computer editor instead of front panel elements, and the logic all in FPGA s or whatever. Much cheaper (The original Quantec sold for DM 27,000
Re: [motm] 490 filter.
2001-12-04 by Scott Juskiw
... I think it makes sense to atomize the modules down to their basic function. In the old days, the 420 and 440 needed to have a built-in mixer because
Re: [motm] quantec.... !! and 490 filter.
2001-12-04 by Paul Schreiber
Who said this was the *only* Moog filter...hmmmmm??!?! Paul S. ... From: To: Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:35 AM
Re: [motm] MOTM-490 uVCF
2001-12-04 by mark@indole.net
... So is the uVCF the Moog ladder filter you ve been discussing, or is there going to be a full-sized MOTM diode ladder filter as well?? ... This is true.
Quantec
2001-12-04 by mark@indole.net
... Afaik, Quantec also made a version of the QRS that was programmable via Macintosh software written by Stephen St. Croix.
quantec.... !! and 490 filter.
2001-12-04 by revtor@aol.com
Quantec reverb - All discrete logic!! 200 TTL chips!! thats insane... Impressive indeed.. who the hell designed that thing!!! ? Now Paul, I was wondering
Re: [motm] quantec.... !! and 490 filter.
2001-12-04 by The Old Crow
... I think Paul is going forward with the plan to offer a set of 1U micromodules that can both complement the standard MOTM line as well as be keyed toward