Mailist to discuss all issues regarding the Digitech GSP-2101 Guitar FX Processor group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Mailist to discuss all issues regarding the Digitech GSP-2101 Guitar FX Processor

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:25 UTC

Thread

5 pole DIN vs 6 pole DIN w/screen

5 pole DIN vs 6 pole DIN w/screen

2004-12-08 by whidbeymark

Hi all,

My FC1 midi cable has died (yes, I'm sure it is the cable, not the 
solder connection in the FC) so I'm going to replace it.  The FC1 
manual just says to use a "midi cable".  Reading the archives I came 
across a post saying to be sure to use a "6 pole DIN cable with 
screen" not a "5 pole DIN cable". 

I'm new to this and have absolutely no idea what any of this cable 
terminology means.  Would somebody please explain this? 

Thank You Much,

Mark

Re: [gsp-2101] 5 pole DIN vs 6 pole DIN w/screen

2004-12-08 by Dieter Waechter

Hi!

this posting was from me.
Yes, you MUST use a "6 pole DIN cable with screen" not a "5 pole DIN cable".
the schreen is the sleeve of the cable ans insures, that no noise (light
switching pulses on stage aso.) feed into the data lines.

Dieter

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "whidbeymark" <whidbeymark@...>
To: <gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 6:51 AM
Subject: [gsp-2101] 5 pole DIN vs 6 pole DIN w/screen


>
>
> Hi all,
>
> My FC1 midi cable has died (yes, I'm sure it is the cable, not the
> solder connection in the FC) so I'm going to replace it.  The FC1
> manual just says to use a "midi cable".  Reading the archives I came
> across a post saying to be sure to use a "6 pole DIN cable with
> screen" not a "5 pole DIN cable".
>
> I'm new to this and have absolutely no idea what any of this cable
> terminology means.  Would somebody please explain this?
>
> Thank You Much,
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [gsp-2101] 5 pole DIN vs 6 pole DIN w/screen

2004-12-08 by Mark Libby

Hi, 
 
thank you for the reply!  What does DIN stand for?  Also, I'm confused about how a 6 pole cable would fit into a 5 pole socket and what the xtra pole is used for.
 
Thanks again!
 
Mark

Dieter Waechter <smile1973@...> wrote:
Hi!

this posting was from me.
Yes, you MUST use a "6 pole DIN cable with screen" not a "5 pole DIN cable".
the schreen is the sleeve of the cable ans insures, that no noise (light
switching pulses on stage aso.) feed into the data lines.

Dieter
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: "whidbeymark" <whidbeymark@...>
To: <gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 6:51 AM
Subject: [gsp-2101] 5 pole DIN vs 6 pole DIN w/screen


>
>
> Hi all,
>
> My FC1 midi cable has died (yes, I'm sure it is the cable, not the
> solder connection in the FC) so I'm going to replace it.  The FC1
> manual just says to use a "midi cable".  Reading the archives I came
> across a post saying to be sure to use a "6 pole DIN cable with
> screen" not a "5 pole DIN cable".
>
> I'm new to this and have absolutely no idea what any of this cable
> terminology means.  Would somebody please explain this?
>
> Thank You Much,
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
Get unlimited calls to

U.S./Canada


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

   To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gsp-2101/
  
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
gsp-2101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
  
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Meet the all-new My Yahoo! \ufffd Try it today!

Re: [gsp-2101] 5 pole DIN vs 6 pole DIN w/screen

2004-12-08 by Dieter Waechter

Hi!
DIN = Deutsche Industrie Norm
Check that plug! it doesn't have 5 poles!
It has 6 poles!
5 pins inside and 1 metal sleeve = 6 poles!!!! NOT 5 !!!!!
the sleeveis connected to GND and MUST be connected to the screen of the cable!
Dieter
----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Mark Libby
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: [gsp-2101] 5 pole DIN vs 6 pole DIN w/screen

Hi,
thank you for the reply! What does DIN stand for? Also, I'm confused about how a 6 pole cable would fit into a 5 pole socket and what the xtra pole is used for.
Thanks again!
Mark

Dieter Waechter <smile1973@...> wrote:
Hi!

this posting was from me.
Yes, you MUST use a "6 pole DIN cable with screen" not a "5 pole DIN cable".
the schreen is the sleeve of the cable ans insures, that no noise (light
switching pulses on stage aso.) feed into the data lines.

Dieter

----- Original Message -----
From: "whidbeymark"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 6:51 AM
Subject: [gsp-2101] 5 pole DIN vs 6 pole DIN w/screen


>
>
> Hi all,
>
> My FC1 midi cable has died (yes, I'm sure it is the cable, not the
> solder connection in the FC) so I'm going to replace it. The FC1
> manual just says to use a "midi cable". Reading the archives I came
> across a post saying to be sure to use a "6 pole DIN cable with
> screen" not a "5 pole DIN cable".
>
> I'm new to this and have absolutely no idea what any of this cable
> terminology means. Would somebody please explain this?
>
> Thank You Much,
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! – Try it today!

Stevie Ray Sound

2004-12-10 by Pedro Ferreira

I have been trying to get the Stevie Ray sound but just can't do it right,
it always lacks something.

I'm using the Clean Tube slightly overdriven, razing a bit the treble and a
bit of coros at the end. I have a Fender American Plus with gold lace
sensors and the 2101 is going to a Marshall 9005 power amp.

 

One more thing, anyone has a morley wah pedal going to the input of the
2101? Does it sound good?

 

Any help would be good.

 

Thanks,

Pedro Ferreira

RE: [gsp-2101] Stevie Ray Sound

2004-12-10 by M M

I read where on 'In Step' SRV used up to 50 different amps at one time.
Good luck reproducing that.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Pedro Ferreira [mailto:pedro_mig_ferreira@...] 
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 10:31 AM
To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [gsp-2101] Stevie Ray Sound
 


Yahoo! Groups Survey
Please help us to improve Yahoo! Groups.
<http://v2.decipherinc.com/survey/yahoo/yah04021?list=2> Take the survey
now! 



I have been trying to get the Stevie Ray sound but just can't do it
right, it always lacks something.
I'm using the Clean Tube slightly overdriven, razing a bit the treble
and a bit of coros at the end. I have a Fender American Plus with gold
lace sensors and the 2101 is going to a Marshall 9005 power amp.
 
One more thing, anyone has a morley wah pedal going to the input of the
2101? Does it sound good?
 
Any help would be good.
 
Thanks,
Pedro Ferreira
 
  _____  

Yahoo! Groups Links
*         To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gsp-2101/
  
*         To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
gsp-2101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:gsp-2101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> 
  
*         Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .

Re: [gsp-2101] Stevie Ray Sound

2004-12-11 by jason stanley

I use a Morley Bad Horsie into my 2101. Very smooth with the exception of slight audiable quirk on initial activation when controled.  Works great for me.   If possible, try a few pedals out to accommodate your tastes. I feel SRV had a few different sounds from fat, smoother neck pickup sounds to crunchier roadhouse blues. Very diverse playing...flipping switches and adjusting tone pot controls, guitar changes for specific songs. One thing is for certain, single coil pickups may be key.  

Pedro Ferreira <pedro_mig_ferreira@...> wrote: st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }Yahoo! Groups Survey
Please help us to improve Yahoo! Groups. Take the survey now! 

I have been trying to get the Stevie Ray sound but just can\ufffdt do it right, it always lacks something.

I\ufffdm using the Clean Tube slightly overdriven, razing a bit the treble and a bit of coros at the end. I have a Fender American Plus with gold lace sensors and the 2101 is going to a Marshall 9005 power amp.

 

One more thing, anyone has a morley wah pedal going to the input of the 2101? Does it sound good?

 

Any help would be good.

 

Thanks,

Pedro Ferreira



---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

   To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gsp-2101/
  
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
gsp-2101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
  
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 




		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 The all-new My Yahoo! \ufffd Get yours free!

Converters

2004-12-15 by Pedro Ferreira

Hello!

I have bought a high quality pre to go with my 2101, and I have noticed that
the 2101 was not that good, converters related, it takes a lot of sound
quality and attack either I use it though the pre-in or the effects-loop-in.

Does any one know how to upgrade de converters or install a SPID or ADAT
input so that we can inject the signal directly already converted?

I love this processor, but I might have to replace it if I don't improve the
converters and sell myself to TCelectronic. Please don't let me do so.

 

Any help would be good.

 

Thanks,

Pedro Ferreira

Re: Converters

2004-12-15 by gusfmm

Pedro,

That you're thinking of would be quite an endeaviour to do! You're 
talking about modifying the internal circuitry to source a digital 
signal directly to the processor skipping the A/Ds. Someone else 
please correct me if I'm somehow wrong, but that's anything but 
trivial.

After Saber540's comments about his trial a few days ago, I did my 
own since I also wanted to compare the same thing on my ART multiFX. 
Here is my experimental set-up:

- My "raw" signal flow was as follows:
  Guitar -> Behringer 1600 ProCom compressor -> Digitech 2101LE 
input -> Digitech 2101LE FX loop send -> Mesa Triaxis input
- Compression, Distortion and analog EQ were all switched OFF on the 
2101. Volume control after analog section was set to 0dB on the 
2101. Global EQ was set totally flat on the 2101. 
- Outputs used on the Triaxis were the "record" ones.
- The Triaxis' record left OUT was routed to a Behringer UB1832-
FXPRO mixer mono IN channel directly and panned full left. This was 
my baseline signal.
- The Triaxis' record right OUT went to the 2101's FX loop left 
return.
- All digital FX modules but Noise Gate were removed from the 
algorithm on the 2101. Hence, the 2101 should be acting as just 
a "direct signal pipe" with nothing affecting the signal "in theory".
- Digitech 2101LE left main output went to another Behringer UB1832-
FXPRO mixer mono IN channel and panned full right.
- Main Behringer UB1832-FXPRO mixer outputs went to my SB AWEGold 
PC's soundcard.

I noticed three main things:
1) I can confirm what Saber540 found out: There is a 5ms delay in 
the analog signal coming out of the 2101.
2) The two signals (raw left and 2101 right) WERE NOT identical. 
This was expected as the 2101 uses 18bit 48kHz A/D/A converters. 
However, the overall signal shape was very similar, just 
slightly "attenuated" or compressed. I have to take a closer look to 
the Noise Gate settings to make sure there was no ramp-up effect 
influencing this.
3) Same experience was done with the ART-SGXNitro instead of the 
2101LE. Both signals were totally in-synch, no delay observed, but 
there was a more noticeable difference in the wave shapes. I have no 
info as of what A/D quality the ART uses, so no further conclusions 
can be drawn out of this.

Sonically I must add, while it's true that the raw tube distortion 
from the Triaxis was slightly modified by the 2101 circuitry, I 
would not say that the difference was concerning. Besides that, I 
personally never use a raw signal from the Triaxis, it always gets 
processed with EQ, some chorus, and a bit of reverb or delay, AT 
LEAST.

Are the 18bit A/D converters playing a role on this? I definitely 
believe so, but how much of a difference would you be able to notice 
from a unit like a TC Electronic G-Force with 24bit converters??? 
One more thing: I'm also a believer of using a BBE SonicMaximizer as 
the last component in your signal path. And since there is so much 
difference in the sound when you turn those things on, I'm not 
really concerned about the 2101LE degradating or affecting somehow 
the original signal. The BBE seems to make everything sound great!

I'm so happy having so much flexibility from using the Triaxis as my 
main distortion source (via the FX loop) and the internal 
2101 "Grunge" or tube distoritions whenever I feel like using them 
that the 2101 has been just the perfect solution to my needs. And 
all this is available just at the touch of a button, without any 
other external gadget or anything!!! What else can you ask for??? Oh 
yeah.... I know..... Digitech, could you please launch a 3101 with 
24bit converters???   ;-)

Hope this helps or at least serves as food for thought. Peace!

Gus.

--- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, "Pedro Ferreira" 
<pedro_mig_ferreira@n...> wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> I have bought a high quality pre to go with my 2101, and I have 
noticed that
> the 2101 was not that good, converters related, it takes a lot of 
sound
> quality and attack either I use it though the pre-in or the 
effects-loop-in.
> 
> Does any one know how to upgrade de converters or install a SPID 
or ADAT
> input so that we can inject the signal directly already converted?
> 
> I love this processor, but I might have to replace it if I don't 
improve the
> converters and sell myself to TCelectronic. Please don't let me do 
so.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
>  
> 
> Any help would be good.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Pedro Ferreira

Re: Converters

2004-12-15 by gusfmm

Pedro,

Forgot to suggest something to you.

Pick any patch you don't use on the 2101. Edit the algo and get rid 
of everything in it. Save the algo. Go back to the program and turn 
everything OFF, turn volume to 0dB and EQ totally flat.

Connect your guitar to the 2101. Connect the 2101 FX loop send to 
your new pre-amp input. Connect the output of your new pre-amp to 
the 2101 FX loop return.

Go to the last module/step of your program on the 2101, which ought 
to be the global wet-dry mixer. Crank it all the way to WET 100% 
(although if you've done everything I've said this shouldn't matter 
at all).

Play. If you feel there is a noticeable difference, please write 
back telling us, and you might need to buy some other mFX. If not, 
then you will contribute supporting our findings and the 2101 should 
be just right for you. 

Seriously, in doing all this, I also came to realize that there are 
several aspects involved in the algorithm programming that can 
affect your sound (positively or not, it's up to you to judge it) 
that you have to be careful and keep this in mind in order to really 
obtain the most from the 2101. Please, let us know.

Gus.

--- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, "Pedro Ferreira" 
<pedro_mig_ferreira@n...> wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> I have bought a high quality pre to go with my 2101, and I have 
noticed that
> the 2101 was not that good, converters related, it takes a lot of 
sound
> quality and attack either I use it though the pre-in or the 
effects-loop-in.
> 
> Does any one know how to upgrade de converters or install a SPID 
or ADAT
> input so that we can inject the signal directly already converted?
> 
> I love this processor, but I might have to replace it if I don't 
improve the
> converters and sell myself to TCelectronic. Please don't let me do 
so.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
>  
> 
> Any help would be good.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Pedro Ferreira

RE: [gsp-2101] Re: Converters

2004-12-15 by Pedro Ferreira

Here's what I have found, and it's very obvious...

- Some effects sound better then others;
- Some effects take more processing power then others;
- Not all effects modules take the same processing time;
- The same effects modules take the same time to process the signal no mater
how many, or how less effects you place in an algorithm or their sequence;


What does all this has to do with converters????
- Nothing and everything.

So:

1º - If a module is not very good, sound won't be good no matter how many
bits you have in the A/D or D/A converter (not talking about extremes like 8
bits of course, talking about 18 to 20 or 20 to 24).

2º - If a module takes to much time to process your signal you tend to think
it's not so good because your hands and ears are expecting something they
find normal (action/reaction).

3º - If in a module the sound if mixed with it self and or modulated, it's
normal that there will be some wave cancellation effects and frequency
boosts.

Conclusion:

My message about trying to get help to improve the quality of the sound by
changing the converters is unnecessary.
I was trying to fix something that could never be fixed. It's true that it
might improve sound a bit, but not so much that I could say it makes sense
to do so.
When using modules such as Detuners and Pitch Shifters sound tends to be not
so good and there's no ADA converter in the world that could improve this.
If I want the high quality version of this effects I have to buy a faster
and more powerful unit like the TCElectronic (the 2120 has some high quality
ones too, unfortunately not as good).
I love the 2101, it's the best unit I have ever had not because it sounds
ultra cool, but because I can do everything with it. Along the years I have
learn to love this machine and live with its flaws and walk around them.

To end here's a list of the effects modules not so good that can damage your
sound if used in line (unfortunately some of them sound better like this and
not in parallel):

- 4 Phase Chorus
- Stereo Dual Chorus
- Pitch Shifter
- Dual Pitch Shifter
- Stereo Pitch Shifter
- Smooth Pitch Shifter
- Mono Detuner
- Dual Detuner
- Stereo Detuner
- Harmony
- Stereo Dual Detuner
- 4-Voice Detuner
- Arpeggiator
- Stereo Arpeggiator
- Whammy
- Programmable Whammy
- Smooth Whammy

Hoppe I could help any one that felt like the 2101 was not up to the job any
more.

Please say what you think about the modules I chose, please tell what are
the one you think don’t belong in the list and the one that should be.

2101 RULEZZZZZZ,
Pedro Ferreira




-----Mensagem original-----
De: gusfmm [mailto:gusfmm@...] 
Enviada: quarta-feira, 15 de Dezembro de 2004 18:35
Para: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
Assunto: [gsp-2101] Re: Converters



Pedro,

Forgot to suggest something to you.

Pick any patch you don't use on the 2101. Edit the algo and get rid 
of everything in it. Save the algo. Go back to the program and turn 
everything OFF, turn volume to 0dB and EQ totally flat.

Connect your guitar to the 2101. Connect the 2101 FX loop send to 
your new pre-amp input. Connect the output of your new pre-amp to 
the 2101 FX loop return.

Go to the last module/step of your program on the 2101, which ought 
to be the global wet-dry mixer. Crank it all the way to WET 100% 
(although if you've done everything I've said this shouldn't matter 
at all).

Play. If you feel there is a noticeable difference, please write 
back telling us, and you might need to buy some other mFX. If not, 
then you will contribute supporting our findings and the 2101 should 
be just right for you. 

Seriously, in doing all this, I also came to realize that there are 
several aspects involved in the algorithm programming that can 
affect your sound (positively or not, it's up to you to judge it) 
that you have to be careful and keep this in mind in order to really 
obtain the most from the 2101. Please, let us know.

Gus.

--- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, "Pedro Ferreira" 
<pedro_mig_ferreira@n...> wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> I have bought a high quality pre to go with my 2101, and I have 
noticed that
> the 2101 was not that good, converters related, it takes a lot of 
sound
> quality and attack either I use it though the pre-in or the 
effects-loop-in.
> 
> Does any one know how to upgrade de converters or install a SPID 
or ADAT
> input so that we can inject the signal directly already converted?
> 
> I love this processor, but I might have to replace it if I don't 
improve the
> converters and sell myself to TCelectronic. Please don't let me do 
so.
> 
>  
> 
> Any help would be good.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Pedro Ferreira






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: [gsp-2101] Re: Converters

2004-12-16 by Brian Hansen

It's taken a bit of work, but I've gotten, at least what I consider to be a
good sound out of the Dual Chorus, and the Stereo Chorus.

I've also had a bit of good luck using 2 mono Detuners for that Van Halen
type sound.  One is set a bit flat, and the other is set a bit sharp.  But
the two main patches I use both have chorus on them.

Blessings,

Brian
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pedro Ferreira" <pedro_mig_ferreira@...>
To: <gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 2:17 PM
Subject: RE: [gsp-2101] Re: Converters



Here's what I have found, and it's very obvious...

- Some effects sound better then others;
- Some effects take more processing power then others;
- Not all effects modules take the same processing time;
- The same effects modules take the same time to process the signal no mater
how many, or how less effects you place in an algorithm or their sequence;


What does all this has to do with converters????
- Nothing and everything.

So:

1\ufffd - If a module is not very good, sound won't be good no matter how many
bits you have in the A/D or D/A converter (not talking about extremes like 8
bits of course, talking about 18 to 20 or 20 to 24).

2\ufffd - If a module takes to much time to process your signal you tend to think
it's not so good because your hands and ears are expecting something they
find normal (action/reaction).

3\ufffd - If in a module the sound if mixed with it self and or modulated, it's
normal that there will be some wave cancellation effects and frequency
boosts.

Conclusion:

My message about trying to get help to improve the quality of the sound by
changing the converters is unnecessary.
I was trying to fix something that could never be fixed. It's true that it
might improve sound a bit, but not so much that I could say it makes sense
to do so.
When using modules such as Detuners and Pitch Shifters sound tends to be not
so good and there's no ADA converter in the world that could improve this.
If I want the high quality version of this effects I have to buy a faster
and more powerful unit like the TCElectronic (the 2120 has some high quality
ones too, unfortunately not as good).
I love the 2101, it's the best unit I have ever had not because it sounds
ultra cool, but because I can do everything with it. Along the years I have
learn to love this machine and live with its flaws and walk around them.

To end here's a list of the effects modules not so good that can damage your
sound if used in line (unfortunately some of them sound better like this and
not in parallel):

- 4 Phase Chorus
- Stereo Dual Chorus
- Pitch Shifter
- Dual Pitch Shifter
- Stereo Pitch Shifter
- Smooth Pitch Shifter
- Mono Detuner
- Dual Detuner
- Stereo Detuner
- Harmony
- Stereo Dual Detuner
- 4-Voice Detuner
- Arpeggiator
- Stereo Arpeggiator
- Whammy
- Programmable Whammy
- Smooth Whammy

Hoppe I could help any one that felt like the 2101 was not up to the job any
more.

Please say what you think about the modules I chose, please tell what are
the one you think don't belong in the list and the one that should be.

2101 RULEZZZZZZ,
Pedro Ferreira




-----Mensagem original-----
De: gusfmm [mailto:gusfmm@...]
Enviada: quarta-feira, 15 de Dezembro de 2004 18:35
Para: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
Assunto: [gsp-2101] Re: Converters



Pedro,

Forgot to suggest something to you.

Pick any patch you don't use on the 2101. Edit the algo and get rid
of everything in it. Save the algo. Go back to the program and turn
everything OFF, turn volume to 0dB and EQ totally flat.

Connect your guitar to the 2101. Connect the 2101 FX loop send to
your new pre-amp input. Connect the output of your new pre-amp to
the 2101 FX loop return.

Go to the last module/step of your program on the 2101, which ought
to be the global wet-dry mixer. Crank it all the way to WET 100%
(although if you've done everything I've said this shouldn't matter
at all).

Play. If you feel there is a noticeable difference, please write
back telling us, and you might need to buy some other mFX. If not,
then you will contribute supporting our findings and the 2101 should
be just right for you.

Seriously, in doing all this, I also came to realize that there are
several aspects involved in the algorithm programming that can
affect your sound (positively or not, it's up to you to judge it)
that you have to be careful and keep this in mind in order to really
obtain the most from the 2101. Please, let us know.

Gus.

--- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, "Pedro Ferreira"
<pedro_mig_ferreira@n...> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have bought a high quality pre to go with my 2101, and I have
noticed that
> the 2101 was not that good, converters related, it takes a lot of
sound
> quality and attack either I use it though the pre-in or the
effects-loop-in.
>
> Does any one know how to upgrade de converters or install a SPID
or ADAT
> input so that we can inject the signal directly already converted?
>
> I love this processor, but I might have to replace it if I don't
improve the
> converters and sell myself to TCelectronic. Please don't let me do
so.
>
>
>
> Any help would be good.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pedro Ferreira







Yahoo! Groups Links













Yahoo! Groups Links

One more about tubes

2004-12-18 by Pedro Ferreira

- Witch is V1 and V2?
- To get less gain in "Clean Tube" what is the tube I should use?
- Sovtek 12AX7PLS or Electro Harmonix??

Re: [gsp-2101] One more about tubes

2004-12-18 by Adrian Teo

You can switch them to lower gain 12AU7 or 12AY7 tubes. The AX series 
has the highest gain of the 12A-7 series.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Dec 18, 2004, at 10:30 AM, Pedro Ferreira wrote:

> - Witch is V1 and V2?
>  - To get less gain in "Clean Tube" what is the tube I should use?
>  - Sovtek 12AX7PLS or Electro Harmonix??
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> ADVERTISEMENT
> <121504_y1204_b_300250a.gif>
> <l.gif>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> 	• 	To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gsp-2101/
>  
> 	• 	 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> gsp-2101-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>  
> 	• 	 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
> Service.
>
>

Re: One more about tubes

2004-12-18 by saber540ltd

V1 is the tube closest to the front panel.
Clean Tube uses only V1.
For Distorted and Saturated Tube settings, the signal goes through 
both V1 and V2 in series.

--- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, "Pedro Ferreira" 
<pedro_mig_ferreira@n...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> - Witch is V1 and V2?
> - To get less gain in "Clean Tube" what is the tube I should use?
> - Sovtek 12AX7PLS or Electro Harmonix??

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.