I personally own 2 IIx's and a mirage among many other samplers. Although the mirage does not sound just like the fairlight it sounds a hell of a lot more realistic than sampling the IIx into a 16 bit sampler. How that is, I do not know. The original fairlight samples have bad loop points and only one sample point that is transposed all of the way up and down the keyboard. The mirage with a little filter manipulation sounds pretty damn close to the fairlight in a blind A/B and on a recording I cannot tell the difference. I believe that it has to do with the 8 bit sample resolution because on my Emulator I it sounds pretty close as well. Just my 2 cents. Kevin Kelley Audio Playground www.keyboardmuseum.org --- yazzofever <yazzofever@yahoo.com> wrote: > Ok, > > You can stop laughing. But I have read on the > internet that some feel > that out of all the vintage samplers from the 80's, > the ensoniq mirage > nails the fairlight II 8 bit sounds the best. > > I KNOW it is not a fairlight with all the other > bells and whistles, > additive sythesis, sequencer, etc. > > I'm speaking cheifly of the sound of samples. > > Has anyone both to compare? > > Micah > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Fairlight-CMI] mirage vs. fairlight cmi II
2006-04-20 by kevin kelley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.