[motm] Module voting time!
2001-07-11 by Tentochi
The dual VCA wins hands down. It seems like several people on the list don t know what this really means to them. Any one that has 2 or more VCOs and doesn t
Messages
Browse messages
Page 449 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Re: Module voting - dual vca
2001-07-10 by jpotter@it.rjf.com
Ahh. CV Morphing. Hadn t thought of that. Thanks - John ... What ... 130 ... be ... motm or ... or audio ... below, and ... most, ... I would ... course,
FW: [motm] VOTE
2001-07-10 by Tkacs, Ken
Wouldn t be the first time synthesis bled over into video... http://www.nearfield.com/~dan/Visual/visual.htm ... From: elhardt@aol.com [mailto:elhardt@aol.com]
VOTE - quadraphonic panning
2001-07-10 by sigma@studiomanus.com
My vote is for MOTM-130 dual vca. It should be possible to connect two MOTM-130s so that you could position sound image in quadraphonic space. Yours, Sigma
Re: [motm] VOTE
2001-07-10 by Paul Schreiber
Ekkkkkk!!! Part of my previous life at Cirrus Logic! Run away, run away! Paul S. ... From: To: Sent: Monday, July 09,
Re: [motm] VOTE
2001-07-10 by elhardt@aol.com
Vote for: MOTM-RS-170A, NTSC - RGB converter with H/V sync separator and Timebase corrector. It s about time we are allowed to process video as well as
[motm] Module voting - dual vca
2001-07-10 by Jeffrey Pontius
... Primarily thinking about fade/pan in cv uses, not 2 vca s (which, as mentioned, the 110 has). Two disclaimers: (a) I m assuming that one can fade/pan cv s
Re: [motm] Re: sampling modulars for a remix + a vote
2001-07-10 by Microtonal
Even better, use a Kurzweil K2500 or K2600 with Live Mode. This samples your input, then processes it polyphonically like any other sample instantly. Instant
Re: random vibrato
2001-07-10 by John
Very kool. thanks for the info Paul!!! John
Re: [motm] random vibrato
2001-07-10 by Paul Schreiber
Both are smooth , but certainly the 820 can smooth them even more. Paul S. ... From: John To: Sent: Monday, July
random vibrato
2001-07-10 by John
A quick question about the random and vibrato outs on the 101. it says on pauls website that the vibrato output is a wandering sine wave if the switch is set
Re: [motm] VOTE
2001-07-09 by joe pavone
you can never have enough vcos. my vote is for uVCO first ... and I *wish* the SEM filter was next..... ...jp
Re: Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by Mike Marsh
And even if it s not on the list: * SEM Filter * Any other filters you can dream up (including Moog ladder) Mike ... considering
RE: [motm] Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
1) Pulse Divider 2) uVCO 3) VCA However, I d also like to voice my desire for the preamp! That s really my #1 desire; it would free up my mixer. Secondly,
Re: sampling modulars for a remix + a vote
2001-07-09 by Eric Frampton
... Boy it was good to read this. I thought I was the only one thinking in these terms (mention this kind of stuff on the AH list and the kids run around
Re: [motm] Module voting time
2001-07-09 by Christopher Jeris
My votes: (1) Dual VCA by a long shot. I know my 110 has two VCA s in it, not just one, but I would rather have two _different_ dual VCA modules than get
[motm] Module voting
2001-07-09 by gjalass
Just to add my view: 1. Dual VCA/Panner/Fader 2. Pulse Divider 3. something else like Env Follow & Pre Amp or a Quantizer The uVCO would be a nice addition
vote
2001-07-09 by Vehorn, Benjamin
I m voting for the Dual VCA/pan/fade.
My Vote
2001-07-09 by thomas white
I am one of the guys out here shooting for Polyphony so I vote for the micro-VCO. I will have each voice be one 300 VCO and one micro-VCO. Of course I also
a better way to vote
2001-07-09 by mark@indole.net
This list is run from Yahoogroups. Yahoogroups provides an easy to use polling feature. The moderator sets up a poll, then everyone on the list can go vote
Re: Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by andyfinch@lowerbarn.freeserve.co.uk
I ll stick my neck out and vote for the uVCO. Cheers, Andy.
Re: [motm] Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by George Kisslak
I vote for the following: 1st - Dual-VCA close 2nd - Pulse-Divider 3rd - uVCO Obviously, I see the need for all three of these! A pulse divider would good
Re: Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by jpotter@it.rjf.com
Why don t you give a shot at convincing the rest of us Jeff. What type of applications have you been thinking of? ... I ve ... have
Re: [motm] Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by Scott Juskiw
I have to agree completely with Microtonal on this one, my preferences are also... 1. Dual VCA/Panner/Fader 2. Pulse Divider 3. NOT the microVCO, something
MOTM record release!
2001-07-09 by David Bivins
Well, Puffboy beat me to vinyl, but that s o.k. I ll get im later. ;) Thanks to the redoubtable Peter Tang (fellow MOTMer), I have a record that s just now
Re: [motm] Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by Nathan Hunsicker
310, but i d like to cast two unlisted votes for the preamp and the envelope follower (not all of us are keyboard players) -Nate ... Please reply to:
Re: [motm] Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by ivancu@aol.com
a) MOTM-130 Dual VCA w/Pan & Fade as before That s my vote, and I m sticking to it. And no, I don t live in Florida. Ivan
vote
2001-07-09 by klem klemmingberg
uVCO tom r
Re: [motm] Some insight into module selection process
2001-07-09 by bleeped
... don t forget humble and modest. :) bleep. out.
sampling modulars for a remix
2001-07-09 by David Bivins
Hey folks, Thought some of you might be interested in this. Paul Wagorn/Puffboy asked me to remix a track of his. I basically re-recorded it, using my own
Some insight into module selection process
2001-07-09 by Paul Schreiber
Several points (all good and valid) have been brought up, so here s a quick run-down of my semi-organized thought processes. These are in order of how I judge
Re: Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by doc@trocarrecords.com
h3y all, the dual vca gets me first vote, but when any of these are built, i will buy. i am very much lookin forward to this one, but can easily find uses
Re: [motm] Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by Jeffrey Pontius
... This will add a lot of functionality, externally and internally. I ve been thinking about what I can do with this module for months and have concluded
Re: [motm] VOTE
2001-07-09 by Microtonal
I agree with Tom s ordering, though not with all of his arguments. My vote is for: 1. Dual VCA/Panner/Fader 2. Pulse Divider 3. NOT the microVCO, something
FW: [motm] VOTE
2001-07-09 by Tkacs, Ken
... VCOs? ... . If another VCO were to be designed, I d vote for a 2U DUAL-VCO like on the Oberheim SEM. Sure, I have four MOTM-300s, which means only eight
Re: Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by jpotter@it.rjf.com
In my order of preference... 1. MOTM-310 MicroVCO 2. MOTM-130 Dual VCA w/Pan & Fade as before 3. MOTM-??? VC d Pulse Divider JP
VOTE
2001-07-09 by mbedtom@aol.com
I usually sit on the sidelines, but I think I ll speak up now. My vote is for the VCA. A 1U VCO is nice, but doesn t everyone already have at least one or two
RE: [motm] Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by Gur Milstein
Hi my vote for C , the VC d Pulse divider! thanx Gur Milstein
Re: [motm] Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by The Old Crow
... C! Crow /**/
Re: [motm] Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by sikorsky
... purely from a selfish point of view, i d go for the pulse divider first cheers paul b
Vote!
2001-07-09 by Dave Fulton
I vote for the following! 1st:VC Divider 2nd:VCO 3rd:VCA/Panner Dave
Re: Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by mate_stubb@yahoo.com
Divider. Moe
Re: Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by Mike Marsh
I vote for the Divider, then the VCO, then the Dual VCA. What features will be in the VCO? I heard that you were considering continuously variable (and under
RE: [motm] Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by Mike B. Fisher
My vote: Pulse divider, definitely! that would be an excellent addition to the MOTM line. Mike ... From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@airmail.net] Sent:
RE: [motm] Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by Aardvark-mi
I will cast my vote for C , the VC d Pulse divider! Al Wagner ... From: Paul Schreiber [mailto:synth1@airmail.net] Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 10:52 PM To:
Module voting time!
2001-07-09 by Paul Schreiber
OK, I ran across a stash of CEM3330s today, new in the tube (from Ensoniq, actually). This means the MOTM-110 has an extra 4 months of life left.
Re: [motm] Signal to Noise Ratio
2001-07-08 by Microtonal
Revised numbers, taking my patchbay, mixer and some cables out of the equation. banana jack system: -82.43 dB RMS (using shielded banana/1/4 cable to mult)
Re: [motm] Signal to Noise Ratio
2001-07-08 by Paul Schreiber
The mixer is the noisy thing in the loop. I read -91.5dB without a mixer. Also, the filters use vintage 4558 op amps which are adding some as well.
Signal to Noise Ratio
2001-07-08 by Microtonal
Has anyone else had results like this? banana jack modular synthesizer, circa 1994-1995 Filter to vca to mixer, no signal input to filter, no other patches,
Progress on stooge panels,etc
2001-07-07 by J. Larry Hendry
I apologize for the bandwidth for those of you that do not have stooge panels on order. However, 60 of you do, so mailing to the list was the easiest way to