2009-02-13 by intellijel
I have a G6 case and obviously the current draw of all the modules is less than the 1.2A max of the psu2. In fact it is currently way less than 400ma. Can I safely add another 6U case and connect it to the PSU2 via doepfer bus boards or is one 3U more enough? I heard that as you
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by intellijel
Doepfer A-117 808 noise / Random Clock This module can be used to make 808 cowbells, cymbals and for a variety of clock and noise functions. I have an 808 so I don't really need it. $70USD + shipping Would consider trades for other eurorack modules. (located in Vancouver, Canada)
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by John V. Talbert
Hi, Florian >> it lacks two very common controls: modulation and pitch >> bend. > The A100CGK is built for very small dimensions. Thats the reason why it > does not contain it. In the A-100 range there are already moduls like > the joysticks or the theremins, which can replace th
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by laryn91
The main problem I see with the polls is there is lack of participation. There are 1207 members and usually it's only 20-30 people who reply. And I suspect it's the same small group who vote in every poll. So it may be a tiny group influencing your product designs. Suppose this g
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Florian Anwander
Hello John > keyboardist, it lacks two very common controls: modulation and pitch > bend. The A100CGK is built for very small dimensions. Thats the reason why it does not contain it. In the A-100 range there are already moduls like the joysticks or the theremins, which can replac
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> POLL QUESTION: VC DIGITAL MULTI EFFECTS PROCESSOR module proposal > - with several CV inputs to control parameters of a DSP and some > memory for reverbs, delays, resonators, amp simulators, dynamics... > > CHOICES AND RESULTS > - yes, 33 votes, 71.74% > - no, 13 votes, 28.26%
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by John V. Talbert
> hello > I do not want to be critical to much but instead of few option of expanding mixers from 138 family > one stereo with more inputs and pan cv would be just top and I think sell okay, theres so many people performing on A100 > and neets something portable and small. I comp
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by peteruertz
Test 2: Using A-149-1 "stored random voltage" to trigger the somewhat "hihatt"! http://www.audiotie.com/audio/nikita/a-1491/peteruertz_pm_37.mp3 Peter --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "peteruertz" wrote: > > http://www.audiotie.com/audio/nikita/a-1491/peteruertz_pm_32.mp3 > >
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Florian Anwander
Hello John > So a link to a page that perhaps included where the concept of the module > originated, examples of ways it might be used in a patch and perhaps > even historical references of where it's been used before could help > people to make more informed decisions. Very good
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by John V. Talbert
> i still believe that the low number of participants is the main reason for > the limited usefulness of some polls. One other thing that might increase participation or provide more meaningful results is to provide additional information on how a new module might be used. Rememb
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by John V. Talbert
> Thats where the arguments come back like the cat bites its tail. I say > the low number of participants is due the fact of too long lasting polls > and too many obsolete viewable polls. I would say there could be a more real-world reason why people don't participate in polls: T
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Bakis Sirros
:-) Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist [Doepfer_a100] group owner www. parallel - worlds - music. com www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic www. myspace. com/ memorygeist www. DiN. org. uk www. musicamaximamagnet
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Guy Drieghe D.
Hiya Florian, On 13 Feb 2009, at 11:36, Florian Anwander wrote: > Hi Guy > >> >> 1.) I will buy this module >> >> 2.) I think this module is useful, but I won't buy it (at least >> not >> >> now) >> >> > Not necessarily. >> > For instance, I tick this choice simply because I like
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Florian Anwander
Hi Bakis > they are only 10 open polls at the moment. all these open polls are created by other group members and not me, so i just wanted to respect their freedom and allow these members to end their polls when they wanted to. > that's why i left them open, not due to bad modera
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Florian Anwander
Hi Guy >> 1.) I will buy this module >> 2.) I think this module is useful, but I won't buy it (at least not >> now) > Not necessarily. > For instance, I tick this choice simply because I like the idea of > this module and I *might* buy it some time in the future, Your choice has
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Bakis Sirros
i agree with Guy. Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist [Doepfer_a100] group owner www. parallel - worlds - music. com www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic www. myspace. com/ memorygeist www. DiN. org. uk www. musi
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Bakis Sirros
hi Florian, first, the list of open polls is not endless. they are only 10 open polls at the moment. all these open polls are created by other group members and not me, so i just wanted to respect their freedom and allow these members to end their polls when they wanted to. that'
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: VC DIGITAL MULTI EFFECTS PROCESSOR module proposal - with several CV inputs to control parameters of a DSP and some memory for reverbs, delays, resonators, amp simulators, dynamics... CHOICE
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: Doepfer are planning to release a touch plate keyboard (TKB). However, I think it might be interesting to see it released in a "module" format that can be added with other modules side-by-si
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: VC GRAIN PROCESSOR module proposal - with vc delaytime, vc feedback, vc pitch, vc grain size, vc grain direction, vc grain laptime, vc grain atack, vc grain release CHOICES AND RESULTS - yes
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: VC GRAIN GENERATOR module proposal - with vc sampselect, vc startpoint, vc loop point, vc pitch, vc grainsize, vc grain direction, vc grain lap, vc grain atack, vc grain release, vc position
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: What are you thinking about an A-100 module with a chorus ensemble circuit like that one in the 70's Solina String Ensemble? Perhaps you can use this module as an effect unit for making some
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: VC WIDERANGE RADIO RECEIVER experimental module proposal - (FROM VLF TO CW) with vc freq zone selector, vc freq finetune, and vc q factor (like in the old lamp radios) CHOICES AND RESULTS -
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Guy Drieghe D.
On 13 Feb 2009, at 10:36, Florian Anwander wrote: > Hello Bakis > > > and i have to admit that i am one to blame for some misleading > poll results... > I think this tells us, that the questions asked in the polls are not > good. > > For future polls you should always provide sel
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: SENSOR TO CV VOLTAGE ADAPTOR module proposal - with voltage gain, offset , range, and linearity controls, lag process and noise filter to adapt any kind of sensor to normalized CV (if possib
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: SENSOR TO GATE/TRIG ADAPTOR module proposal - with voltage gain, low headroom, high headroom controls and selector for trig or gate modes to use any kind of sensor to normalized GATE/TRIG (d
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: VC MULTI-SAMPLE RECORDER/LOOPER/DELAY module proposal - like a digitech's "jam man" in a module with large memory, MDcards, gateplay, trigreset, vc sampselect, vc pitch, reversible vc startl
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: What about making a a-100 sequenser in the spirit of the roland sh-101. Many of my friends (including me :)use that sequencer to control their systems. It's simple, no menus, it's fast and l
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Bakis Sirros
ok. Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist [Doepfer_a100] group owner www. parallel - worlds - music. com www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic www. myspace. com/ memorygeist www. DiN. org. uk www. musicamaximamagnet
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Florian Anwander
Hi Bakis > btw, if more people cared to vote (and not only 50, out of more than 1200 members! ) then the polls would give much clearer results for sure. but... I think one problem is, that the list of open polls is endless. The polls last too long. If you don't respond direct to
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> hmm, i am not very sure that these selections will give clearer > results, maybe you're right though... > > Dieter, what is your opinion regarding the poll selections/ > options i should offer? I'd prefer Florian's version. Dieter
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Bakis Sirros
hmm, i am not very sure that these selections will give clearer results, maybe you're right though... Dieter, what is your opinion regarding the poll selections/ options i should offer? i really want the polls to be as useful as possible for Doepfer (although, i strongly suggest
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Florian Anwander
Hello Bakis > and i have to admit that i am one to blame for some misleading poll results... I think this tells us, that the questions asked in the polls are not good. For future polls you should always provide selections like that: 1.) I will buy this module 2.) I think this mod
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by Bakis Sirros
and i have to admit that i am one to blame for some misleading poll results... i always was quite positive in my votes, hoping that most modules would be useful to many people and would sell ok... for the A186-1 (OR combiner), i was the one that said it would be very very useful,
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> Look at the A-135-2 module/sub-system. Maybe this is what you are > looking > for. All versions (two different 4-fold modules and the sub-system > approach) > shown on our website have been built as prototypes and work as they > should. > But the inquiries are very poor so for
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> I can't believe that a simple uncontrolled poll of only 29 users > is meaningful to you to base > your product planning around it. I bet that only those who are > emotionally invested will > bother to vote and most everyone else will ignore the poll. It's > meaningless data. >
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-13 by laryn91
I can see how *discussions* on this list can be sometimes useful for feature planning. Users can bring up features and issues that Dieter may not have considered. But I can't see how an uncontrolled poll of 28 users means anything other than just the personal desires of the unkno
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-12 by rwert@poczta.onet.pl
Look at the A-135-2 module/sub-system. Maybe this is what you are looking for. All versions (two different 4-fold modules and the sub-system approach) shown on our website have been built as prototypes and work as they should. But the inquiries are very poor so for (not sufficien
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-12 by Bakis Sirros
the polls are not useless. they have helped, many many times, in the past, for Doepfer to decide features included in their designs and decisions about their forthcoming modules. ok, of course, they are not always really valid due to the low number of participants (that's why i a
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-12 by selfoscillate
polls are not useless. they can help in many ways, but i admit that sometimes the results can be misleading, thinking about the poor sales of some "wanted" modules. the past has proven that sometimes it is better to think twice before producing a module that is "wanted" by the fo
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-12 by Monroe Eskew
It's better than not doing it! Doepfer is one of the most democratic companies I know. On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:09 AM, laryn91 wrote: > I can't believe that a simple uncontrolled poll of only 29 users is > meaningful to you to base > your product planning around it. I bet that
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-12 by laryn91
I can't believe that a simple uncontrolled poll of only 29 users is meaningful to you to base your product planning around it. I bet that only those who are emotionally invested will bother to vote and most everyone else will ignore the poll. It's meaningless data. It's like aski
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-12 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> yes, this I agree but this is not a synth mixer, this is just a adio mixer.(I also use audio mixer on the end of my > system) and I meant synth mixer which by Pan CV makes this machines STEREO, strange that nobody need that > > Anyway bad news for me, shame (Serge and I think B
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-12 by yahoo@doepfer.de
> If one manufactures 100 units but has only 30 orders it will be a loss (and we had indeed some such > losses in the past, e.g. the A-100CGK, A-138x, A-164-1 or A-186). > .... > > hello > I do not want to be critical to much but instead of few option of expanding mixers from 138
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-12 by robert piotrowicz
hello Frorian! On 2009-02-12, at 18:02, Florian Anwander wrote: And in the end of the day, the people will buy the Behringer for 70 Euros instead of the Doepfer for 100 Euros (or even more (think e.g. of the A-129-3 as equivalent in the production costs), which won't have all the
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-12 by Florian Anwander
Hello Robert > I do not want to be critical to much > but instead of few option of expanding mixers from 138 family > one stereo with more inputs and pan cv would be just top > and I think sell okay, No it won't sell okay, because there are mixers on the market for under 70 Euros
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-12 by robert piotrowicz
. If one manufactures 100 units but has only 30 orders it will be a loss (and we had indeed some such losses in the past, e.g. the A-100CGK, A-138x, A-164-1 or A-186). .... hello I do not want to be critical to much but instead of few option of expanding mixers from 138 family on
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-12 by achtung_999
I off course meant Sonology does not have capacity to produce modules in significant quantities. On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:25 PM, wrote: > Yes, I'd be interested to cooperate with the sonology people. And we would > have the capacity to produce such staff. But after all it's not
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-12 by yahoo@doepfer.de
Yes, I'd be interested to cooperate with the sonology people. And we would have the capacity to produce such staff. But after all it's not the question if we could manage to manufacture a module but if there are sufficient inquiries. It does not make sense to start a production i
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-02-12 by achtung_999
Of course they don't have the capacity.. On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:45 PM, achtung_999 wrote: > Hey Daan. > > It is just an idea that someone higher up had. > Like I said very premature and Limited edition DIY kits. > But I thought I owed it to Dieter to inform him about it. > >
Thread view
Attachments: 0