2004-04-26 by Paul Curtis
Graham, > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Graham Davies" > wrote: > > > ... I will try GCC for now. > > The subject of the thread does drift, doesn't it, but every post was > a good one. Thanks for the continued help. > > I will sign up for the GCC for AVR list. I am familiar w
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-26 by Graham Davies
--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Graham Davies" wrote: > ... I will try GCC for now. The subject of the thread does drift, doesn't it, but every post was a good one. Thanks for the continued help. I will sign up for the GCC for AVR list. I am familiar with UNIX- style developmen
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-26 by Paul Curtis
Marvin, > > Gcc generates this with -O3, an abomination in my > > eyes: > > Larger numbers behind the -O option do not > automatically cause "better" optimization. There is no > universal definition for how to get "better" optimized code > (It depends on what the application is w
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-26 by mpdickens
--- Paul Curtis wrote: > Gcc generates this with -O3, an abomination in my > eyes: Larger numbers behind the -O option do not automatically cause "better" optimization. There is no universal definition for how to get "better" optimized code (It depends on what the application is
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-25 by Volkmar Dierkes
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 03:55:22 -0700 (PDT), Shibu Krishnan wrote: > when iam converting my .elf file to coff using elfcoff command, the original .c file is becoming blank, if i am using the same folder as destination path. can u suggest the remedy for this problem. > > the command
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-25 by Paul Curtis
Erikc, > Gotcha. Much more sensible. In fact, that looks a little > like FORTH because that VM (and hardware based on it) also > uses two stacks. Data stack and return stack, yes. I've written a number of C compilers for stack machines. > BTW, has anybody implemented a FORTH > in
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-25 by Paul Curtis
Eric, > > > > As for a compiler, I find GCC code to be unsuited to > > > > the AVR > > > > > > What about gcc do you find unsuitable for the avr? > > > > The fact is unifies the two stacks; the entry/exit code > for a function > > is particularly unappealing. > > Can you explain
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-25 by erikc
Gotcha. Much more sensible. In fact, that looks a little like FORTH because that VM (and hardware based on it) also uses two stacks. BTW, has anybody implemented a FORTH interpreter on the AVR? Erikc - firewevr@airmail.net /// "An Fhirinne in aghaidh an tSaoil." "The Truth agains
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-25 by David VanHorn
At 07:24 AM 4/25/2004 +0100, Paul Curtis wrote: >Hi, > >> > As for a compiler, I find GCC code to be unsuited to >> > the AVR >> >> What about gcc do you find unsuitable for the avr? > >The fact is unifies the two stacks; the entry/exit code for a function >is particularly unappe
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-25 by erikc
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Curtis" To: Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 07:24 Subject: RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: STK500, STK501 & AVR Studio not a complete environment > Hi, > > > > As for a compiler, I find GCC code to be unsuited to > > > the AVR > > > > What about gcc do yo
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-25 by Paul Curtis
Hi, > > As for a compiler, I find GCC code to be unsuited to > > the AVR > > What about gcc do you find unsuitable for the avr? The fact is unifies the two stacks; the entry/exit code for a function is particularly unappealing. -- Paul Curtis, Rowley Associates Ltd http://www.row
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-25 by Mark
Hi, Regarding the ATmega8(not L), what would be the expected current consumption when in power-down sleep mode? I can't get it lower than 60uA. Thanks, Mark Jordan
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-25 by John Johnson
If you're running MS Windows, look for WinAVR, it's a nice, easy install. Regards, JJ On Saturday, Apr 24, 2004, at 19:49 US/Eastern, mpdickens wrote: > > --- Graham Davies wrote: > >> $800 will be outside my comfort range so I will try >> GCC for now. > > > Hello Graham, > > I'v
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-24 by mpdickens
--- Graham Davies wrote: > $800 will be outside my comfort range so I will try > GCC for now. Hello Graham, I've been using gcc for a couple of years with avr processors. Further, it has performed well for me (And the company I work for...) and is well supported by the developers
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-24 by mpdickens
--- Paul Curtis wrote: > As for a compiler, I find GCC code to be unsuited to > the AVR What about gcc do you find unsuitable for the avr? Regards Marvin Dickens ===== Registered Linux User No. 80253 If you use linux, get counted at: http://www.linuxcounter.org __________________
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-24 by Graham Davies
--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Curtis" wrote: > I have two Olimex JTAG ICEs and a > true blue Atmel JTAG ICE all working > nicely on STK500, 501, and 502. Thanks for this information. The price difference ($45 instead of $300) is considerable. > As for a compiler, I find
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-24 by Paul Curtis
Graham, > My plan is to try out GCC as a compiler. For a debug interface, I > have ordered an Olimex AVR-JTAG from SparkFun. This appears to be a > clone of the Atmel JTAGICE with some features like level shifters > missing. It seems that you program it with the exact same firmwa
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-24 by David VanHorn
> >Who knows, One day I may buy Eagle, but right now Protel 99SE works for >the designs I do, and I have invested a lot of time creating custom >footprints and components (hmm not many more AVR's to put in now ;o) But >with the free Version of Eagle being limited to double sided
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-24 by Graham Davies
--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Graham Davies" wrote: > I'm just starting out with the AVR. I bought an STK500, STK501 and > two ATmega64s from DigiKey. ... Is there really no compiler in AVR > Studio? Is there really no means of debugging a program on the > hardware without an
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-24 by Kathy Quinlan
> -----Original Message----- > From: mpdickens [mailto:md30022@yahoo.com] > Sent: Friday, 23 April 2004 12:37 PM > To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: STK500, STK501 & AVR Studio not a > complete environment > > > I Participate on this list as a software/ha
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-23 by jay marante
Sorry bout that. Wasnt advertising. I got that from someone here, too, a year ago. I was just answering what that guy was asking. Besides, its on ones conscience anyway. It was just a mere fact. I do, too, make my own software. Perhaps, those sites with those crack files should b
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-23 by David VanHorn
At 11:19 PM 4/22/2004 -0700, jay marante wrote: >Ahh... May i know whats going on? It would appear that you're advocating stealing software. You're in a forum full of people who write software for a living.
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-23 by erikc
Maybe the best thing for our friend to do is not to advertise the fact that he's using warez. Besides which, I read on slashdot that a whole bunch of warez sites were shut down yesterday. Erikc - firewevr@airmail.net /// "An Fhirinne in aghaidh an tSaoil." "The Truth against the
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-23 by jay marante
Ahh... May i know whats going on? --- phil1960us@yahoo.com wrote: > but I bet the vendor monitors this list and will be taking a close > look at our friend... heh heh heh. > > maybe there's an intelligence test in there somewhere. > > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, David VanHor
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-23 by jay marante
Ahh... May i know whats going on? --- phil1960us@yahoo.com wrote: > but I bet the vendor monitors this list and will be taking a close > look at our friend... heh heh heh. > > maybe there's an intelligence test in there somewhere. > > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, David VanHor
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-23 by David VanHorn
At 09:37 PM 4/22/2004 -0700, mpdickens wrote: >I Participate on this list as a software/hardware >developer and find the suggestion of stealing software >(Or anything, for that matter...) to be disgusting. > >What is the position of the list owner of this group >regarding the exc
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-23 by mpdickens
I Participate on this list as a software/hardware developer and find the suggestion of stealing software (Or anything, for that matter...) to be disgusting. What is the position of the list owner of this group regarding the exchange of this type of information? Marvin Dickens Isi
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-23 by Phil
but I bet the vendor monitors this list and will be taking a close look at our friend... heh heh heh. maybe there's an intelligence test in there somewhere. --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, David VanHorn wrote: > At 09:37 PM 4/22/2004 -0700, mpdickens wrote: > > >I Participate on
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-23 by jay marante
to license your software. i guess that's stealing! hehe... upand_at_them wrote:A keygen to do what exactly? To steal someone's software? --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, jay marante wrote: > Theres lot of C Compilers. Theres iccavr which i > currently used. You can find keygens a
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-23 by jay marante
Theres lot of C Compilers. Theres iccavr which i currently used. You can find keygens at the internet for license. :) -jay --- dkinzer@easystreet.com wrote: > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Graham Davies" > wrote: > > I'm just starting out with the AVR. I bought an STK500, STK
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-22 by upand_at_them
A keygen to do what exactly? To steal someone's software? --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, jay marante wrote: > Theres lot of C Compilers. Theres iccavr which i > currently used. You can find keygens at the internet > for license. :) -jay
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-22 by Don Kinzer
--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Graham Davies" wrote: > I'm just starting out with the AVR. I bought an STK500, STK501 and > two ATmega64s from DigiKey. AVR Studio is described by Atmel as an > Integrated Development Environment and I expected that in conjuction > with the STKs
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-22 by Graham Davies
I'm just starting out with the AVR. I bought an STK500, STK501 and two ATmega64s from DigiKey. AVR Studio is described by Atmel as an Integrated Development Environment and I expected that in conjuction with the STKs I would be all set. However, unless I'm missing something, ther
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-22 by Ben Zijlstra
Alex You could also use a Atmega32, RTL8019AS and the board Hugh Duff / VA3TO makes. ARP, PING, UDP, Telnet, HTTP all working simultanious. Examples in ImageCraft C and in Bascom-AVR. The board can be seen on my homepage. It is a board with 4 relays, 4 input opto-coupled. Ben Zij
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-22 by Reza
--- amir rahafrooz wrote: > I want to use internal oscillator for > atmega32.should I connect anything to pins XTAL1 & > XTAL2? > no! nothing at all! __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25� http://photos.yahoo.com/p
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-21 by Zheng Anding
Thank you so much for the info. This one looks better than EIT because it supports ATMega128. I think Atmel discontinue to support EIT is because of ATMega103 they've obsoleted. I'm just wondering that is there a easy way for Ethernut to build-in a embedded web server just like E
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-21 by John Johnson
This is a shot in the dark, but try leaving off either the .\ or the .cof extension, or both. Regards, JJ On Wednesday, Apr 21, 2004, at 06:55 US/Eastern, Shibu Krishnan wrote: > Dear friends > > when iam converting my .elf file to coff using elfcoff command, the > original .c fi
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-21 by Shibu Krishnan
Dear friends when iam converting my .elf file to coff using elfcoff command, the original .c file is becoming blank, if i am using the same folder as destination path. can u suggest the remedy for this problem. the command i used is avr-gcc -g -mmcu=at90s8515 -c demo.c avr-gcc -g
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-21 by Paul Curtis
Ethernut as an alternative? I have both EIT-1 and Ethernuts... Also, if you already have the EIT, then it's licensed and you can produce your own boards. Regards, -- Paul. _____ From: Zheng Anding [mailto:adzheng@yahoo.com] Sent: 21 April 2004 04:54 To: avr-chat@yahoogroups.com S
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-21 by Zheng Anding
How come I cann't buy this tool from DigiKey or other ATMel distributors? I wrote an email to ATMel but got the same info. Any comments? Where can I buy a similar product which can support Embedded Internet on AVR? Thanks. Alex Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digit
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-20 by Bruce Parham
Kathy Quinlan wrote: > > I downloaded on Sunday from Atmel, still no UART support in Simulator > :o( > > Regards, > > Kat. > There does seem to be some support... on some machines. I haven't installed 4.09 yet but, on 4.08 simulation, I've found that UART Tx interrupt and status
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-20 by David VanHorn
At 03:32 PM 4/20/2004 +1000, John Samperi wrote: >At 10:32 AM 19/04/04 -0700, you wrote: >> >>I just downloaded Studio 4.09 from AVRFreaks but, after installation, it >claims to be ver 4.08. >>So, thinking that AVRFreaks has a problem, I attempted to download it from >Atmel but r
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-20 by Kathy Quinlan
> -----Original Message----- > From: John Samperi [mailto:samperi@ampertronics.com.au] > Sent: Tuesday, 20 April 2004 1:33 PM > To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Studio 4.09??? > > > At 10:32 AM 19/04/04 -0700, you wrote: > > > >I just downloaded Studio 4.09
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-20 by John Samperi
At 10:32 AM 19/04/04 -0700, you wrote: > >I just downloaded Studio 4.09 from AVRFreaks but, after installation, it claims to be ver 4.08. >So, thinking that AVRFreaks has a problem, I attempted to download it from Atmel but ran into >a login (user name / password) popup. What's u
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-20 by fnatmed
--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "weston54" wrote: > Fantastic, just what I was looking for, but I wonder if I could ask > you one thing. Could you post your schematic? I don't need to PCB > this for a one off, I can just build it on perfboard. Thank you. Everything is in the pro
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-19 by amir rahafrooz
I want to use internal oscillator for atmega32.should I connect anything to pins XTAL1 & XTAL2? Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25�
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-19 by Bruce Parham
I just downloaded Studio 4.09 from AVRFreaks but, after installation, it claims to be ver 4.08. So, thinking that AVRFreaks has a problem, I attempted to download it from Atmel but ran into a login (user name / password) popup. What's up??? Bruce
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-19 by weston54
Fantastic, just what I was looking for, but I wonder if I could ask you one thing. Could you post your schematic? I don't need to PCB this for a one off, I can just build it on perfboard. Thank you. Mark
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-19 by jay marante
I THINK all AVR have fuses. -jay amir rahafrooz wrote: Dear! I'd like to know which AVRs have Fuses? --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25� --------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group o
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2004-04-19 by amir rahafrooz
Dear! I'd like to know which AVRs have Fuses? Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25�
Thread view
Attachments: 0