PKN Ink
2006-01-07 by Tom Husband
Is PKN ink just for BO in the 2200 or can it be used in place of Eboni or Photo Black with the other UT7 inks? I want to try some semi gloss paper or the new
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 749 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2006-01-07 by Tom Husband
Is PKN ink just for BO in the 2200 or can it be used in place of Eboni or Photo Black with the other UT7 inks? I want to try some semi gloss paper or the new
2006-01-07 by john dean
Could this be why the first guy to beta test this paper in a big way and loved it said it more resembles the old dye transfer print surface than exactly
2006-01-07 by scott_now_coming
Let me say this: In my limited testing of Silver Rag, it the best looking paper I ve used. This spring , I shot a portrait that I truely love (which says a lot
2006-01-07 by Paul Roark
Philip, ... No, UT7 needs the cyan and magenta hextone channels, in addition to the black ink. It has light and dark warm carbon and cool toner inks. A 4-ink
2006-01-07 by Eleanor Brown
Yes there is some gloss differential. The surface texture and sheen do minimalize it, but it s there. eleanor
2006-01-07 by mambo445
How does it look in high contrast area especially in the very light (near white with very little to no ink was laid)? Is there any gloss differential in those
2006-01-07 by Clayton Jones
Hello Peter, ... Yes I did miss it, but see it now thanks. It does look very impressive compared to the bicubic. But I would still like to see what it will
2006-01-07 by Peter Marshall
Clayton, You obviously missed the SizeFixer image which is there - you need to make sure you allow the popup that contains the main illustrations to the page.
2006-01-07 by Pacific New Media
Thanks Paul for your answer. it is very helpful. For most papers we only need about 3 or 4 inks/positions from UT7 so it is possible to use UT7 in 4 or 6 color
2006-01-07 by Paul Roark
... All the good matte inkjet papers are buffered. ... Ammonia is a gas, so I doubt it s in the paper. I ve used ammonia to neutralize silver prints that
2006-01-07 by Clayton Jones
Hello Peter, ... I read your review with interest, but was disappointed not to see a photo of the Sizefixer result (one would think that an example of the
2006-01-07 by Dennis Dowling
Hi, I hear a lot of people are printing on matte papers. I have a new epson r2400 but haven t been able to get a good result on matte. Mainly, I have smooth
2006-01-07 by Greg
Just a note, take a look at the pH of some of the fine art type papers. Many of the Hanhemuhle papers are listed as being slightly basic. And if the inks the
2006-01-07 by scott_now_coming
Do you consider pigments to be acidic? If one is using acid-free paper and pigment ink, I d stick to a BUFFERED board and mat. Below was taken from the Light
2006-01-06 by Platinum Jim
The only prints for which I even consider buffered are b&w silver prints. The typical reason for the buffering is to overcome residual acid, which should not
2006-01-06 by dahaal
... This brings up another question: What is the best paper for use in a custom-bound book? The paper will not be framed behind glass, and won t be stored in
2006-01-06 by scott_now_coming
Use a buffered board. I use Cresent, but any good 100% rag buffered board will work. Scott
2006-01-06 by brucercohio
Hi all Does anyone have guidance on when to use a buffered or unbufferd matt board? Today a person at Light Impressions told me to use a Non Buffered
2006-01-06 by Jerry Blanton
... lulu.com and ... pretty ... I never ... I have recently used SharedInk.com and liked the quality, paper choices, and binding choices. It is definitely not
2006-01-06 by Tim Atherton
... You also have to remember that FB Silver Gelatin glossy/semi-glossy prints have glare/sheen as well. I held one of my Silver Rag test mprints next to such
2006-01-06 by Eleanor Brown
John, I tried the PremierArt Luster Rag (the PremierArt Hot press is one of my favorite papers), but the Luster Rag was a disaster. Horrible
2006-01-06 by john dean
Welcome to the wonderful world of noise.
2006-01-06 by john dean
Eleanor, I haven t had time to test mine yet. What is the coating looking like to you now? Is it smooth and consistent? I just saw a print yesterday done on
2006-01-06 by Peter Marshall
Ninja and Neat are not the only games now, though I ve reviewed both in the past. Some of the raw software has quite decent filtering built in, and I d also
2006-01-06 by Peter Marshall
When I ve had images published in books and magazines I haven t asked the publisher to overprint them with a watermark or anything else to prevent people
2006-01-06 by Peter Marshall
Hi, I ve just today posted a little review of SizeFixer, in which there are some minute images comparing extreme resizing by this, Photozoom Pro, QImage and
2006-01-06 by Eleanor Brown
I sent in a test print on this paper using K3 inks and the Dmax measured out at 2.46 for those of you who are interested. Apparently this agrees with the Dmax
2006-01-06 by fjohn1963
esharamaki / Steve Thank you for your comments and insight. Steve, I was about to pull the trigger on a copy of JPG magazine (from Lulu) yesterday afternoon.
2006-01-06 by Steve Bye
The paper surface and the printing resolution depend on whether you use the $0.02/page B&W-only process or the $0.15/page color process. I am looking at a book
2006-01-06 by esharamaki
I have limited experience with Lulu. First of all, I used Open Office to format my 9x7 book - no professional layout. Converted to PDF and uploaded via FTP -
2006-01-06 by Greg
In a semi related discussion, has anyone tried Noise Fixer from Fixerlabs? I m thinking of grabbing the Size Fixer XL plus the other bundled parts, and was
2006-01-06 by john dean
Thanks for that Steve, That was very helpful. I have been working with that Reduce Noise filter in CS2 and find it very useful but I have t compared it with an
2006-01-06 by Greg
... of ... who ... an ... your ... a ... If they are using the EFI Fiery RIP to drive that printer, colormanagement should be extremely easy! Unless of course
2006-01-06 by fjohn1963
... Hello, I ve been and am still under the impression that Lulu (and Café Press for that matter) do not have an option to use that nice, slightly glossy and
2006-01-06 by Mark Savoia
I have had books done by both Lulu and Apple, the Apple book looked much better but cost substantially more. It s OK for doing a few (Apple s) for an opening
2006-01-06 by Greg
... that its ... ISO and ... processing ... batch ... give better ... Couldn t you also set up a Photoshop action to go through an entire folder and process
2006-01-06 by Greg
At those prices, if you were going to make several different books (or use them often) it might be worth getting a CMYK profile made for their printer. Then
2006-01-06 by esharamaki
The options on Lulu are kind of confusing. The B&W print that is $0.02/page is like cheap paperback quality or newprinty kind of - I wouldn t recommend it. I
2006-01-05 by Paul Roark
Philip, Different people use different ways of figuring dilutions. MIS often, for example, just assigns arbitrary percentages just to signify what relative
2006-01-05 by Roger Howard
... I have for years through two employers; Digimarc does *not* protect images, it tags them to enable later (forensic) identification; there s also a
2006-01-05 by Steve Bye
From my limited experimenting with the Noise Ninja demo version, I think it can do a better job than the new Reduce Noise filter in CS2, but I don t think I
2006-01-05 by Mark Hahn
Thanks for the input Steve! I was looking at Lulu and was worried that the $.15 per page was too good to be true, but have now found several people like
2006-01-05 by Tyler Boley
Sorry, yes, you are right. Between OS updates, the 9800, more storage, new cannons, etc., I have not sprung for PSCS2. So I m not familiar with that new
2006-01-05 by Pacific New Media
I was reading FAQ for K6 and K7 inks. Following information is interesting: K7: The seven dilutions are as follows: K7 Shade #1: 100.0% K7 Shade #2: 32.0% K7
2006-01-05 by James Parker
This is the general approach that DigiMarc uses to embed a watermark that is invisible to the viewer. It is probably the most well-known way to track images
2006-01-05 by William John Smith
If you really want to protect and trace your images there is Digimarc. http://www.digimarc.com/ Adobe has been pushing it for years, it does cost. I don t
2006-01-05 by Steve Bye
Check out lulu.com and MyPublisher. I ve only seen output from lulu.com and it looked very good. It was mixed color and B&W images. The color was pretty good.
2006-01-05 by john dean
Thanks Tyler, There is always something new to buy isn t there. Were you refering to the Reduce Noise filter menu in PS CS2 when you said D&S PS filter? ( dust
2006-01-05 by Greg
If you really want to hide some info within the images, you might want to take a look through the links on this page: http://www.jjtc.com/Steganography/ You
2006-01-05 by Tyler Boley
... wrote: ... We downloaded and tested every one of them we could find in demo mode. Personally I liked the Noiseware filter best, Ninja came in