Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Ink "base"

Ink "base"

2007-01-08 by Rick Colson

Does anyone know of a compatible ink base that will work to create
dilutions of Epson black ink... Ultrachrome or K3? Does anyone know
the formula for ink base? Sources? What's used to adjust the viscosity?

Thanks all...

Rick

RE: [Digital BW] Ink "base"

2007-01-09 by Paul Roark

>Does anyone know of a compatible ink base that will work 
>to create dilutions of Epson black ink... Ultrachrome or K3? 

I have some MIS base that is labeled "UC Base."  I have no idea if it's
really appropriate or whether they still sell it.

I made my own, using only things I knew were compatible since they were
major components of the UC inks, disclosed as such in the MSDSs.  My mix was
4 parts water to 3 parts glycerol. It seemed to work well with dilution of a
bit more than 1:1.  I'm not sure how high I'd go with the dilution since it
obviously excludes some components.  I've experimented with a wetting agent
for it also.  I just used Kodak Photo Flo.  It worked fine but was not
necessary at the dilutions I was using.

>What's used to adjust the viscosity?

This worked well: http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/Viscosity_Comparisons.pdf 

Have fun.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: Ink "base"

2007-01-09 by Rick Colson

Paul -

Thanks for your generous reply. I assume you used distilled water in your
"base" brew?

Rick

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"

2007-01-09 by Paul Roark

Yes, use distilled water in the mix.

 

Paul

www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/>  

 

 

  _____  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Rick
Colson
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 7:12 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"

 

Paul -

Thanks for your generous reply. I assume you used distilled water in your
"base" brew?

Rick

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-09 by sinar001

Surface tension also plays a roll. Straight distilled water has the
most surface tension. Adding alcohol reduces surface tension, as does
a surfactant such as photo flow.

John Nollendorfs
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
<paul.roark@...> wrote:
>
> Yes, use distilled water in the mix.
> 
>  
> 
> Paul
> 
> www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Rick
> Colson
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 7:12 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"
> 
>  
> 
> Paul -
> 
> Thanks for your generous reply. I assume you used distilled water in
your
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> "base" brew?
> 
> Rick
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-09 by Paul Roark

John,

> Surface tension also plays a roll. Straight distilled water 
> has the most surface tension. Adding alcohol reduces 
> surface tension, as does a surfactant such as photo flow.

Yes. Be sure to read my post in light of my previous post that gave the
formula and limits to dilution.  I was diluting with about 60% of my mix (3
parts glycerol to 4 parts water) and 40% UC ink.  At that dilution the UC
ink appeared to have enough of all the other "stuff" to work fine.  The
Photo Flo (which does have a bit of alcohol in it) in minute amounts might
be a good wetting agent, but it did not change the performance of the inks
with the dilutions I was using, as far as I could tell in my experiments.
So, I just dropped it.  When I tried to determine the amount of Photo Flo
that would be appropriate (which would take some digging through my files),
I recall that is was a very small amount.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

[Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-09 by Tyler Boley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, James Irelan
<james@...> wrote:
>
> 
> On Jan 9, 2007, at 3:28 PM, Paul Roark wrote:
> 
> > John,
> >
> > > Surface tension also plays a roll.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> sometimes a paradiddle
> 
> James

sometimes a ratamacue

no one knows what we're talking about...
Tyler

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-09 by Bruce Watson

Tyler Boley wrote:
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, James Irelan
> <james@...> wrote:
>   
>> sometimes a paradiddle
>>
>> James
>>     
> sometimes a ratamacue
>
> no one knows what we're talking about...
> Tyler
>   
No one?
-- 
Bruce Watson
/



















/

Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-09 by xylonic2000

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley"
<tyler@...> wrote:
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, James Irelan
> <james@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > On Jan 9, 2007, at 3:28 PM, Paul Roark wrote:
> > 
> > > John,
> > >
> > > > Surface tension also plays a roll.
> > 
> >  
> > sometimes a paradiddle
> > 
> > James
> 
> sometimes a ratamacue
> 
> no one knows what we're talking about...
> Tyler
>
You may be correct, Tyler, but I believe that surface tension makes
incorporation of paradiddles in French rolls all but impossible.
Vienna rolls are different.
Reinald

[Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-09 by kenstrain2000

> sometimes a ratamacue
> 
> no one knows what we're talking about...
> Tyler
It is no longer possible that no one knows!

In percussion, the paradiddle is a four-note sticking pattern 
consisting of two alternating notes

Though this one is harder

The ratamacue, or single ratamacue, is a rudiment based on the drag, 
used most in marching cadences ... 

One learns something every day... :)


>

[Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-10 by Tyler Boley

Cool, it'a Spinal Tap day on the list!!!
No, wait, those guys in that band (didn't the 1st drummer die?) could
not possibley have known their rudiments.

Why do the roadies always level the drum riser?

So the drummer will drool equally out of both sides of his mouth...

ok, done.
Tyler

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "kenstrain2000"
<kenstrain2000@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> 
> > sometimes a ratamacue
> > 
> > no one knows what we're talking about...
> > Tyler
> It is no longer possible that no one knows!
> 
> In percussion, the paradiddle is a four-note sticking pattern 
> consisting of two alternating notes
> 
> Though this one is harder
> 
> The ratamacue, or single ratamacue, is a rudiment based on the drag, 
> used most in marching cadences ... 
> 
> One learns something every day... :)
> 
> 
> >
>

Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-10 by Tyler Boley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "xylonic2000"
<n984652@...> wrote:
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley"
> <tyler@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, James Irelan
> > <james@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > On Jan 9, 2007, at 3:28 PM, Paul Roark wrote:
> > > 
> > > > John,
> > > >
> > > > > Surface tension also plays a roll.
> > > 
> > >  
> > > sometimes a paradiddle
> > > 
> > > James
> > 
> > sometimes a ratamacue
> > 
> > no one knows what we're talking about...
> > Tyler
> >
> You may be correct, Tyler, but I believe that surface tension makes
> incorporation of paradiddles in French rolls all but impossible.
> Vienna rolls are different.
> Reinald
>

single or double stroke?
Tyler, really  done now.

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-10 by Dana H. Myers

Tyler Boley wrote:
> 
> 
> Cool, it'a Spinal Tap day on the list!!!
> No, wait, those guys in that band (didn't the 1st drummer die?) could
> not possibley have known their rudiments.

Ah, Stumpy Pete, he was a great bloke...

;-)
Dana

[Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-10 by Tyler Boley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Bruce Watson
<bwyg@...> wrote:
>
> Tyler Boley wrote:
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, James Irelan
> > <james@> wrote:
> >   
> >> sometimes a paradiddle
> >>
> >> James
> >>     
> > sometimes a ratamacue
> >
> > no one knows what we're talking about...
> > Tyler
> >   
> No one?
> -- 
> Bruce Watson

well, I can't be right ALL the time...
By the way, John Nollendorfs knows more about ink than anyone on this
list probably...
History moves and dissapears fast in the digital world, but John not
only had a vialble color ink set out for some time, that could emulate
ciba on the right surfaces, but had the only viable dye based mono
sets ever put on the market, to my knowledge. They were quite
stunning, with great dmax, decent longevity as azo based.
Unfortunately proper substrates in the marketplace were hard to find.
John knows a lot about how coatings take ink, and how a number of
factors effect longevity, and many other things I'm probably unaware
of... for all I know, he may still supply the inks.
Tyler

[Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-10 by dlruckus

Some do, but in another vein how about a digim instead of a diddle?
Duane


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley"
<tyler@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, James Irelan
> <james@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > On Jan 9, 2007, at 3:28 PM, Paul Roark wrote:
> > 
> > > John,
> > >
> > > > Surface tension also plays a roll.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > sometimes a paradiddle
> > 
> > James
> 
> sometimes a ratamacue
> 
> no one knows what we're talking about...
> Tyler
>

[Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-10 by koloshor

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley"
<tyler@...> wrote:
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, James Irelan
> <james@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > On Jan 9, 2007, at 3:28 PM, Paul Roark wrote:
> > 
> > > John,
> > >
> > > > Surface tension also plays a roll.
> > 
> > 
> > sometimes a paradiddle
> > 
> > James
> 
> sometimes a ratamacue
> 
> no one knows what we're talking about...

What do you call someone who follows a band around?
- A drummer!

How do you know when there's a drummer at your door?
- The knocking keeps speeding up.

How do you know when the stage is level?
- The drummer drools out both sides of his mouth.

Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-10 by koloshor

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Rick Colson
<colson@...> wrote:
>
> Oh my God. What have I started? Will someone please shoot me.

Why should we shoot you? Are you a drummer?

How do you get two drummers playing in synchronization?
- Shoot one of them.

Did you hear about the bass player who locked his keys in the car?
- He had to break a window to get the drummer out!

[Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-10 by sinar001

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley"
<tyler@...> wrote:
SNIP 
> well, I can't be right ALL the time...
> By the way, John Nollendorfs knows more about ink than anyone on this
> list probably...
> History moves and dissapears fast in the digital world, but John not
> only had a vialble color ink set out for some time, that could emulate
> ciba on the right surfaces, but had the only viable dye based mono
> sets ever put on the market, to my knowledge. They were quite
> stunning, with great dmax, decent longevity as azo based.
> Unfortunately proper substrates in the marketplace were hard to find.
> John knows a lot about how coatings take ink, and how a number of
> factors effect longevity, and many other things I'm probably unaware
> of... for all I know, he may still supply the inks.
> Tyler
>

Boy, I leave the list for a day with a "tension thought" and it all
turns to drum talk!

Thanks for the kind words Tyler! 

For the most part I have left the ink business, but have kept up my
contacts. I thought about jumping in to sell "me too" pigments, but
thought better of it.

Right now just happy to get some commercial photography jobs and
keeping the art repro business alive. Amazing how much simpler life is
when you aren't running to the Post Office sending off ink packages
anymore!

John Nollendorfs

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-11 by Geoff Meadowcroft

Oh dear! Another of these time-wasting off-topic, topics.
I, for one, wish you would keep these out of this forum.
Geoff


On 10 Jan 2007, at 23:29, koloshor wrote:

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley"
  <tyler@...> wrote:
  >
  > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, James Irelan
  > <james@> wrote:
  > >
  > >
  > > On Jan 9, 2007, at 3:28 PM, Paul Roark wrote:
  > >
  > > > John,
  > > >
  > > > > Surface tension also plays a roll.
  > >
  > >
  > > sometimes a paradiddle
  > >
  > > James
  >
  > sometimes a ratamacue
  >
  > no one knows what we're talking about...

  What do you call someone who follows a band around?
  - A drummer!

  How do you know when there's a drummer at your door?
  - The knocking keeps speeding up.

  How do you know when the stage is level?
  - The drummer drools out both sides of his mouth.

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-11 by James Irelan

On Jan 11, 2007, at 4:06 AM, Geoff Meadowcroft wrote:

> Oh dear! Another of these time-wasting off-topic, topics.
> I, for one, wish you would keep these out of this forum.
> Geoff




When you think about it, Geoff, complaining about being off topic is  
actually just as off topic as anything else, wastes more time, and is  
a lot less funny.

James Irelan 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

surface tension---> Piezography K7 Inks

2007-01-11 by Tony Young

This is not a comedy forum and the topic should be limited to  appropriate subject matter... i.e., I'd like to solicit opinions on  what paper(s) work(s) best with my epson4000 and piezography K7 inks?  Aside from googling, I'd like to hear from some experienced printers  what their favorite papers are and, more important, why. Thank you!
  Tony
  
  
James Irelan <james@redweather.com> wrote:                                                  
  On Jan 11, 2007, at 4:06 AM, Geoff Meadowcroft wrote:
  
  > Oh dear! Another of these time-wasting off-topic, topics.
  > I, for one, wish you would keep these out of this forum.
  > Geoff
  
  When you think about it, Geoff, complaining about being off topic is  
  actually just as off topic as anything else, wastes more time, and is  
  a lot less funny.
  
  James Irelan 
  
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  
  
      
                                    

 
---------------------------------
Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on Yahoo! Answers.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-11 by Geoff Meadowcroft

On 11 Jan 2007, at 12:45, James Irelan wrote:


  On Jan 11, 2007, at 4:06 AM, Geoff Meadowcroft wrote:

  > Oh dear! Another of these time-wasting off-topic, topics.
  > I, for one, wish you would keep these out of this forum.
  > Geoff

  When you think about it, Geoff, complaining about being off topic is
  actually just as off topic as anything else, wastes more time, and is
  a lot less funny.

  James Irelan

Yes, but if it stops another 400 off-topic messages cluttering our 
inboxes the net result is positive.

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] surface tension?

2007-01-11 by Stephen Petegorsky

>This is not a comedy forum and the topic should be limited to appropriate
subject matter.

Yeah, mabye...  But I¹m actually more worried that all work and no play will
make us into dull boys and girls.  I don¹t think there is much risk of this
forum degenerating because of the occasional injection of levity.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-11 by James Irelan

>
>
> Yes, but if it stops another 400 off-topic messages cluttering our
> inboxes the net result is positive.





Not if they're 400 entertaining ones   :    )

James
> .
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] surface tension---> Piezography K7 Inks

2007-01-11 by Carolyn Frayn

On 11-Jan-07, at 6:07 AM, Tony Young wrote:
> This is not a comedy forum and the topic should be limited to   
> appropriate subject matter... i.e., I'd like to solicit opinions  
> on  what paper(s) work(s) best with my epson4000 and piezography K7  
> inks?  Aside from googling, I'd like to hear from some experienced  
> printeYou just told a couple of our most experienced printers and  
> long time listers that this isn't a comedy forum. Always best to do  
> a little research.

You just told a couple of our most experienced and longest listers  
they are not in a comedy forum.. then asked for help... now that's  
funny.

When non moderators insist on asserting moderator status it floors  
me.. The 'best' forums have 'spirit'..

Carolyn
---
http://www.carolynfrayn.com

[Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-11 by lulalake_1999

> > > 
> > > sometimes a paradiddle
> > > 
> > > James
> > 
> > sometimes a ratamacue
> > 
> > no one knows what we're talking about...
> > Tyler
> >

Yeah, they would think it's a bunch of flim flam.

Jules

Re: [Digital BW] surface tension---> Piezography K7 Inks

2007-01-11 by James Irelan

>
>
> You just told a couple of our most experienced and longest listers
> they are not in a comedy forum.. then asked for help... now that's
> funny.
>
> When non moderators insist on asserting moderator status it floors
> me.. The 'best' forums have 'spirit'..
>
> Carolyn









Well said, Carolyn.

James
>> .
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-11 by CorrPro96@aol.com

In a message dated 1/11/2007 9:54:19 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
james@... writes:

>  Yes, but if it stops another 400 off-topic messages cluttering our
>  inboxes the net result is positive.





Not if they're 400  entertaining ones   :    )

James
>  .



All these silly postings are NOT entertaining one bit. This is going on  
every day.
 
Richard (Brooklyn)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: tense surfaces

2007-01-11 by lenzzman44

Yeah!! What Carolyn said.

Oh, and if you haven't yet checked out http://www.carolynfrayn.com
you've missed one of the most lovely stops on the Web. Double thanks,
Carolyn.

Print on,
Jim


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carolyn Frayn
<carolyn@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> You just told a couple of our most experienced and longest listers  
> they are not in a comedy forum.. then asked for help... now that's  
> funny.
> 
> When non moderators insist on asserting moderator status it floors  
> me.. The 'best' forums have 'spirit'..
> 
> Carolyn
> ---
> http://www.carolynfrayn.com
>

Re: [Digital BW] surface tension---> Piezography K7 Inks

2007-01-12 by Tony Young

You've made your point... pathetic group- has turned into a humorous joke itself-
  leaving the "experienced"-moderator-officializing-spirits to entertain themselves
  on the floor in their blathering humorous fog...  I'll find answers elsewhere. 
  No need to ask... moderating my self outta here so no need to respond with your 
  unbelievably "funny" wits.
   
  Tony
  

Carolyn Frayn <carolyn@...> wrote:
          On 11-Jan-07, at 6:07 AM, Tony Young wrote:
> This is not a comedy forum and the topic should be limited to 
> appropriate subject matter... i.e., I'd like to solicit opinions 
> on what paper(s) work(s) best with my epson4000 and piezography K7 
> inks? Aside from googling, I'd like to hear from some experienced 
> printeYou just told a couple of our most experienced printers and 
> long time listers that this isn't a comedy forum. Always best to do 
> a little research.

You just told a couple of our most experienced and longest listers 
they are not in a comedy forum.. then asked for help... now that's 
funny.

When non moderators insist on asserting moderator status it floors 
me.. The 'best' forums have 'spirit'..

Carolyn
---
http://www.carolynfrayn.com



         

 
---------------------------------
Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on Yahoo! Answers.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] surface tension---> Piezography K7 Inks

2007-01-12 by Tyler Boley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Tony Young
<tmjoint69@...> wrote:
>
> You've made your point... pathetic group-

well... sorry about that. But this is the right group for your question.
It's been slow and boring here for a bit, and the holidays, we're only
human. None of us actually claim to be funny.
You should change the subjet line to your paper question and try again.
Tyler

Tension surfaces

2007-01-12 by Stephen Petegorsky

> You've made your point... pathetic group-

How about this as a subject line for when anyone dares to be less than
serious again?


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] surface tension---> Piezography K7 Inks

2007-01-12 by koloshor

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Tony Young
<tmjoint69@...> wrote:
>
> You've made your point... pathetic group- has turned into a humorous
joke itself-
>   leaving the "experienced"-moderator-officializing-spirits to
entertain themselves
>   on the floor in their blathering humorous fog...  I'll find
answers elsewhere. 
>   No need to ask... moderating my self outta here so no need to
respond with your 
>   unbelievably "funny" wits.

How about if we respond with the cold, hard light of reality, in a way
that may actually help you in your dealings with people (both here and
elsewhere)?

I just did a search for posts by you, Mr. Tony Young. Guess what I
found? You've posted three times, to a grand total of two threads, and
you've never, ever made a single positive contribution to this group.

In one thread, when we were being serious, you complained about us
using terms that were too hard for you to understand. In the other,
when we weren't being serious, you judged us as "pathetic". Well, I'm
sorry, Mr. Young, but we're not here to entertain you. If there's a
direction you'd like to see conversation go, start threads on your
topics of interest. It's been said, too many times, if you're not part
of the solution, then you're part of the problem.

While I agree that your idea about "moderating my self outta here", I
doubt your other observation "I'll find answers elsewhere" is true.
All you're doing is waiting for the world to anticipate what you need
and provide it in a neatly wrapped package, just the way you want it,
without hard to understand words, without humor that you don't get.
This is not going to happen. There isn't a Yahoo group
"DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrintDoneTonyYoung'sWay", and there is never
going to be. Learn to live in a community.

[Digital BW] Re: Ink "base"--don't forget surface tension!

2007-01-12 by koloshor

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Geoff Meadowcroft
<geoffmead@...> wrote:
>
> Oh dear! Another of these time-wasting off-topic, topics.
> I, for one, wish you would keep these out of this forum.
> Geoff

You and Tony Young are a matched set. Three posts each, and a horrible
signal to noise ratio (3 of his 3 posts were complaints, 2 of 3 of
yours are). Everyone who made humorous contributions to this thread
has a better percentage of useful to useless posts than either of you
two do.

If you want a forum with a higher percentage of posts that meet your
criteria for "on-topic", then may I suggest that you clean your own
house first...

Re: [Digital BW] surface tension---> Piezography K7 Inks

2007-01-12 by James Irelan

On Jan 11, 2007, at 6:34 PM, Tony Young wrote:

> You've made your point... pathetic group- has turned into a  
> humorous joke itself-
> leaving the "experienced"-moderator-officializing-spirits to  
> entertain themselves
> on the floor in their blathering humorous fog... I'll find answers  
> elsewhere.
> No need to ask... moderating my self outta here so no need to  
> respond with your
> unbelievably "funny" wits.





And no need to continue with yours, which obviously would be  
impossible.  Bye.

James

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.