Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 198 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

Re: Epson Hot Press Natural

2010-04-08 by zz_ir

Sounds like an exciting new prospect. I m heading to the paper store this weekend, so it sounds like I need to add this to my shopping list. I believe I will

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Epson Hot Press Natural

2010-04-08 by shileshjani

Clayton, I will add this paper for future trials - even though I don t do much MK printing at present. Thank you for your examplary service to this printing

Thread view Attachments: 0

Epson Hot Press Natural

2010-04-08 by ClaytonJ

Hello All, I ve been testing Epson s Hot Press Natural and have just updated the Great Paper Chase article on the web site with a review (article #5 at the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Epson K3 Magenta ink

2010-04-08 by ClaytonJ

Hello Keith, ... Glad it was helpful. K3/ABW isn t a perfect system, but it s very good and with a bit of care and attention is capable of producing superb

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Glossy Carbon Inks

2010-04-07 by pr_roark

... I ve been told by MIS and IS they are, and in my tests they perform as I d expect carbon to. However, my tests are not as thorough as Mark s. ... And with

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Glossy Carbon Inks

2010-04-07 by shileshjani

So if it is surfaces of pigments you are looking at, it would be scanning electron microscopy (SEM). If these particles are truly sub-micron (say 0.1 micron),

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Glossy Carbon Inks

2010-04-07 by piezobw

Shilesh, I wonder if the two pigment particles (unocated and coated) will show up differently? They are not going to be sliced - but rather imaged as dry

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Glossy Carbon Inks

2010-04-07 by shileshjani

OK. I get the difference between resinated and encapsulated. I doubt you will see much meaningful differences on an electron microscope (other than size),

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Glossy Carbon Inks

2010-04-07 by Bruce Watson

... I miss M&Ms too. I gave em up because of the color dyes. I don t mind printing with them, but there seems to be a fair amount of doubt about their being

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Glossy Carbon Inks

2010-04-07 by piezobw

... I m lactose intolerant and they actually add lactose to m&ms - I always thought that that might be the thin white layer between the chocolate and the hard

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Glossy Carbon Inks

2010-04-07 by piezobw

Shilesh, Encapsulation is an expensive and wasteful process that is difficult and it s not something that many companies can attempt. Epson and HP do. HP

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Glossy Carbon Inks

2010-04-07 by shileshjani

Paul, Thank you for the information below. I did not know that K4 (presumably Image Specialist) LK and LLK were 100% carbon. I thought 100% carbon inks (e.g.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Epson K3 Magenta ink

2010-04-07 by zz_ir

Thanks for the additional info Clayton. With what you wrote, I was able to get on the right track with the testing and stop wasting time without a testing

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Glossy Carbon Inks

2010-04-07 by pr_roark

... The MIS K4 LLK, LK, PK, and various UT inks (e.g., UT7 C and LC) are 100% carbon and glossy compatible. They are very warm on glossy paper, with a Lab B =

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Glossy Carbon Inks

2010-04-07 by piezobw

Ben, You might try overprinting with Piezography Gloss Optimizer which is a polyester material - if you can spare a channel on your printer for that purpose.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Glossy Carbon Inks

2010-04-07 by ben

I am wondering what carbon based inks are available for printing on glossy stocks like Epson s Exhibition Glossy paper? I have converted a R1800 to a 3K photo

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.