Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 325 of 329 · 16407 messages matched

LPC210x board update

2003-12-10 by leon_heller

I ve added a bill of materials to my LPC210x board web page: http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/lpc2104.html I ve had a small batch of the boards made.

Thread view Attachments: 0

VPB bad read behaviour

2003-12-09 by Robert Adsett

I m seeing some odd behaviour in the VPB registers that I haven t been able to track down so far. So I thought I would check to see if anyone else had run

Thread view Attachments: 0

Poll results for lpc2100

2003-12-09 by lpc2100@yahoogroups.com

The following lpc2100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: Which microcontroller in an existing or planned design is most likely to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Overclocking, risky, risky

2003-12-08 by lpc2100_fan

Hi, we also did some speed testing. From internal RAM (room temperature) we got the first suspicious behavior between 90 and 100 MHz. I guess this is very good

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2100] Wiggler JTAG connections

2003-12-07 by Arie de Muynck

... Except on JTAG interface line nTRST. The purpose of this line is to keep the JTAG logic in a reset state, so the device can function normally when no JTAG

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2100] Delay routines

2003-12-07 by Robert Adsett

... A timer using timer 0. This is a first pass and still could use some refinement and verification but it does show a method that works. Using the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Overclocking

2003-12-06 by Leon Heller

Here is a note from someone about overclocking the LPC210x: http://runryder.com/helicopter/t66907p2/ He has had one running at 120 MHz. Leon -- Leon Heller,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Floating Point performance

2003-12-06 by lpc2100_fan

Hi Robert, all my messages show up almost instantly. I never use e-mail though, always posting direct inside the yahoo group. Bob ... least one ... site I

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2100] Delay routines

2003-12-05 by Robert Adsett

... I would be surprised it they couldn t be used that way. I see two ways of doing it. One is to use interrupts on match. The other is to poll the status

Thread view Attachments: 0

LPC's w/ external address/data bus

2003-12-05 by Bill Knight

I downloaded a new eval copy of the ARM toolsuite from Keil yesterday. In the docs I found reference to four new parts. They were essentially the LPC

Thread view Attachments: 0

Floating Point performance

2003-12-05 by harshit suri

Hi All 1)Can we perform floating point operations using the latest lpc series MCUs? i specifically need to perform a PID controller and need flaoting point for

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2100] Re: Delay routines

2003-12-05 by Bill Knight

While I have yet to implement this on the LPC ARMs the following is an approach I have been using with success for years. At system startup setup a timer

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2100] Re: Delay routines

2003-12-05 by Curt Powell

That sounds great; let s hope they follow with a LPC2126 for us RAM-hungry types! ... From: lpc2100_fan [mailto:lpc2100_fan@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, December

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Delay routines

2003-12-05 by lpc2100_fan

Curt, it is my understanding that you can use the match registers without changing the I/O pins but I will make sure this statement is true. In regards to the

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2100] Delay routines

2003-12-05 by Curt Powell

I had looked at the timers before but it was unclear if you would have to give up GPIO pins by putting them into alternate function mode (we re already

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2100] Delay routines

2003-12-05 by Robert Adsett

... I m just starting to look into this myself. A pointer in the general direction. Look at timer 0 (or 1) and the match registers). I ll followup with more

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Power up sequence

2003-12-04 by skulchak

Thank you Richard. I did not know that Nohau compiles check sum automatically. I assumed that I had to do it. Regards, Skulchak. ... complement ... worry ...

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Power up sequence

2003-12-04 by Richard

Skulchak, The valid code signature at 0x14 is merely the two s complement of the sum of the vector table. That way when the checksum for the whole vector

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2100] Power up sequence

2003-12-04 by Robert Adsett

... I don t understand. Why not just use Philips download utility? Also does Nohau s utility not deal with this already? ... Considering that the processor

Thread view Attachments: 0

Power up sequence

2003-12-04 by skulchak

Hello group, I am trying to come up with a simple power up sequence for my application using IAR. So that I could just FLASH application into the part, and run

Thread view Attachments: 0

DDS update

2003-12-04 by Leon Heller

Using the latch has eliminated nearly all the glitches. The remaining ones are very small and probably won t matter. I ll try to get rid of them, anyhow.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2100] Re: DDS working

2003-12-04 by microbit

I think the server gets silly at times, or whatever. There was a stage very recently where I didn t get posts from the CW430 group for like 12 days, and then

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2100] Delay routines

2003-12-04 by Robert Adsett

Curiouser & curiouser. I just had my latest message echoed back in about 10 minutes and then this one showed up. It looks like it took about 5 hours. I ve

Thread view Attachments: 0

GDB, wiggler and breakpoints

2003-12-03 by Robert Adsett

Sigh, has anyone had any success setting breakpoints using a wiggler and GDB? I thought I had something but today I realized it doesn t actually set the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: DDS working

2003-12-03 by leon_heller

... I have the same problem as well. They appear almost immediately on the group s web page, but sometimes the emailed version takes a long time. I ve got a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2100] DDS working

2003-12-03 by Ben Dooks

... yeah, the best way is to use some form of latch to clean the signal up. -- Ben Q: What s a light-year? A: One-third less calories than a regular

Thread view Attachments: 0

Delay routines

2003-12-03 by Curt Powell

Can anyone point me to some delay() routines for the lpc? I can handle milliseconds and above but I need something that works down in the microseconds range

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2100] DDS working

2003-12-03 by Robert Adsett

... Even with assembly I would expect to see a significant glitch. Even at max speed I was seeing several hundred nS to perform both operations. (see earlier

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2100] Re: DDS working

2003-12-03 by microbit

Hmmm, I didn t see the post of Ben, seems like I m in the same boat as Robert here :-) Obviously not all posts are always routed fully to every member. -- Kris

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: DDS working

2003-12-03 by leon_heller

... Thanks, Ben. That speeded it up somewhat. Compiling for Release rather than Debug made a big difference as well. I ve never used C before for this sort of

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2100] DDS working

2003-12-03 by Ben Dooks

... yeah, I pointed out the code being produced is loading the table value twice, which is why I suggested that the sawtooth[ptr] be loaded into a temporary

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.