Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 375 of 564 · 28179 messages matched
2005-11-30 by David Salter
Hi folks, I've decided it's about time I racked up my box of spare modules so am looking for a G6 and an RS15, or two G6's. SE UK based so am happy to collect within a reasonable distance. Must be complete with bus boards and PSU please. Anyone able to help? Rgds David David Salt
2005-11-30 by selfoscillate
hello ingo, i checked the manual and found that i was wrong in my previous post. whenever a cord is patched to the L+ and/or L- inputs, the corresponding pots will be disabled, so they have no effect anymore. i couldn't check the module itself yesterday, but i hope that i find th
2005-11-29 by tkrakowiak
Hello Ingo, i find it very handy using it to shape filter resonance on most of my patches. also check out the files section there are some examples there. > the magic is to make small > moves very correct indeed! all the best t
2005-11-29 by Bakis Sirros
hello ingo-2, the a136 is a great module just needs the correct settings: its A knob amplifies the signal with a gain rate of about 4 to 5. so, in order to obtain a neutral signal you have to set the A knob to about +1(gain to about 1). the same is valid for the +A and -A knobs.
2005-11-29 by ilanode
Thanks, Tom and Ingo! I'm still confused. Ingo, the impact on a sine was close to non-existent. None of the waveforms were able to come up with a result worth mentioning. We were 2 of us in front of the module and both *very* disappointed untill we came up with the Jomox. Since t
2005-11-29 by selfoscillate
hello ingo, 1. the a136 should have great effect on waveforms like triangle, sine or sawtooth, but the results vary widely, depending on the knob settings. on some settings you get no output at all. 2. i use the a136 for complex signals too, like drums or vco-mixtures. often the
2005-11-29 by thomasborax
a little tricky at first for sure. i don't think it will do much for a square wave, because essentially a square wave is "clipped" already. i found it will definitely enhance a tri or sine wave, though not to the buzzy extent of the a137. it shines when used before and after filt
2005-11-29 by ilanode
Hello list, the A136 is on my mind for long time. Recently I had the chance to toy with it for a while and was wondering on the results: 1) On *any* of the VCO's waveforms it had rather minor impact. 2)Dramtic and great results could be obtained by feeding a more complex signal (
2005-11-29 by selfoscillate
hello sebastian, the only info about the keyboard sequencer is the preliminary page on the doepfer homepage. i guess the touchplate keyboard will be available in 2006, but there is no date for the sequencer yet. it looks like doepfer will go for the separated design, as this enab
2005-11-29 by Sebastian
First of all, I 'd like to tell "Hello" to all of You , it's my first post on this forum :) The second thing is my question about planned Keyboard Sequencer, are there any infos, when it will be available? Will it be closer to the first concept (everything in one casing), or to t
2005-11-29 by selfoscillate
hello sam, please check this file, if you haven't already. http://www.selfoscillate.de/a100files/a126-speechsweep.mp3 if this is not what you want to do with the a126, then please tell me about your desired application, maybe i can do some more examples then. best wishes ingo ---
2005-11-29 by sam
hello all i was wondering if anyone would be willing to post any sound examples of the doepfer frequency shifter if it's not too much trouble. thanks! s
2005-11-27 by achtung_999
But they are great!! On 11/27/05, Bakis Sirros wrote: > hello ollie, > welcome to the group! :-) > sorry, no a124 to sell though. > just buy a new one, their are not so expensive, IMHO. > best regards, > bakis. > > > > > > --- synth_ollie wrote: > > > If you have one to sell, ema
2005-11-27 by Bakis Sirros
hello ollie, welcome to the group! :-) sorry, no a124 to sell though. just buy a new one, their are not so expensive, IMHO. best regards, bakis. --- synth_ollie wrote: > If you have one to sell, email me offlist... > > thanks, > OLLIE > > > > > Bakis Sirros Parallel Worlds Athens
2005-11-27 by synth_ollie
If you have one to sell, email me offlist... thanks, OLLIE
2005-11-27 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: Would you PURCHASE a Tendency Mask Generator module, if Doepfer would manufacture one? (the Tendency mask generator at Sonology is a device which you feed an upper limit and a lower limit as
2005-11-26 by brian Manfield
Would it raise the cost too much to have CV control of wet/dry mix? It seems a shame to tie up an additional module when this could surely be implemented on board. brian --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Dieter Doepfer" wrote: > > The preliminary information of the BBD module
2005-11-25 by thomasborax
bryan- you or the singer sounds remarkably like eno. shockingly so. the slightly flat cadence and lyrical non-sequiters complete the simulation. and that's not a dis 'cause i'm a big fan of the four pop records. --tom --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Bryan E Cornell" wrote:
2005-11-25 by Bryan E Cornell
Here are a couple of mp3's I just posted that I made with my band The Picture is Dead. Both feature my Blacet/Wiard/Doepfer system and my MS10. http://pictureisdead.com/sounds.htm Bryan
2005-11-25 by selfoscillate
hello phil, that was what i thought in the beginning too, switching the time range for only a few bucks more would be great. but finally the dual module needs an extra mixer and even more front panel controls than two separate modules, so the price for a dual module will be more
2005-11-25 by p.hendricks
so what, approximately, would the price difference be? for maybe $30-$50, i think the double is worth it, but this may depend on the bottom line price to begin with? so if it's maybe 25-40% more the dual is better, over 50%, then the single? I'm leaning towards the dual unless it
2005-11-23 by phaedra@t-online.de
Or 188-1 for 1024 stages and the further one 188-2 for 2048! all the best Axel "Bakis Sirros" schrieb: > hello, > yes, dieter, i would prefer the single module too. > maybe you could label one as A188-1a and the other > A188-1b to avoid confusion. > bakis. > > > > > > > --- ilano
2005-11-23 by Bakis Sirros
hello, yes, dieter, i would prefer the single module too. maybe you could label one as A188-1a and the other A188-1b to avoid confusion. bakis. --- ilanode wrote: > For a guitar stomp box a switch to change eg btn > chorus and flanger > is a good and common idea. For a modular sy
2005-11-23 by synth_freak_2000
hello list, i have created a new poll about the forthcoming A188-1 BBD module. this poll will only be open until December the 10th! so, get your votes coming... do you prefer a single module, or a double module with both BBD chips in it? best regards, bakis [doepfer_a100] group o
2005-11-23 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the Doepfer_a100 group: Should Doepfer manufacture a single module similar to the prototype shown on the doepfer's website BBD A188-1 page with 2048 or 1024 stages BBD (can be chosen by the customer in his order). The pc boar
2005-11-23 by ilanode
For a guitar stomp box a switch to change eg btn chorus and flanger is a good and common idea. For a modular synth an independent delay which can be combined with another independent one makes much more sense. Regards, Ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Dieter Doepfer" wr
2005-11-23 by Anton Coops
But the lower price is attainable only > if the module contains only one HSVCO for both BBDs. Otherwise the price of > the double module will be nearly the same as for two single modules. This also depends on which current modules can be used to alter the HSVCO-output, the a-163
2005-11-23 by selfoscillate
hello dieter, after thinking twice, i would choose the single module concept too. separate clocks are not a bad thing :-) best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Dieter Doepfer" wrote: > > The preliminary information of the BBD module has been updated. I think that
2005-11-23 by Pierre Zeeman
>I can't wait to see your comments. Bakis, maybe you could start a poll >(very >simple: single or double module prefered). Single, definitely _________________________________________________________________ Fast. Simple. Personal. Visit the all-new MSN South Africa. http://za.ms
2005-11-22 by phaedra@t-online.de
Good evening to all, under these circumstances I prefer the single module too and will install two of them with the different BBDs. The double module is only interesting with independant HSVCOs. I also want to know something about the values of up to x ms for both numbers of stag
2005-11-22 by Florian Anwander
Hi Dieter > single module is the lower price. But one would need two of these modules to > have both time ranges available (down to 7ms or 2,5ms resp.). What would be the maximum delay time ? I prefer the single module too: its more flexible to have two separate modules, then one
2005-11-22 by Dieter Doepfer
The preliminary information of the BBD module has been updated. I think that the main features of the module are defined in the meantime. But there is one thing that leaded to internal discussions in the company and I'd like to hear your comments: Should we manufacture a single m
2005-11-22 by Florian Anwander
Hi Dieter and Ingo >>I think I'll get the tools out of the box, Peter's mod sounds niceeee! >>I was quite surprised about the A133 example, very cool that it sounds >>so similar to the A114. > Even I'm very surprised as completely different circuits are used. The A-114 > uses the
2005-11-22 by Dieter Doepfer
> Great work again Ingo! 1000% agree. > Thanks. > I think I'll get the tools out of the box, Peter's mod sounds niceeee! > I was quite surprised about the A133 example, very cool that it sounds > so similar to the A114. Even I'm very surprised as completely different circuits are
2005-11-22 by Bakis Sirros
hello ingo, many thanks for all these helpful audio clips! you have become the Official [doepfer_a100] group audio clip provider! well done! :-) best regards, bakis. --- selfoscillate wrote: > > hello list, > > here is a second go on the ring modulators. > > 1. > first i made a c
2005-11-21 by Tim Stinchcombe
Dieter has already mentioned the key fact which I omitted last night (I wasn't sure just what your experience level was then), in that the TL082 converts the currents from the PA381s to the voltage which is then output. It is this current conversion that would require separate op
2005-11-21 by achtung_999
Great work again Ingo! Thanks. I think I'll get the tools out of the box, Peter's mod sounds niceeee! I was quite surprised about the A133 example, very cool that it sounds so similar to the A114. Greetings, Ernst
2005-11-21 by Zoran Bosnjak
Hello Ingo, I think that the most musical combination would be playing the loop from ringmods-sequence2.mp3 by A-133 for bar and a half, than playing the last half bar by CGS. Thanks a lot for posting these samples and regards, Zoran >From: "selfoscillate" >Reply-To: Doepfer_a100
2005-11-21 by selfoscillate
hello zoran, when making the examples i was surprised about the different sound of all the ring modulators, but most surprising was that the a133 and the a114 sounded so similar. the standard a114 and a133 had the softest and most mellow sound, the real ring was the buzziest, and
2005-11-21 by ilanode
Thanks! Once more great job! Regards, Ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" wrote: > > > hello list, > > here is a second go on the ring modulators. > > 1. > first i made a comparison between a114 and a133 polarizer. > to my surprise the a133 polarizer can be
2005-11-21 by Dieter Doepfer
The CEM3381/PA381 VCAs have current outputs (not voltage outputs as usual). The currents of the four CEM3381/PA381 are summed up in a current-to-voltage converter to obtain a common voltage output. This is why you do not obtain an signal at the CEM3381/PA381 (current) outputs. On
2005-11-21 by Dieter Doepfer
Gino, for someone who is a bit familiar with electronics it is not a problem to replace the old the transformer by the toroid/ringcore transformer. For older versions of the power supply one has to drill a hole for the transformer mounting. Newer versions of the pc board (even th
2005-11-21 by Dieter Doepfer
Dave, please look at our web site: As of now (November 14, 2005) the A-100 power supply will be manufactured only with ring core transformer/1200mA. The stock of A-100 power supplies with standard transformer/650mA are sold while stocks last. We have no old versions of the power
2005-11-21 by selfoscillate
hello list, here is a second go on the ring modulators. 1. first i made a comparison between a114 and a133 polarizer. to my surprise the a133 polarizer can be adjusted to sound almost exactly like an a114. listen to the following example, first you hear an a114 and then an a133.
2005-11-21 by danv_83
ok, i was trying to use the lf444 quad op amp,,,, and i couldn't get a single thing to happen other than some crummy low end noise. perhaps i'm not biasing something correctly,,, i am new to electronics theory and am only just now getting into more hands on things. i didn't imple
2005-11-20 by Tim Stinchcombe
To do this looks relatively straightforward. The PA381 is a current output device: the currents output from pins 1 & 7 of both chips all come together at one end of J1, and are summed by one op amp in the TL082 - pin 6 is the summing junction, pin 7 the o/p, pin 5 grounded. So yo
2005-11-20 by danv_83
Hi, I was just playing around with the a-135. I basically want to be able to make seperate outputs for each channel after the cv attenuator circuitry. I am having trouble figuring out exactly how the circuit works - I was thinking that the final stage before each channel's signal
2005-11-20 by allanjhall
Sorry for the OT posting but this may be of interest to some members of the group looking to expand their existing A100 systems. I'm selling an A100 G6 rack fully loaded with lots of interesting modules including:- 2 x A111 VCO's, A191 Midi/CV Shepard Generator, A178 Theremin, A1
2005-11-20 by sfrules
'Lo! Found this on another group. I'm sure if you haven't already been there, that it's what you're looking for! ---> John Loffink The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site http://www.wavemakers-synth.com sfrules
2005-11-20 by Anton Coops
thank you! I would also like to read some more about general physics of waves, not specifically applied to acoustics, but a nice readable book or a good website about all the basic properties that are also found in electronics, light etc. I couldn't think of anything else than th