New 200e modules!
2009-07-31 by kkonkkrete
Great news about the reincarnation of the 259e! Just a shame that I'm not within the intended age group... For those that have not yet seen: http://www.buchla.com/series200e.html
Messages
Browse messages
Page 19 of 56 · 2773 messages matched
Re: [200e] I finally ordered my 200e system!
2009-07-16 by Brian Whittington
Congrats, Barry! I saw your module list on Muffwiggler. Seven modules + the ZO doesn't sound too small to me . . . it will keep you busy for a good while, for sure. Cheers,Brian --- On Wed, 7/15/09, Barry J. Anderson wrote: From: Barry J. Anderson Subject: [200e] I finally ordere
I finally ordered my 200e system!
2009-07-15 by Barry J. Anderson
I sent the deposit off today. I called in my order and they told me it would be ready in two months. I also have a Zeroscillator on order. I will have to be patient. It will be a small system initially. I plan on adding a module or two every year or so.
Re: FS: 261e
2009-07-12 by Heath Finnie
Sold! --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com, "Heath Finnie" wrote: > > I'm selling a 261e in excellent condition with firmware version 9 which I believe is the latest. > > Thanks! >
FS: 261e
2009-07-12 by Heath Finnie
I'm selling a 261e in excellent condition with firmware version 9 which I believe is the latest. Thanks!
Re: [200e] Re: Reissue of the 203 folding cabinet but with "e" technology
2009-06-30 by amnesia
I would buy one tomorrow if they did.
Re: Reissue of the 203 folding cabinet but with "e" technology
2009-06-30 by davidwurth@ymail.com
Sorry but this assumption is correct. I never said that I would make a 203 with e technology. It was just an idea that I wanted to share with the community. I thought if there is enough resonance Buchla and Associates would start thinking about building one. David
Re: [200e] Reissue of the 203 folding cabinet but with "e" technology
2009-06-30 by rick
this would be the first assumption on this list in recent times which is in fact correct. --- On Tue, 6/30/09, amnesia wrote: From: amnesia Subject: Re: [200e] Reissue of the 203 folding cabinet but with "e" technology I assume this was a dream? > > ______________________________
Re: [200e] Reissue of the 203 folding cabinet but with "e" technology
2009-06-30 by amnesia
I assume this was a dream? > >
Re: [200e] 30wls
2009-06-28 by amnesia
any news on this? I want one :-) > >
Re: 201e-6
2009-06-28 by alt_mode
--- In 200e@yahoogroups.com, amnesia wrote: > > 201e - 6 do you get the external power to plug in to the wall power > socket? Yes, at least the one I have has the power cable. It is essentially the middle boat from an 18 WLS. > 201e - 6u 6-panel Unpowered Boat ... this is just th
Re: [200e] Re: 4 x 201e - 4 cabinets linked
2009-06-28 by ezra buchla
if you buy an unpowered boat it will be shipped with the proper cabling stuff for your particular need On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:19 AM, amnesia wrote: > > > I think I forgot to ask the most obvious question. > > How can they be linked? > > I > > > > > > > there is a limited numb
Re: [200e] 201e-6
2009-06-27 by jon schatz
On Jun 27, 2009, at 6:59 AM, amnesia wrote: > 201e - 6 do you get the external power to plug in to the wall > power > socket? > 201e - 6u 6-panel Unpowered Boat ... this is just the box no > internal connections and no external power i think the 201e-6u s the same as an upper/low
Re: [200e] 201e-6
2009-06-27 by amnesia
201e - 6 do you get the external power to plug in to the wall power socket? 201e - 6u 6-panel Unpowered Boat ... this is just the box no internal connections and no external power sound simple but i read it both ways
[200e] 2 software suggestions
2009-06-26 by flowline
hi, 1. Patch morphing on the 225e would be VERY nice dont you think? 2. Linking 210e's, so if you add more than one they are auto-detected and become one matrix, for example as you scroll through the ins or outs, when it gets to the last one, instead of looping back around it jum
Re: [200e] 260e question
2009-06-26 by don hassler
So, it might be possible for someone to modify the 261e to allow external sources? The hairbrained thought I have here is for those who want the analog osc that maybe a 258v could provide, and all it's fm'ness, but with the missing link of the 259 waveshaping? > yes the waveshape
Re: [200e] 260e question
2009-06-26 by Chris Muir
On Jun 26, 2009, at 11:33 AM, ezra buchla wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:57 AM, don hassler > wrote: >> More questions: >> Does the 261e waveshape functions occur after conversion as analog? > > yes the waveshaper is 100% analog, very close to old 258 Typo... it is very clos
Re: [200e] 260e question
2009-06-26 by ezra buchla
really hating yahoo's stupid sidebar formatting right now.... On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:57 AM, don hassler wrote: > > > > Modelmaker??? wow... > you know, we need to record demonstrative parameter sweeps for the line6 plugin . haha > > Hard to get past that one. > Anyway, Ezra,
Re: [200e] 260e question
2009-06-26 by don hassler
Modelmaker??? wow... Hard to get past that one. Anyway, Ezra, I think you addressed the external audio fm before, & confirmed that fm direct from the mod esc worked better. It wasn't clear whether this was ever something that could be addressed firmware, but beyond that, sort of
Re: [200e] 260e question
2009-06-26 by ezra buchla
they do not suffer from the same artifacts to the same degree yasi help me make some sounds with that thing! for the modelmaker. On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:38 AM, buchlajoe wrote: > > > Hi all. Can anyone describe if the fm inputs on the 260e behave like the > same fm in's on the
260e question
2009-06-26 by buchlajoe
Hi all. Can anyone describe if the fm inputs on the 260e behave like the same fm in's on the 261e or 259e ? Or do they sound like a more traditional fm in. I find the fm in's on the 259e and 261e to be a bit "grainy" Thanks. Joe
Re: [200e] Re: 4 x 201e - 4 cabinets linked
2009-06-26 by amnesia
I think I forgot to ask the most obvious question. How can they be linked? I > > > there is a limited number of modules that can succesfully use the i2c bus > simultaneously. it's not an exact limit because it depends on the actual > modules involved. 24 is quite safe. 30 is prob
Re: [200e] Pulse SOU
2009-06-23 by ezra buchla
i don't think i totally understand. what would a Pulse version do? you can easily generate random timings with a single 266 section and a single 281 section. On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 3:30 PM, amnesia wrote: > > > pardon my lack of knowledge about this but why has there never been
Re: [200e] Re: 4 x 201e - 4 cabinets linked
2009-06-23 by ezra buchla
there is a limited number of modules that can succesfully use the i2c bus simultaneously. it's not an exact limit because it depends on the actual modules involved. 24 is quite safe. 30 is probably ok. there's been plenty of discussion of this topic on this list. maybe there is a
Re: [200e] Re: 4 x 201e - 4 cabinets linked
2009-06-23 by amnesia
how do you link them? I am looking to add to my 18wls and looking at 2 more 201e-6 Could they be linked? Ross alt_mode wrote: > > > Yes, it works. I had 4 x 201e-4 rack mount cabinets connected together > in a previous configuration. > > Eric > > --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com , > A
Re: [200e] Pulse SOU
2009-06-23 by Chris Muir
On Jun 22, 2009, at 3:30 PM, amnesia wrote: > pardon my lack of knowledge about this but why has there never been a > Pulse version of the SOU? By patching up a network with the SOU, and a few 281 Function Generator sections, you can get some pulses that are at least unpredictabl
Re: [200e] Reissue of the 203 folding cabinet but with "e" technology
2009-06-23 by amnesia
David Are you going to make this or was it more a thought? Ross davidwurth@ymail.com wrote: > > > What would you think about a limited run of 203s, but with "e" technology. > I think that the one with 5 rows of 6 looks really nice. I came up > with the idea because > there has al
Re: Reissue of the 203 folding cabinet but with "e" technology
2009-06-22 by prscrptn
I want one... --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com, amnesia wrote: > > i would be interested > > prophetvs wrote: > > > > > > i like this idea... > > > > --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com , > > "davidwurth@" wrote: > > > > > > What would you think about a limited run of 203s, but with "e" > > t
Re: Reissue of the 203 folding cabinet & Cloning
2009-06-22 by prscrptn
I believe that the buss board in the center boat of the 18 space cabinet has 8 connectors, but 2 of them are used for powering the other 2 boats... --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com, Chris Muir wrote: > > > On Jun 22, 2009, at 2:57 PM, rick wrote: > > > re: cloning.. I think rather the
Re: 4 x 201e - 4 cabinets linked
2009-06-22 by alt_mode
Yes, it works. I had 4 x 201e-4 rack mount cabinets connected together in a previous configuration. Eric --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com, Alessandro Cortini wrote: > > sorry...i didn't read that part.... > > Yeah i think you should be fine! > > i agree...hopefully somebody more knowl
Re: [200e] Reissue of the 203 folding cabinet but with "e" technology
2009-06-22 by amnesia
5x 6 for me please...:-) 40 is a bit too many for my health :-) it seems to be the year of the case, lots of euro cases coming out soon:-)
Re: [200e] Re: Reissue of the 203 folding cabinet & Cloning
2009-06-22 by Chris Muir
On Jun 22, 2009, at 2:57 PM, rick wrote: > re: cloning.. I think rather then assuming Don is cool or is not > cool with it (be it a cabinet or module or power board)... it would > make more sense to simply call him and discuss your ideas/plans/ > concerns.. I find Don very friend
Re: [200e] 4 x 201e - 4 cabinets linked
2009-06-22 by Alessandro Cortini
sorry...i didn't read that part.... Yeah i think you should be fine! i agree...hopefully somebody more knowledgeable on the subject will chime in... A. On Jun 22, 2009, at 3:27 PM, Dennis Verschoor wrote: > Thanks Alesandro > > But with 4 panels off 4 modules i will be safe i thi
Re: [200e] Pulse SOU
2009-06-22 by amnesia
pardon my lack of knowledge about this but why has there never been a Pulse version of the SOU? I understand Chris Muir has the Pendulum Rachet, but it is my understanding that it wont go too random????
Re: [200e] 4 x 201e - 4 cabinets linked
2009-06-22 by Dennis Verschoor
Thanks Alesandro But with 4 panels off 4 modules i will be safe i think. I just wonder if it would work but i think the answer will show up soon. Cheers, Dennis On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Alessandro Cortini wrote: > > > to my knowledge, the 200e patch storage won't work wi
Re: [200e] 4 x 201e - 4 cabinets linked
2009-06-22 by Alessandro Cortini
to my knowledge, the 200e patch storage won't work with more than 24 modules in the system (if it'll work at all with that many), or 2 x 12 cabinets. There were plans to interconnect two cabinets somehow in order to be able to link them under one patch storage facility at one tim
Re: [200e] Re: Reissue of the 203 folding cabinet & Cloning
2009-06-22 by rick
I would suggest going with Dons intended 201e cases for the 200e system.. its much more portable and lightweight then the older style 203 cabinets..due to the increased functional density of the 200e vs the 200 I would say its probably a bit of overkill anyway (just my opinion) a
Re: [200e] Re: Reissue of the 203 folding cabinet but with "e" technology
2009-06-22 by amnesia
i would be interested prophetvs wrote: > > > i like this idea... > > --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com , > "davidwurth@..." wrote: > > > > What would you think about a limited run of 203s, but with "e" > technology. > > I think that the one with 5 rows of 6 looks really nice. I came up
Re: [200e] Reissue of the 203 folding cabinet but with "e" technology
2009-06-22 by Chris Muir
On Jun 22, 2009, at 1:50 PM, davidwurth@ymail.com wrote: > What would you think about a limited run of 203s, but with "e" > technology. > I think that the one with 5 rows of 6 looks really nice. I would love to have a 40-space 200e case (5x8), myself. That said, there would need
Re: Reissue of the 203 folding cabinet & Cloning
2009-06-22 by davidwurth@ymail.com
I nerver said anything about cloning. I just wanted to to share my idea about a bigger portable cabinet for 200e modules. Of course produced by Buchla & Accociates but with all the gadgets from the 201e. If you want the standard configuration with the 222e you cant add some of th
4 x 201e - 4 cabinets linked
2009-06-22 by m0n075
Hello list Can i link 4x 201e - 4 cabinets together and use one patch storage module once the 4 panels are filled and linked? I am asking because i wanna build an enclosure like my Serge modular. And put the Buchla next to it. Like this> http://modular.googlepages.com/serge.jpg C
Re: Reissue of the 203 folding cabinet but with "e" technology
2009-06-22 by prophetvs
i like this idea... --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com, "davidwurth@..." wrote: > > What would you think about a limited run of 203s, but with "e" technology. > I think that the one with 5 rows of 6 looks really nice. I came up with the idea because > there has allready been a rerun in
Reissue of the 203 folding cabinet but with "e" technology
2009-06-22 by davidwurth@ymail.com
What would you think about a limited run of 203s, but with "e" technology. I think that the one with 5 rows of 6 looks really nice. I came up with the idea because there has allready been a rerun in 2003 for 200 users and a total of seven were made. The good thing about the 5 row
200e Video modules?
2009-06-22 by maldoroar
I was reading about video synthesizers the other day & i was wondering if any of the 200 series systems were modified for, or incorporated modules for video synthesis? Then i wondered if video modules might be a possibility in the 200e system, considering the technology might be
Re: Bi-Directional 210e
2009-06-20 by prscrptn
Thanks everyone for the input/output :) --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com, damon wrote: > > trumped! > > On Jun 19, 2009, at 3:30 PM, ezra buchla wrote: > > > > > > > and backwards. > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:26 PM, ezra buchla > > wrote: > > > > > sideways. > > > > > > > > > On
Re: [200e] Bi-Directional 210e
2009-06-19 by damon
trumped! On Jun 19, 2009, at 3:30 PM, ezra buchla wrote: > > > and backwards. > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:26 PM, ezra buchla > wrote: > > > sideways. > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:20 PM, damon wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> fortunately if it is a firmware option to be implem
Re: [200e] Bi-Directional 210e
2009-06-19 by ezra buchla
and backwards. On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:26 PM, ezra buchla wrote: > sideways. > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:20 PM, damon wrote: > >> >> >> fortunately if it is a firmware option to be implemented, it is no >> problem to mount the module upside down. ;-] >> >> >> On Jun 19, 200
Re: [200e] Bi-Directional 210e
2009-06-19 by ezra buchla
sideways. On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:20 PM, damon wrote: > > > fortunately if it is a firmware option to be implemented, it is no > problem to mount the module upside down. ;-] > > > On Jun 19, 2009, at 3:17 PM, ezra buchla wrote: > > > > > > > it won't do damage, but it also won'
Re: [200e] Bi-Directional 210e
2009-06-19 by damon
fortunately if it is a firmware option to be implemented, it is no problem to mount the module upside down. ;-] On Jun 19, 2009, at 3:17 PM, ezra buchla wrote: > > > it won't do damage, but it also won't work. > i've had the same feeling, sometimes, about input count vs output >
Re: [200e] Bi-Directional 210e
2009-06-19 by ezra buchla
it won't do damage, but it also won't work. i've had the same feeling, sometimes, about input count vs output count. i think it's possbile to convert them in firmware... On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:22 AM, prscrptn wrote: > > > I wanted to test the 210e and see if it can pass signal