Xpantastic! group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Xpantastic!

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:44 UTC

Thread

Chaining multiple Xpanders

Chaining multiple Xpanders

2011-06-28 by tyrosine

I recently got an Xpander, and although it's incredibly deep, six voices isn't much to play with.

Is there a way to pair up two Xpanders (short of hunting down a Matrix-12)? Or even more than two?

There are some references in the manual to using the MIDI ECHO function (see page 50). It seems like this would work, but I wanted to see if anyone has experience using multiple Xpanders in this way.

Re: [xpantastic] Chaining multiple Xpanders

2011-06-28 by Jeremy Smith BSc (Hons)

tyrosine wrote:
> I recently got an Xpander, and although it's incredibly deep, six voices isn't much to play with.
> 
> Is there a way to pair up two Xpanders (short of hunting down a Matrix-12)? Or even more than two?

I think a Matrix-12 only has 2 outputs, so don't get that instead of 2 
Xpanders!

> There are some references in the manual to using the MIDI ECHO function (see page 50). It seems like this would work, but I wanted to see if anyone has experience using multiple Xpanders in this way.

I guess just copy the tracks in your sequencer and use more than 1 USB 
MIDI interface. I have 4 (!) USB MIDI interfaces.

Cheers,

Jeremy.

Re: Chaining multiple Xpanders

2011-06-28 by Epoxy2600

I know you say "short of hunting down a Matrix-12", but honestly if you can live without the CV jacks, the M12 is the way to go if you want extra voices. The benefit of going the M12 route rather than 2x Xpanders is: 1) Saves space 2) All 12 voices will be calibrated within the same unit for consistency 3) Less hardware to worry about maintaining...I'm talking things like the displays, encoders 4) Has its own keyboard for immediate playing while tweaking sounds 5) Draws less electricity than two Xpanders.

Currently the M12 goes for about $4000 and a nice Xpander $2000, so if you are serious about buying a 2nd Xpander maybe you should consider selling yours and getting the Matrix instead...they are not that hard to find in nice shape.

Anyhow, just my thoughts having owned both instruments in the past and deciding to stick with the M12 because of the joy of having 12 voices under one hood.

Howie


--- In xpantastic@yahoogroups.com, "tyrosine" <nocontext@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> I recently got an Xpander, and although it's incredibly deep, six voices isn't much to play with.
> 
> Is there a way to pair up two Xpanders (short of hunting down a Matrix-12)? Or even more than two?
> 
> There are some references in the manual to using the MIDI ECHO function (see page 50). It seems like this would work, but I wanted to see if anyone has experience using multiple Xpanders in this way.
>

Re: [xpantastic] Chaining multiple Xpanders

2011-06-28 by Tony Cappellini

When the buttons/knobs are changed on the front panel, all of this info is echoed over midi. But the cmds use sysex, which is slow.
If you connect the midi out of Xpander 1 to the Midi in of Xpander 2 and set the appropriate Midi enables & echo flags, you should be able to control the second xpander form the first (but not the other way around)
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:22 PM, tyrosine <nocontext@...> wrote:

I recently got an Xpander, and although it's incredibly deep, six voices isn9;t much to play with.

Is there a way to pair up two Xpanders (short of hunting down a Matrix-12)? Or even more than two?

There are some references in the manual to using the MIDI ECHO function (see page 50). It seems like this would work, but I wanted to see if anyone has experience using multiple Xpanders in this way.


Re: Chaining multiple Xpanders

2011-06-28 by tyrosine

--- In xpantastic@yahoogroups.com, "Jeremy Smith BSc (Hons)" <jeremy@...> wrote:
>
> I guess just copy the tracks in your sequencer and use more than 1 USB 
> MIDI interface. I have 4 (!) USB MIDI interfaces.
> 

Thanks, but I want to actually play the instrument with more than six voices for writing music, not just for sequencing.

--- In xpantastic@yahoogroups.com, "Epoxy2600" <epoxy2600@...> wrote:
> I know you say "short of hunting down a Matrix-12", but honestly if you can live without the CV jacks, the M12 is the way to go if you want extra voices.

Perhaps... but as Jeremy mentioned, the Matrix-12 also lacks the individual voice outputs (unless I wanted to mod it, which is really beyond my interest).

--- In xpantastic@...m, "Epoxy2600" <epoxy2600@...> wrote:
> The benefit of going the M12 route rather than 2x Xpanders is: 1) Saves space 2) All 12 voices will be calibrated within the same unit for consistency 3) Less hardware to worry about maintaining...I'm talking things like the displays, encoders 4) Has its own keyboard for immediate playing while tweaking sounds 5) Draws less electricity than two Xpanders.

These are all good points – particularly regarding calibration and components.

But I'm still curious: would two Xpanders actually work together? I guess another example would be to use a Matrix-12 with an Xpander for 18 voices (literally, using the latter as an expander module – which was probably the source of the name, disregarding that the Xpander came out first).

Re: [xpantastic] Chaining multiple Xpanders

2011-06-28 by PeWe


easiest way,- own 2 or 3 Xpanders and a Oberheim XK ...

But you can do that over midi w/ every MIDI controller transmitting MIDI via 3 zones on 3 MIDI channels (or more) simultaneously, depending on how many Xpanders you want to link.
"MIDI Echo" bypasses MIDI info from MIDI In to MIDI Out,- like MIDI Thru, but adds all parameter changes you perform on the 1st ( master) Xpander to the "slave" Xpanders via MIDI Sysex,- MIDI Merge.

Oberheim XK offers arpeggiator (w/ analog clock sync) and original levers,- something you don´t find in modern controllers.
Preset memory system fits Xpander / Matrix-1000 perfectly.
I have a somewhat cusomized XK,- but I´m fine w/ a Kurz PC361 too.
It´s a most excellent controller.



Am 28.06.2011 23:31, schrieb Jeremy Smith BSc (Hons):
Show quoted textHide quoted text

tyrosine wrote:
> I recently got an Xpander, and although it's incredibly deep, six voices isn't much to play with.
>
> Is there a way to pair up two Xpanders (short of hunting down a Matrix-12)? Or even more than two?


Re: [xpantastic] Re: Chaining multiple Xpanders

2011-06-28 by Tony Cappellini

>>Thanks, but I want to actually play the instrument with more than six voices for writing music, not just for sequencing.

>>But I'm still curious: would two Xpanders actually work together? I guess another example would be to use a Matrix-12 with an Xpander for 18 voices (literally, >>using the latter as an expander module – which was probably the source of the name, disregarding that the Xpander came out first).

I seriously doubt it. You'd have to modify the firmware to do that, and chances are the CPU's are already maxed out.
You can already hear the CPU's lagging when complex modulations are used, when the user turns kbos on the front panel.


You're better off buying 3-4 Matrix 1000's, which do have a way to chain them together.
You can actually get a 36 voice polysynth using 6 Matrix 1000's, for less than the price of an Xpander.

Re: [xpantastic] Re: Chaining multiple Xpanders

2011-06-28 by PeWe


Right !
You cannot spill over voices w/ the Xpander/Matrix-12

Matrix -1000 can

Am 29.06.2011 00:02, schrieb Tony Cappellini:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
\ufffd

>>Thanks, but I want to actually play the instrument with more than six voices for writing music, not just for sequencing.

>>But I'm still curious: would two Xpanders actually work together? I guess another example would be to use a Matrix-12 with an Xpander for 18 voices (literally, >>using the latter as an expander module \ufffd\ufffdwhich was probably the source of the name, disregarding that the Xpander came out first).

I seriously doubt it. You'd have to modify the firmware to do that, and chances are the CPU's are already maxed out.
You can already hear the CPU's lagging when complex modulations are used, when the user turns kbos on the front panel.


You're better off buying 3-4 Matrix 1000's, which do have a way to chain them together.
You can actually get a 36 voice polysynth using 6 Matrix 1000's,\ufffd for less than the price of an Xpander.


Re: [xpantastic] Re: Chaining multiple Xpanders

2011-06-29 by Jeremy Smith BSc (Hons)

Tony Cappellini wrote:
> 
> You're better off buying 3-4 Matrix 1000's, which do have a way to chain 
> them together.
> You can actually get a 36 voice polysynth using 6 Matrix 1000's,  for 
> less than the price of an Xpander.

The problem with a Matrix 1000 is you can't detune each channel. For 
instance, on the Xpander you copy a patch 6 times, make a multi with 
those 6 voices, then detune each of the 6 patches. Then you get a really 
layered sound.

You can't do this on the Matrix 1000 because it doesn't let you have a 
different patch per channel in unison mode.

Correct me if I'm wrong!

Jeremy.

Re: [xpantastic] Re: Chaining multiple Xpanders

2011-06-29 by PeWe


You\ufffdre free to use several Matrix-1000,- each one on a different MIDI channel, each one plays the same or a different sound, each one set to unison if you want and play \ufffdem simultaneously that way,- if you use the right MIDI controller.
You can detune every Matrix-1000 against the others,- there\ufffds a master tune parameter.

Also,- you\ufffdre able to play up to 6 Matrix-1000 in Group Mode (page 29 /Chapter 4 in the manual).
All will be controlled by the group master ... but:
"other changes like fine tune must be made on each unit individually" (page 30).

This has nothing to do w/ the mono/guitar MODE where separate voices of ONE Matrix-1000 play on 6 different MIDI channels.
Channel MODE, page 20 of the manual ...


Am 29.06.2011 17:13, schrieb Jeremy Smith BSc (Hons):
Show quoted textHide quoted text

The problem with a Matrix 1000 is you can't detune each channel. For 
instance, on the Xpander you copy a patch 6 times, make a multi with 
those 6 voices, then detune each of the 6 patches. Then you get a really 
layered sound.

You can't do this on the Matrix 1000 because it doesn't let you have a 
different patch per channel in unison mode.

Correct me if I'm wrong!

Jeremy.


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xpantastic/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xpantastic/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    xpantastic-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    xpantastic-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    xpantastic-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [xpantastic] Re: Chaining multiple Xpanders

2011-06-29 by Tony Cappellini

I think you're correct Jeremy, but having more voices appears to be the primary concern.
Not being able to detune each channel isn't such a limitation
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Jeremy Smith BSc (Hons) <jeremy@...> wrote:
Tony Cappellini wrote:
>
> You're better off buying 3-4 Matrix 1000's, which do have a way to chain
> them together.
> You can actually get a 36 voice polysynth using 6 Matrix 1000's, for
> less than the price of an Xpander.

The problem with a Matrix 1000 is you can't detune each channel. For
instance, on the Xpander you copy a patch 6 times, make a multi with
those 6 voices, then detune each of the 6 patches. Then you get a really
layered sound.

You can't do this on the Matrix 1000 because it doesn't let you have a
different patch per channel in unison mode.

Correct me if I'm wrong!

Jeremy.


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xpantastic/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xpantastic/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
xpantastic-digest@yahoogroups.com
xpantastic-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
xpantastic-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Re: Chaining multiple Xpanders

2011-06-30 by tyrosine

I sold my Matrix-1000 years ago – sounds like a distant cousin of the Xpander, so not really an option.

The suggestion about copying a patch to six voices, then detuning each, is a great workaround for the lack of individual voice detune (on a single patch). I think that's available on the Matrix-12 but not the Xpander.

Thanks to everyone for the responses.

Re: [xpantastic] Re: Chaining multiple Xpanders

2011-06-30 by Jeremy Smith BSc (Hons)

tyrosine wrote:
> I sold my Matrix-1000 years ago \ufffd sounds like a distant cousin of the Xpander, so not really an option.
> 
> The suggestion about copying a patch to six voices, then detuning each, is a great workaround for the lack of individual voice detune (on a single patch). I think that's available on the Matrix-12 but not the Xpander.

No, it is available on the Xpander, I've done it myself.

Cheers,

Jeremy.

Re: [xpantastic] Re: Chaining multiple Xpanders

2011-06-30 by Jeremy Smith BSc (Hons)

Jeremy Smith BSc (Hons) wrote:
> tyrosine wrote:
> 
>>I sold my Matrix-1000 years ago \ufffd sounds like a distant cousin of the Xpander, so not really an option.
>>
>>The suggestion about copying a patch to six voices, then detuning each, is a great workaround for the lack of individual voice detune (on a single patch). I think that's available on the Matrix-12 but not the Xpander.
> 
> 
> No, it is available on the Xpander, I've done it myself.

Note: I meant copying the patch to 6 voices is possible on the Xpander 
and the Matrix 12.

But I agree the Xpander doesn't have the Matrix 12 feature you describe.

Cheers,

Jeremy.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.