Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 408 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

Re: Help....

2007-12-24 by Clayton Jones

Hello Arlene, ... It s not just you, there are a few others around . Unfortunately it s a familiar story. Some people don t mind that side of it, or at

Thread view Attachments: 0

...RIP inkjet printing...

2007-12-24 by djon43

1) At 64, a dinosaur with 56 years of photo processing/printing experience, I m VERY happy with B&W and color inkjet (2200, OEM, QTR, CS2, Nikon & Epson

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: B&W Scanning Quality

2007-12-24 by djon43

Do it yourself. Expecting good work from a photo store is silly. If they were competent they wouldn t be in that business.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] B&W Scanning Quality

2007-12-24 by djon43

In view of the periodic vanishing and reappearance of Nikon scanners in dealer inventories, and statements from dealers (KEH) it s evident that there s a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] B&W Scanning Quality

2007-12-24 by john dean

I shoot film totally also, 4x5, drum scanned. But the market for people buying ccd Nikon scanners for 35mm is quickly becoming a thing of the past. j

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] B&W Scanning Quality

2007-12-24 by AnnMarie Tornabene

And there are many of us that are still shooting film.... Mark Savoia, I just went to your website and I d like to pick your brain about some giclee work I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Help....

2007-12-24 by Clayton Jones

Hello Rick, Very interesting story, thanks. Fortunately I never had any serious incidents like that but I m sensitive to fumes in general and had many

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Help....

2007-12-24 by Paul Roark

Hi Arlene, I m not sure what the problem is with your printer, but when my printers have not been able to clean themselves, it s been the pump that has broken.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] B&W Scanning Quality

2007-12-24 by Tony Sleep

... Absolutely not. It s slow and painful and takes a lot of post production, but I have managed to scan and print many negatives that were absolute swines

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] B&W Scanning Quality

2007-12-24 by James Irelan

... No, not at all, given a decent scanner and someone who knows how to work the software. You ll do better with competent use of the software and an average

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] B&W Scanning Quality

2007-12-24 by Mark Savoia

It is not about the current photographers, they may indeed be shooting much more digital, but about the millions of films, 35mm and larger, to have yet been

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] B&W Scanning Quality

2007-12-23 by john dean

And they aren t going to change. The market for scanning 35mm film is just about over, and no one is shooting 2 1/4 film commercially anymore. I m waiting for

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] B&W Scanning Quality

2007-12-23 by Tyler Boley

... Exactly. That they stated any other approach was custom was a clue. You should be able to do much better with little or no extra cost or effort just by

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] B&W Scanning Quality

2007-12-23 by Richard Sintchak

Used Nikon 4000 scanners are WAY less than that nowadays. I paid just over $1100 for mine new back around 5 years ago. Just got a used 9000 for $1200

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: ... on darkrooms

2007-12-23 by Eric Neilsen

I wouldn t have suggested it had I not done it, see it done, etc. : ) There are many ways to do it. The Pictorico OHP is a good choice for both negs intended

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] B&W Scanning Quality

2007-12-23 by Eric Neilsen

Norm, How much did these “high quality” scans cost? I have a Nikon 9000 and it works very well. Many, in fact FAR too many, scan operators could not punch

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: ... on darkrooms

2007-12-23 by ann clancy

Also, check out PDN negative making from Mark Nelson. we made a wide variety of digital negatives using inkject papers then contact printed them to Ilford RC

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] B&W Scanning Quality

2007-12-23 by AnnMarie Tornabene

Harry - That actually makes a lot of sense. I haven t researched dedicated film scanners in a long time. Maybe I should look into it again, providing prices

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: ... on darkrooms

2007-12-23 by Patrick Kealey

I concur with le Globe Trotteur using diginegs with silver works fine. Besides his work that I have just looked at briefly, another is Digital Negatives by

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] B&W Scanning Quality

2007-12-23 by Harry Lockwood

With a ³high end² Nikon scanner at 4000 ppi, that should not have happened. I suspect they did the scans with some auto levels or curves or the like. I get

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: ... on darkrooms

2007-12-23 by Le Globe Trotteur

Digi negs work great with silver. I have a few prints in a gallery and they sell really good. They are even better because i used photoshop to improve the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: ... on darkrooms

2007-12-23 by Le Globe Trotteur

i use an epson r220 for silver print. the only thing i had to do is put a 3 filter in the enlarger. the epson r220 does not lay enough ink to block the light.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] B&W Scanning Quality

2007-12-23 by AnnMarie Tornabene

Norm - excellent questions...I, too, wonder about the limitations of negative scanning. I have managed to get details but for some reason my 35mm negs scanned

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: ... on darkrooms

2007-12-23 by AnnMarie Tornabene

But I honestly DON T want to go back to the darkroom albeit my ranting. And I really don t think digi negs work with silver prints. And I ll pass on the small

Thread view Attachments: 0

B&W Scanning Quality

2007-12-23 by nsams2002

I recently had a local photo store do some scanning for me of some B&W 35mm negatives. I was very disappointed with the results. Areas in shadow, the details

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: ... on darkrooms

2007-12-23 by Peter De Smidt

... Has anyone done this? I ve heard that you can make decent platinium/palladium prints, but that silver gelatin requires a higher-quality negative, such as

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: ... on darkrooms

2007-12-23 by Eric Neilsen

AnnMarie, With your new 2400 you should be able to make high enough quality digital contact printing negatives fro silver gelatin printing, so start converting

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Help....

2007-12-23 by Le Globe Trotteur

The reason is that nobody process B&W film anymore. Chemicals get bad too fast for me to do it and I do not like the time spent agitating and get dust on the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Help....

2007-12-23 by Le Globe Trotteur

Hi Clayton, I did also started with Dan Burkholder. I am printing my photoshop file with my epson R220. The B&W file as a curve added to it that was generated

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Help....

2007-12-23 by arlenelove3@aol.com

I ve never used any inks other than MIS, and I m about to give up with them and the Continuous Flow Systems, and give in to Epson. I ve wasted days, weeks,

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Help....

2007-12-23 by Gary W. Weaver

Hee, I think the only thing I have left is a silk screen frame and that s in storage 1500 miles from here. Still have some 1-bit scans from the era. That s

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Help....

2007-12-23 by AnnMarie Tornabene

Wow! Those are some amazing stories, Rick...We should be grateful you are still with us. I am so thankful for not having anything like that really happen. My

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: ... on darkrooms

2007-12-23 by AnnMarie Tornabene

Hey gang - Just so you know what I use here: Nikon FM2 , Epson 4990 scanner, Photoshop CS and soon, the 2400. I am also happy to report that I STILL have my

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Help....

2007-12-23 by AnnMarie Tornabene

Hey I prefer grain sometimes.....and why not start off shooting black and white rather than convert..unless, of course you are shooting commercial work where

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Help....

2007-12-23 by Rick Colson

In the darkroom vs. digital wars a couple of brief, interesting stories: My father was a photographer in the 1920s. He woke up one day and he couldn t see.

Thread view Attachments: 0

darkroom musings

2007-12-23 by AnnMarie Tornabene

... Yes, you are right. I was referring to a mentally messy thing. Although I come from a photography background, (BFA in photography - magna cum laude if I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Help....

2007-12-23 by Clayton Price

Hi, Le Globe Trotteur, A vary intriguing thread, and a subject that has interested me since the advent of the digital/inkjet age. As I recall, Dan Burkholder

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: ... on darkrooms

2007-12-23 by Myron Gochnauer

... Perhaps this will work itself out as the technology matures, but right now one of the most disturbing aspects of digital printing is the short life and

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Help....

2007-12-23 by Gary W. Weaver

No, it s nothing new. I was doing this with dot matrix printers (Gemni 10x) and liquid emulsion. Get with it guys!! : ) gar ... From:

Thread view Attachments: 0

Epson 2200 in L.A. Free to Good Home

2007-12-23 by John Hollenberg

I have an Epson 2200 I am giving away. Loaded with Cone NK7 inks (one cartridge has run out). For pickup only on West side of Los Angeles after holidays.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Help....

2007-12-23 by Le Globe Trotteur

James, i ll answer your question but do not want to start a long discussion between ink prints and silver. People do whatever they feel comfortable with. I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.