Yahoo Groups archive

Fairlight-CMI

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:03 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 40 of 109 · 5429 messages matched

AUTO: Chris Haworth (returning 24/11/2008)

2008-11-22 by Chris Haworth

I am out of the office until 24/11/2008. For DB eSpear related queries, please contact Giles Ellis. Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Re: CMI Series IV" sent on 22/11/08 0:04:19. This is the only notification you will receive while this pers

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Re: CMI Series IV

2008-11-22 by Peter Connelly

Hi Peter, Just the idea of something potentially being created by the pioneer of digital sampling alone is enough to spark off my interest. There are very few gaps in today's market and maybe in reality it isn't a viable project to develop a fully blown Series IV in the same way

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Fairlight-CMI] Re: CMI Series IV

2008-11-20 by Peter Vogel

Hi Peter C, So what is your dream for a Series IV? Where's the hole in the market, as you see it? Thansk, Peter V _____ From: Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Peter Connelly Sent: Friday, 21 November 2008 5:08 AM To: Fairlight-CMI@

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Re: CMI Series IV

2008-11-20 by Peter Connelly

My cheeks are killing due to the grinning after reading such a possibility. A Fairlight IV. It is the future!!! Thanks Peter :D P On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Peter Kersten synthserv@hotmail.com > wrote: Peter, This news brings a very large happy smile on my face. Thanks. :-)

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-18 by Michael

I think he does mean High-End-Performance in matter of sound. :-) Greetz, Michael --- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Vogel" wrote: > > Hi Tobias, > > Could you explain what you mean by "individual clock speed per voice card?" > > When you say "high end system", do you m

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Some more thoughts, Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-18 by Michael

By the way, one more reason for having the analog outputs would be the sound of them like some people here asking still for voice channel cards. They know that they made the sound also... :-) Greetz, Michael --- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, "Michael" wrote: > > Dear Peter, >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Some more thoughts, Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-18 by Michael

Dear Peter, I would need the outputs as even today with the huge process in sound quality in digital people STILL use hardware compressors, Mic Preamps, effects etc due to their sound. What you want to create would only be a "protools" system based on fairlight workflow and techn

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Fairlight-CMI] Re: Some more thoughts, Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-16 by Peter Vogel

Thanks for your thoughts Michael. I think it will be possible to emulate the random things qualities of the original analog circuits. Of course analog parts do it easily but with suffuicuent processing power I think it can be done, perhaps with a control that lets you select from

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Some more thoughts, Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-15 by Michael

Great thoughts Tobias and great idea to think about a CMI IV Peter, please let me give some thoughts, too... Basing the original CMI operating system and features on a CC-1 will be definitely nice. But nowadays there are much more possibilities regarding workflow and GUI design a

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Fairlight-CMI] Re: Floppydrive problems

2008-11-15 by Tim Curtis

Hi Peter - I really have no idea. I managed to find one years ago. An old guy who's owned a computer store since the '70s still had one that hasn't been used in 25 years, but for some reason he held onto it. You're probably going to have to look for something similar. I highly do

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-15 by Peter Kersten

Peter, You asked: >What do you think it is about the CMI that makes it so special, and does that still apply today? wrote: > > At this stage it's just an idea, although I'm confident it can be done very > well using the CC-1. The question is how many people would pay say $5,000 >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: CMI Series IV

2008-11-15 by Peter Kersten

Peter, This news brings a very large happy smile on my face. Thanks. :-))) I'm sure I'm not the only one on this list with such a smile ;-) Cheers, Peter Kersten. --- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, peter.vogel@... wrote: > > Thanks for your comments Peter. > > I should point o

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Floppydrive problems

2008-11-15 by Peter Kersten

How do I get a alignment disk? regards, Peter. --- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Curtis" wrote: > > Your Drive probably needs an alignment. Where are you located? > > > > I've had to align two different drives in my Series 1. They're not too bad > if you have an alignmen

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Some more thoughts, Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-14 by lancelink84

Hi Peter, I think you have a great product that will certainly fill a void in musical production right now. I think the price to performance/ feature ratio is definitely on par with other companies, such as Open Labs, who are building computer based workstations. If you haven't h

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Fairlight-CMI] Anybody have a Series II?

2008-11-14 by Tim Curtis

Hi John – It’s very similar in sound to the IIx. It came with a slightly different library. There’s a little less high end, but it still sounds like a Fairlight. Truthfully, I get more use out of my IIx because of Page R. That’s why I’d really like to get a later software rev. -T

Thread view Attachments: 0

Anybody have a Series II?

2008-11-13 by Tim Curtis

Does anyone on the list have a Series II? I’d like to get a newer revision software to run on my Series I, but of course I can’t use the same software from my IIx. I’d really like to have Page R available on the Series I. I’m also not sure exactly what revision I’m in need of, so

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] CMI Series IV

2008-11-13 by peter.vogel@vogelfamily.net

Thanks for your comments Peter. I should point out that I have no connection with Fairlight (the company) these days, but I will pass on your comments to them. I think supporting things like 8 inch floppies is not as easy as keeping motorbike parts, but perhaps if I do continue t

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Fairlight-CMI] Floppydrive problems

2008-11-13 by Tim Curtis

Your Drive probably needs an alignment. Where are you located? I’ve had to align two different drives in my Series 1. They’re not too bad if you have an alignment disk. Tim From: Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Peter Kersten Sent:

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Floppydrive problems

2008-11-13 by Peter Kersten

I agree Tim, I already found a site about alignment a while ago, during my search for a new storagesolution. http://www.accurite.com/FloppyPrimer.html I don't have an alignment disk. I'm, located in the Netherlands. Thanks for your reply Tim :-) I wonder if it could be a bad bear

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Floppydrive problems

2008-11-13 by Peter Kersten

I agree Tim, I already found a site about alignment a while ago, during my search for a new storagesolution. http://www.accurite.com/FloppyPrimer.html I don't have an alignment disk. I'm, located in the Netherlands. Thanks for your reply Tim :-) I wonder if it could be a bad bear

Thread view Attachments: 0

Floppydrive problems

2008-11-13 by Peter Kersten

Well, one of the two floppydrives refuses to read discs. I tried a brandnew cleaningdisc with isopropanol. (Thanks for the cleaningdisk Frank R.) It didn't help. I soo much look forward to a new storagesolution.......... Lets hope the friendly guy I know is working on it succeeds

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-13 by Peter Kersten

Hi Peter, Interesting to say at least. However: as a IIx user, first thing that comes to my mind is lack of good service and upgrades. In 1979 I bought a brandnew Motorbike, limited edition even. And even today ALL parts can be obtained. How different is the story for my IIx, and

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Re: Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-10 by Tobias Enhus

Peter, I am very exited that you have a modern working approach to solving the sound issue. A modern solution is ultimately probably better for many reasons. As long as the results are equal or better than the original. As most audio people, I'm also a Mac guy, but if it's to the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-10 by billyrockplay

Hi all - love the idea a of series IV with two provisos; 1. that there be some backwards compatibility with my old series III, rev 5.4 so that i can transfer files and sequences. 2. that the card can work with Apple Hardware and OS since i am commited (like many) to using MACS to

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Fairlight-CMI] Some more thoughts, Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-09 by Peter Vogel

Hi Tobias & Fabian, Many thanks for such thoughtful comments. All the issues you raised can be addressed by the approach I am considering. Vari-speed for sure. No loss of resolution from summing, sure. That's because the Crystal Core is not a DSP, it is a bunch of gates that can

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Some more thoughts, Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-09 by d_40q

Peter, I completely agree with Tobias on this topic. It has much been talked about and I am sure you are well aware of the technical details + allthough I run the risk of repeating what Tobias has already stated, I feel, In order to make the point (to others involved in this disc

Thread view Attachments: 0

Some more thoughts, Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-09 by Tobias Enhus

Peter, The appeal to me in a system like say a CMI-IV, are not the qualities of an experimental platform like a Kyma system (as someone suggested). The appeal to me is much more basic. I rather want a simple, the audio sampler version of a really really good sushi chefs knife. No

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-08 by scott.jim63

Hi Peter, As a newbie on the forum, I was completely stunned when I logged in and saw this thread. I have to say that it would be amazing if this instrument could be brought up to date & fit easily into a modern studio setting, but still retain the classic sound. The studio in a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Series IV

2008-11-07 by bty496052

Hi all Hi Peter. I have been working on a Series IV type system for about six months now. It is a cheaper option than the CC1. Its spec so far is 19 inch rack mount computer case 2,8GB duel core intel chip. This can be the fastest chip at the production stage or can be maybe a fe

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Fairlight-CMI] Re: Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-07 by Tobias Enhus

Hey! For me, sound quality, speed and reliability is the most important. Sound with depth and organic character. More so than track count and flashy graphics. The Synclavier sampler changes its sample pitch by changing the clock speed of the card that the sample is loaded onto. P

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-07 by dvdborn

Hi Peter, I'm an avid Series IIx user. To place my remarks in context: my main samplers are the Emulator III, Series IIx and NI Kontakt 3. I don't make music for a living. Given the fact that the CC1 is the main component I see two possible ways of realizing a Series IV. 1. As a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Re: Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-07 by Jean-Bernard EMOND

Hi all, I think the same Tobias way... Even if, I am Fairlight and Synclavier user, and other synthetizers. For the professionals most important is the reliability of the machine and the return on investment ! And obviously as for all the price ! Me, I practise the music in leisu

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Fairlight-CMI] Re: Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-07 by Peter Vogel

Hi Tobias, Could you explain what you mean by "individual clock speed per voice card?" When you say "high end system", do you mean high performance (as in excellent sound quality) or large capacity (number of tracks) or something else? What in particular would appeal to you about

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Re: Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-07 by Tobias Enhus

I would like to chime in with Fabian on this. Im using a combo of Kyma and Synclavier as my main Synthesis tools. There simply is no high end system like a CMI-IV available today. I would be more than happy to pay $5k for a dedicated high end system like CMI IV. Now, how would yo

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-06 by Marcin 'Rambo' Roguski

> Hi Peter, > > My vote would be on a more self contained version[...] > I'd also like to see the option of having the user interface closer to the > originals rather than the 12million different colours Second- will gladly wait fos Series IV (Instead of Series III) if it's gonna

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-06 by Laurent/LIFELIKE

That self contained device is a very cool idea too. On 6 nov. 08, at 13:25, Peter Vogel wrote: I don't think Fairlight has a Mac version on the radar at the moment. But I'll ask. What do you think of a completely self-contained device, that is, a small PC with the CC-1 installed,

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-06 by Martin Selwood

Hi Peter, My vote would be on a more self contained version as mentioned below. I can see there being all sorts of problems with motherboard compatibility problems and so on, let alone when we next have another update from microsoft or a new round of processors/hardware etc. If i

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-06 by Laurent/LIFELIKE

hi Peter, Is it really a great idea. In my opinion some would pay that price if the power is justified enough. The product would need strong marketing and big artists endorsement support at the date of release, which i dont think would be a problem im sure some of those artists t

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-06 by Peter Vogel

Hi Colin, The Crystal Core in not a sound card - it's a parallel procesing engine that's maybe 100 times more efficient at processing audio than a Pentium-style processor. To understand the finer points, this is worth reading: http://www.fairlightau.com/Downloads/Public/Crystal%2

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-06 by Anders Kjellberg

A self contained unit would be very nice. White of course. Several VGA outs would be nice so we can always have Page R up and running! Being an engineer myself I would like to have a reliable series II and III. I'm fed up with oxide and EOL components! To make a truely great prod

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-06 by Colin Ross

Hi Peter I must say it great and a honour having you on the forum so thanks being a member and thanks for all your input. Is there any other sound card that could be used. $5000 sound alot in todays market for a sound card. There so many cards out there and alot alot cheaper. Wou

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-06 by d_40q

Hello Peter, although I am not a Fairlight but a Synclavier user, I follow this forum due to my appreceation of the original CMI's sound, concept and design. In my humble opinion your exiting proposal to create a CMI-IV unsing today's technology could hit a market-gap, if it was

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-06 by Peter Vogel

Yes, a studio in a box should be possible for $5K. I will have to have further discussions with Fairlight, but I don't see why the CC-1 can't run say 64 tracks of sound/sequncer/mixer. The question is, what would make it more attractive than what's already available? I would need

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-06 by Peter Vogel

I don't think Fairlight has a Mac version on the radar at the moment. But I'll ask. What do you think of a completely self-contained device, that is, a small PC with the CC-1 installed, optionally built into a keyboard. Just some audio/digital/network I/Os and a VGA and QWERTY co

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-06 by Peter Vogel

At this stage it's just an idea, although I'm confident it can be done very well using the CC-1. The question is how many people would pay say $5,000 for this, when you can buy other soft synths much cheaper. I would need to be confident that there is a signifcant market to justi

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-06 by Steve Rance

The SX-20, CC-1 (the Crystal Core Card) and DREAM II software come as a package and can only be supplied as a whole. At today's exchange rate the above come in at around $9000.00 if you supply a PC. This will give you a 192 track Disk Recorder, 8 band EQ and 3 stage Dynamics on e

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-05 by Laurent/LIFELIKE

Hi Peter As a professional composer in electronic music i can tell you that there would be a lot of people interested in that kind of emulation. Also you're right with software update, its possible to push further the concept while using the power of today's dsp etc... I guess a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Fairlight CMI series IV?

2008-11-05 by Laurent LEMAIRE

Hi Peter, I'm not a professional musician, just a hobbyist and a collector of old synths. I understand that such product could interest professionals who would like to have the Fairlight sound and avoid the issues of using an old gear. I'm not in this situation. I love old machin

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.