Re: [motm] baby panel ideas
2001-03-05 by J. Larry Hendry
I originally had planned the magic bus to be 1U tall until I figured out each one would have 96 jacks. Wow. I sure as heck don t need that many mults. But,
Messages
Browse messages
Page 476 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
RE: [motm] Next filters
2001-03-05 by Tentochi
from 3/23/00 I can t wait to get more filters too! Shemp
baby panel ideas
2001-03-05 by klem klemmingberg
I know this discussion got overrun by mixer discussion (of which I will steer completely clear), but as I was contemplating a single row 10U module case
RE: [motm] 3rd run Panel request... STEP-ONE BREAKOUT PANEL
2001-03-05 by Tentochi
Well, there are already three sequencers that have been thoroughly discussed here. MOAS DoMOAS and a mini sequencer (1X8) Here is the link that Steve referred
Mixer Path Gain
2001-03-05 by Paul Schreiber
Something to be aware of........ When the Mixer is is dual 3:1 mode, each set of pots is set for full dynamic range. That is to say, if you have 3 full-scale
Re: [motm] 3rd run Panel request... STEP-ONE BREAKOUT PANEL
2001-03-05 by Cap'n F.M. Bleep
... i most definitely have and am drooling with anticipation... however i think i m gonna go the patchbay route myself... i figure i can fill one nicely with a
Re: [motm] And now for something completely different.......
2001-03-05 by Cap'n F.M. Bleep
... that sounds supremely cool, but i ve got all kinds of crap running in and out of my system right now... a dual vca would be very, very helpful... bleep.
Re: [motm] Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-05 by J. Larry Hendry
Now, That s the kind of LED that is valuable. IMHO. Larry ... From: Dave Hylander To: Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001
RE: [motm] And now for something completely different.......
2001-03-05 by Kisslak, George
I d definitely go for it, provided it doesn t push out the release of the other modules too much. GeorgeK
Re: 3rd run Panel request... STEP-ONE BREAKOUT PANEL
2001-03-05 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
Is that thing a real product, or just a guy making some pcbs? Has anyone actually seen one. My first take - where s the knobs? Moe ... per step. ... 1/4 jacks
3rd run Panel request... STEP-ONE BREAKOUT PANEL
2001-03-05 by revtor@aol.com
First of all, It s great to see an ol fashioned feature debate going on again.. The 830 mixer looks great, Paul has done it again. Bravo!!! Now here s my
Re: [motm] Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-05 by Dave Hylander
No, The LED is on the output. I use one of the bicolor and it indicates the polarity and strength of the signal. Very similar to the 320 LFO operation. dave
RE: [motm] Battle over
2001-03-05 by Tentochi
I like the version with the 3X2 and 6X1 switch. Excellent for live performance IMHO. It looks cool on Moe s mock-up too! --Shemp
Re: [motm] LED's ?
2001-03-05 by eiii@aol.com
LED s are fine. My gripe is the lack of an indicator light on the 900 power supply (after I left the machine powered up for about a week). Went to Radio
Yahoo BS
2001-03-05 by J. Larry Hendry
OK, count me in. I hate Yahoo too. For a while it was OK. I ve got this Yahoo Messenger thing which is actually quite nice. However, during an emergency
Re: LED's ?
2001-03-05 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
If you re up for a little mild DIY, here s a mod I posted awhile back for adding output and/or gate LEDs to your MOTM-800s. Several list members have had good
Re: [motm] I hope Hylander......
2001-03-04 by Dave Hylander
Well, my inventory is a bit low on kits. I m waiting on one from Paul, but I ve got a schematic for a CV Twister / Wave Warper thingy that I could do. Then
Re: [motm] And now for something completely different.......
2001-03-04 by Microtonal
Paul never mentioned doing a tracking generator. Jim Patchell on the Synth DIY list is working on a generic PCB for one, and if it isn t what I want then I ll
I hope Hylander......
2001-03-04 by bigd@buffalo.com
.......has some kits to build, looks like hes gonna have a few snow days : ) hehehehehehe jim, NY
Re: [motm] Re: And now for something completely different.......
2001-03-04 by Microtonal
I agree wholeheartedly. The Dual VCA/panner/fader will be great for stereo effects. It s more of a basic necessity than a luxury module like a timbre
Re: [motm] And now for something completely different.......
2001-03-04 by ixqy@aol.com
... In a message dated 3/4/01 4:47:53 PM Central Standard Time, jpont@ksu.edu ... I would also rather see the previously mentioned modules released first. I m
Re: [motm] And now for something completely different.......
2001-03-04 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... No numbskull! The 830 is the mixer! Sheesh! Trying to figure out a response that involves, that was supposed to be an offlist reply! John Airhead Barlow
Re: And now for something completely different.......
2001-03-04 by doc@trocarrecords.com
h3y, speakin for those of us who are inept/ignorant(mainly myself), what exactly would a vc d timbre distortion module do/be? i am(was?) lookin forward to
Re: [motm] And now for something completely different.......
2001-03-04 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 3/4/01 2:29:38 PM, synth1@airmail.net writes: Can you tell us more?
Re: [motm] And now for something completely different.......
2001-03-04 by bigd@buffalo.com
those too! get that assembly line cooking Paul ! : ) jim
Re: [motm] OT: Rack screws ?
2001-03-04 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 3/4/01 2:41:54 PM, mark@indole.net writes:
RE: [motm] Syncing LFO's (was: Questions and comments about motm)
2001-03-04 by Tony Karavidas
... You are correct. You cannot sync it in LOOP ONLY mode. Tony Karavidas Encore Electronics http://www.encoreelectronics.com Designers of The best MIDI to CV
Re: And now for something completely different.......
2001-03-04 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
... I d rather have the dual VCA. Moe ... of slow
Re: And now for something completely different.......
2001-03-04 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
Get with the program, Barlow ! The 830 is the mixer we ve been yakking about all day! Moe
Re: Battle over
2001-03-04 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
New image, with audio mix on left, cv mix on right: http://motm.retrosynth.com/moe_stuff/future_motm/m-830r2.jpg Moe ... to ... with
Re: [motm] And now for something completely different.......
2001-03-04 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... Very definitely! Is the 830 the divider? JAB
Re: [motm] And now for something completely different.......
2001-03-04 by Jeffrey Pontius
... I am much more interested in some of the already mentioned future modules (sem filter, micro vco, delayed vib.). Jeff
Re: [motm] Re: Battle over
2001-03-04 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... Will the switch clear the PCB? I bet Paul already has the pots and they are board mounted which I find to be a hassle mounting offboard. JB
Re: [motm] Battle over
2001-03-04 by The Old Crow
... The majority of pots, when possible, go on the right side for circuit-board reasons. Crow /**/
Re: [motm] Battle over
2001-03-04 by Paul Schreiber
I ll see if it fits mechanically. And, in it s current position the BIAS pot is pcb mounted. Less wire, less labor. Paul S. ... From: Microtonal
Re: [motm] And now for something completely different.......
2001-03-04 by bigd@buffalo.com
me me me! jim, NY
And now for something completely different.......
2001-03-04 by Paul Schreiber
Shemp stuffing LEDs up his nose. Since I still have about 38 MOTM-110 VCAs left, and sales are sort of slow (about 7 a month) So..... after the, 101, after the
Re: [motm] OT: Rack screws ?
2001-03-04 by mark@indole.net
... I ve used them with heavy equipment as well, but the screw I have fromMid Atlantic are definitely not steel. Maybe they sell two kinds of screws. Can you
Re: Battle over
2001-03-04 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
John has a point. Since the BIAS pot must be on the right side due to physical constraints, how about if the LEFT side had 3 log pots with range 0 - 10, and
Re: [motm] OT: Rack screws ?
2001-03-04 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 3/4/01 12:20:33 PM, mark@indole.net writes:
Re: [motm] Battle over
2001-03-04 by Microtonal
Well, not to be nitpicky, but I would want the bias pot to be on the left column and mixer, since that side is more likely to be used with control voltages
The battle will never be over
2001-03-04 by J. Larry Hendry
For reasons unknown to man, the mixer feature set has surely been the most discussed of all modules. Go figure. I think this is round three, and is pale yet
Re: Battle over
2001-03-04 by GeorgeK
I just thought I d throw in my two cents... ... The ... don t see a ... I agree with the switched jack concept. No need for a switch or LED as you can simply
Re: [motm] Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by J. Larry Hendry
... From: Tony Allgood But I don t get this. Surely the top output should be the sum of the top row of inputs. Inserting a
Re: [motm] Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by Microtonal
... For everyone who says there s no need for a mode switch, look at all the arguments about whether the first or second output would activate the switching.
Re: [motm] LED's ?
2001-03-04 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... Only on ones owned by Moe and me! JB
LED's ?
2001-03-04 by bigd@buffalo.com
Will we ever see LED s on MOTM modules ? Jim
Re: [motm] Re: Battle over
2001-03-04 by jwbarlow@aol.com
In a message dated 3/4/2001 12:22:24 PM, oakley@techrepairs.freeserve.co.uk ... I m not sure if this is what Tony meant, but it might be a better choice to go
Re: [motm] Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by bigd@buffalo.com
well unfortunetly for some who use are MOTM in the studio, having to explain to a producer or guitarist patching things this everytime is a pain. Id prefer the
Re: [motm] Re: Mixer design as of now
2001-03-04 by J. Larry Hendry
I have to disagree with the prevailing opinion here. The jack switching is more efficient in that you do not need an external switch and you leave the panel