Yahoo Groups archive

Dotcomformat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:20 UTC

Message

Re: Vendor Problems

2011-06-26 by weltonbarker

Yeah, that's probably true. But I really don't think that naming someone in a public forum during an ongoing dispute is a good idea. I'll just shut up. I'm happy to privately inform anyone that requests the info, but I won't say it on this forum. I just don't think it's appropriate. Just because the "business" is rude doesn't mean I have to be.

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Brian Whittington <analoguelist@...> wrote:
>
> Boy, most of us probably at least think we've guessed who it is based on the familiar excuses.
> 
> Brian
>  
> 
> On Jun 25, 2011, at 12:18 PM, "Welton Barker" <weltonb@...> wrote:
> 
> > Well, so much for waiting. I've received more excuses, but no product, and it is now a full ten weeks since my most recent order. I still hesitate to name the vendor, since this is such a small community, and I fear a backlash, but I am at my wit's end. Excuse follows excuse following total silence following excuses... 
> > 
> > This time around, the delivery was supposed to have been this week. Well, it's Saturday, and no shipment has been initiated. 
> > 
> > As for the web page displaying items in stock, the excuse was that the software was faulty. If that is the case, perhaps a different software should be utilized? Just a suggestion. 
> > 
> > I've now made several phone calls (with no answer), left one message (with no response), and sent multiple emails, most of which were not answered; those that were simply put off shipment because of job and home responsibilities. This was accompanied by a claim that responses had been sent, but I had not received them. I've scoured my spam folders, and can guarantee that there is nothing remotely related contained therein.
> > 
> > Is it time for BBB and the Attorney General's office?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> >
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.