RE: [Digital BW] 8 bit to 16 bit for BW???
2002-05-28 by Austin Franklin
... Hi Tom, I have my wife swap them randomly...just to keep me on my toes ;-) Austin
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1886 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Re: spraying glossy prints
2002-05-28 by Julian Thomas
One thing i do is to spray whilst the ink is still wet - maybe 30secs after printing. Julian ... From: Bruce To:
Re: [Digital BW] Print Quality From A Nikon D1
2002-05-28 by Bob Frost
Jerry, I ve thought seriously about getting the Nikon D100 with its 6.3 interpolated megapixels (2.1 real megapixels), but in the end I still come back to the
Re: [Digital BW] Polaroid SprintScan 120...?
2002-05-28 by Simon Lamb
SNIP: I couldn t use, or often need the extra dpi of the Nikon since I can t process it. Therefore I start to get interested in the Polaroid. Cleavis The SS120
Re: Setup problem with MIS Variable Tone ink cartridge and Epson 1280 on PC
2002-05-28 by klog221
Erica, 2 things. Yes you should be using the Black ink designed for the VM inkset. The Epson black ink is completely different. Second: I suggest you try
Re: 8 bit to 16-Canon G2 is 16 bit
2002-05-28 by tomoc
... starting ... 5000, ... edit ... Jim- The G2 is a more logical choice on paper. But a few of the Nikon features (focusing is faster, macro is much
Re: [Digital BW] 8 bit to 16 bit for BW???
2002-05-28 by tomoc
... what I believe is true, or not...
Re: 8 bit to 16 bit for BW???
2002-05-28 by tomoc
Roy- Yes, you can view the histograms with the 5000...and I often do, but the 5000 is INCREDIBLY SLOW transferring the tiff files to the memory card. For the
Re: [Digital BW] Polaroid SprintScan 120...?
2002-05-28 by Martin Wesley
Cleavis, I would just add one comment to Jeff s below about the Polaroid 120, which I also have. It is not full frame along the sides of the medium format
[Digital BW] Setup problem with MIS Variable Tone ink cartridge and Epson 1280 on PC
2002-05-28 by Paul Roark
Ericka, ... Use the MIS black. I m not sure what the Epson black would look like. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com
Re: [Digital BW] Polaroid SprintScan 120...?
2002-05-28 by J Greer
Cleavis, The film carriers pass through the SS 120 (slots on both ends, you feed the carrier through the front and it moves out the end if needed). The 120
Re: [Digital BW] Tetenal paper
2002-05-28 by Robert Morrison
Yep, the Tetenal Spectrajet was one of the papers that I wrote about earlier...performance is not different than other papers in it s class (Epson Premium
Tetenal paper
2002-05-28 by André Vallejo
Any experiences with Tetenal papers?
Polaroid SprintScan 120...?
2002-05-28 by lyonscox
I am finding myself scanning MOSTLY 120 film. My old Agfa DuoScan is doing just fine for most things, but I get curious. I recently ruled out the Minolta
Setup problem with MIS Variable Tone ink cartridge and Epson 1280 on PC
2002-05-28 by Ericka Menchen
I am new to printing high quality black and white pictures. I recently bought a MIS Variable Tone ink cartridge for my Epson 1280. I tried to follow the
Piezography Exhibit in NYC
2002-05-28 by John Custodio
I m having an exhibit of 12 landscapes printed with Piezography on an Epson 7000 at Soho Photo Gallery, 15 White Street in New York City (3 blocks south of
Re: [Digital BW] 8 bit to 16-Canon G2 is 16 bit
2002-05-28 by Robert Morrison
... Yep...that s what took the G2 off my list...its also the thing that made the Leica promising...but the idiots at Panasonic locked it into SD cards which
Re: First setup -To Paul and all
2002-05-28 by André Vallejo
Thanks all for the tips,I ll try the tips and see where I get! André
Re: 8 bit to 16-Canon G2 is 16 bit
2002-05-28 by Bernie Epstein
Truman: As the heading in online help says in parentheses, gamma is available in ImageReady under Image Adjustment. Now that the help system is common to PS
Re: [Digital BW] 8 bit to 16-Canon G2 is 16 bit
2002-05-28 by jimhayes361
... 4), wider ... 1/1000) ... and ... is that ... It does give you some headroom to work with, and you can push the historams around, say the contrast was too
Re: [Digital BW] Re: spraying glossy prints
2002-05-28 by Robert Morrison
... Probably not. The key is technique...I think the 1303 is the same stuff minus the UV absorpbers. As you layer on more thin coats your dmax will
Re: spraying glossy prints
2002-05-28 by Bruce
... Robert, I have a bunch of old Kodak glossy inkjet paper and as an experiment I printed on it using Piezo inks. At first I was like, Wow!, then the ink
Re: [Digital BW] Print Quality From A Nikon D1
2002-05-27 by massman8064145
... since ... supposed ... price. ... A3 ... Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page ... messages to keep them short. ... header.
RE: [Digital BW] Print Quality From A Nikon D1
2002-05-27 by Lawrence Smith
... I don t have one but I did talk to a guy in San Diego in April that was shooting with one. He had the 70-200 IS lens attached and it was a fine combo! He
Re: [Digital BW] Print Quality From A Nikon D1
2002-05-27 by Jerry Olson
Not really, especially at infinity, but fine for 8x10 s . Why not get the Nikon D100 when it comes out this summer? 6.3 megapixels, and about two thousand
Re: [Digital BW] Print Quality From A Nikon D1
2002-05-27 by Mij Sirron
The D1 s are cheap because they are obsolete. The D1X is so much better. Besides resolution, the D1 s had, in my experience, a problem with rendering Caucasian
RE: [Digital BW] Print Quality From A Nikon D1
2002-05-27 by Austin Franklin
Hi Jim, An A3 is ~ 11 x 16, and 2.6M pixels is ~ 1k x 1.6k which gives you 1024 across 11 inches, or less than 90 pixels per inch to the printer. IMO, that is
Re: [Digital BW] First setup -To Paul and all
2002-05-27 by Robert Morrison
... Right, I haven t actually tested VM...but the Brightcube Semi-Matte sprayed with Krylon is what I would recommend for MIS FS or Cone inks. The surface is
[Digital BW] First setup -To Paul and all
2002-05-27 by Paul Roark
André, ... I m not familiar with the 980. ... One thing the curves do is give separation between the darkest values. Sometimes the 95% & 100% print the same
Re: [Digital BW] Print Quality From A Nikon D1
2002-05-27 by Robert Morrison
... No. You need a minimum of 6megapixel. I shot a D1 for about a year and a half and got many lovely 5x7 and some 8x10 that I was happy with though. Don t
Print Quality From A Nikon D1
2002-05-27 by jmoore50310
I have the opportunity to purchase a used Nikon D1 at a good price. My only concern is the print quality that I will get with my Epson 1280 using MIS VM inks.
Re: First setup -To Paul and all
2002-05-27 by charles_bandes
... RGB,that has a ... Why does gamut matter in black and white? I don t get it. (Not intended as a criticism, but an honest question, I don t understand and I
First setup -To Paul and all
2002-05-27 by André Vallejo
I finally received all the parts from MIS and two paper sample packs,put it all together and started printing,with an Epson 980,MIS VM-Quads and Paul s curves
Re: [Digital BW] 8 bit to 16-Canon G2 is 16 bit
2002-05-27 by Robert Morrison
Yeah...its a tough call between these two...more resolution (5 vs. 4), wider angle lens (28mm vs. 34mm) and higher max shutter speed (1/4000 vs. 1/1000) on the
Re: [Digital BW] 8 bit to 16-Canon G2 is 16 bit
2002-05-27 by Truman Prevatt
Speaking of Canon, I converted some raw files in 16 bit linear (gamma=1) the other day. I then went to change the gamma in Photoshop 7. I couldn t for the life
8 bit to 16-Canon G2 is 16 bit
2002-05-27 by jimhayes361
... I m only going to comment on the digital camera part. Without starting a Nikon/Canon war, if you have a Canon G2 instead of the Nikon 5000, it passes 10
RE: [Digital BW] Taking apart printers/ultrasonic cleaning
2002-05-27 by Austin Franklin
... still worked? I soaked an Epson 3000 printhead that had a few clogged nozzles in isopropyl alcohol and it rendered the print head entirely dead. I
Re: [Digital BW] Taking apart printers/ultrasonic cleaning
2002-05-27 by Steadman Uhlich
Soundzzzzz very interestinggggg. Ultrasonic cleaning. But...the head alignment is the kicker. From other accounts, it takes some special sw or technique to
RE: [Digital BW] 8 bit to 16 bit for BW???
2002-05-27 by Austin Franklin
... As a note, the histogram is only an 8 bit histogram, so they should be the same... Austin
RE: [Digital BW] Best 35mm Black & White negative scanner?
2002-05-27 by Austin Franklin
Leafscan 35. (or 45, which scans at 5080, and the 35 at 4000). It s the only scanner I know of that scans B&W using a single neutral density filter, instead
Re: [Digital BW] Hartmann Single Black
2002-05-27 by photo_bear_nova
Thanks for the help...
Best 35mm Black & White negative scanner?
2002-05-27 by Rick Schiller
Any recommendations or thoughts on an excellent 35mm film scanner if I need high excellent tonality scans from traditional silver-emulsion films? My Canon 2720
Re: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Quadtone Print Labeling
2002-05-27 by toomagenta@aol.com
In a message dated 5/26/2002 10:55:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time, ... If you are going to use the new Epsons, Ultrachromes sounds good. And it is what it is.
Re: [Digital BW] Quadtone Print Labeling
2002-05-27 by Todd Flashner
Carbon Ink Print
Re: [Digital BW] 8 bit to 16 bit for BW???
2002-05-27 by lyonscox
In my micro experience... I have taken to scanning in 16 bit, it gives a better historgram. Then saving that file (tossed once a finished print achieved) and
BrightCube Praise
2002-05-27 by lyonscox
I would like to commend Kami and Brightcube on packaging. I had ordered 17x22 in softwhite along with some other paper. It was delayed in coming so I inquired
Re[4]: [Digital BW] Quadtone Print Labeling
2002-05-27 by Richard Sintchak
... TA Especially as the term archival can and is used to mean anything you want! TA So many manufacturers stick archival on their products just to sell
RE: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Quadtone Print Labeling
2002-05-27 by Tim Atherton
... Especially as the term archival can and is used to mean anything you want! So many manufacturers stick archival on their products just to sell stuff...
RE: [Digital BW] 8 bit to 16 bit for BW???
2002-05-27 by Austin Franklin
... Hi Tom, Sorry, I didn t know something was still pending... ... Probably not...but try it and find out for your self ;-) As others have suggested, using a
Re[2]: [Digital BW] Quadtone Print Labeling
2002-05-27 by Richard Sintchak
Sunday, May 26, 2002, 5:44:47 PM, Jerry Olson wrote: JO Carbon pigment print sounds good to me. It s what I use. JO Jerry Bill Agee calls them carbon based