Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 1.6 released
2004-12-09 by manu@netbsd.org
... Integrated, will be in 1.7.3 -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent le binaire et ceux qui ne le comprennent
Messages
Browse messages
Page 129 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: [milter-greylist] [patch] spf.c 1.7.2
2004-12-09 by manu@netbsd.org
... Thanks, I integrated that one. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent le binaire et ceux qui ne le
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: A few new user's thoughts
2004-12-09 by manu@netbsd.org
egcrosser wrote: [SPF] ... Well, if that happens, I assume SPF has no point, then. I just see a minor point: buying a domain costs money,
Re: The callback
2004-12-09 by ivan_fm
... I have one idea also to implement, related to berkeley. A whitelist database, the milter will only read the database like sendmail does on access db, get
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 1.6 released
2004-12-09 by S L
... Gloups ! I was late :-) Find attached the initscript for SUSe (specific to SUSe is the use of /etc/rc.status, rc_status, rc_reset). Difficult to do a
[patch] spf.c 1.7.2
2004-12-09 by egcrosser
... +++ spf.c Thu Dec 9 13:30:48 2004 @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ #include conf.h #include spf.h - +#include acl.h #ifdef HAVE_SPF #include Eugene
Re: A few new user's thoughts
2004-12-09 by egcrosser
... this ... not ... SPF-clean ... is ... but ... compliant ... spam ... I m afraid that s not really the case. What a spammer can do is register a (number
Re: [milter-greylist] A few new user's thoughts
2004-12-09 by manu@netbsd.org
... Well, you don t really win anything. IMO spammers using SPF compliant servers are not such a problem: they have a real server, so their spam will get
milter-greylist-1.7.2 is out
2004-12-09 by manu@netbsd.org
A busy day for milter-greylist. Two releases, and I haven t been able to cope with all the contributions I had today. What a success! Here is
milter-greylist 1.6 released
2004-12-09 by manu@netbsd.org
I m happy to announce the release of our new stable version of milter-greylist: http://ftp.espci.fr/pub/milter-greylist/milter-greylist-1.6.tgz MD5
A few new user's thoughts
2004-12-08 by egcrosser
Hello people, I ve just built and installed milter-greylist, and I have a few ideas/troubles: 1. Submissions that pass SPF check are not greylisted. I think
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: The callback
2004-12-07 by Jack L. Stone
... Perhaps this statement on the milter-sender developer s website had me confused: ...In order to support B/W lists, unknown recipient checks, and a
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: The callback
2004-12-07 by manu@netbsd.org
... milters operate outsied of sendmail, what DB is inside sendmail does not really matter. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde:
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: The callback
2004-12-07 by manu@netbsd.org
... Another goal is to preserve the lightweight approach. In order to scale for much bigger setups, I thought about having different buckets in the database
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: The callback
2004-12-07 by Jack L. Stone
... ....yes, this & virtusertable because of numerous vhosts -- then, mail comes/goes from/to this box through the gateway box. Or sendmail box just relay ...
Re: The callback
2004-12-07 by eugene_kurmanin
... sendmail? No. No need to recompile anything. Do you add users to passwd & aliases only? Or sendmail box just relay to another box? Kind regards, Eugene
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: The callback
2004-12-07 by Jack L. Stone
... ....be glad to. But, does the DB 3+ have to be recompiled into sendmail? If so, I d have to try it on a test box first. ... Happy trails, Jack L. Stone
Re: The callback
2004-12-07 by eugene_kurmanin
Do you still want to test my milter-verify under heavily mail traffic? ... It sounds good always :) It s a really useful... ... 3+. I have not get a corrupted
Re: The callback
2004-12-07 by eugene_kurmanin
... dump ... having ... May be need to use database with transactions? It s help sometimes :)
Re: [milter-greylist] The callback
2004-12-07 by manu@netbsd.org
... Greylisting can cause callback to tempfail, but the callback scheme still have some benefits. When you get a permanent failure, I beleive you have a very
The callback
2004-12-07 by Jack L. Stone
I had noticed that milter-sender has been withdrawn from the FBSD ports a few days ago. In the archives, also noted that the callback really needed to depend
Re: [milter-greylist] "mail from: <>" handling
2004-12-07 by Jack L. Stone
... FWIW: As a user, I agree with the waste of storage & shouldn t be whitelisted.... Happy trails, Jack L. Stone System Admin Sage-american
Re: [milter-greylist] "mail from: <>" handling
2004-12-06 by manu@netbsd.org
... Hmmm... it s true I don t see any trouble with not whitelisting . Anyone has an opinion on this? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans
Re: [milter-greylist] MX synchronisation bug?
2004-12-06 by Remy Card
... Ok, I wrote the fix. I cannot send the patch since I added the fix in my ACL development version, but it is quite easy to add in autowhite.c: - add:
Re: [milter-greylist] Preparing 1.6
2004-12-06 by Matthieu Herrb
... On Solaris 2.8, milter-greylist may grow out of memory pretty quickly due to some bugs in the pthread nsl and socket libraries. It is strongly recommended
Re: [milter-greylist] memory footprint problem in 1.5.3->1.6rc1 update
2004-12-06 by Matthias Scheler
... I think it would be better to abort configure and ask the admin to install the patch that Matthieu mentioned. Kind regards -- Matthias Scheler
"mail from: <>" handling
2004-12-06 by Tony Johansson
I have one domain that gets enormous amounts of undeliverable mail notification messages due to joe jobs (see http://members.cox.net/joejob/) Does
Re: Another MX sync bug
2004-12-06 by Klas Heggemann
This may be related. I find entries in the dumped file that contains the same tuple, with one greylisted and the other autowhitelisted: 192.36.125.2
Re: [milter-greylist] Clarification
2004-12-06 by manu@netbsd.org
... autowhite: how long an entry is autowhitelisted timeout: how long an entry remains in the greylist. ... I use libspf_alt without troubles. Be sure to link
Re: [milter-greylist] MX synchronisation bug?
2004-12-06 by Remy Card
... Ok. I did not know about this since I am quite new to this list. ... Note that this could be a bit more complex than what I wrote. After re-reading the
Re: [milter-greylist] Another MX sync bug
2004-12-06 by Remy Card
... Right. But, then, your log files grow as overflow error messages are generated when pending records are added to the peer sync list. ... I have tested
Re: [milter-greylist] Another MX sync bug
2004-12-06 by manu@netbsd.org
... The memory leak is limited because once the queue is full, it stops growing. Your analysis and your fix seem good to me. Did you tested it? Can I commit it
Re: [milter-greylist] MX synchronisation bug?
2004-12-06 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, this has been a known minor bug for a while. ... Sounds good. Someone test that fix? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde:
Clarification
2004-12-05 by Tony Johansson
Hello, Whats the difference between the autowhite and timeout options? I ve read the greylist.conf comments along with manual pages for milter-greylist and
Re: [milter-greylist] Preparing 1.6
2004-12-05 by Remy Card
Hi, ... The obvious solution is to use a real Unix operating system and to give up using Solaris :-) Just kidding :-) Rémy
Another MX sync bug
2004-12-05 by Remy Card
Hi, I think that I have found another bug in the MX synchronisation code. The code checks that a peer is not the local server (function local_addr() in sync.c)
MX synchronisation bug?
2004-12-05 by Remy Card
Hi, I think that I have found a problem in the MX synchronisation code. It seems to me that a tuple that is autowhitelisted for more time is not sent to the
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: new release: 1.5.9
2004-12-05 by Remy Card
... Yep. I have the access-list version running on my mail servers. It seems to run fine. I want to spend some more time checking that there is not problem
Preparing 1.6
2004-12-05 by manu@netbsd.org
Hi I ll be releasing milter-greylist 1.6 soon, but before I d like two caveats to be documented: 1) On Solaris, it s impossible to open more than 256 streams
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.6rc1 released
2004-12-02 by Christian Pelissier
... Sendmail syslog level not the same on the test machine ? -- Christian Pélissier Office National d Études et de Recherches Aérospatiales BP 72 92322
Re: milter-greylist-1.6rc1 released
2004-12-02 by eugene_kurmanin
Program work correct. autowhitelisted for more is mean that message don t delay, milter- greylist is seen this message and delay it early :) just set
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.6rc1 released
2004-12-02 by S L
... Emmanuel, I now want to only add a report header to delayed messages. I run milter-greylist in test mode(-T) and so set report delays in the config file.
Re: [milter-greylist] memory footprint problem in 1.5.3->1.6rc1 update
2004-12-02 by Christian Pelissier
... 108993-39 SunOS 5.8: LDAP2 client, libc, libthread and libnsl libraries patch This patch correct LDAP, PAM and a lot of libraries and is available as
Re: [milter-greylist] memory footprint problem in 1.5.3->1.6rc1 update
2004-12-01 by S L
... Cool ! Clearly milter-greylist 1.6rc1 memory footprint is not far from the one of version 1.4 on my linux boxes. I wish I could say the same for
Re: [milter-greylist] memory footprint problem in 1.5.3->1.6rc1 update
2004-12-01 by manu@netbsd.org
... Well done! ... In an ideal world, we could check for that bug and avoid using getaddrinfo() if it is broken. Are you able to write a test? -- Emmanuel
Re: [milter-greylist] memory footprint problem in 1.5.3->1.6rc1 update
2004-12-01 by Matthieu Herrb
... Ok, I found the problem. Milter-greylist is innocent. It s a Solaris bug. Solaris 8 needs the 108827-40 patch (which has since then been obsoleted by
Re: [milter-greylist] memory footprint problem in 1.5.3->1.6rc1 update
2004-12-01 by Matthieu Herrb
... Yes, once started it remains steady. ... I ll try to do some off-line debugging, using our greylist.db as input. -- Matthieu
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: new release: 1.5.9
2004-12-01 by manu@netbsd.org
... It shoulnd t be long now. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent le binaire et ceux qui ne le comprennent
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.6rc1 released
2004-12-01 by manu@netbsd.org
... The rotten entries are not reloaded, so you won t have more warnings after you reload. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde:
Re: [milter-greylist] memory footprint problem in 1.5.3->1.6rc1 update
2004-11-30 by manu@netbsd.org
... Heh, the release candodate trick worked one more time to get people testing the beast :) ... Does it remains steady at 220 MB? I d like to be sure it s not