Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 48 of 56 · 2770 messages matched
2006-03-10 by nicholas_kent
I need to replace two B10K pots on my Model 15. As far as I can find (Mouser, Jameco) they are Alpha 16mm B10K PC mount knurled But I can only find audio taper in that format (which I guess I'll use unless I can find an exact match). So I'm just wondering if anyone knows a source
2006-03-10 by nicholas_kent
Just thought this was worth mentioning. I'm not really blaming anyone. I figured this info might help someone when they ship. I recently bought and had a second hand Doepfer G6 case containing modules shipped to me. The packing seemed quite responsible and while I didn't request
2006-03-09 by ziggy-millam550@hashcookiez.com
Wow, what a blast, what a trip actually. was kind of getting bored with the net, was gonna get rid of my broadband and go back to 56k because i hardly used the thing, and really, I didn't do anything much to need it. But last weekend i found this crazy pickup thing, with webcmera
2006-03-07 by (i think you can figure that out)
--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, q v s f u e k p s v h s l w wrote: > > Hi > > i made my vote :) thats cool regards the wavetable .Digital in analogue? well i hope so , i think its the missing link and future of modular hardware systems along with bring back some of the
2006-03-07 by (i think you can figure that out)
Nope! --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, eric f wrote: > > Very nice indeed. I'm very curious as to whether the expanders can be clocked at different rates than the primary unit. > > cheers, > eric f > > "(i think you can figure that out)" wrote: > Go to: > > http://www.e
2006-03-07 by q v s f u e k p s v h s l w
Hi i made my vote :) thats cool regards the wavetable .Digital in analogue? well i hope so , i think its the missing link and future of modular hardware systems along with bring back some of the rare and obscure stuff .Weird digital noises are lovely , i love the idea of the harm
2006-03-07 by eric f
Very nice indeed. I'm very curious as to whether the expanders can be clocked at different rates than the primary unit. cheers, eric f "(i think you can figure that out)" wrote: Go to: http://www.ear-group.com/model_21.html to check it out
2006-03-07 by (i think you can figure that out)
I've posted a photo of the Model 21 prototype - the Milton 2 - in the Miscellaneous folder in this yahoogroup. What you're looking at, while not yet complete, is operationally equivalent to the Milton 1 engine board. Actually there are a few added features over the it's predecess
2006-03-07 by (i think you can figure that out)
Axel, I am sorry that you've not not received the THIRD unit i've sent ot you., sent o you your new address yet. This is odd. Please note: Touhed by Sound is not an EAR dealer. We've had discussions with them and others in your area, but no formal arrangment has been made with an
2006-03-07 by Bryan E Cornell
1) How do you glide between notes? AND 2) What is the row of 8 (16 on the Venti) inputs for? Bryan
2006-03-07 by (i think you can figure that out)
It looks like we have a landslide on the Model 18 poll..BUT hey, there are four days remaining and anything could happen - we've all seen how weird elections can swing at the last moment, or even three weeks after the fact (wink wink). Anyway, if you haven't voted yet - please do
2006-03-07 by (i think you can figure that out)
i gotcha covered on that. I don't see the Milton, either Venti or Grande being more than 2 or so inches deep, if that. The main electronics, pots, LEDS. toggle and tact swtiches are all going to be mounted to a single board that sits about 5/8's of an inch behind and resting para
2006-03-06 by damon
A fantastic suggestion at that. I second this request. On Mar 6, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Robair, Gino wrote: > That's very exciting news! > One request, Peter: please try to make sure it'll fit into the Doepfer > suitcase (depth-wise). I've had problems lately where module boards > and
2006-03-06 by Robair, Gino
That's very exciting news! One request, Peter: please try to make sure it'll fit into the Doepfer suitcase (depth-wise). I've had problems lately where module boards and ribbon cables begin to pile up in the suitcase causing a space issue with the power boards/parts of the case.
2006-03-06 by Fahl, Romeo
That sounds awesome! Refresh my memory - will this be available in Kit form? Romeo > -----Original Message----- > From: PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of (i > think you can figure that out) > Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006
2006-03-06 by (i think you can figure that out)
In the next day or so I'm going to be posting a photo of the prototype Milton engine. Warnng you ahead of time, there's not a lot to look at - and this is a very good thing. Currently we have all counting functions operational (start/stop, hold, reset, obedient clock, manual adva
2006-03-06 by Fahl, Romeo
Are you on Starbucks' payroll? -----Original Message----- From: PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com on behalf of (i think you can figure that out) Sent: Sun 3/5/2006 3:34 PM To: PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com Subject: [PLAN_B_analog_blog] There willl be Milton, and MILLLLLLLLL
2006-03-06 by (i think you can figure that out)
Go to: http://www.ear-group.com/model_21.html to check it out
2006-03-06 by (i think you can figure that out)
--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "Fahl, Romeo" wrote: > > Are you on Starbucks' payroll? No, but for the $$ I drop there, I am in their XMAS card list.
2006-03-06 by Frank Vanaman
'evening-- >> One I have been tossing around recently (car mode) is a >> harmonic generator of sorts - all analog. First ten harmonics via >> sliders or VCs. Sine, saw and possibly square outs. >> > >neato! > Yeah, I concur. Sounds a lot like one of the oscillator devices in the
2006-03-06 by Brad Hawkins
> One I have been tossing around recently (car mode) is a > harmonic generator of sorts - all analog. First ten harmonics via > sliders or VCs. Sine, saw and possibly square outs. > neato!
2006-03-05 by (i think you can figure that out)
Milton news, opus (insert big number here): First off, the computer conversion process is going really well. We've settled on the powerful Amtel AT89C2051 Microcontroller to do this job. Far better (and at 11MhZ, faster) than a PIC or Microcomputer as a Microcontroller has it's o
2006-03-05 by (i think you can figure that out)
MATT! Before i answer...have you voted for your preferred Model 18 (that's really 18) format yet? ha ha. ANYWAY...no plans to do a wavetable as I have enough goodies on the drawing board at Plan B Skunkworks to last me....hmm...10 years? Nah, not quite THAT long. close though. Bu
2006-03-05 by selfoscillate
--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure that out)" wrote: > > I can hear Ingo chuckling in the background here... you have good ears, you heard it even before i noticed it myself ;-) this brings me to another point, maybe you should take a few minutes
2006-03-05 by izimizam
Hi is a wavetable osc planned still ? maybe with a few twists ;)ppg waveset etc.Surprised no one has done a Ppg OSc module , maybe the current wavetatble osc are this .Also wondered if anyone will be doing a noise generator digital noise type osc like the dark star chaos etc ? or
2006-03-04 by (i think you can figure that out)
Rragrding balanced outand and transformers: There are several ways to create balanced separation,using a transofrmer being one of them - but yes, a costly one. I currently have a pair of Jensen Transformers inline to my synth outs and they're amazing. Even though they're unbalanc
2006-03-04 by david rothbaum
> Sorry to most that voted, I like it modular. So, why did you vote for all in > one? i voted for the all in one. looking at the differences between the 2 versions the thing that stood out to me was the cue feature. which is really cool, very helpful for live performance and so a
2006-03-04 by phil hendricks
On 3/3/06 10:53 PM, "(i think you can figure that out)" wrote: > There's a possibility that the NON VC Stereo Mixer - what's > currently known as the Model 18 - will be released regardless of > how the poll swings. It's too useful not to. > > As far as a VC add-on, that would be
2006-03-04 by (i think you can figure that out)
There's a possibility that the NON VC Stereo Mixer - what's currently known as the Model 18 - will be released regardless of how the poll swings. It's too useful not to. As far as a VC add-on, that would be doubtful if the poll goes to the larger carnation. To reason being: The w
2006-03-04 by (i think you can figure that out)
I can hear Ingo chuckling in the background here... Regardless what my last posts say - it's the model EIGHTEEN that we're polling about, not the model 16. Sorry once again...I am dyslexic - numbers, left/rights and hearing no, thinking I heard yes's beat the cr@p out of me const
2006-03-04 by (i think you can figure that out)
Just a reminder - the poll which will decide the fate of the Model 16 has but one week left. I would really like to have a bigger sample to draw upon before determining how we're going to approach this. With over 100 members - we should be able to count on more than 17 responces.
2006-03-03 by (i think you can figure that out)
Ted, I've sent your VCO out and it was returned today by USPS as Return to Sender. Can you give me another address for you? Please email me at the peter@ear-group.com address. thanks - - P
2006-02-25 by david rothbaum
I would completely agree that adding the 5.1 to the basic mixer would be asking people who might not have use for that to pay extra for something they might not need. so if you/someone were to do it i think the expansion idea would be best. I suggested it as an add on as it would
2006-02-25 by Brad Hawkins
> film work. Understandable. But....would these individuals rather > use the plethora of 5.1 panners available in most digital audio > systems? YES so do it quad and us that gig can use it OR it's 2 stereo outs ??? doesn't that make sense?
2006-02-25 by (i think you can figure that out)
Here's the argument that keeps popping up with me: I'm thinking that 5.1 would be most appealing to those doing film work. Understandable. But....would these individuals rather use the plethora of 5.1 panners available in most digital audio systems? If we went ahead and committed
2006-02-23 by david rothbaum
Yes that makes sense. In thinking about it would be quite complicated. and the more common stereo would be best for most applications. but the 5.1 thing would be pretty great. Perhaps on an 5.1 expansion model for the mixer it could be connected via a ribbon cable and have a swit
2006-02-20 by david rothbaum
--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure that out)" wrote: > > Regarding 5.1 outputs on the mixer: > > I see this as a dedicated5.1 panner module. 5.1 processing is > not a simple as it sounds and the costs involved I thik would > make the model 18 out
2006-02-20 by phaedra@t-online.de
Hi Peter, the new version of Model 18 is exactly that I would need as a groundtaking module in my system! It is a very good redesign with all important components of the first plan (18, 18A and 18B). Do it now, please :-) All the best Axel "(i think you can figure that out)" schr
2006-02-20 by (i think you can figure that out)
the model 16 is mono. the model 18 is quad in, stereo and mono out.. - P --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, Brad Hawkins wrote: > > quad, or dual stereo? >
2006-02-20 by Brad Hawkins
quad, or dual stereo?
2006-02-20 by paradigmshiftbeats
--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure that out)" wrote: > > I've also included the original channel routing switches, which will > enable that channel's output to be routed to the headphones alone, > the main outputs alone or both the headphones and
2006-02-19 by PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the PLAN_B_analog_blog group: Please vote for your preferred Model 18 configuration! The choice is between the "all in one' design (shown in the 'Misc' folder on this yahoogroup, photo entitled "M18 Stereo Balanced Output Pro
2006-02-19 by (i think you can figure that out)
I've redrawn the original faceplate of the Stereo Balanced Output Processor to remove some features I found to unessessary in the prototype design (namely the VC level attenuation pots), and combine all features of the three submodules that made up the three part model 18 functio
2006-02-19 by RSA
All, My initial asking price was high, so in order to move the system (this includes all doepfer and 2 plan b vco's), I can accept $1500 + shipping. Still prefer postal money order or bank check, but paypal can work if buyer pays the fee. as additional info, I waited a year to ge
2006-02-19 by (i think you can figure that out)
Regarding 5.1 outputs on the mixer: I see this as a dedicated5.1 panner module. 5.1 processing is not a simple as it sounds and the costs involved I thik would make the model 18 out of reach for most that didn't nessisarily need tha functionality. - P
2006-02-19 by (i think you can figure that out)
Let me say this about that: On the Model 16 expansion: It's only money! No seriously -these addtional channels will effect the cost, can't lie about that - but not that much. Bottom line, the M16 will come in less expensive than the Doepfer A-129 set and will have more features (
2006-02-18 by RSA
Hello, sorry for the cross-post. I am going back to college, I won't have much time for music, so I have the following items for sale, to the right of each is the price you would pay if bought new from Analogue Haven: 1 A-175 volt inverter $55.00 1 A-143-1 Complex Envelope Genera
2006-02-18 by tk421_evvt
I would agree with tim here. though also the addition of another couple of inputs (6 total would be great). and yet another idea would be in addition the the stereo outs you could add quad outputs or even 5.1 outputs. and have the pan function in 360 when in quad mode and standar
2006-02-16 by Tim J
Both of these are amazing looking modules. I'm very curious to actually hear them. Thats a hell of an improvement on the model 16. This is goiing to be a great module. I'm hoping to put together a plan b system with some effects modules by AS and doepfer. I have to say, I'm just
2006-02-14 by (i think you can figure that out)
The M16 will now also have two individual signal inputs - one with full level attenuation and two outputs jacks as opposed to only one on the original, which cuts down the needs for mults all the damn time. - P