Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 470 of 690 · 34488 messages matched

Tiny Telephone/Big Bucks

2001-03-15 by pow333@hotmail.com

Darn! $12 US per tip for a patch cord. That would be some kind of overkill. I love my MOTM just the way it is. paul

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Don't Stuff It

2001-03-14 by ceres@sirius.com

... Having built two -320 s (the one module that definitely qualifies as RESISTOR HELL), I d have to say that resistor sorting IS a big pain to do, and I would

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: bananna plugs (was Modcan)

2001-03-14 by ceres@sirius.com

... Not speaking for Paul, of course. But I d see balanced connectors as superfluous on a modular (as opposed to, say, a mixer) for two main reasons: *

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Don't Stuff It

2001-03-14 by imorpheusl@aol.com

I would prefer that he kept the whole resistor thing as-is. I think that $12 per kit isn t bad, but not necessary. Sorting resistors is part of the whole

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: bananna plugs (a tiny twist)

2001-03-14 by pow333@hotmail.com

With this renewed interest in interfacing, I wonder why no one has brought up the possibility of Tiny Telephone. Most modern patch-bays use these plugs. Why

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] bananna plugs (was Modcan)

2001-03-14 by Paul Schreiber

... Only among the wicked and ignorant :) ... aspect ... that ... So what? Bananas suffer from: a) un-shielded connections. Name ONE PIECE of professional

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: bananna plugs (was Modcan)

2001-03-14 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com

... Well, I haven t seen unshielded banana oscope probes forever. You won t see them on any scope with decent bandwidth. My nothing-special- at-all 100mHz

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] bananna plugs (was Modcan)

2001-03-14 by elhardt@aol.com

... like 1/8 jacks just because i ve snapped more than a couple with a good chord yank, but bananna plugs seem kinda cool. all that stacking stuff...

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] bananna plugs (was Modcan)

2001-03-14 by Nathan Hunsicker

i can think of a few reasons i don t like banana plugs 1 easier for noise to enter the patch [lack of shielding] 2 no locking mechanism [bananas can be pulled

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [motm] bananna plugs (was Modcan)

2001-03-14 by Tkacs, Ken

This is an eternally debated subject. The general feeling about banana jacks seems to be that the stacking aspect is a great plus (I don t think anyone DOESN T

Thread view Attachments: 0

bananna plugs (was Modcan)

2001-03-14 by perpetual@uswest.net

... what s the bias against bananna plugs all about? personally, i don t like 1/8 jacks just because i ve snapped more than a couple with a good chord yank,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Re: Modcan

2001-03-14 by elhardt@aol.com

... rarely come up on anyone s lists? I ve not seen the stuff, but it does look at least somewhat interesting.

Thread view Attachments: 0

MOTM-820 screw issue

2001-03-14 by Paul Schreiber

Some recent MOTM-820 kits may have incorrect length screws (they are supposed to be 6-32 x 1/2). If your screws are short, I ll send new ones. Grrrr.......

Thread view Attachments: 0

FW: [motm] OT: Web Site Weirdness

2001-03-14 by Tkacs, Ken

Ahh, that explains it. I slipped on a brain cell. Thanks! ... From: John Blacet To: motm@yahoogroups.com Sent: 3/13/01 5:48 PM Subject: Re: [motm] OT: Web Site

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Re: Modcan

2001-03-14 by ivancu@aol.com

In a message dated 3/13/01 6:02:21 PM, mate_stubb@yahoo.com writes: It was no-contest

Thread view Attachments: 0

BEST MODULAR SITE EVER!

2001-03-14 by user

The most amazing treasure of the web is here!: The home of The Moog Endless...A live 24/7 streaming audio/video Moog Model 55 !!! Live from Kobi Japan!

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Modcan

2001-03-14 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com

I looked into Modcan (and others) before I cast my lot with MOTM. Nice module lineup. Perhaps being in Canada is a psychological barrier to US buyers - I don t

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] OT: Web Site Weirdness

2001-03-13 by John Blacet

Looks like Roger Arrick is buying up all the web sites that might be useful. He also has http://www.modularsynthesizers.com/ in both the singular and plural.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] OT: Web Site Weirdness

2001-03-13 by John Blacet

Grant s site is musicsynthesizer.com (still ticking....) the other one is musicsynthesizer*s*.com -- ___________________ John Blacet Blacet Research

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] OT: Web Site Weirdness

2001-03-13 by Thomas Hudson

... They now both resolve to the same IP address. Doing a whois on musicsynthesizers.com comes up with: Registrant: Arrick Robotics (MUSICSYNTHESIZERS-DOM)

Thread view Attachments: 0

OT: Web Site Weirdness

2001-03-13 by Tkacs, Ken

This is odd... there is/WAS a site at www.musicsynthesizers.com that I have been visiting lately. It has a lot of neat stuff, including details on a lot of

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] motm 300 question

2001-03-13 by Paul Schreiber

Linear FM is what the DX-7, TR-808 and other synths use to create different sounds out of VCOs. Instead of the usual 1V/Oct response, the response is like

Thread view Attachments: 0

motm 300 question

2001-03-13 by perpetual@uswest.net

what is meant by Linear FM with switchable AC or DC coupling ? alex

Thread view Attachments: 0

OT: Free Music 4 Download

2001-03-13 by Tkacs, Ken

A friend of mine works at http://www.emusic.com which is an MP3 download / burn your own CD kind of deal. This isn t Napst3r, it s above-board, as it were.

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [motm] Attention MOTM Kit Builders!!

2001-03-13 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)

I respectively disagree. But, then again, I believe that we have different views on our systems. Mine is something I relax with, something that I do in those

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Attention MOTM Kit Builders!!

2001-03-13 by mmarsh@stellcom.com

I know I m in the minority but for larger kits I like this idea a lot. My main goal with the MOTM is to make music, though the assembly is a blast, too. Time

Thread view Attachments: 0

Don't Stuff It

2001-03-13 by Tkacs, Ken

I realize that Paul has already banged the gavel, but since we re all still venting... I, too, vote No to proposition Stuff-it. It s not that I m in love

Thread view Attachments: 0

Don't Stuff It

2001-03-13 by mbedtom@aol.com

As to pre-stuffing parts, I d scream an emphatic NO . MOTM kits are therapy for me. As a completely anal person, it would make measuring the value of each

Thread view Attachments: 0

MOTM-830 ordering Info

2001-03-13 by Paul Schreiber

Now accepting MOTM-830 Mixer orders! USE THE ORDER FORM!!! IF YOU SEND ME ORDER EMAIL , I M GONNA RETURN IT WITH A NASTY-GRAM. a) price is $169 kit/$229

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [motm] Attention MOTM Kit Builders!!

2001-03-13 by Aardvark-mi

NOOOOoooo..... Maybe I m a bit warped but I find stuffing a board to be relaxing!!! Picture this, it s late in the evening, the kids are in bed, wife is on the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Attention MOTM Kit Builders!!

2001-03-13 by Andrew

... $10 - $12 ... Or, are ... I would like to keep the price down and build it myself. I, like others have mentioned, also find it relaxing. I think if the

Thread view Attachments: 0

prestuffing

2001-03-13 by klem klemmingberg

While I have no truly deep objections to prestuffed boards, I wonder if it would detract from the educational aspect of motm. (isn t there something somewhere

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Attention MOTM Kit Builders!!

2001-03-13 by jwbarlow@aol.com

As far as stuffing goes, I m six of on, half a dozen of the other (or maybe I ve just been watching The Prisoner too much). ... The Infidel chiming in here!

Thread view Attachments: 0

Stuffing = BAD

2001-03-13 by Paul Schreiber

OK OK, the unwashed masses have spoken: I ll just sequence them. Paul S. back to our regularly scheduled Stooges

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.