Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Stupid newbie questions/old cars vs ink printing

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Stupid newbie questions/old cars vs ink printing

2003-05-15 by Barry Kelsall

> The analogy with old English cars goes much too far.  Nothing I have
> encountered in trying to print B&W digitally compares to trying to
> keep a 1953 MGTD running. In all of my trials and tribulations in
> front of my computer, I have never been stuck on a dark country road
> late at night with a broken axle or any of the 100 other things that
> constantly stopped working at the worst possible time.
>
> Steve


lol

OK, maybe this almost comes close - how about 100 prints due in 3 days, &
printer #1 develops the dreaded bacterial ink curdle (expired shelf life) &
printer #2 decides to start vertical banding.

You got oil on your hands, I got ink on my hands...

-BK

[Digital BW] Re: Stupid newbie questions/old cars vs ink printing

2003-05-15 by Peter Nelson

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Barry Kelsall" 
<bktimes@y...> wrote:
> > The analogy with old English cars goes much too far.

That's because you're missing the point of the analogy!

I'm not comparing cars to inkjet printers.  I'm comparing their 
USERS.

I'm saying the what motivates someone to tinker with vintage sports 
cars is the same thing that motivates someone to like to play around 
with all sorts of different inks, drivers, papers, profiling 
software, RIPS, separate printers for color and black and white, 
etc.   They are both "enthusiast" cultures -  collections of 
(mainly) guys who like the process of tinkering and experimenting 
and using arcane, esoteric language. 

My guess is that if Canon or Epson ever DID come up with a decent 
out-of-the-box b+w printing solution it wouldn't change anything 
that most people here do.   They would still be tinkering with this 
stuff just like ham radio operators, despite telephones and the 
Internet, still like to score QSL's from all continents with a 10W 
QRP rig on 20M with a 3 element Yagi.

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Stupid newbie questions/old cars vs ink printing

2003-05-15 by capuozzo

That's YoGi- Not Yagi!

Capp
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Peter Nelson [mailto:peter@...]
  Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 1:32 PM
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Stupid newbie questions/old cars vs ink printing


  --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Barry Kelsall"
  <bktimes@y...> wrote:
  > > The analogy with old English cars goes much too far.

  That's because you're missing the point of the analogy!

  I'm not comparing cars to inkjet printers.  I'm comparing their
  USERS.

  I'm saying the what motivates someone to tinker with vintage sports
  cars is the same thing that motivates someone to like to play around
  with all sorts of different inks, drivers, papers, profiling
  software, RIPS, separate printers for color and black and white,
  etc.   They are both "enthusiast" cultures -  collections of
  (mainly) guys who like the process of tinkering and experimenting
  and using arcane, esoteric language.

  My guess is that if Canon or Epson ever DID come up with a decent
  out-of-the-box b+w printing solution it wouldn't change anything
  that most people here do.   They would still be tinkering with this
  stuff just like ham radio operators, despite telephones and the
  Internet, still like to score QSL's from all continents with a 10W
  QRP rig on 20M with a 3 element Yagi.




        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
            Choose your car now!
                                - Make -AcuraAM GeneralAston !
MartinAudiBentleyBMWBuickCadillacChevroletChevrolet
TruckChryslerDaewooDodgeDodge TruckFerrariFordFord TruckGMCGMC
TruckHondaHyundaiInfinitiIsuzuJaguarJeepKiaLamborghiniLand
RoverLexusLincolnLotusMazdaMazda TruckMercedes-BenzMercuryMitsubishiN!
issanNissan TruckOl
dsmobilePlymouthPontiacPorscheRolls-RoyceSaabSaturnSubaruSuzukiToyotaToyota
TruckVolkswagenVolvo









  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - Include your full name with your message.
  - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
  - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
&amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
  - Complete your Yahoo profile.
  - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.




  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Stupid newbie questions/old cars vs ink printing

2003-05-15 by Martin Wesley

----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "capuozzo" <gtmlabels@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 11:21 AM
Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re: Stupid newbie questions/old cars vs ink
printing


(snip earlier)

>   That's because you're missing the point of the analogy!
>
>   I'm not comparing cars to inkjet printers.  I'm comparing their
>   USERS.
>
>   I'm saying the what motivates someone to tinker with vintage sports
>   cars is the same thing that motivates someone to like to play around
>   with all sorts of different inks, drivers, papers, profiling
>   software, RIPS, separate printers for color and black and white,
>   etc.   They are both "enthusiast" cultures -  collections of
>   (mainly) guys who like the process of tinkering and experimenting
>   and using arcane, esoteric language.
>
>   My guess is that if Canon or Epson ever DID come up with a decent
>   out-of-the-box b+w printing solution it wouldn't change anything
>   that most people here do.   They would still be tinkering with this
>   stuff just like ham radio operators, despite telephones and the
>   Internet, still like to score QSL's from all continents with a 10W
>   QRP rig on 20M with a 3 element Yagi.
>
Capp,

While I think your analogy is true for some it is definitely not true for
all. A lot of people "tinker" because they have a very specific artistic
goal in mind and are striving to achieve it. The technology and the need to
"tinker" is a barrier. Other people "tinker" with various things because
"tinkering" is fun. Some do both.

If Epson or Canon or whoever did come out with a good B&W solution many,
many people would simply put it to use making the prints the want and never
look back. Some folks have already done that with the existing systems.

Martin Wesley

http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html

[Digital BW] Re: Stupid newbie questions/old cars vs ink printing

2003-05-15 by Clayton Jones

Hello Peter and Capp,

Great thread, guys.  Just a few quibbles:

>stuff just like ham radio operators...still like to score QSL's from
>all continents with a 10W QRP rig on 20M with a 3 element Yagi.

Technically, QRP means 5 watts or less.  You're right, the QRP guys do
tend to be tinkerers, competing to build the smallest transmitter,
such as will fit in a 35mm film can, etc.  The really dedicated ones
do it with .1 watt.


>That's YoGi- Not Yagi!

Sorry, but it IS Yagi.  He was one of two Japanese engineers who
figured out the formulas for multi-element parasitic array antennas. 
The other man's name was Uda.  The antenna books sometimes refer to
these as Yagi-Uda antennas, but most hams just say "Yagi".  



Regards,
Clayton  (WV4H)


Info on black and white digital printing at    
http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm

[Digital BW] Re: Stupid newbie questions/old cars vs ink printing

2003-05-16 by Clayton Jones

Hello Peter,

>>Technically, QRP means 5 watts or less.
>The ARRL defines it as 10 watts input (or less)

Oh, ok, so you're doing the old input vs output thing  

  "The definition of QRP, recognized by most amateur 
  organizations, is 10-W input, or 5-W measured output..."

The most common usage nowadays is to speak in terms of output power. 
If you read the rest of that page you'll notice that all further
references are to output.  

I'm sure this is incredibly fascinating to the other photographers
here, so let's end this now before we get kicked out <g>.

73 and good DX,
Clayton


Info on black and white digital printing at    
http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.