dst-0.10 coming soon
2004-12-16 by manu@netbsd.org
Hi After the recent talks about reputation systems, I decided to resurrect DST. I m currently working on sorting various issues (making things simplier for the
Messages
Browse messages
Page 128 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Another idea for rating system
2004-12-14 by manu@netbsd.org
... Hum... I swear I have readen the beginning of the line. I just skiped the last words! :) -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde:
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Another idea for rating system
2004-12-14 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, I beleive that. Hum... I ll work on introducing stupid bugs to prevent large scale deploying of milter-greylist, just in case :) ... You omit
Re: Another idea for rating system
2004-12-14 by egcrosser
... General idea is to accept spam and mail from anyone (except those with very bad reputation), but make the job harder (bigger delays, higher chance of
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Another idea for rating system
2004-12-14 by Gary Aitken
Hi Eugene, ... By throttling you simply mean extend the greylist delay, correct? It s not clear to me that this will have any effect in the end, until one gets
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 1.6rc1 and Solaris 9 (sparc)
2004-12-14 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... pettai Dec 13 20:00:55 gemini milter-greylist: [ID 634049 mail.error] local_addr: bind failed: Error 0 It s strange. It seems bind() returns an error
Re: Another idea for rating system
2004-12-14 by egcrosser
OK, I m back from hacking an antivirus module for zmscanner, and full of sh^H^Hthoughts. Maybe too global for this project, maybe not. First, I think that I
milter-greylist 1.6rc1 and Solaris 9 (sparc)
2004-12-14 by fredrik.pettai@vattenfall.com
Hello list! I ve compiled and installed milter-greylist-1.6rc1 on Solaris 9 (sparc). It works fine to compile if you install the following: - gcc - flex -
Re: [milter-greylist] whitelist/timed whitelist
2004-12-14 by Joseph Burford
Dan, ... I have found it easy enough to keep the size of the database down by using a local whitelist of companies and mailservers that I trust. That way the
Re: [milter-greylist] whitelist/timed whitelist
2004-12-14 by Dan Hollis
... Yes, because large ISP has potential ENORMOUS list of ip+address+datetime pairs. Imagine ISP with 50k+ users and tens of millions of hosts sending it mail.
Re: [milter-greylist] whitelist/timed whitelist
2004-12-13 by Ivan F. Martinez
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:34:24 +0100 manu@netbsd.org wrote: MO MO Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: MO MO Some questions to be answered by users
Re: [milter-greylist] whitelist/timed whitelist
2004-12-13 by manu@netbsd.org
... Why not, a new feature that cannot harm. But I think there should be a noaccessdb configuration option to switch it off, like we have for SPF and SMTP
Re: [milter-greylist] whitelist/timed whitelist
2004-12-13 by manu@netbsd.org
... All this sendmail.cf stuff is so scaring :) ... Argh, nobody sent feedback about the previous one! Some questions to be answered by users and contributors,
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: The callback
2004-12-13 by Remy Card
... This can easily be done but this requires some changes in the ACL API (ctx has to be added as a parameter to acl_filter() to enable the use of sendmail
whitelist/timed whitelist
2004-12-13 by Ivan F. Martinez
I started to test an extra feature for greylist. Timed whitelist, to be used when testing with new users/domains, or with that don t like the delay introduced
Re: Another idea for rating system
2004-12-13 by Klas Heggemann
... Unfortunatly, good guys sometimes get hit by bad guys. When checking the logs, I find more then one site, that resends a perfectly legitimate message after
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: A few new user's thoughts
2004-12-13 by manu@netbsd.org
... Try http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/dst -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent le binaire et ceux qui ne le
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: A few new user's thoughts
2004-12-12 by Gary Aitken
... Hmmm, when I look at that and do an ls I get Can t build data connection: Operation timed out Do I need more info to go deeper or determine what to look
Re: [milter-greylist] Statistics
2004-12-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... Please don t post in HTML. My MUA is not a browser, HTML is painful to read -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui
Re: [milter-greylist] redhat rpm
2004-12-11 by Cyril Guibourg
... I don t think so. ;-)
Re: [milter-greylist] redhat rpm
2004-12-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... But will it create havoc? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent le binaire et ceux qui ne le comprennent
Re: [milter-greylist] Another idea for rating system
2004-12-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... Don t refrain talking about your ideas, that would lower the chances of a good thing getting out of the discussion. :) ... I see a big flaw: Immagine you
Re: [milter-greylist] Use of SPF
2004-12-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... 1) Using SPF as a blocking too belongs to a specific milter. There is no reason to do that in milter-greylist. We can afford modularity, please enjoy it.
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: A few new user's thoughts
2004-12-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... In my opinion the easiest way to catch spammer is to use honeypot addresses. Publish such an address in an HTML comment on your website, and you ll get
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: redhat rpm
2004-12-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... Heh, I have no strong opinion on it, only doubts. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent le binaire et ceux
Re: [milter-greylist] Statistics
2004-12-11 by Cyril Guibourg
Alexander Waller writes: [1. text/html]... You should consider that other people may use plain text only mail clients. Thanks.
Statistics
2004-12-11 by Alexander Waller
Hi! I want to count the IPs milter-greylisting drops. And I want to count the good ones. As I understand tubles will be in greylist.db until timeout is
Re: [milter-greylist] redhat rpm
2004-12-11 by Cyril Guibourg
... Hi Emmanuel, $ uname -s FreeBSD [cyril@blackbox:~ 13:44:35] $ grep DESTDIR /usr/ports/Mk/* /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk:LOCALBASE?=
Re: [milter-greylist] Another idea for rating system
2004-12-11 by Ivan F. Martinez
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 10:55:30 -0000 egcrosser wrote: E E E Manu and guys, E Sorry, I feel that I am too chatty today. I promice to
Another idea for rating system
2004-12-11 by egcrosser
Manu and guys, Sorry, I feel that I am too chatty today. I promice to stop after this message ;-) I ve got another idea how to measure rating of the peer,
Re: [milter-greylist] Use of SPF
2004-12-11 by Ivan F. Martinez
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 10:26:28 -0000 egcrosser wrote: E E E Gentlemen, E I d like to return to the SPF issue. E E Currently, this
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: A few new user's thoughts
2004-12-11 by Ivan F. Martinez
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 10:19:12 +0100 manu@netbsd.org wrote: MO MO egcrosser wrote: MO MO I have no real-life experience with milter
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: redhat rpm
2004-12-11 by Ivan F. Martinez
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 10:01:28 -0000 egcrosser wrote: E E E --- In milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com, manu@n... wrote: E Ivan F.
Use of SPF
2004-12-11 by egcrosser
Gentlemen, I d like to return to the SPF issue. Currently, this filter uses SPF pass condition is a reason to *allow* submission. As I demonstrated in one of
Re: A few new user's thoughts
2004-12-11 by egcrosser
... Ah, yes, I see... Maybe milter interface should have had another set of callback points, where MTA could tell the filter what it is going to reply to the
Re: redhat rpm
2004-12-11 by egcrosser
... DESTDIR (not INSTALL_DESTDIR!) is de facto standard for exactly the task of installing into a sandbox. `automake always start target paths with
Re: [milter-greylist] redhat rpm
2004-12-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... The patch define a ${DESTDIR} prepended to each path in the Makefile. I d like to be sure that no build environement will predefine ${DESTDIR} and
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: The callback
2004-12-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... Oh, ok, that seems acceptable. ... FWIW, Ivan sent me the patch behind the scene, and I d like some feedback from other contributors. Especially from Remy
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: A few new user's thoughts
2004-12-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... You might discover that a message was not deliverable (ie: you hit the rcpt stage but not the body stage), but you won t know is it s because the recipient
redhat rpm
2004-12-11 by Ivan F. Martinez
I have made some patches and a spec file to build rpm for redhat/fedora linux. I have tested with RH7.3/9 and FC1/2. The files are available for anyone
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: The callback
2004-12-11 by Ivan F. Martinez
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:48:13 +0100 manu@netbsd.org wrote: MO MO Ivan F. Martinez wrote: MO MO MO That s not really a bekreley DB related
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: A few new user's thoughts
2004-12-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... Lucky you. ... The idea is to keep track of systems reputations: a system that sends many broken mails will be delayer for longer, possible raising the
Re: A few new user's thoughts
2004-12-10 by egcrosser
... bad ... last_update to ... DCC. ... I have no real-life experience with milter interface, but maybe xxfi_abort() vs. xxfi_eom() could be used to tell
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: The callback
2004-12-10 by manu@netbsd.org
... I m not sure milter-greylist should use Berkeley DB. Sendmail s databases are mostly read-only, and generated from text files. If you crash, it s not a
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: A few new user's thoughts
2004-12-10 by manu@netbsd.org
... milter-greylist does not know what addresses are valid, or about DCC. How do you plan to address that problem? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: A few new user's thoughts
2004-12-10 by Gary Aitken
This seems not particularly useful to me. We get very little mail addressed to non-existent users. Furthermore, any mail addressed to non-existent users is
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: The callback
2004-12-10 by Ivan F. Martinez
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 07:59:24 +0100 manu@netbsd.org wrote: MO MO ivan_fm wrote: MO MO I have one idea also to implement, related to
Re: A few new user's thoughts
2004-12-10 by egcrosser
... of ... recall ... owner. SPF indeed has less point than it is generally perceived. What it does allow is building reputation/certification systems based
Re: The callback
2004-12-10 by eugene_kurmanin
... implement ... QDBM much faster than Berkley DB & and more useful in huge volume database.
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: The callback
2004-12-10 by manu@netbsd.org
... That s not really a bekreley DB related problem, you can do that with any backend, can t you? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le