Re: [motm] Has anyone used these modules?
2004-02-10 by J. Larry Hendry
Has anyone used these modules? ----- Original Message ----- ... own is this one. ... I think it looks pretty neat. It appears to me that the panel format is
Messages
Browse messages
Page 252 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Re: [motm] Has anyone used these modules?
2004-02-10 by Marc Bareille
Hi Tobias and MOTM group , I have received last week a couple of TM116 and one 16 Bit Quantizer ordered one month ago to Analogic ACS ... What i can say
Re: [motm] Has anyone used these modules?
2004-02-10 by Scott Juskiw
... Some time ago, Tony from Encore mentioned he was thinking about doing a quantizer. I know that doesn t help if you need one right now. Perhaps Tony will
Re: [motm] TLN 156 problem / question / warning
2004-02-10 by Sikorsky
... i meant frequency shifter exchange rate is currently $1.87 to £1 grrrreat ! cheers paul (also waiting for a pile of astatic microphones to turn up - and
Re: [motm] TLN 156 problem / question / warning
2004-02-10 by Sikorsky
... 3 ... and what happens when i get home..? a gorgeous pair of type 9 tanks were waiting for me - just over £50 all in valentine s weekend..? pah ! cheers
Re: [motm] Yahoo Panel Group
2004-02-10 by David Hylander
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/ModularSynthPanels/ ~dave~
FW: [motm] Yahoo Panel Group
2004-02-10 by Tkacs, Ken
Do you mean the Stooge Panels ? I don t think it s a separate Internet group ; the Stooges are folks on this MOTM list.
Yahoo Panel Group
2004-02-10 by emmaker
Hello, Could someone let me know what the name of the panel group is for the MOTM/Oakley stuff is? I could find it by meyself. Thanks Jay
Re: [motm] MPC4000 sound quality for MOTM?
2004-02-10 by Chris Walcott
A buddy of mine has one of these and really likes it. He also uses it as his clock in a MOTU system. Made a huge improvement. - chris
Re: [motm] Re: MPC4000 sound quality for MOTM
2004-02-10 by Chris Walcott
... Hey, I have that same preamp. Mine has a DI jack and switch on the front. I run everything I can through that preamp. Makes everything sound good. -
Re: [motm] Re: MPC4000 sound quality for MOTM
2004-02-10 by Chris Walcott
... Rupert Neve would disagree with you. I went to a evening talk at my local pro audio shop where he talked about this subject. He tells this story about a
Re: [motm] TLN 156 problem / question / warning
2004-02-10 by Sikorsky
hello all, i had a pretty good look around on the web, and called a couple of rare parts companies, and the only (useful) reference i could find was at Tube
Re: [motm] TLN 156 problem / question / warning
2004-02-10 by Scott Juskiw
... These are good ideas, thanks JH. I didn t realize the VTL5C3 was difficult to get in Europe. Nice to know there s an option. I just looked at the spec
Re: [motm] TLN 156 problem / question / warning
2004-02-10 by Sikorsky
thank you very much i was begining to think i d made a costly mistake (but then again, they still haven t charged my credit card...) cheers paul b From:
Re: [motm] TLN 156 problem / question / warning
2004-02-10 by jhaible@debitel.net
... Just leave the middle wire open. AFAIK, the VTL5C3/2 is just a center tapped VTL5C3. You can also just use one half of the cell (leave one of the outer
TLN 156 problem / question / warning
2004-02-10 by Sikorsky
hello all - hope this isn t too off topic i finally nearly got my TLN156 ready - i ordered my reverb tanks direct from accutronics, but i was having a problem
Re: [motm] Panel order - Quad Band Pass design?
2004-02-10 by Tobias Machine Head
Any general Stooge panel interest on this guy? http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~concuss/concussor/sp8-ss.htm Or this guy?
RE: [motm] Re: So you think MOTM is expensive?
2004-02-10 by John Loffink
... My MOTM has better S/N ratio than my 24 bit audio card or any other modular I ve tested, so it may be more than just marketing. It is hard to tell how
RE: [motm] Re: So you think MOTM is expensive?
2004-02-10 by John Loffink
... If this bothers you a light to the side of the MOTM works wonders. This highlights the edges of the modules more effectively than frontal lighting. John
RE: [motm] So you think MOTM is expensive?
2004-02-10 by John Loffink
I am a strong advocate of using synthesizers for peaceful purposes. I suggest a boycott of CMS, or better yet, a sit-in. (tongue in cheek) John Loffink The
Re: [motm] Lo-Z/Hi-Z (was No 88.2 or 96k then?)
2004-02-10 by Richard Brewster
It s a fine point, but op amps have output current limiting built in. From the ST Micro TL072 data sheet: 4. The output may be shorted to ground or to either
Re: [motm] So you think MOTM is expensive?
2004-02-09 by Mike Estee
... Yeah, it makes a huge sucking sound when you get near the cash register. --mikes
Re: [motm] So you think MOTM is expensive?
2004-02-09 by Mike Estee
... I like the overall aesthetic of the DSC, but good heavens, I can think of much better things to do with a thousand bucks than buy a single VCO. Like make
Re: [motm] Lo-Z/Hi-Z (was No 88.2 or 96k then?)
2004-02-09 by Paul Haneberg
... There are really two issues here Lo-Z/Hi-Z and Balanced Line/Unbalanced Line. It is very difficult to give a really good explanation of impedance (the Z
Re: So you think MOTM is expensive?
2004-02-09 by konkuro
... Nope, that s MOTM. :-) ... Do you hear the price of one inch of shielded wire vs. one inch of not shielded? It s all about marketing... Given the choice
Re: [motm] MPC4000 sound quality for MOTM?
2004-02-09 by Robert van der Kamp
Guys, would this Apogee preamp/ADC unit do the job? It has both a preamp and AD built it, but I don t know if the specs of the preamp are good enough to deal
Re: [motm] No 88.2 or 96k then?
2004-02-09 by Robert van der Kamp
... I see! Good explanation. ... That s quite a claim! I m impressed. ... Maybe this is getting a little too off-topic, but good you (or someone else) explain
Re: [motm] MPC4000 sound quality for MOTM?
2004-02-09 by Jim Black
... Oh, absolutely! As others have posted... gain is not an issue with our MOTM. At issue is the A/D conversion of the MPC. Is it of the level of an Apogee,
Re: [motm] No 88.2 or 96k then?
2004-02-08 by Paul Haneberg
The wrap-around you are referring to does not happen because the lowpass filter in the converter prevents any frequencies above 22.05 khz from making it to the
Re: No 88.2 or 96k then?
2004-02-08 by Mike Marsh
If I read this correctly, your concern about aliasing in a digital recording is theoretically possible. But in practice, the converters will filter any
Sampe-Rate Conversion
2004-02-08 by Paul Schreiber
To convert between non-integer sample rates, something called a Polyphase FIR Filter is used. This was invented by Bob Adams of Analog Devices in the early
Re: [motm] No 88.2 or 96k then?
2004-02-08 by Robert van der Kamp
... I m aware of the 24 bit technique, and the dithering. But I m surprised that no one suggests the need for high sample rates. Afaik, sampling at 44.1 or 48k
Re: So you think MOTM is expensive?
2004-02-08 by Mike Marsh
... to go ... Or *heard* anything that made me change my mind for that matter :) ! Regarding recording MOTM onto disc: the less between the MOTM and the bits
Re: MPC4000 sound quality for MOTM?
2004-02-08 by rreprobate
Gang. The instrument input on a high-end pre-amplifier very often improves the sound of a synth because it presents a significantly higher input impendence.
Miniwave Expander Is Back
2004-02-08 by Dave Hylander
Hi everyone, I have the Miniwave Expander PCBs back in stock with a few changes. For those who don t know, this add on PCB for the Wiard/Blacet Miniwave adds
Re: [motm] Re: So you think MOTM is expensive?
2004-02-08 by nathan durham
... Hear, hear. I ve seen nothing that s made me question my decision to go with MOTM. nathan durham
Re: [motm] MPC4000 sound quality for MOTM?
2004-02-08 by simon@austarmetro.com.au
... Why not just run it straight into the MPC? The MPC has a level control to set the gain right, so it has an inbuilt preamp stage. ... Why is it stupid?
Re: [motm] MPC4000 sound quality for MOTM?
2004-02-08 by Robert van der Kamp
... Okay, so I seems I need to find an Apogee A/D and use it all the time. ... Whoa! This is a surprise for me. Are you saying that my mixer isn t enough to
Re: [motm] Re: So you think MOTM is expensive?
2004-02-08 by Robert van der Kamp
... Jeez, I thought the first mention of the 1/8 jacks here was a joke! Weird choice... - Robert
Calif. DIY Meet
2004-02-08 by Paul Schreiber
http://www.oldcrows.net/~patchell/SynthDIY2004.html Possible MOTM folks able to attend? Paul S.
Re: So you think MOTM is expensive?
2004-02-08 by rreprobate
This is great news. So CMS is back in the saddle? I was this close to tearing into my 2600 myself. That runty anachronism has been seriously pissing me off
Re: MPC4000 sound quality for MOTM?
2004-02-08 by rreprobate
... Bah. In most cases, yes. Most synths, from old stuff on up to today s crap have quite wimpy output stages. For most stuff, a DI or line driver makes a huge
RE: [motm] Re: So you think MOTM is expensive?
2004-02-08 by John Loffink
Yep, if CMS was that concerned about longevity they would have used 1/4 jacks. You d think a guy who did so much service on Arp 2600s would know better.
Re: [motm] MPC4000 sound quality for MOTM?
2004-02-08 by Jim Black
I think the suggestion to use a front-end A/D for the MPC is dead-on. I, personally, do not run the MOTM direct into the A/D, but that is me. It is easier to
Re: So you think MOTM is expensive?
2004-02-08 by ivancu@aol.com
You get to pay more money AND get 1/8 jacks. No thanks, I ll pass! Looks a lot like an Aries (just at first glance). Ivan
[motm] Re: MPC4000 sound quality for MOTM
2004-02-07 by Dave Trenkel
... I pretty much agree with everything Paul says here. I don t have Apogee converters, but I m pretty happy with the Swissonic converters I use. I do
Re: [motm] Re: MPC4000 sound quality for MOTM
2004-02-07 by Paul Haneberg
... From: To: Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 12:10 PM Subject: Re: [motm] Re: MPC4000 sound quality for
Re: [motm] Re: MPC4000 sound quality for MOTM
2004-02-07 by simon@austarmetro.com.au
... How about recording at 88.2KHz or 176.4KHz, and downsampling to 44.1KHz if outputting for CD? How does that sort of sample rate conversion work out, do you
Re: MPC4000 sound quality for MOTM
2004-02-07 by paulhaneberg
I ve never used an MPC4000 but I can offer you some general advise on recording the MOTM. First off, there is a big advantage to having 24 bit versus 16 bit.
Re: [motm] So you think MOTM is expensive?
2004-02-07 by Scott Juskiw
... And then they blow it by using 1/8 minijacks. But I ve always liked the graphics on those CMS modules.