Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Chmod and chown
2005-01-19 by manu@netbsd.org
... What version is that? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Un bouquin en français sur BSD: http://www.eyrolles.com/Informatique/Livre/9782212114638/livre-bsd.php
Messages
Browse messages
Page 126 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: Chmod and chown
2005-01-19 by Mattias Pettersson
... The new line was there, but I had an error earlier. So the bug is still there, but thanks to you I found the error that caused my problem and now
Re: [milter-greylist] Chmod and chown
2005-01-19 by Klas Heggemann
... Perhaps the no newline at the end bug is still there. Check that the config file ends with a newline. If you se the output unknown token .. at line ...
Re: [milter-greylist] installation problem
2005-01-19 by Thomas Cameron
Running the command: yum install sendmail-devel should do the trick for you, mate. TC ... From: H Li To: milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, January
Re: [milter-greylist] installation problem
2005-01-18 by Stephane Lentz
... For RPM based systems (RH/FedoraCore/SuSE/Mandrake) it lies in sendmail-devel package. So H Li, install sendmail-devel-8.13.1-2.i386.rpm SL/
Re: [milter-greylist] Chmod and chown
2005-01-18 by manu@netbsd.org
... greylist.conf should be readdable by the user that runs milter-greylist. greylist.db should be readable and writable, and the socket s directory should be
Chmod and chown
2005-01-18 by Mattias Pettersson
I m having problems to get my milter to read my greylist.conf. It s in the right place but seems to be ignored. Can someone please tell me how to chown and
Re: [milter-greylist] installation problem
2005-01-18 by manu@netbsd.org
... Where is libmilter on your system? If it s in /usr/local/lib/libmilter.a, do ./configure --with-libmilter=/usr/local -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Un bouquin en
installation problem
2005-01-18 by H Li
Hi, I just download milter-greylist-1.6, and try to install it on my redhat fc3 linux system (using sendmail 8.13.1-2). When I run ./configure, I got:
Re: [milter-greylist] Storing Hashes instead of full tuples
2005-01-15 by manu@netbsd.org
... But you loose regex matching. What problem will you solve by using hashes anyway? Do you have problems with the greylist database being too big for your
Re: [milter-greylist] Delaying greylist responses for teergrubing
2005-01-15 by manu@netbsd.org
... I beleive you can do that in sendmail.cf, can t you? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Publicité subliminale: achetez ce livre!
Storing Hashes instead of full tuples
2005-01-15 by billstewart2002a
There was a discussion a while back about storing hashes of a tuple instead of the tuple itself. It makes the live database much smaller, as much as a factor
Delaying greylist responses for teergrubing
2005-01-15 by billstewart2002a
Teergrube (German for tarpit ) is a system that slows down spammer machines by taking a long time to respond to SMTP. If enough machines are keeping spammer
Re: [milter-greylist] SPF and Greylisting
2005-01-15 by manu@netbsd.org
... (snip) ... Drop a nospf line in greylist.conf -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Publicité subliminale: achetez ce livre!
SPF and Greylisting
2005-01-15 by billstewart2002a
A recent discussion somewhere on the net mentioned that milter-greylist doesn t greylist if a sender s SPF information validates. I looked at the archives
Re: [milter-greylist] An importent news concern to we4softwares
2005-01-13 by manu@netbsd.org
... Well, we can afford a spam sometime, it does not hurt :) -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Publicité subliminale: achetez ce livre!
Re: [milter-greylist] An importent news concern to we4softwares
2005-01-13 by Dan Hollis
... spammer is now banned. emmanuel, please be careful when authorizing members. don t be afraid to send them a challenge email asking why they want to join
Re: [milter-greylist] An importent news concern to we4softwares
2005-01-13 by manu@netbsd.org
... I fail to see how your message is something else than an unsollicited commercial e-mail. Unless you have a very good explanation for it, you re going to be
An importent news concern to we4softwares
2005-01-13 by ideawe4
We4Softwares is a leading global IT solutions and service provider operating from Bangalore, India. We4Softwares, a software development center has made its
Re: [milter-greylist] Parsing errors in the database
2005-01-11 by Matthias Scheler
... Thanks. But please include the filename, too. Kind regards -- Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
Re: [milter-greylist] Patch: Delay reject until after DATA phase if sender is null (was: Re: Null Sender)
2005-01-11 by Matthias Scheler
... No. In step 3 the mailer on mail.a.com will deliver an e-mail with a null sender address to two people on mail.b.com which IIUC is what the discussion
Re: [milter-greylist] Parsing errors in the database
2005-01-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... I ll turn that message into a debug-only one. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@netbsd.org
Parsing errors in the database
2005-01-08 by Matthias Scheler
Hello, I still get parsing errors when Milter Greylist 1.6 rereads the database: Jan 8 10:07:59 colwyn milter-greylist: error at line 2299: syntax error Jan
Re: [milter-greylist] Patch: Delay reject until after DATA phase if sender is null (was: Re: Null Sender)
2005-01-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... So, would it be a problem to greylist the DSN if 1@b.com asked for greylisting and not 2@b.com? I d say nobody expects instant DSN, so greylisting it will
Re: [milter-greylist] Patch: Delay reject until after DATA phase if sender is null (was: Re: Null Sender)
2005-01-07 by Matthias Scheler
... Maybe like this? 1.) Host mail.a.com hast an alias foobar@a.com which contains 1@b.com and 2@b.com . 2.) Host mail.a.com send an e-mail to
Re: [milter-greylist] Patch: Delay reject until after DATA phase if sender is null (was: Re: Null Sender)
2005-01-06 by Stephane Lentz
... Alias expansion case is maybe a case : http://www.exim.org/pipermail/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20020923/044111.html mentioning RFC2505 2.6.1 (
Re: [milter-greylist] Patch: Delay reject until after DATA phase if sender is null (was: Re: Null Sender)
2005-01-06 by manu@netbsd.org
... It s true I have trouble to imagine a legal situation where we would have a null sender and multiple recipients. Ideas, anyone? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus
Re: [milter-greylist] Patch: Delay reject until after DATA phase if sender is null (was: Re: Null Sender)
2005-01-06 by Moritz Both
... I agree. We talk about delaying a message for a couple of hours, not about dropping it. Probably I m not aware of all situations in which a null sender
Re: [milter-greylist] Patch: Delay reject until after DATA phase if sender is null (was: Re: Null Sender)
2005-01-04 by Scot L. Harris
... ... Personally I think keeping it simple is the best option, if it has a null sender delay it by default. Trying to get to tricky
Re: [milter-greylist] Patch: Delay reject until after DATA phase if sender is null (was: Re: Null Sender)
2005-01-04 by manu@netbsd.org
... Reading your code, I remembered why this was a difficult problem. Think about this kind of scenario: greylist.conf contains this: acl whitelist rcpt
Re: [milter-greylist] Patch: Delay reject until after DATA phase if sender is null (was: Re: Null Sender)
2005-01-04 by manu@netbsd.org
... Well, developping against non latest code is not a good idea. I ll try if it applies on 1.7.x. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
Patch: Delay reject until after DATA phase if sender is null (was: Re: Null Sender)
2005-01-03 by Moritz Both
So nobody said delaying until after the DATA phase if the sender is null is a bad thing. Happy to be able to contribute easily, here is the patch against 1.6
Re: [milter-greylist] Null Sender
2005-01-03 by Matthieu Herrb
... I think there is some confusion here. 36 days is the recommended expiration for the auto-whitelist. Here at LAAS, we use 3 days for the greylist timeout
Re: [milter-greylist] Null Sender
2005-01-03 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, that s probably right :) ... That s right. The motivation behind filtering at the RCPT stage is that we can perform greylisting for some users and not
Null Sender
2005-01-02 by Moritz Both
Hi, Just having read the greylist whitepaper at http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/whitepaper.html and was excited, so I searched the correct
RE: [milter-greylist] another bad yahoo range
2004-12-29 by Adri Koppes
Gary, I have noticed Yahoo started using more group servers a little while ago. As far as I have been able to determine these lines in greylist.conf should
another bad yahoo range
2004-12-29 by Gary Aitken
I got something delayed from this range of IPs from yahoo groups 66.94.237.0/23 Gary
Re: [milter-greylist] startup scripts, and some doc comments
2004-12-28 by Gary Aitken
... OK, I understand the problem a bit better now. I ve tweaked the milter-greylist man page in the diffs I sent to indicate that the default install scripts
Re: [milter-greylist] Milter (greylist): timeout before data read
2004-12-28 by Ethan Burnside
Greetings, ... we have the following in our sendmail.cf: ...list.sock, T=C:5m;S=30s;R=30s;E:5m seems to work fairly well in conjunction with a script that
Re: [milter-greylist] Milter (greylist): timeout before data read
2004-12-28 by Tony Johansson
... Yes I did, no difference. Is this not a problem to any else? If not I guess I should take a look at speeding up dns-resolution or replace libspf_alt /Tony
Re: [milter-greylist] startup scripts, and some doc comments
2004-12-28 by Cyril Guibourg
... Hello Gary, Since it s infancy, the startup script provided with fbsd port allows full config: http://tinylink.com/?XgdLfcRsRM For those wanting to live on
Re: [milter-greylist] startup scripts, and some doc comments
2004-12-28 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, it will. ... But if we do this, we ll need a sample config file for each operating system, taking into account the location of the PID file or the
Re: [milter-greylist] Milter (greylist): timeout before data read
2004-12-28 by Jack L. Stone
... Did you remember to restart sendmail....?? Just a mention. Happy trails, Jack L. Stone System Admin Sage-american
startup scripts, and some doc comments
2004-12-28 by Gary Aitken
Hello all, I just built and installed 1.6; previously was running 1.5.3.1 I m a bit puzzled by the start-up scripts provided in both my old version and the new
Re: [milter-greylist] Milter (greylist): timeout before data read
2004-12-27 by Tony Johansson
... I took a look at http://www.rhyolite.com/pipermail/dcc/2003/000923.html and slapped on a , F=T, T=C:30s;S:5s;R:5s;E:30s after Xgreylist,
Re: [milter-greylist] Milter (greylist): timeout before data read
2004-12-27 by manu@netbsd.org
... You re right. ... Raise the timeout. ... It works axactly the same way as with other milters. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le
Milter (greylist): timeout before data read
2004-12-27 by Tony Johansson
Hello, I m running milter-greylist-1.6rc1 with libspf_alt-0.4.0 on multiple RHEL3.0 with sendmail 8.12.11 and bind 9.2.4rc6 I m seeing lots of entries in
Re: [milter-greylist] 1.7.3a - automakified
2004-12-24 by Cyril Guibourg
... In an ideal world we would get rid of auto* GNUthings... Anyway, merry christmas and happy new year to all milter-greylist folks.
Re: [milter-greylist] 1.7.3a - automakified
2004-12-24 by Eugene Crosser
... Not really. After all, portability is much more about writing code than using tools ;-) If you mean my couple of diffs, of course you are welcome to tear
Re: [milter-greylist] 1.7.3a - automakified
2004-12-23 by manu@netbsd.org
... (snip) ... The portability enhancement are highly desirable., but automake is not a very exciting path to follow IMO. Is there anything that make