Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Transitions

Transitions

2006-05-12 by Brian Chapman

In a previous post I mentioned the "stepped" transitions between areas 
of light and dark in some of the images I have tried printing.  

Here's a link to one of the previous messages:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/message/7715
1

Some additional experimenting and learning has led me to believe that 
the transitions between dark and light in a general sense were only 
part of what I was seeing.  The real issue is between different 
densities of dark where the mixes of ink changes.  When I printed out 
the step wedges from Paul's site (on EEM using Pauls profile for EEM 
and Gamma 2.2 for the printer driver gamma setting) I noticed there 
are a couple of "transition" density levels where the different mixes 
of ink show up more obviously than others - between 70 & 80% and again 
between 80 and 90%.  

For 99% of images this isn't an issue but in images where the sky is 
very dark and therefore has large areas where those transitions 
mentioned above occur it becomes visible - almost like a line across 
the page wherever those transitions occur.  (It's much easier to see 
the transitions on wide areas where it occurs - I didn't notice it 
when I was printing test strips (1"x8") from the center of the image 
below.  This result doesn't occur with BO printing because it's all 
the same ink.    

Here is an example:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/brianechapman/75838437/

Does anyone have any suggestions to reduce the effect?  

Sorry for the long post, I just wanted to make sure I gave enough info!

Thanks!!

Brian 
http://www.brianchapmanphotography.com

RE: [Digital BW] Transitions

2006-05-13 by Paul Roark

Brian,

I'm not real sure what workflow you're using.  But, it sounds like the
problems could be with the dark ink(s) being injected by the printer before
there is enough of the lighter ink to hide them. If the problem is due to
the dark grays, I'd expect them to show up closer to 60%.  If they were both
being injected at about the same time due to a grayscale workflow, some RGB
curves might be able to separate where in the image the crossover occurs.
Since the problem area is further down, I'd guess it's the black ink being
injected before the dark grey inks can hide it.  If the workflow you're
using includes the driver being set to "Color Controls" I'd consider
switching that to No Color Adjustment.  That allows the midtones to go all
the way up to their maximum ink limit.  The print might be too dark, so a
grayscale curve or using Create ICC to linearize the system might be needed.

This is sort of a guess, but it might be worth a try.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Brian
> Chapman
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 10:17 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Transitions
> 
> In a previous post I mentioned the "stepped" transitions between areas
> of light and dark in some of the images I have tried printing.
> 
> Here's a link to one of the previous messages:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/message/7715
> 1
> 
> Some additional experimenting and learning has led me to believe that
> the transitions between dark and light in a general sense were only
> part of what I was seeing.  The real issue is between different
> densities of dark where the mixes of ink changes.  When I printed out
> the step wedges from Paul's site (on EEM using Pauls profile for EEM
> and Gamma 2.2 for the printer driver gamma setting) I noticed there
> are a couple of "transition" density levels where the different mixes
> of ink show up more obviously than others - between 70 & 80% and again
> between 80 and 90%.
> 
> For 99% of images this isn't an issue but in images where the sky is
> very dark and therefore has large areas where those transitions
> mentioned above occur it becomes visible - almost like a line across
> the page wherever those transitions occur.  (It's much easier to see
> the transitions on wide areas where it occurs - I didn't notice it
> when I was printing test strips (1"x8") from the center of the image
> below.  This result doesn't occur with BO printing because it's all
> the same ink.
> 
> Here is an example:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/brianechapman/75838437/
> 
> Does anyone have any suggestions to reduce the effect?
> 
> Sorry for the long post, I just wanted to make sure I gave enough info!
> 
> Thanks!!
> 
> Brian
> http://www.brianchapmanphotography.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
> they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
> the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner
> and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the Files
> section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” AND
> “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO
> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE
> “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN
> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE
> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii)
> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii)
> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Re: Transitions

2006-05-14 by Brian Chapman

Hey Paul,

Thanks for the info.  The workflow I'm using is:

1.  Open image in 16 bit RGB (Adobe 1998) from the RAW file
2.  Make adjustments including channel mixing for conversion to B&W
3.  Flatten the image
4.  Convert to Greyscale (current profile is DG20 for default)
5.  Print with Preview using printer driver gamma 1.8 and the EEM 2.2
profile (the results are pretty close with or without the profile in
this case).

I have had much better results in the last couple of days assinging
the Gray Gamma 2.2 profile (which displays darker on my monitor) and
then adding an adjustment layer (levels) and increasing brightness to
gamma 1.25 (from 1.00) and then printing using the EEM 2.2 profile and
printer driver gamma 2.2.  The results are much smoother and more how
I expect (want) them to look.  

It's somewhat confusing though because 'assigning' the profile doesn't
really do anything except let me look at the image darker on screen -
the real difference in the print is from using the darker printer
gamma (2.2) and the adjustment layer prior to printing...is this
correct?  If it works better this way does it mean that something else
is not configured correctly somewhere else in my workflow?  

I don't use any of the color controls - I mean they're "on" but all at
zero.  

Again, many thanks!!!

Brian
http://www.brianchapmanphotography.com

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
<paul.roark@...> wrote:
>
> Brian,
> 
> I'm not real sure what workflow you're using.  But, it sounds like the
> problems could be with the dark ink(s) being injected by the printer
before
> there is enough of the lighter ink to hide them. If the problem is
due to
> the dark grays, I'd expect them to show up closer to 60%.  If they
were both
> being injected at about the same time due to a grayscale workflow,
some RGB
> curves might be able to separate where in the image the crossover
occurs.
> Since the problem area is further down, I'd guess it's the black ink
being
> injected before the dark grey inks can hide it.  If the workflow you're
> using includes the driver being set to "Color Controls" I'd consider
> switching that to No Color Adjustment.  That allows the midtones to
go all
> the way up to their maximum ink limit.  The print might be too dark,
so a
> grayscale curve or using Create ICC to linearize the system might be
needed.
> 
> This is sort of a guess, but it might be worth a try.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Brian
> > Chapman
> > Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 10:17 AM
> > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Digital BW] Transitions
> > 
> > In a previous post I mentioned the "stepped" transitions between areas
> > of light and dark in some of the images I have tried printing.
> > 
> > Here's a link to one of the previous messages:
> >
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/message/7715
> > 1
> > 
> > Some additional experimenting and learning has led me to believe that
> > the transitions between dark and light in a general sense were only
> > part of what I was seeing.  The real issue is between different
> > densities of dark where the mixes of ink changes.  When I printed out
> > the step wedges from Paul's site (on EEM using Pauls profile for EEM
> > and Gamma 2.2 for the printer driver gamma setting) I noticed there
> > are a couple of "transition" density levels where the different mixes
> > of ink show up more obviously than others - between 70 & 80% and again
> > between 80 and 90%.
> > 
> > For 99% of images this isn't an issue but in images where the sky is
> > very dark and therefore has large areas where those transitions
> > mentioned above occur it becomes visible - almost like a line across
> > the page wherever those transitions occur.  (It's much easier to see
> > the transitions on wide areas where it occurs - I didn't notice it
> > when I was printing test strips (1"x8") from the center of the image
> > below.  This result doesn't occur with BO printing because it's all
> > the same ink.
> > 
> > Here is an example:
> > http://www.flickr.com/photos/brianechapman/75838437/
> > 
> > Does anyone have any suggestions to reduce the effect?
> > 
> > Sorry for the long post, I just wanted to make sure I gave enough
info!
> > 
> > Thanks!!
> > 
> > Brian
> > http://www.brianchapmanphotography.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other
resources as
> > they are often being updated.
> > 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> > 
> > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you
wish to
> > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting
this same
> > page.
> > 
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages
to keep
> > them short.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
flames.
> > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> > membership without notice.
> > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of
digital B&W
> > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be
removed from
> > the membership.
> > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group
Owner
> > and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files
> > section:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> > 
> > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
PRINT
> > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
> > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE
LIABLE TO
> > YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
> > EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
> > PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE
> > "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE
BEEN
> > ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i)
THE USE
> > OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii)
> > UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR
DATA; (iii)
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> > YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> > PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
>

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Transitions

2006-05-15 by Paul Roark

Brian,

(Catching up on the e-mails here ...)

With respect to the workflow, I was just looking at the printing.  It sounds
like you're using "Color Controls" set to 0.  It also sounds like when you
print in Gamma 2.2 the problem is less.  That might be consistent with my
thoughts.

The Epson driver when set to "Color Controls" holds back some of the midtone
inks.  I've never tested it, but logically, if those inks are operating
under a lower ink limit, they may not cover the black ink dots as well when
that ink starts.  That's why I suggested you try the "No Color Adjustment"
driver setting.  It'll be too dark, but you can correct that with a
Photoshop curve or an ICC made with Roy's "Create ICC" program.  This latter
route would be what I recommend.  It would have the additional benefit of
making the print match the monitor.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Brian
> Chapman
> Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 11:16 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Transitions
> 
> Hey Paul,
> 
> Thanks for the info.  The workflow I'm using is:
> 
> 1.  Open image in 16 bit RGB (Adobe 1998) from the RAW file
> 2.  Make adjustments including channel mixing for conversion to B&W
> 3.  Flatten the image
> 4.  Convert to Greyscale (current profile is DG20 for default)
> 5.  Print with Preview using printer driver gamma 1.8 and the EEM 2.2
> profile (the results are pretty close with or without the profile in
> this case).
> 
> I have had much better results in the last couple of days assinging
> the Gray Gamma 2.2 profile (which displays darker on my monitor) and
> then adding an adjustment layer (levels) and increasing brightness to
> gamma 1.25 (from 1.00) and then printing using the EEM 2.2 profile and
> printer driver gamma 2.2.  The results are much smoother and more how
> I expect (want) them to look.
> 
> It's somewhat confusing though because 'assigning' the profile doesn't
> really do anything except let me look at the image darker on screen -
> the real difference in the print is from using the darker printer
> gamma (2.2) and the adjustment layer prior to printing...is this
> correct?  If it works better this way does it mean that something else
> is not configured correctly somewhere else in my workflow?
> 
> I don't use any of the color controls - I mean they're "on" but all at
> zero.
> 
> Again, many thanks!!!
> 
> Brian
> http://www.brianchapmanphotography.com
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
> <paul.roark@...> wrote:
> >
> > Brian,
> >
> > I'm not real sure what workflow you're using.  But, it sounds like the
> > problems could be with the dark ink(s) being injected by the printer
> before
> > there is enough of the lighter ink to hide them. If the problem is
> due to
> > the dark grays, I'd expect them to show up closer to 60%.  If they
> were both
> > being injected at about the same time due to a grayscale workflow,
> some RGB
> > curves might be able to separate where in the image the crossover
> occurs.
> > Since the problem area is further down, I'd guess it's the black ink
> being
> > injected before the dark grey inks can hide it.  If the workflow you're
> > using includes the driver being set to "Color Controls" I'd consider
> > switching that to No Color Adjustment.  That allows the midtones to
> go all
> > the way up to their maximum ink limit.  The print might be too dark,
> so a
> > grayscale curve or using Create ICC to linearize the system might be
> needed.
> >
> > This is sort of a guess, but it might be worth a try.
> >
> > Paul
> > www.PaulRoark.com
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Brian
> > > Chapman
> > > Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 10:17 AM
> > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [Digital BW] Transitions
> > >
> > > In a previous post I mentioned the "stepped" transitions between areas
> > > of light and dark in some of the images I have tried printing.
> > >
> > > Here's a link to one of the previous messages:
> > >
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/message/7715
> > > 1
> > >
> > > Some additional experimenting and learning has led me to believe that
> > > the transitions between dark and light in a general sense were only
> > > part of what I was seeing.  The real issue is between different
> > > densities of dark where the mixes of ink changes.  When I printed out
> > > the step wedges from Paul's site (on EEM using Pauls profile for EEM
> > > and Gamma 2.2 for the printer driver gamma setting) I noticed there
> > > are a couple of "transition" density levels where the different mixes
> > > of ink show up more obviously than others - between 70 & 80% and again
> > > between 80 and 90%.
> > >
> > > For 99% of images this isn't an issue but in images where the sky is
> > > very dark and therefore has large areas where those transitions
> > > mentioned above occur it becomes visible - almost like a line across
> > > the page wherever those transitions occur.  (It's much easier to see
> > > the transitions on wide areas where it occurs - I didn't notice it
> > > when I was printing test strips (1"x8") from the center of the image
> > > below.  This result doesn't occur with BO printing because it's all
> > > the same ink.
> > >
> > > Here is an example:
> > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/brianechapman/75838437/
> > >
> > > Does anyone have any suggestions to reduce the effect?
> > >
> > > Sorry for the long post, I just wanted to make sure I gave enough
> info!
> > >
> > > Thanks!!
> > >
> > > Brian
> > > http://www.brianchapmanphotography.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other
> resources as
> > > they are often being updated.
> > >
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> > >
> > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you
> wish to
> > > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting
> this same
> > > page.
> > >
> > > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages
> to keep
> > > them short.
> > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
> flames.
> > > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> > > membership without notice.
> > > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of
> digital B&W
> > > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be
> removed from
> > > the membership.
> > > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> > > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group
> Owner
> > > and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files
> > > section:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> > >
> > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> PRINT
> > > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
> > > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE
> LIABLE TO
> > > YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
> > > EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
> > > PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE
> > > "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE
> BEEN
> > > ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i)
> THE USE
> > > OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii)
> > > UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR
> DATA; (iii)
> > > STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> > > YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> > > PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
> they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
> the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner
> and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the Files
> section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” AND
> “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO
> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE
> “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN
> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE
> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii)
> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii)
> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>

Re: Transitions

2006-05-18 by Brian Chapman

Paul,

I *finally* got around to trying your suggestion!  The result (with 
no adjustment curve or icc) seemed like it was ok, but when I tried 
to create curve to correct for the darker print it really looked bad 
(very harsh transitions).  Obviously it wasn't as simple as I had 
hoped :)  So I think I'm going to stop worrying about it until I get 
the QTR program and have more control of what's happening!  

One other thing...I've heard the term 'linearize' a lot recently but 
I can't figure out what it means in the context of printing...can 
anyone explain?  Is it basically creating a calibrated workflow all 
the way through?  

Thanks, 

Brian
http://www.brianchapmanphotography.com

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@...> wrote:
>
> Brian,
> 
> (Catching up on the e-mails here ...)
> 
> With respect to the workflow, I was just looking at the printing.  
It sounds
> like you're using "Color Controls" set to 0.  It also sounds like 
when you
> print in Gamma 2.2 the problem is less.  That might be consistent 
with my
> thoughts.
> 
> The Epson driver when set to "Color Controls" holds back some of 
the midtone
> inks.  I've never tested it, but logically, if those inks are 
operating
> under a lower ink limit, they may not cover the black ink dots as 
well when
> that ink starts.  That's why I suggested you try the "No Color 
Adjustment"
> driver setting.  It'll be too dark, but you can correct that with a
> Photoshop curve or an ICC made with Roy's "Create ICC" program.  
This latter
> route would be what I recommend.  It would have the additional 
benefit of
> making the print match the monitor.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Brian
> > Chapman
> > Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 11:16 AM
> > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Transitions
> > 
> > Hey Paul,
> > 
> > Thanks for the info.  The workflow I'm using is:
> > 
> > 1.  Open image in 16 bit RGB (Adobe 1998) from the RAW file
> > 2.  Make adjustments including channel mixing for conversion to 
B&W
> > 3.  Flatten the image
> > 4.  Convert to Greyscale (current profile is DG20 for default)
> > 5.  Print with Preview using printer driver gamma 1.8 and the 
EEM 2.2
> > profile (the results are pretty close with or without the 
profile in
> > this case).
> > 
> > I have had much better results in the last couple of days 
assinging
> > the Gray Gamma 2.2 profile (which displays darker on my monitor) 
and
> > then adding an adjustment layer (levels) and increasing 
brightness to
> > gamma 1.25 (from 1.00) and then printing using the EEM 2.2 
profile and
> > printer driver gamma 2.2.  The results are much smoother and 
more how
> > I expect (want) them to look.
> > 
> > It's somewhat confusing though because 'assigning' the profile 
doesn't
> > really do anything except let me look at the image darker on 
screen -
> > the real difference in the print is from using the darker printer
> > gamma (2.2) and the adjustment layer prior to printing...is this
> > correct?  If it works better this way does it mean that 
something else
> > is not configured correctly somewhere else in my workflow?
> > 
> > I don't use any of the color controls - I mean they're "on" but 
all at
> > zero.
> > 
> > Again, many thanks!!!
> > 
> > Brian
> > http://www.brianchapmanphotography.com
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
> > <paul.roark@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Brian,
> > >
> > > I'm not real sure what workflow you're using.  But, it sounds 
like the
> > > problems could be with the dark ink(s) being injected by the 
printer
> > before
> > > there is enough of the lighter ink to hide them. If the 
problem is
> > due to
> > > the dark grays, I'd expect them to show up closer to 60%.  If 
they
> > were both
> > > being injected at about the same time due to a grayscale 
workflow,
> > some RGB
> > > curves might be able to separate where in the image the 
crossover
> > occurs.
> > > Since the problem area is further down, I'd guess it's the 
black ink
> > being
> > > injected before the dark grey inks can hide it.  If the 
workflow you're
> > > using includes the driver being set to "Color Controls" I'd 
consider
> > > switching that to No Color Adjustment.  That allows the 
midtones to
> > go all
> > > the way up to their maximum ink limit.  The print might be too 
dark,
> > so a
> > > grayscale curve or using Create ICC to linearize the system 
might be
> > needed.
> > >
> > > This is sort of a guess, but it might be worth a try.
> > >
> > > Paul
> > > www.PaulRoark.com
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > > > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of
> > Brian
> > > > Chapman
> > > > Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 10:17 AM
> > > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Subject: [Digital BW] Transitions
> > > >
> > > > In a previous post I mentioned the "stepped" transitions 
between areas
> > > > of light and dark in some of the images I have tried 
printing.
> > > >
> > > > Here's a link to one of the previous messages:
> > > >
> > 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/message/77
15
> > > > 1
> > > >
> > > > Some additional experimenting and learning has led me to 
believe that
> > > > the transitions between dark and light in a general sense 
were only
> > > > part of what I was seeing.  The real issue is between 
different
> > > > densities of dark where the mixes of ink changes.  When I 
printed out
> > > > the step wedges from Paul's site (on EEM using Pauls profile 
for EEM
> > > > and Gamma 2.2 for the printer driver gamma setting) I 
noticed there
> > > > are a couple of "transition" density levels where the 
different mixes
> > > > of ink show up more obviously than others - between 70 & 80% 
and again
> > > > between 80 and 90%.
> > > >
> > > > For 99% of images this isn't an issue but in images where 
the sky is
> > > > very dark and therefore has large areas where those 
transitions
> > > > mentioned above occur it becomes visible - almost like a 
line across
> > > > the page wherever those transitions occur.  (It's much 
easier to see
> > > > the transitions on wide areas where it occurs - I didn't 
notice it
> > > > when I was printing test strips (1"x8") from the center of 
the image
> > > > below.  This result doesn't occur with BO printing because 
it's all
> > > > the same ink.
> > > >
> > > > Here is an example:
> > > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/brianechapman/75838437/
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone have any suggestions to reduce the effect?
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for the long post, I just wanted to make sure I gave 
enough
> > info!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!!
> > > >
> > > > Brian
> > > > http://www.brianchapmanphotography.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other
> > resources as
> > > > they are often being updated.
> > > >
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> > > >
> > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or 
you
> > wish to
> > > > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by 
visiting
> > this same
> > > > page.
> > > >
> > > > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier 
messages
> > to keep
> > > > them short.
> > > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks 
or
> > flames.
> > > > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed 
from the
> > > > membership without notice.
> > > > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of
> > digital B&W
> > > > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be
> > removed from
> > > > the membership.
> > > > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group 
rules and
> > > > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the 
group
> > Owner
> > > > and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in 
the Files
> > > > section:
> > > > 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> > > >
> > > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL 
BW, THE
> > PRINT
> > > > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT 
THE "OWNER" AND
> > > > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT 
BE
> > LIABLE TO
> > > > YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, 
CONSEQUENTIAL OR
> > > > EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR 
LOSS OF
> > > > PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES 
(EVEN IF THE
> > > > "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO 
GROUP HAVE
> > BEEN
> > > > ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: 
(i)
> > THE USE
> > > > OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO 
GROUP; (ii)
> > > > UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR
> > DATA; (iii)
> > > > STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, 
THE PRINT
> > > > YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE 
DIGITAL BW, THE
> > > > PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other 
resources as
> > they are often being updated.
> > 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> > 
> > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you 
wish to
> > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
this same
> > page.
> > 
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier 
messages to keep
> > them short.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
flames.
> > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from 
the
> > membership without notice.
> > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of 
digital B&W
> > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be 
removed from
> > the membership.
> > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules 
and
> > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the 
group Owner
> > and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the 
Files
> > section:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> > 
> > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, 
THE PRINT
> > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" 
AND
> > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE 
LIABLE TO
> > YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL 
OR
> > EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR 
LOSS OF
> > PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF 
THE
> > "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP 
HAVE BEEN
> > ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) 
THE USE
> > OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; 
(ii)
> > UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR 
DATA; (iii)
> > STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
PRINT
> > YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL 
BW, THE
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
>

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Transitions

2006-05-19 by Paul Roark

> ...I've heard the term 'linearize' a lot recently but
> I can't figure out what it means in the context of printing...

The way it is used here refers to getting the printer to output a grayscale
that is visually even and smooth.  That is, if a 21-step test file is
printed, the steps should be visually even -- or, more accurately, coincide
with some pre-determined, standard distribution of values.  In fact, the
curve or grayscale "ramp" is not "linear" because our eyes don't react that
way to light.  So, in reality "linearization" means getting the printer to
produce an output that matches whatever standard we've selected.  I
currently favor the Gray Gamma 2.2 space and grayscale ramp.  However, the
95% to 100% step is way less separated visually than the 50% to 55% step,
but since my monitor displays this same distribution, it works well.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.