Re: [motm] Re: Battle over
2001-03-04 by jhaible@t-online.de
... Unity gain buffer amp drives cw end of pot. Inverting amp drives ccw end. Middle connection of pot is output, and loaded to GND by a smaller resistor. For
Messages
Browse messages
Page 477 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Re: Battle over
2001-03-04 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
Fearless Leader has spoken! New image up at: http://motm.retrosynth.com/moe_stuff/future_motm/m-830.jpg Moe ... The ... don t see a
Re: [motm] Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by mark@indole.net
... I agree. A variety of switched jacks is one reason to choose 1/4 . You might as well take advantage of it. The only advantage to additional switch would
Re: [motm] OT: Rack screws ?
2001-03-04 by mark@indole.net
... I think I have a bunch of those. I also have a bunch of screws that came with various racks from various manufactures including Mid Atlantic... They all
Re: [motm] OT: Rack screws ?
2001-03-04 by J. Larry Hendry
# 10/32 I have found the black ones with Hex heads at both Lowes and Furrows. They are a bit pricey this way. But, its fine if you only need a few in a
Battle over
2001-03-04 by Paul Schreiber
Thanks for all the Mixer suggestions. Here is the final decision: a) Mixer model is 830, as in MOTM-830 b) Moe inage #1 is the design: a bias switch, and a
Re: Battle over
2001-03-04 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
You can make a case for reversing attenuators in the audio side as well - for instance I want to mix waveforms from a single VCO, and want to do so both out of
Re: [motm] Re: Battle over
2001-03-04 by Tony Allgood
... half its travel, and in reverse log fashion for the other half, no? You can do this with a load on the pot wiper, say a 10K resistor on a 100K pot. But I
Re: [motm] Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by Tony Allgood
... Absolutely, no need for the switch. ... first. But I don t get this. Surely the top output should be the sum of the top row of inputs. Inserting a jack in
Re: [motm] OT: Rack screws ?
2001-03-04 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 3/4/01 10:27:07 AM, bigd@buffalo.com writes:
Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
Har! Round Three of the Mixer Wars erupts again! I posted both panel designs to start a discussion, in part because some of the newer list members are
Re: [motm] Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by Dave Hylander
I like the dedicated mode switch on mixer2. dave
Re: [motm] Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by Dave Hylander
Sorry for the attachment, that was supposed to go private to Dave B. dave (acting like a stooge)
Re: [motm] Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... I think I prefer this one for the reasons John gave previously. Beyond that, I like everything that Paul has incorporated into this module so far. Hey,
Re: [motm] Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by Dave Hylander
This is what I d like to see. The switch changes between 2x3 and 1X6, and there is a LED :). Sorry about the resolution. It s difficult to export out of
Re: [motm] OT: Rack screws ?
2001-03-04 by bigd@buffalo.com
I was hoping to go to the hardware store if i could actually, : ) GC not may fave, anyone know what size to get ? Jim
Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
I ve whipped up a couple of panel candidates, neither of which has been blessed by Paul. One of them incorporates John L. s suggestion for a dedicated MODE
OT: Rack screws ?
2001-03-04 by bigd@buffalo.com
Anyone know a good source for standard rack screws ? Thx Jim
Re: [motm] OT: Rack screws ?
2001-03-04 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 3/4/01 10:18:56 AM, bigd@buffalo.com writes:
OT - Lots of Curtis IC's
2001-03-04 by ivancu@aol.com
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1412781724 Just passing on the info. Ivan
RE: [motm] Questions and comments about motm
2001-03-04 by Tony Karavidas
... Hi Mark, I joke with Paul sometimes that the kits should be MORE expensive than assembled because of all the extra work it takes to prepare the kit and the
Re: [motm] Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by Dave Hylander
Is there a picture of it somewhere? I didn t know there were 8. dave
Re: [motm] Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... That would be my understanding! BTW, you may remember a long while ago I was raving about using inverters to add and subtract different waveforms from a
Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
Where would you put the extra jack? There are already 8! Moe ... else
Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
Well, add it with positive or negative polarity. In the case of a dc signal, you are adding negative offset. Is that what you meant? Moe ... from the mix?
Re: [motm] Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by Paul Schreiber
No room. Paul S. ... From: Dave Hylander To: Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 5:05 AM Subject: Re: [motm] Mixer
Re: [motm] Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by Microtonal
Instead of using Out1 or Out2 to switch from single to dual mode, I would recommend a real switch. This could let you use both Outs in Dual mode and help
Re: [motm] Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by Dave Hylander
How about + and - output jacks for the mixed output?
Re: [motm] Mixer design, forgot to address this
2001-03-04 by elhardt@aol.com
... As long as our intelligence is going to be insulted with that pricing scheme, might as well go all the way with $169.99. :) (Synth.com reference) -Elhardt
Re: [motm] Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by elhardt@aol.com
... Am I to understand that this will allow us to subtract a signal from the mix? -Elhardt
Re: [motm] Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by J. Larry Hendry
... Well, not corner the market. But, I do have these magic busses that require 48 jacks each. I know there will be 4 of them. ... Careful Moe. I have some
RE: [motm] Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by Tentochi
What is the model number? ... Can you desing the PCB (and FP) so we can add this ourselves at a later time???? That would be cool. ... Did you order the wrong
Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by bruce@sigalarm.com
The kick is up... And its good!!! That and a triple VCA and I can rule the world. My Matrix 12 has enough VCA s to attenuate a solar eclipse... So I guess I
Re: [motm] Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by J. Larry Hendry
(**(^&%$$%*&)_*(R^& supposed to be private ... I HATE this F***ing rely function. ... From: J. Larry Hendry To:
Re: [motm] Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by J. Larry Hendry
Sound great Paul. I do have one question. You said switches when the jack is inserted into OUT 1. Intuitively, I would consider Out 1 the one to be active
Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
This sounds good to me. So 7 knobs, 1 switch, 8 jacks, right? A typical full 2U panel. Do you need a mockup? What do you want the labels to say? Your thinking
Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
Yeah, sure Larry! We just caught you trying to corner the market ! What s that now, at least 20 times the Stooge has managed to send private mail to the
Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by Paul Schreiber
Here is what I m about to commit to for the mixer unless someone else convinces me elsewise: * 2U wide * dual 3:1 or single 6:1 * it splits into dual mode when
Re:Questions and comments about motm
2001-03-04 by Charles McQuillan
... Yeah, it s the right list... (sigh) ... My sentiments exactly. You came to the right place. I m looking forward to the MOTM triple preamp. I believe it
Re: (2) Questions and comments about motm
2001-03-04 by bruce@sigalarm.com
... I hear ya. For folks wanting to stuff a 19 enclosure this can be a problem. But if you want to build a modular synth, you may not be as concerned about
Re: Questions and comments about motm
2001-03-04 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
... Play and patch Doepfer and you ll see the light . The MOTM Envelope follower will be 2U. The triple preamp was announced to be 1U. This is a large format
Re: [motm] (2) Questions and comments about motm
2001-03-03 by J. Larry Hendry
... Nothing really that is really designed for the things you want to do. ... Re: synth.com ... -- Some of the synth.com stuff runs on +/- 15 VDC and will work
Re: [motm] (2) Questions and comments about motm
2001-03-03 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... My original preference (when MOTM was just a gleam in Paul s eye) was to go much more dense with like 0.5 knobs -- very much like Serge. In retrospect I m
Syncing LFO's (was: Questions and comments about motm)
2001-03-03 by mark@indole.net
... That sounds right. I do not think there is any way for an incoming clock to drive the LFO rate in the analogue realm. However, a couple of motm users
Re: [motm] Questions and comments about motm
2001-03-03 by ivancu@aol.com
In case nobody else has mentioned it, don t forget the Big Briar CP-251 control processor as another viable product to add to your collection.
Re: [motm] (2) Questions and comments about motm
2001-03-03 by Microtonal
... the ... I ... They use similar mounting specifications but I believe the power supply specs might be slightly different. I d be less worried about the
Re: [motm] (2) Questions and comments about motm
2001-03-03 by mark@indole.net
... I must have missed Analogue Systems. Do all of those manufacturers use the same mounting specifications?? Not only do I not like 1/8 jacks because I am
(OT) Wiard (was: Questions and comments about motm)
2001-03-03 by mark@indole.net
... I didn t say it was, and I apologize if that s what you thought I meant. Regardless, $3500 is still expensive even if it s a good deal. ... If Grant has
Re: [motm] Questions and comments about motm
2001-03-03 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... When we last saw our fabled mixer design, it was a multimode 2U (by 5U of course) 6X1 or 2X3 audio and DC mixing module -- it switches from mono to stereo
Re: [motm] Questions and comments about motm
2001-03-03 by Jeffrey Pontius
... I m among those few motm ers where about 90% of my motm modules are factory assembled. With this in mind, before deciding on basing my modular on motm,