Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 327 of 329 · 16407 messages matched

UART1 - lpc2106

2003-11-29 by vidya_srinivas2000

hello all v have a lpc2106 board from nohau. i was trying to use both UART0 & 1 when my board stopped working. i was writing to UART0 and also to UART1 i am

Thread view Attachments: 0

LPC210x proto boards

2003-11-28 by leon_heller

I ve just received a small batch of PCBs for my little LPC210x prototyping system. I can supply bare boards, or assembled and tested ones. I m ordering a

Thread view Attachments: 0

NEW - LPC2106 TinyArm Module

2003-11-28 by burntectinyarm

New from Burn Technology is our TinyArm module based on the Philips LPC2106 device. For more information please visit http://www.burntec.com/tinyarm.asp

Thread view Attachments: 0

New LPC210x boards

2003-11-28 by leon_heller

Tsvetan at Olimex told me yesterday that they are developing a range of LPC210x boards, some preliminary information is in the news section on their web site.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Wiggler JTAG connections

2003-11-27 by leon_heller

I ve just added the connection details for the Wiggler JTAG interface for my LPC210x system to my web page: http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/lpc2104.html

Thread view Attachments: 0

leddisp hex

2003-11-27 by Andres Prado, Juanjo

Hi ! Hey Leon are you sure the leddisp example on your page do work? I tried with the led example and it did work in my board but the leddisp didn´t. Best

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiggler JTAG interface

2003-11-26 by leon_heller

... shows ... EPP and ... last time ... Since ... Macraigors site. I actually wrote EPP on my Wiggler, to remind me, after I spent a long time getting it to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2100] Re: Wiggler JTAG interface

2003-11-26 by Robert Adsett

... As it turns out it is none of those. 15,17,19 as N/C works fine (I came up with that after reading documentatio from ARM, Nohau and Ashling and attempting

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: LPC Baud Rate Question???

2003-11-26 by Robert Teufel

... BAUD rate of 57600 bps but cant figure out the correct values to write to the DLM/DLL registers... ... 15MHz...Yes?? ... baud rate, which gives 57600x16 =

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2100] Re: Wiggler JTAG interface

2003-11-26 by Leon Heller

... My Wiggler interface conforms to that, now. I ve just tried the Rowley debugger with my hardware - it works! Good thing, as I ve got a sizeable application

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiggler JTAG interface

2003-11-26 by Richard

Thanks Hugh, That is a helpful document. Richard ... customers ... ARMConne ... should ... an ... my ... restrictions, ... to ...

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiggler JTAG interface

2003-11-26 by leon_heller

... Thanks, Richard. Connecting nTRST did the trick. I hadn t bothered with it as Atmel didn t use it with their interface, although Macraigor includes it in

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiggler JTAG interface

2003-11-26 by Richard

Make sure your JTAG connector (assuming the standard 20-pin connector) has the following signals: 1)3.3V 2)3.3V 3)TRST 4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18, and 20)GND 5)TDI

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiggler JTAG interface

2003-11-26 by peetervois

Try tu pull up the RTCK aswell. This thing does have two sets of JTAG pins. IF RTCK and DBGSEL are both high during reset then the pins 0.17-0.21 will be used

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiggler JTAG interface

2003-11-26 by peetervois

Maybe the JTAG interface on the chip is disabled? ... success. ... EB01/EB40 ... 1) and ... had to ... LPC2104, but ... with the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Wiggler JTAG interface

2003-11-26 by Leon Heller

I m trying to get a Wiggler working on my prototype, without any success. 8-( The connections I m using are basically the same as on the Atmel EB01/EB40 board,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: LPC Baud Rate Question???

2003-11-26 by Bill Knight

... BAUD rate of 57600 bps but cant figure out the correct values to write to the DLM/DLL registers... ... 15MHz...Yes?? ... baud rate, which gives 57600x16 =

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: LPC Baud Rate Question???

2003-11-26 by leon_heller

... BAUD rate of 57600 bps but cant figure out the correct values to write to the DLM/DLL registers... ... 15MHz...Yes?? ... baud rate, which gives 57600x16 =

Thread view Attachments: 0

LPC Baud Rate Question???

2003-11-26 by David Bermingham

Hi, Im looking for Help on the UART initialisation for the LPC, I need a BAUD rate of 57600 bps but cant figure out the correct values to write to the DLM/DLL

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Simple LCP210x and GDB

2003-11-26 by leon_heller

... GDB can be used to debug a target via a serial link. However, GDB stub code is required running on the target. I ve been told that writing a stub is

Thread view Attachments: 0

CrossWorks for ARM now supports LPC2100

2003-11-26 by Michael Johnson

Hi, We are trialling the V1.1 release of CrossWorks for ARM which includes support for the LCP2100. If anyone is interested then you can download it from

Thread view Attachments: 0

Simple LCP210x and GDB

2003-11-26 by peetervois

Hi, I have a question: Is it possible to debug the code on the Leon s Simple LCP210x Proto board using GDB? I mean Over RS232 serial line . Best Regards ...

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2100] EasyARM

2003-11-26 by Hugh O'Keeffe

Hi Leon, I actually have one of these kits. Its made by ZLGMCU ( http://www.zlgmcu.com/home.asp) and is selling in the far

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2100] EasyARM

2003-11-26 by Bill Knight

Try Babel Fish Translation on the page. Even I can read the results. http://world.altavista.com/ -Bill Knight R O SoftWare On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 23:34:39 -0000,

Thread view Attachments: 0

EasyARM

2003-11-25 by Leon Heller

I ve been trying to help someone in Hong Kong get his home-made LPC2106 system working. This morning he mentioned an ARM kit he had borrowed from a friend;

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.