Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 1572 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

RE: [Digital BW] Scanners for B & W

2003-05-27 by Anton Pickard

Kemal, Thanks for the link. I realize that flatbed scanning will not be as good as a film scanner - but it is what my budget will allow at this point. Besides

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning

2003-05-27 by Austin Franklin

Hi Truman, ... Hum... Gain is a multiplication factor, increasing exposure is a shift (called an offset). One will expand the range, the other will simply

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning

2003-05-27 by Truman Prevatt

A CCD counts photons and produces a voltage as a function of the number of photons detected over a time window (integration time). So while it is probably a

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Scanning

2003-05-27 by Stephen Kobrin

You cannot. But, is that really a problem? That is a question not a statement :) Steve ... software?

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning

2003-05-27 by Austin Franklin

Hi Anthony, ... Yes, Nikon is the culprit here... ... Agreed. I m not sure that moving the image data around in the histogram (in other words, in the range

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning

2003-05-27 by Anthony Atkielski

You don t, or at least none are built in. You can create your own, though. I just created a generic one for Provia and Velvia slides, for conventional B&W (I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scanning

2003-05-27 by Stephen Kobrin

Hi Austin, I set the Nikon scan software (LS-2000) to scan at 12 bits which PS reads as 16. I then do what I can at 16 bits in PS before reducing it to 8 to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning

2003-05-27 by Anthony Atkielski

... I was wondering about that myself. NikonScan calls it analog gain, but since exposure time seems to be the usual way of doing things, I was wondering

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: Action to remove dirt and dust

2003-05-27 by Daniel Staver

I ll post this in the group since it might be of interest to others: I use a Canon CanoScan FS4000US scanner. You could have a copy of my action, but there s

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning

2003-05-27 by Austin Franklin

Anthony, ... The use of the term analog gain by some manufacturers is really erroneous. The adjustment called analog gain does not allow you to adjust the

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning

2003-05-27 by Daniel Staver

... Well, that s assuming the original manufacturers know how to make even half-decent scanning software. With my FS4000 and Canon FilmGet that s not the case.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning

2003-05-27 by Anthony Atkielski

... Some scanners allow you to adjust exposure time, analog gain, etc., but there are usually severe limits to what you can do in this respect.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning

2003-05-27 by Anthony Atkielski

... If you know that you will only be scanning the image, never projecting it or enlarging it, you can expose the film such that the areas of the image in

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scanning

2003-05-27 by Anthony Atkielski

... Your current strategy seems correct to me. You should use the scan exclusively to extract as much data from the film as possible. Once you have the data,

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning

2003-05-27 by Alessandro Pardi

That s what I used to think and do, too, but very recently I changed my mind. These days I m scanning Portra400BW 6x7 with an Epson3200 using Vuescan, and my

Thread view Attachments: 0

A suggestion about scanning b&w negatives

2003-05-27 by Jean-Marc Humbert

Reading with great interest most of the posts dealing with the optimal method to scan b&w negs, I must say that I am still very confused: with a Nikon LS 4000

Thread view Attachments: 0

Driver Choices/Comparisons

2003-05-27 by bu88ahu88a

Hi, Has anyone done any comparison testing of the various free or low-cost drivers for Epson printers? I m aware of Epson (obviously), Gimp Print, Quadtone

Thread view Attachments: 0

D-max with Ultra Chromes too high???

2003-05-27 by Tom OConnell

Wow...I printed some black background images today on Eclipse semi Matte paper (bought a ton of this when Inkjetgoodies put it on close- out). The blacks

Thread view Attachments: 0

Scanning Agfa Scala

2003-05-27 by Mitch Alland

Recently, I ve been using Agfa Scala, a transparency b&w film and scanning it on the FlexTight Precision II, which has adequate dynamic range for this film.

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Scanning

2003-05-27 by Kevin Gulstene

Craig- Everything downstream from the raw data from the A/D is software manipulation. There is nothing you can do in a single scan to extract more real

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Scanning

2003-05-27 by Austin Franklin

Hi Steve, ... That depends. If you are getting 8 bit data from your scanner, then you are FAR better off doing tonal adjustments and setpoints in the scanner

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning

2003-05-27 by Austin Franklin

... Tony, Pretty much no matter what you do, say, with Tri-X, Plus-X, Delta 100/400/3200, NeoPan 1600 etc. you won t get close to the density range capability

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scanning

2003-05-27 by A. Huntley

Stephen, We ll see what some of the more knowledgeable members of this group have to say but, like you, I always try to get the most information from the neg

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scanning

2003-05-27 by Anton Pickard

Does this imply that if I am using B&W film (not C-41) where I have some control over development times etc, that I should calibrate the exposure/development

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Scanning

2003-05-27 by craig

Kevin The point being that you are being presented a better image due to post-scan manipulation in software as against extracting more or better

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Scanning

2003-05-27 by Kevin Gulstene

OK that s kind of funny. ... Umm, yes. How else would you evaluate the scan. If it looks better visually, and the histogram tells you it has

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scanners for B & W

2003-05-27 by A. Huntley

... what ... Pro, ... Agreed. I d be very wary of flatbed dpi claims. When I first started down the digital path I was recommended the Epson Expression 1600 by

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.