Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 137 of 144 · 7194 messages matched
2001-05-30 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., kursk1@e... wrote: Bill you seem pretty smart in your choices already ! see below > hello > my name is Bill. This summer I'm gonna invest in a modular > system and I would very much appreciate your opinions on > choosing a system. The choices (I've narro
2001-05-30 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., matt wilson law office wrote: hiya sorry . your email address didnt come in fuyll & I can only mail you via list . my full adress is in the last mail , or as moderator I'm sure you have it ? sorry about this . please email (just in case) me at sonic@...
2001-05-30 by Matt Wilson
kursk1@... wrote: hello my name is Bill. you're supposed to say "my name is bill and i'm a synthaholic" ;^)....welcome to the list! This summer I'm gonna invest in a modular system and I would very much appreciate your opinions on choosing a system. The choices (I've narrowed the
2001-05-30 by Sebastian Kuehnl
Ok, speaking of steps "per phase" is a little too limited here as it would only apply to waveforms with no foldovers etc. I don't know what to say instead, perhaps someone with better physics vocabulary can jump in. "Per (voltage) range" seems appropriate. SK ----- Original Messa
2001-05-30 by Sebastian Kuehnl
Hello John, Peter and all, From JohnP: > The stepped part of the SSG doesn't 'self-clock'. Not mine anyway... the > CYCLE jack I believe is meant to be patched back to the IN jack. Then > when > you clock the SAMPLE (with a periodic clock) you get a weird staircased > triangle, t
2001-05-30 by kursk1@earthlink.net
hello my name is Bill. This summer I'm gonna invest in a modular system and I would very much appreciate your opinions on choosing a system. The choices (I've narrowed them down to) are MOTM, Wiard , and Serge. I'm on the ground floor as far as modulars go but I still want to inv
2001-05-30 by matt wilson law office
i split last thursdays for a wedding in mexico over the (american memorial day) holiday weeking, and come back today to view the first bit of unfortunate "bad behavior" on our list, seemingly between pete kember and a few others. i tried to figure out what was going on but got di
2001-05-29 by John Papiewski
Here I go getting anal again. The FREQUENCY of the internal triangle is determined by the stepped rate knob. The sample rate is the sample rate. Damn that Serge and his weird modules! ; )
2001-05-29 by Junger Joerg
so behaves mine. but mine is an old model with 3" panel width (bought the panel from list member john d.) perhaps beginning of the 80s. regards, joerg > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: John Papiewski [SMTP: johnp@... ] > Gesendet am: Dienstag, 29. Mai 2001 15:38 > An: Se
2001-05-29 by John Papiewski
sonic@... wrote: > hi Steve , > From memory , > basically , if you use the Stepped portion of the module , put > in noise/or some very complex signal into the input , patch a > clock/oscillator to the trigger in , or patch the cycle jack into the > trigger in for self clocking se
2001-05-29 by Junger Joerg
I think these are another four quantizer channels that you can use with whatever voltage you want to have quantized. regards joerg > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: C. Whitten [SMTP: chris@... ] > Gesendet am: Dienstag, 29. Mai 2001 10:11 > An: SergeModular@yahoogroups.c
2001-05-29 by C. Whitten
OK here's a very basic question. Can anyone help me with the TKB Quantizer ins and outs? The bottom half is self explanatory with scale select and outputs ABCD. What do the 4 inputs and 4 outputs in the top half do? On my Arp sequencer you can input voltages to change the pitch o
2001-05-29 by Junger Joerg
I don't think that the noise source has two uncorrelated outputs (which would make it something like a 'dual noise source'). I assume that the white/pink noise outputs are delivering the same signal (at least the recently posted 70s serge catalog is indicating this). Another exam
2001-05-29 by Junger Joerg
Hi, if I remember correctly there is also something mentioned about how the rate of the smooth or stepped generator (don't know which one) should to be adjusted. This seems to make sense as the RVG has only one rate control (but I have to look it up in my Gold book), meaning one
2001-05-28 by Steve Ridley
> Patching SSG to be an RVG, from Gold book: > > Noise S/H output to Stepped In > Coupler output to Stepped Sample and Smooth In > > Smooth out is Smooth > Stepped out is Stepped > Coupler out is Pulse Excellent, thanks. I'll go and think about what's going on. Steve Ridley (too
2001-05-28 by Microtonal
Patching SSG to be an RVG, from Gold book: Noise S/H output to Stepped In Coupler output to Stepped Sample and Smooth In Smooth out is Smooth Stepped out is Stepped Coupler out is Pulse John Loffink microtonal@... > > > As I don't have the Gold book, can anyone tell me how the >
2001-05-28 by Steve Ridley
> > As I don't have the Gold book, can anyone tell me how the > > SSG is patched to be an RVG. > hi Steve , > From memory , > basically , if you use the Stepped portion of the module , put > in noise/or some very complex signal into the input , patch a > clock/oscillator to the t
2001-05-28 by Sebastian Kuehnl
A question aside from the strengths of the SSG... Looking at the catalog, I would assume that the Random Source made the Random Voltage Generator & Noise Source combo almost obsolete? There is only two things they don't have in common; the "stepped random" jacks on the NOI - whic
2001-05-28 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., "Steve Ridley" wrote: > > Please! There is nothing to be gained from this. It doesn't > matter who's fault it is - everyone involved comes out of these > arguments looking bad. In the end no one else cares who > was right or who started it, and some peop
2001-05-28 by jhaible@t-online.de
> Juergen , the posts are there for anyone to read as to who said > what . Fortunately. (;->) > I am not asking anyone to find out > anything , just pointing out an error ......same deal with you if I > remember . You, pointing out an error of mine? You're dreaming. > I hear you
2001-05-28 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., sonic@s... wrote: > --- In SergeModular@y..., "Bill Felton" wrote: > > Seems to be a shared opinion... > > Perhaps the best approach would be to ignore > > any/all input from that source. My apolagies - your mail was not on Putney site , as I stated .It'
2001-05-28 by Steve Ridley
Please! There is nothing to be gained from this. It doesn't matter who's fault it is - everyone involved comes out of these arguments looking bad. In the end no one else cares who was right or who started it, and some people just get fed up and unsubscribe. The whole group loses
2001-05-28 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., sonic@s... wrote: > --- In SergeModular@y..., "Bill Felton" wrote: > > Seems to be a shared opinion... > > Perhaps the best approach would be to ignore > > any/all input from that source. > > see the EMS "putney" site -where for some strange reason bill
2001-05-28 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., "Bill Felton" wrote: > Seems to be a shared opinion... > Perhaps the best approach would be to ignore > any/all input from that source. see the EMS "putney" site -where for some strange reason bill has posted this . It is'nt very hard Bill to point out t
2001-05-28 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., "Bill Felton" wrote: > Seems to be a shared opinion... > Perhaps the best approach would be to ignore > any/all input from that source. Dear Bill Your email fails to mention what you are refering to or have any qualification...... this is typical of what
2001-05-28 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., jhaible@t... wrote: > > > chris , the "pissy comments" originated from you . Unfortunately , > > > I am better known as Sonic boom than my real name , altho' anyone who > > remotely cares can find out a lot about me by one click on > > their 'puter......
2001-05-28 by Bill Felton
Seems to be a shared opinion... Perhaps the best approach would be to ignore any/all input from that source. cheers, Bill > -----Original Message----- > From: jhaible@... [mailto: jhaible@... ] > Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 11:29 AM > To: SergeModular@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re
2001-05-28 by jhaible@t-online.de
> chris , the "pissy comments" originated from you . Unfortunately , > I am better known as Sonic boom than my real name , altho' anyone who > remotely cares can find out a lot about me by one click on > their 'puter........... It was P.K.'s "pissy comments" that drove me away fr
2001-05-28 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., KimG wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm Kim G. Hansen from Copenhagen, Denmark. > I've got a Serge panel that i use together w. an ASM-1 > and two System 700 filters. > > I've used it extensively on two recent releases on dutch label "Korm Plastics". > > It's c
2001-05-28 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., "C. Whitten" wrote: > > chris , if I played with Dire Straits & Paul McCartney circa "the > > frog song" -I'd keep anonymous too...... tee hee > This is undoubtedly meant to be a light hearted jibe. I'm using my real name > as opposed to something like '
2001-05-28 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., Junger Joerg wrote: > hi, > > i own a Fenix (serial no. 7), which i bought to expand the one Serge panel i > had back then (1997). compared to the Serge stuff it was a real bargain. > what about this Fenix GT thing? You syhould speek to the boss at Fenix
2001-05-28 by KimG
Hello all, I'm Kim G. Hansen from Copenhagen, Denmark. I've got a Serge panel that i use together w. an ASM-1 and two System 700 filters. I've used it extensively on two recent releases on dutch label "Korm Plastics". It's called " Antenne " there's a few mp3's up on Epitonic: ht
2001-05-28 by C. Whitten
> chris , if I played with Dire Straits & Paul McCartney circa "the > frog song" -I'd keep anonymous too...... tee hee This is undoubtedly meant to be a light hearted jibe. I'm using my real name as opposed to something like 'sonic boom' so I guess I can only expect the odd pissy
2001-05-28 by Junger Joerg
hi, i own a Fenix (serial no. 7), which i bought to expand the one Serge panel i had back then (1997). compared to the Serge stuff it was a real bargain. what about this Fenix GT thing? cheers, joerg >>> Rentenanstalt/Swiss Life - Official Partner Expo.02
2001-05-28 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., sonic@s... wrote: sorry to other members: Dear Matt Please can you email me , I dont have/cant find your address. sonic@... > regards Pete Kember
2001-05-28 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., "C. Whitten" wrote: > > by the way ? Is there anyone out there putting out recordings using > > the serge > Lots of people. Maybe they don't want to go public on this list. > The Fenix/Serge combination has been quite well covered in the past although >
2001-05-28 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., John Papiewski wrote: > > > sonic@s... wrote: > > > > > > > MAF and John P. (both list members)......have done some stunning > > Serge > > > recordingz....just listening to john P's stuff today..... > > Thanks very much Rob... I'm blushin'.... > > > > >
2001-05-28 by John Papiewski
sonic@... wrote: > > > > MAF and John P. (both list members)......have done some stunning > Serge > > recordingz....just listening to john P's stuff today..... Thanks very much Rob... I'm blushin'.... > > > > > and yes..they play live....quality stuff. > > Wow....what sorta stuff
2001-05-28 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., "Sebastian Kuehnl" wrote: for some strange reason this was posted on the EMS site--see that site for the reply this deserves . dont hacve the time to waste repeating myself to the hard of thinking. p.k > Peter, I have not yet experienced the privilege of
2001-05-28 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., r wrote: > SergeModular@y... wrote: > > > ..........can I take it that there is'nt anyone out there > > doing too much with a serge in live/recorded music except John > > McEntire ? > > > > > MAF and John P. (both list members)......have done some stunni
2001-05-28 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., "C. Whitten" wrote: > > by the way ? Is there anyone out there putting out recordings using > > the serge > Lots of people. Maybe they don't want to go public on this list. wonder why ? ???????name me some you know of these "lots". i dont mean running of
2001-05-27 by Sebastian Kuehnl
Peter, I have not yet experienced the privilege of knowing you as an artist, which is purported to help me understand you. So far I've been having hard times sorting out your certainly interesting knowledge between lots of affected, at best meta-relevant personal criticisms. I as
2001-05-27 by r
SergeModular@yahoogroups.com wrote: ..........can I take it that there is'nt anyone out there > doing too much with a serge in live/recorded music except John > McEntire ? MAF and John P. (both list members)......have done some stunning Serge recordingz....just listening to john
2001-05-27 by C. Whitten
> by the way ? Is there anyone out there putting out recordings using > the serge Lots of people. Maybe they don't want to go public on this list. The Fenix/Serge combination has been quite well covered in the past although probably more so on the Fenix list. There are several 'S
2001-05-27 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
Is there anyone on list using a fenix modular with their serge ? I found the Fenix a real asset to the Serge for just £1000 , it has 3 very well spec'd vco's , 3 vc lfos , 3 m/mode vc filters that have more charachter than the Serge filters & it has 24 db (5 pole option) 2 diff r
2001-05-27 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., DarkStr717@a... wrote: > > In a message dated 5/26/01 1:07:55 PM, bfelton@m... writes: > > > probability of recreating the 'combined' > noise source plus random voltage generator > module with the separates. The probability > of doing that is 1, that is,
2001-05-27 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., "Bill Felton" wrote: > Sorry, but not at all. dont be sorry , pleese. > The original message inquired as to the > probability of recreating the 'combined' > noise source plus random voltage generator > module with the separates. The probability > of doin
2001-05-26 by DarkStr717@aol.com
In a message dated 5/26/01 1:07:55 PM, bfelton@... writes: probability of recreating the 'combined' noise source plus random voltage generator module with the separates. The probability of doing that is 1, that is, unity, that is 100%, since the very patch required to do this is
2001-05-26 by Bill Felton
Sorry, but not at all. The original message inquired as to the probability of recreating the 'combined' noise source plus random voltage generator module with the separates. The probability of doing that is 1, that is, unity, that is 100%, since the very patch required to do this
2001-05-26 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk
--- In SergeModular@y..., "C. Whitten" wrote: > > THE PROBABILITY IS 1 - THE PROBABILITY OF WHAT ? > Maybe he is trying to say that the patch discussed is 'probably' illustrated > in the Gold book. could be . it was a SLIGHTLY poorly worded message (I.M.O.), anyway you look at it