Re: [lpc2000] Atmel SAM7
2004-03-17 by capiman@t-online.de
Manny thanks for the info ! But they are available as samples first in 3Q04, in production 4Q04. Beside the SAM7A3 the flash / ram size is smaller, but they
Messages
Browse messages
Page 299 of 329 · 16407 messages matched
Re: [lpc2000] Atmel SAM7
2004-03-17 by David Willmore
... Oh, yeah, that SAM7S32 looks like it s aimed right at the people who think a LPC2104 is too big. :) Nice family of chips--when it ships. So, the big
Atmel SAM7
2004-03-17 by Pablo Bleyer Kocik
Hello. Atmel has recently announced their SAM7 line product of smart ARM uCs (http://www.at91.com/www/phpBB2/viewtopic.php4?t=24). Specs are very similar to
Re: [lpc2000] ISP Problems
2004-03-17 by capiman@t-online.de
Have a look at http://www.clibb.de and go to lpc21isp. There you see how you can call the original philips utility by command line (at least older version
about 2119 jtag
2004-03-17 by hesitjin
I ve just got a 2119,and I wonder how to enter the Debug mode of 2119. Although the user manual said that LOW on RTCK while RESET is LOW, enables pins
Re: ISP Problems
2004-03-17 by janek_szymanski
would it be very difficult to put a simple GUI instead ? ... command ... noise, ... We
Re: [lpc2000] ISP Problems
2004-03-17 by Peter Kuhar
It would be nice, if we would be able to run ISP utility from command line (noninteractive) regards, Pero
ISP Problems
2004-03-17 by philips_apps
It has been brought to our attention that sometimes (due to noise, hardware personalities etc) that it may take several synchronization attempts to autobaud
Re: [lpc2000] RE: Looking for TCP/IP stack
2004-03-16 by Bogdan Marinescu
It s quite simple really, I only had the board and the C compiler, not the TCP/IP stack. The eZ80 is a nice processor, but it s no match for an ARM IMHO. If
RE: Looking for TCP/IP stack
2004-03-16 by r_stickley
Thanks for the heads up on this! And of course no good deed goes unpunished, maybe you could answer another question... Just wondering how the uIP (or LWIP?)
Looking for TCP/IP stack
2004-03-16 by Owen Mooney
You can buy the book! There is an excellent text TCP/IP lean available from amazon.com. It s really clear and easy to read. It contains and describes code
Re: [lpc2000] Looking for TCP/IP stack
2004-03-16 by Michael Anburaj
Try LwIP on top of uCOS-II. You can find ARM ports for uCOS-II on my site; and also uCOS_LwIP port. http://geocities.com/michaelanburaj/ Hope this is helpful!
Re: [lpc2000] file upload: Modified ISP tool
2004-03-16 by capiman@t-online.de
Hello Charles, hello Soeren, first again many thanks for your changes ! I sent you an email, that i merge your changes in. And doing this as hobbyist restricts
Re: Choosing an IDE for the LPC2114
2004-03-16 by golssa
Hi Hugh, I used 1.07. Hopefully 1.13 will be improved. Will the upgrade (from 60-days to 32KBytes) be automatic for the entry level kit? ... using ...
Re: Powerconsumption of the LPC2106
2004-03-16 by philips_apps
Hi Andreas, just an extimate but based on some measurements. All the peripherals you mentioned should add less than 10 mA to the 1.8V power supply running at
Re: Uart 0, getting started
2004-03-16 by Richard
Remove J10 after using the ISP Flash Utility or the default state of the DTR line will hold the micro in reset. Richard ... 2129. I ... something. I ...
Re: [lpc2000] Re: running FIQ code from ram?
2004-03-16 by Robert Adsett
... Since it works for the IRQ (and it seems important to you) you must have an idea of how much this improves the response time. What are you seeing? Robert
Exception vector relocation
2004-03-16 by Peter Kuhar
how can i relocate exception vectors to ram /Pero
Powerconsumption of the LPC2106
2004-03-16 by didgiei
Hallo there, I need some help with a rough powerestimation for an possible aplication an the LPC2105. I know that an estimation without a dedicated Hardware
Re: [lpc2000] Re: running FIQ code from ram?
2004-03-16 by Peter Kuhar
I m trying to use ADS1.2. The FIQ code is very short, so i would like to gain the time, needed for MAM to load his buffers. I was trying to do it like this:(it
RE: [lpc2000] Re: Choosing an IDE for the LPC2114
2004-03-16 by Hugh O'Keeffe
Hi Golssa, I m surprised about your comments re:flash programming/debugging using Ashling tools. What version of our tools are you using ? We completely
Re: [lpc2000] Looking for TCP/IP stack
2004-03-16 by Matthias Weingart
www.opentcp.org I only know it, have not used it yet. M.
file upload: Modified ISP tool
2004-03-16 by embeddedjanitor
Hi All I modified Martin s lpc21isp ISP tool a few days back and emailed him, but didn t get a response so I ve posted the modified version on the group.
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Looking for TCP/IP stack
2004-03-16 by Bogdan Marinescu
I agree. Look at uIP, it took me less than a sunday afternoon to port it to an eZ80 board with a CS8900 controller. And I didn t have the driver for CS8900. My
Re: Choosing an IDE for the LPC2114
2004-03-16 by embeddedjanitor
... code ... resources ... your ... I m a sucker for gcc + gdb/insight. I use this on both Winxx(with Cygwin) and Linux and have used these to deliver product.
Re: running FIQ code from ram?
2004-03-16 by embeddedjanitor
... run ... On an LPC210x with MAM enabled, it isn t that obvious that you will get a huge performance kick from running an FIQ from RAM. This might be a case
Re: Looking for TCP/IP stack
2004-03-16 by embeddedjanitor
... be ... stack ... a ... Generally I d say that TCP/IP stacks would be written mainly in C and thus CPU neutral. Have a grub around various LGPL and similar
Re: [lpc2000] running FIQ code from ram?
2004-03-16 by Robert Adsett
... What compiler? Also how much better response are you expecting? Robert Freedom has no meaning of itself. There are always restrictions, be they legal,
running FIQ code from ram?
2004-03-16 by Peter Kuhar
Hello, I would like to copy FIQ code from flash to ram a startup and then run FIQ code from RAM(better response). How can i do that in C. /Pero
Re: Choosing an IDE for the LPC2114
2004-03-15 by golssa
I worked with the Ashling tools too. Consider them if you need a good hardware board. But their debugger constantly runs into a no more hardware resources -
Looking for TCP/IP stack
2004-03-15 by r_stickley
Wondering if anyone has any recommendations for a good TCP/IP stack. I just assumed that if we switched to an ARM processor, there would be lots of stacks
Need your help with power up problems
2004-03-15 by philips_apps
Hello, a while ago Tsvetan from Olimex posted a message that he had problems if the 3.3V supply came up earlier than the 1.8V, another post was excatly the
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Choosing an IDE for the LPC2114
2004-03-15 by Peter Kuhar
I would consider using keil uVision in cooperation with ADS(arm develper studio) compiler/linker. /Pero
Re: Choosing an IDE for the LPC2114
2004-03-15 by philips_apps
Hi, there have been many ports to support the LPC2000 family already. Ashling, Hitech, IAR, Keil, Rowley just to name some of them (in alphabetical order).
RE: Choosing an IDE for the LPC2114
2004-03-15 by Michael Johnson
Hi Bob, It s worth asking the question: Does the IDE support integrated Flash download and debug? This means that from an IDE you can set breakpoints in the
RE: [lpc2000] Choosing an IDE for the LPC2114
2004-03-15 by Hugh O'Keeffe
Hi Bob, Have you considered Ashling?. We offer a complete range of development tools including: LPC2xxx Evaluation Board with on-board JTAG emulator
Re: Choosing an IDE for the LPC2114
2004-03-15 by golssa
Hi, take a look at the Keil IDE, the ARM support eval is for free (full GNU compiler, 16K limited debugger). Its the best and most integrated IDE, while still
Re: Choosing an IDE for the LPC2114
2004-03-15 by rkd0930home
I am not compelled to use an IDE. When I write code I like to step through it to insure that it does what I intended. I find an IDE to be a convenient way to
Re: Description of JTAG interface (protocol), to use in own programs ?
2004-03-15 by embeddedjanitor
... better the ... programs ... The JTAG interface is supported by the Embedded ICE macrocell built into the ARM core. Check out:
Re: Uart 0, getting started
2004-03-15 by embeddedjanitor
... the ... buffer? ... Some development boards use the RTS and DTR lines to effect reset and ISP modes. Make sure that your serial set-up is not driving these
Uart 0, getting started
2004-03-15 by hellika2003
Hi, I have the Keil MCB2100 (www.keil.com/MCB2100) using the 2129. I have spent nearly 2 days trying to get the UART 0 to do something. I have got everything
WARNING! Virus detected
2004-03-15 by postmaster@plovdiv.spnet.net
Your EMail with subject read it immediately , sent to the recipient(s) olimex@plovdiv.techno-link.com contains a virus or other harmful content. The message
warning
2004-03-15 by house@focus.cn
i wait for a reply!
Re: Choosing an IDE for the LPC2114
2004-03-14 by johnnorgaard2003
... Hi I have also seen that Hitech have a ARM compiler and an IDE. I have downloaded the compiler and read some of the manual and sent them som questions !
Re: Choosing an IDE for the LPC2114
2004-03-14 by thomasleuthner
Hello, We have the same problem at the moment. We consider the Hitech system (www.hitech.com.au) - or a chinese system with the GNU compiler and a JTAG
Re: [lpc2000] Choosing an IDE for the LPC2114
2004-03-14 by J.C. Wren
Just out of curiosity, why do you feel compelled to use an IDE? --jc
Choosing an IDE for the LPC2114
2004-03-14 by rkd0930home
Hi, I will be starting a new project using the LPC2114 and I have to decide on an IDE to do the development. I have been considering the Rowley Crossworks and
Ashling update for the LPC2214 (144 Pin chips)
2004-03-14 by helicopterproject2003
I was just wondering where we stand on the Ashling GNU, AsIDE and Pathfinder updates for the LPC2214 and other 144 pin Philips chips. Last I heard was this
Re: Bigger RAM in 2129
2004-03-14 by redsp@yahoo.com
... would ... the ... used ... Li ... Vdd ... I guess I am not sure I understand why you would have a separate RTC if you are not going to provide for a
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Writing to Flash
2004-03-14 by Robert Adsett
... They may also wish to update the flash (and its programming algorithm) and that s harder to do if users have been programming the algorithm themselves