Re: Réf. : [xl7] New OS info
2002-10-21 by Jonathan El-Bizri
>The sample information would have to live in some large buffer before being >burned (Saved) to Flash unless the transfer to USB could store temporarily in >the same or maybe a different ROM, i.e. transfer new samples into flash #3 as >a holding tank, create presets and store all to Flash #4. Highly unlikely the >current hardware could support this. Why is there still so much excitment about Rom burning? I have a feeling that the issue keeps getting brought up again and again by newbies who think this will save them the money of buying any more gear, which isn't the case. Flash ram is really expensive; for the same price as a 32 meg flash ram, you could buy an older used sampler, and get much more for your money. Will someone prove me wrong and explain why we should keep pestering emu about this elaborate, unlikely, expensive and ultimately pretty boring potential feature? bIz