MD praise; MD wishlist
2001-08-02 by Jason Vernon Starnes
Hi all, Just wanted to weigh in on a couple MD topics now that I've had a little time to play with my new favorite toy. I am totally amazed at the flexibility of this machine, and I'm excited to have the chance to give input on the OS. The sounds are phenomenal, and the sound selection system and parameter layout is really intuitive. Being able to sequence parameters makes this machine a true instrument. Also, I have spent entire evenings just tweaking the delay module: it sounds fantastic, and really approaches the behavior of an analog box. So many of the outboard applications I was planning to use the 6 outputs for seem awkward and totally unnecessary now that I have heard the internal effects. Putting a giant booming reverb or an arhythmic delay on only occasional notes is just too much fun. With outboard patches, this kind of thing can be very hard to replicate, but I love that this is all saved with the kit. The MD begs you to experiment. I have to agree with those asking for a few global options: being able to cater a few things to the way we each work would only add to the functionality. Having one slot where the knob functions are reversed would be great for live use, where fine tuning might be less needed, but big sweeps are used for drama. Same goes for the muting function, although I have to say I like the idea of seeing which mutes/unmutes will happen when FUNCTION is released. How about a function, maybe accessible via a double engagement of mute, which allows one to "solo" a given sound? Often I have so much going on, I would like a quick way to tell what a certain sound is doing. Also, this one is quite important to me: as many times as I study the manual, I can never be positive if I am about to clear a pattern or track. Either way, it occurs to me that this is an excellent opportunity to put the yes/no keys to work. The other night a stray button press zapped a pattern I was working on: The message "pattern clear" is informative, but much better would be "pattern clear? Y/N". Then we could have a chance to change our minds.... Anyone else think this would be a good safety feature? It would only really be required on the clear function. An alternative could be an undo feature. Again, I can't say enough good things about this box. It has already changed the way I think about rhythms. Thanks to Elektron for restoring my faith in hardware. cheers, Jason