Re: [Digital BW] RE: PS Manipulation
2002-09-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Actually it s worse... I d liken it, for those Rock and Roll fans, to really horrendous overproduced pseudo Pink Floyd or badly copied Emerson, Lake and
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1784 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Paul Strand-like "bronze" Quadtones
2002-09-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Thanks Ken, hey should be another great tool for the belt! Keith [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
RE: Re[4]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Austin Franklin
Hi Richard, ... For me, that isn t an issue... ... Yes, that s my feeling too. ... Hey, welcome to the club ;-) ... Well, I think there s an interesting
Re[4]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Richard Sintchak
Monday, September 16, 2002, 4:05:05 PM, Austin Franklin wrote: AF I think most people can tell when a filter has been used... One issue I AF have with PS
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Austin Franklin
Tim, ... To some, obviously not...to others, it is. Austin
RE: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Austin Franklin
Hi Tim, ... I certainly disagree with that. A LOT of photography is about accurate reproduction of a scene. ... Absolutely BS. How many did USM in the
RE: PS Manipulation
2002-09-16 by J Brubaker
I ve been reading this thread with interest. I don t understand how over-saturating colors, adding noise, combining parts of more than one image, etc. are any
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Austin Franklin
... Richard, I think most people can tell when a filter has been used... One issue I have with PS manipulation, is believing what I m seeing. With a simple
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Austin Franklin
Hi Richard, ... I know that at least I learned not to have so many awful slides/negatives on the light table, by refining my photographic techniques as well
Re[4]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Richard Sintchak
... TA Why, exactly, should they (we)? Is there a law on the books about TA this that I missed somewhere? TA tim No, no law. I should have been more
Re: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Tim Atherton
... Do people chose a zingy colour film because it s a dull drab day? Of course they do (very few colour films these days have a neutral balance) - pile on
Re: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Lawrence Smith
... LOL Lawrence ... Lawrence W. Smith Photography http://www.lwsphoto.com lsmith@lwsphoto.com
Re: Scanner/Conversion question
2002-09-16 by Shilesh Jani
Mark, When you convert RGB to grayscale, you do indeed reduce the file size. But your resolution and the print size will be the same as before. All that has
Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Richard Sintchak
Monday, September 16, 2002, 3:25:32 PM, Tim Atherton wrote: TA Fist, photography always has and always will be about artificiality and TA manipulation (it s
Re[4]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Richard Sintchak
... GJG Are certainly not about taste, rather simple censorship (fear, GJG ignorance, etc.) Sorry g, That s just plain ridiculous! Censorship! I never said
Re: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Tim Atherton
... Why, exactly, should they (we)? Is there a law on the books about this that I missed somewhere? tim
Re[4]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Richard Sintchak
Monday, September 16, 2002, 2:41:32 PM, Gus J Grubba wrote: GJG I m sorry but this feels more like a reactionary stance on a new GJG methodology for which
Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Richard Sintchak
Monday, September 16, 2002, 2:37:33 PM, Barbara White wrote: BW Oh, for heavens sake! Should we also divulge which, if any, filters were BW used on the lens?
Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Richard Sintchak
Monday, September 16, 2002, 2:24:16 PM, Austin Franklin wrote: AF Obviously, if one IS using PS artistically (by whose definition of AF artistic is
Re: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Tim Atherton
... What a load of old Bo**ocks :-) Fist, photography always has and always will be about artificiality and manipulation (it s two dimensional for goodness
Re: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Carolyn Frayn
... I m pretty sure it s an unwritten list law that this discussion make the rounds every 8 months or so... on almost every list I m on...
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Austin Franklin
Lawrence, ... Er, yes. ... Er, yeah...but does that somehow preclude me from responding? Did you notice I was responding to Gus, not to you? I know this may
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Austin Franklin
Hi Gus, ... OK. ... And, the statement is not something I agree with either... ... Bleck! Regards, Austin
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Gus J Grubba
Austin, I already said that taste is not an argument. We agreed to have different tastes and I ve also said that I would defend your right for that different
Re: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Lawrence Smith
... Austin, Did you bother to read the bottom of the message from Gus? He was replying to RICHARD, not to you! I know this may come as a shock but not all of
Wacom tablets
2002-09-16 by K2 Chittin
There was a long thread on this topic a few days back but I m a little behind with my digest. I believe the conclusion/recommendation was the Intuos 2. It can
RE: [Digital BW] Scanner/Conversion question
2002-09-16 by Gus J Grubba
I m sure a lot of people will chime in here with answers. However, your questions are so basic that my suggestion is for you to pick up a book and learn this
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Austin Franklin
Gus, ... Er, I ve been using PS, and even it s predecessor, plus programs out before PS, like Digital Darkroom....for, what would that be...15 years? I ve got
Re: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Lawrence Smith
... Baloney... Lawrence ... Lawrence W. Smith Photography http://www.lwsphoto.com lsmith@lwsphoto.com
Scanner/Conversion question
2002-09-16 by MARK MAIO
Being new to this list and digital printing, this might be a basic question, so I apologize in advance if it is. I am using a quad tone B&W printing system and
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Gus J Grubba
I m sorry but this feels more like a reactionary stance on a new methodology for which you have no experience. I see Photoshop as a tool no different than
Re: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Barbara White
Oh, for heavens sake! Should we also divulge which, if any, filters were used on the lens? Why can t we think of Photoshop as just another evolutionary
RE: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Austin Franklin
Hogarth1x, ... Obviously, if one IS using PS artistically (by whose definition of artistic is debatable ;-), it requires some artistic talent. But...because
Re: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Truman Prevatt
In the 70 s (they still be around for all I know) there was a school that believed that if you even cropped an image you were some how a charlatan. This school
Re: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by hogarth1x
... photographers ... snip... Come on, Richard. This sounds like the kind of arguments I used to have with my brothers when I was nine. I ve got more talent
Re: Paul Strand-like "bronze" Quadtones
2002-09-16 by Vincent Orlando
Ken, nice look, just downloaded it and tried it on an old photo that I am restoring and just the look I have been trying to get. Much thanks Vinny
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Austin Franklin
Hi Richard, ... I couldn t have said that better my self. ... And I certainly agree with that! ... Possibly, but not always... Regards, Austin
Re: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by david_bookbinder@sprynet.com
Richard, I have rarely been able to significantly improve an image by tweaking a few sliders in Photoshop. I can make the image look different, yes, but not
Re: [Digital BW] Reliability of MIS VM bottle labling
2002-09-16 by Jeff Randall
Martin: I think K2 was talking about the Quad VM inkset where the Yellow position ink is the toner. Magenta is the toner position in the Hex VM inkset. Jeff
Re[2]: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Richard Sintchak
Monday, September 16, 2002, 10:25:46 AM, Bill Agee wrote: BA This argument has been going on long before I got seriously BA interested in photography over 30
CIS more reliable than carts in general?
2002-09-16 by thronxx
Hello all, I have a new Epson 1280, checks out fine. I want to set it up for B/W, but have heard that both MIS and Cone are having problems with the 1280
Re: Reliability of MIS VM bottle labeling
2002-09-16 by Jeff Randall
I have never gotten a mislabled bottle of ink from MIS, however I do always check. I have had no problem visually checking the relative ink densities of MIS
Re: [Digital BW] Reliability of MIS VM bottle labling
2002-09-16 by Martin Wesley
... From: K2 Chittin To: Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 3:30 AM Subject: [Digital
RE: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Bill Agee
... This argument has been going on long before I got seriously interested in photography over 30 years ago...the purists vs the manipulators . Most people
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Adding Spot Color and Overlay and other optionsneeded for EPSON drivers..?
2002-09-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Thanks Andrew, as always, YOU are scrupulously honest... Thanks for the straight answers.. Keith
[Digital BW] Reliability of MIS VM bottle labeling
2002-09-16 by Paul Roark
... I think it is difficult to tell the dark inks apart with this type of test. It takes a more refined method than just dipping a piece of paper in the ink.
Re: Welcome back Andrew (digitaldog); what's the update on IP 5.0 and the 2200?
2002-09-16 by thedigitaldog
... I was told this week for 2200 under OS9. Beta for OSX should be soon too. John from ColorByte (as well as myself) were at Seybold all last week so
Welcome back Andrew (digitaldog); what's the update on IP 5.0 and the 2200?
2002-09-16 by lawrencetrek
Andrew, good to see you re back. some of us missed your updates on the ultrachromes (esp. 2200), IP5.0 and black and white printing. any update on the IP 5.0
Re: Adding Spot Color and Overlay and other optionsneeded for EPSON drivers..?
2002-09-16 by thedigitaldog
... No, center is not working. But unless someone is using some really odd paper, I ve had no problem with thicker paper. I haven t tried roll printing.
Re: Adding Spot Color and Overlay and other optionsneeded for EPSON drivers..?
2002-09-16 by thedigitaldog
... Yes, I have with no problems with control over resolution.