Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 416 of 564 · 28179 messages matched
2004-12-06 by Keld Sørensen
The A128 is the fixed filter bank. Not the A108. Keld --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "turbotron69" wrote: > > Hi list; > > I have for trade an A-108- Fixed filter bank for any module of my interest NOT > available in the basic frame. > > Thanks
2004-12-06 by selfoscillate
i haven't tried a big briar theremins, but i assume that they are better than the doepfer theremin module. at least that is what i've heard from other people. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "dain luscombe" wrote: > hey guys, just wondering if anyone has any
2004-12-06 by turbotron69
Hi list; I have for trade an A-108- Fixed filter bank for any module of my interest NOT available in the basic frame. Thanks
2004-12-06 by vogelscheiss
I think you're right. If I were taking theremin seriously I'd get the Etherwave. If I wanted something to make crazy sounds with on my modular, I'd use the A-100 theremin modules. --Chuck > -----Original Message----- > From: dain luscombe [mailto:ipanimasound@hotmail.com] > Sent:
2004-12-05 by dain luscombe
hey guys, just wondering if anyone has any thought comparing the big briar etherwave with the response of the doepfer theremin module, I realize that having it modular would give me a lot more options, but I'm concerned more with the instrumentality of it. in my experiences the b
2004-12-05 by zendenker
IF anyone is still unconvinced about this wonderful module, here's an extremely scary two-minute rhythmic drone I put together showcasing the a137s mangling abilities. http://www.deepflux.com/synth/a137-trianglelandscape.mp3 (filesize is 3mb) The signal path is very simple: singl
2004-12-04 by Antonio Grazioli
For sale: my Doepfer G6 Rack on Ebay http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem &item=3767224746&ssPageName=ADME:B:LC:US:1 I'm building my own custom case and don't need it anymore. If interested see link above. Greetings [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2004-12-04 by vogelscheiss
Totally. I'm amazed. The modifications the A-137 can make to a triangle wave defy all my expectations. Really a gorgeous-sounding module. I'm gonna need one of those. --Chuck > -----Original Message----- > From: Bakis Sirros [mailto:synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com] > Sent: Friday, Dec
2004-12-03 by Andrew Ison
Hows about live components touching the earthed rack itself? ----- Original Message ----- From: stuadh To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 11:02 AM Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Power Source interference In my case, I can't really contact Doepfer direct
2004-12-03 by Brandon Daniel
Modular Fan said: > > hello, > > For everyone that has been waiting for me to fill > their order, I appreciate the patience. The first > shipment has officially left Doepfer in Germany. It is > over 756 pounds of gear so there should be plenty for > everyone. Woohoo, here come so
2004-12-03 by royce
hi folks, if anybody handy out there is interested: i have an analogue systems mixer module that is not working in my a.sol case. i'm not sure why. i traded it on analogue heaven a while back and i'm sure it wasn' broken when i got it. i don't know how to test it. i have an a.sol
2004-12-03 by Modular Fan
hello, My fault, that should say "sorry to the non-USA customers..." =) Soon it'll be a busy day of "building" systems. Thanks, Shawn Cleary schism@traumatik.net www.analoguehaven.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http:/
2004-12-03 by Modular Fan
hello, For everyone that has been waiting for me to fill their order, I appreciate the patience. The first shipment has officially left Doepfer in Germany. It is over 756 pounds of gear so there should be plenty for everyone. I expect it sometime next week so orders will be fille
2004-12-03 by achtung_999
Hey hello, Today my A-172 arrived. A great module which I can recommend to everyone. I ordered it after I had a change to use my friend Dave's A-172 (who put some of his modules in this: http://www.xs4all.nl/~krooshof/instrumenten/dope.html). The A-172 is great for putting audio
2004-12-03 by trebcavxx
In my own case too, my synth does not consist solely of Doepfer modules. There are also Analogue Solutions and home-built modules. Early on, I did have to run all the LFO modules from their own seperate power supply, due to a buzzing kind of interference that occurred in synchron
2004-12-03 by ilanode
Hi Stuadh, guess you're using the Power One HAA series which is recommended eg by Oakley?! Thus my only hint would be to separate the power supply strictly for the audio path on one hand and for CV and trigger/gate sources on the other. That way you have no hassle with the cap va
2004-12-03 by Bakis Sirros
btw, it is really wierd: i have a modular with 18 PSU's and i have never noticed any interference in the audio outputs. are you sure that all the 6U cases are properly grounded? but, of course, you should contact Roland Mayer direct. his email: technik@doepfer.de bakis. --- selfo
2004-12-03 by stuadh
In my case, I can't really contact Doepfer direct as I'm using a mix of A Sys, Doepfer and homemade modules with a 6U A Sys case and a 6U homemade case Power-one PSU). That said, the trouble started before I added any of the homemade stuff and I added the a-146 LFO to the A Sys c
2004-12-03 by selfoscillate
hello richard, i'd love to help you, but i can't. i'm a nut when it comes to electrical things. maybe you should email the technical stuff at doepfer directly. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "trebcavxx" wrote: > > You've highlighted a condition that's been
2004-12-03 by trebcavxx
You've highlighted a condition that's been present in my own 75- module synth almost from the word GO - pulsating modulation in the sound output. It occurs to a greater or lesser degree in virtually ALL patches (I have 11 VCOs) - and takesd the form of a cyclic variation in ampli
2004-12-03 by Bakis Sirros
hello ingo, again, many thanks for the useful audio clips! bakis. --- selfoscillate wrote: > > > hello, > > here are some a137 examples. > > a triangle wave with fixed frequency coming > from an a111 vco was fed into the a137 input. > > this is the a111 triangle, used as source.
2004-12-03 by selfoscillate
hello, here are some a137 examples. a triangle wave with fixed frequency coming from an a111 vco was fed into the a137 input. this is the a111 triangle, used as source. http://www.selfoscillate.de/a100files/a137-input.mp3 (021kb) in the first example the parameters of the a137 we
2004-12-02 by Florian Anwander
Hi Matthew > application for it other than *slight* timbre modification. If > anybody has some super sexy examples of how to use the A-116 to it's > full potential, please share! I use the A116 is a "normal" Fuzz-Box with extended parameters. So my three main usages are: The bori
2004-12-02 by omegaattraktor
> I don't mean to talk bad on the A-116, but, I never found a musical > application for it other than *slight* timbre modification. If > anybody has some super sexy examples of how to use the A-116 to it's > full potential, please share! > > Matthew one thing i like to do with th
2004-12-01 by mritenburg
> I own the A-116 Waveform Processor too, and the comparison between > A116 and the A137 is like between normal Hardsync and the sounds > you can create with a PLL. > > Florian I don't mean to talk bad on the A-116, but, I never found a musical application for it other than *slig
2004-12-01 by Florian Anwander
Hi Olivier > The reason I am a bit suspicious with the Wave Multiplier is, that I > have made not too good experiences with other Waveshapers. I have a > dual Waveshaper in my Technosaurus Selector and this one is sooo > subtle. Subtle can be good or really boring. Well, all my W
2004-12-01 by Pierre Zeeman
Olivier, >The reason I am a bit suspicious with the Wave Multiplier is, that I >have made not too good experiences with other Waveshapers. ... all my >Waveshapers >so far were boring. While one person's extreme can easily be another's not extreme enough, on my limited experience
2004-12-01 by selfoscillate
> The reason I am a bit suspicious with the Wave Multiplier is, that I > have made not too good experiences with other Waveshapers. I have a > dual Waveshaper in my Technosaurus Selector and this one is sooo > subtle. Subtle can be good or really boring. Well, all my Waveshapers
2004-11-30 by stuadh
Hi, I've been reading up on interference caused by LEDs on the power bus in the archives, a problem that I'm having in my homemade and commercial cases. I've minimised the problem by strategically placing the offending modules, but there was some discussion about including large
2004-11-30 by waveform100
Thanks Florian. My name is Olivier (smoo), I know your Name from "Keys" (I was once on a picture in the Keys...) BTW: Thanks for the PLL, love it. The reason I am a bit suspicious with the Wave Multiplier is, that I have made not too good experiences with other Waveshapers. I hav
2004-11-30 by waveform100
@ Matthew. I already own a Wiard Waveform City and a Mini-Wave, so Buchla-Style Waveshaping is not what I am looking for. I also own a Ken Stone Wave Multiplier, but it has no Faceplate yet:-) Thanks for your interesting info. It is rare to hear a opinion from somebody how had th
2004-11-30 by Bakis Sirros
hello florian, ok, so we agree. we are saying the same thing. actually, i use linear vca's (a132) for audio most of the times! bakis. --- Florian Anwander wrote: > Hi Bakis > > > hello, > > the "correct" vca for audio is the exponential > one. > > the linear is best for cv signal
2004-11-30 by Florian Anwander
Hi Gustaf > But the other aspect (besides pots and stuff): > Does the A132 have worse sound quality than an A130 lin VCA? > Does it add noise or have less accurate tracking to the input CV than > A130? > Is it the same circuitry or does the A132 use cheaper parts? > Did anyone co
2004-11-30 by Florian Anwander
Hi Bakis > hello, > the "correct" vca for audio is the exponential one. > the linear is best for cv signals, but, of course, > both types of vca's can be used for audio and cv. > bakis. This is definitely not true. An exponential VCA is only required to realize a volume change by
2004-11-30 by gargar1974
Hi, I've been thinking about the same thing. I understand that the difference between log. and lin. VCAs when used for audio is the loudness response curve. But the other aspect (besides pots and stuff): Does the A132 have worse sound quality than an A130 lin VCA? Does it add noi
2004-11-30 by Florian Anwander
Hi waveform100 (btw I prefer to know the firstnames of persons I talk to...) > I couldn't find anything about this module in the group. It looks > very interesting. Is it any good? Comparable to the Serge Multipliers > or the Ken Stone Wave Multiplier? I do own it and I like it v
2004-11-30 by ilanode
Bakis, off course your right. A person like me prone to confuse math. terms should have a look on it's A100 for the correct ones. Take care, Ilanode --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros wrote: > hello, > the "correct" vca for audio is the exponential one. > the linea
2004-11-30 by Bakis Sirros
hello, the "correct" vca for audio is the exponential one. the linear is best for cv signals, but, of course, both types of vca's can be used for audio and cv. bakis. --- ilanode wrote: > > Hi thomasborax, technical correct would be a lin vca > for audio but > in the end it comes
2004-11-30 by ilanode
Hi thomasborax, technical correct would be a lin vca for audio but in the end it comes down to personal liking. some prefer log - or even a vactrol based - vca for audio compared to lin. Regards, Ilanode --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "thomasborax" wrote: > > hi folks- > qu
2004-11-30 by Pierre Zeeman
Hi, >It is a marvel of modern science Agreed - I love it: it's probably my overall favourite module (at the moment :)). It can produce a wide range of interesting and useful sounds. As ever with synthesised tones these are difficult to describe, but it is generating sidebands so
2004-11-30 by selfoscillate
--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "thomasborax" wrote: > > hi folks- > quick question- > the dual low cost vca. i'm tight on cash and space, i'd like to use > it as my audio vca. i can add/subtract gain from an external mixer, > i just want it controlled by an eg as any vca wo
2004-11-30 by selfoscillate
--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "waveform100" wrote: > > I couldn't find anything about this module in the group. It looks > very interesting. Is it any good? Comparable to the Serge Multipliers > or the Ken Stone Wave Multiplier? > > I wonder why this is no subject here.. I
2004-11-30 by mritenburg
--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "waveform100" wrote: > > I couldn't find anything about this module in the group. It looks > very interesting. Is it any good? Comparable to the Serge Multipliers > or the Ken Stone Wave Multiplier? I owned an A137. I also own a Ken Stone Wave
2004-11-29 by thomasborax
hi folks- quick question- the dual low cost vca. i'm tight on cash and space, i'd like to use it as my audio vca. i can add/subtract gain from an external mixer, i just want it controlled by an eg as any vca would be. i don't need multiple inputs or pots. also, the ssm2044 filter
2004-11-29 by Andrew Ison
It is a marvel of modern science,soon i shall furnish the rack with another. ----- Original Message ----- From: waveform100 To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 8:44 PM Subject: [Doepfer_a100] A-137 Wave Multiplier I couldn't find anything about this m
2004-11-29 by waveform100
I couldn't find anything about this module in the group. It looks very interesting. Is it any good? Comparable to the Serge Multipliers or the Ken Stone Wave Multiplier? I wonder why this is no subject here.. I am not sure, but maybe Doepfer-Users think it is as boring as the A11
2004-11-29 by Bakis Sirros
hello ingo, many thanks for the excellent work you have done recording all these useful audio clips for the group! regards, bakis. --- selfoscillate wrote: > > > hello, > > here are some very short examples for the > a143/1 and a143/2 quad envelope generators. > obviously these m
2004-11-28 by achtung_999
--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Michael Phillip Wojewoda wrote: > i would like to join It seems you're already in man!
2004-11-28 by Michael Phillip Wojewoda
i would like to join
2004-11-27 by selfoscillate
hello, here are some very short examples for the a143/1 and a143/2 quad envelope generators. obviously these modules leave ordinary quad envelope generators behind. they can also be used as multistage envelopes or lfo's. the examples are mostly very simple, but this way the shape