Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 427 of 564 · 28179 messages matched

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Quick question concerning the A140

2004-09-20 by Bakis Sirros

hello keld, yes it should be correct. the inverted a140 output should be from 0 to -8volts.the REVERSED(or inversed) output (if the a140 had one) would be from 8 to 0volts. that is, in detail, an inverted output with an 8volts offset added to it. bakis. --- Keld S'rensen wrote: >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] LFO interference update

2004-09-20 by ALMAGATA@telefonica.net

Ops! You are right! sorry I was with my mind in other planet... I was thinking the leds get the power from the +5 supply.. Josue. > Very few doepfer modules suck power from the 5v line. The > majority, if they need it, regulate it down on the module itself. > > > > Julian

Thread view Attachments: 0

Quick question concerning the A140

2004-09-20 by Keld Sørensen

Hi all. I just have a quick question about the A140. In the manual it says that the output of the EG is from 0 volt to 8 volt for the normal EG (attack) but 0 volt to -8 volt for the inverse. Is this correct? - I would think that the inverse would be 8 volt to 0 volt for the atta

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Nasty sounds from my a100 system

2004-09-20 by plexusy

hallo ernst. i just wanted to tell you how much i enjoyed your sounds! although no 'musical' they are very unique and could certainly be used in a tune. they are a great example of the kinds of things one can do with analogue modulars that would be very difficult to do otherwise.

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Doepfer_a100] some notes about the new doepfer stuff

2004-09-20 by Zoran Bosnjak

Hi Ingo, if you could post one sample of a101/2 lowpass gate, that would be fantastic. I want to buy that module, and I wonder if it sounds as good as Cyndastries one. Regards Zoran >From: "selfoscillate" >Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com >To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] LFO interference update

2004-09-20 by Florian Anwander

Hi Julian >>Could you proove the "crosstalk" by mounting only one LFO and one VCO to the case? > I don't understand what that would achieve? It is a basic principle of error analysis, that you go from the easy system to the complicated system. The easy system is - Powersupply - v

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] LFO interference update

2004-09-20 by Julian

The psu is a power-one HCBB-75W-A I dont really understand what you meen about the leds and 5V? Very few doepfer modules suck power from the 5v line. The majority, if they need it, regulate it down on the module itself. Julian ----- Original Message ----- > what PSU are you using

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] LFO interference update

2004-09-20 by ALMAGATA@telefonica.net

Hi Julian, what PSU are you using? Its 1.5amp at each + and -? Also (and most important) how many Amps is the 5V supply? My interferencing problems was with leds! they get much current and if your 5v is derived from the +12 line they can interference with other modules. Best Rega

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] LFO interference update

2004-09-20 by Julian

Hello Florian, > Do you really use all six pins of the 16way connector for ground? Yes, i am using all 6 pins (ie three lines on the stripboard). I am also considering running some 24gauge wire along the rear of the stripboard to increase the magnitude of these lines also, for go

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] LFO interference update

2004-09-20 by Florian Anwander

Hi Julian > [ http://www.port23.co.uk/synthdiy/a100/wireing.jpg ] > > My plan now is to increase the gauge of my grounding wires a lot (not that theyre small at the moment), possibly even running a > separate line from each bus back to the common point on the psu. And then maybe

Thread view Attachments: 0

LFO interference update

2004-09-20 by Julian

Just a quick update. My powerone psu arrived just before the weekend. This is a 1.5 amp unit, that should be well within bounds for my 4 row system. And, unfortunately, it does not rid me of the lfo interference. To outline, the easiest way to spot this is to have a couple of vco

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] some notes about the new doepfer stuff

2004-09-20 by Florian Anwander

Hi Ingo > psu2 > ---- > much better than the old one. > i always had problems with my a199 and hum induced > by the power supply. now that i've mounted my a199 > inside a new frame with psu2, all the problems had > gone. no hum and buzz anymore. Also the mechanical hum of the PSU

Thread view Attachments: 0

Touchplate keyboard

2004-09-20 by Modular Fan

hello, > I disagree because that would exclude people who don't rack their Doepfer. I have a big Analogue Systems 8500x modular and then for Doepfer I use stacked SKB cases, of the basic system type because they are not so deep. In 95% of the situation I prefer Doepfer over the A

Thread view Attachments: 0

some notes about the new doepfer stuff

2004-09-20 by selfoscillate

hello, last weekend i've received some new modules. sorry for not doing the a107 examples, but i had to try my new modules first. i hope you all understand ;-) i'll do the a107 examples during this week. a101/1 multitype input vcf (steiner filter) --------------------------------

Thread view Attachments: 0

Nasty sounds from my a100 system

2004-09-19 by achtung_999

Hi list. Just to show you what my sick noise twisting mind came up with. http://www.xs4all.nl/~eloo999/downloads/doepf.mp3 http://www.xs4all.nl/~eloo999/downloads/doepf2.mp3 Noise Warning: not regular Vangelis-style appreggios !! Grtz. Ernst http://www.dendriet.nl http://www.xs4a

Thread view Attachments: 0

a106/7

2004-09-18 by Pierre Zeeman

Hi Ingo, Thanks - hit us with those mad modes then :) rgds Pierre _________________________________________________________________ Get 35 custom filters to manage your e-mail - CLICK! http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-xe

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: parts for diy

2004-09-18 by Tim Stinchcombe

Hi Jim, > Hi, I am trying to make some of my own diy Doepfer > compatible boards. I would like to know what type of > connector is used on the pcboards for the bus connector > (i.e. the 16 pin variety). You can use 'double row' 0.1" pitch pin strip, such as available from Maplins

Thread view Attachments: 0

parts for diy

2004-09-18 by gnarl_heavebrow

Hi, I am trying to make some of my own diy Doepfer compatible boards. I would like to know what type of connector is used on the pcboards for the bus connector (i.e. the 16 pin variety). Also, does anyone know if mounting brackets are standard with regular pc-mount pots, or is th

Thread view Attachments: 0

New poll for Doepfer_a100

2004-09-17 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com

Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the Doepfer_a100 group: What color/kind of knobs would you prefer the new TKS control section module to have? (in this early stage of development, you can still influence the kind of new small knobs that will be used. i spoke

Thread view Attachments: 0

a106 vs a107

2004-09-17 by Pierre Zeeman

Hi, Hahaha - I had a sneaky feeling that you guys would respond like this :) >maybe i should also do some more a107 examples to make >you buy both? ;-) That would be great. But see below ;) >beautiful filter with lots of capabilities. you can >create a million sounds with it. >bu

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: a106 vs a107

2004-09-17 by selfoscillate

hello pierre, --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Pierre Zeeman" wrote: > Hi, > > Hahaha - I had a sneaky feeling that you guys would respond like this :) :-) hehehe > >maybe i should also do some more a107 examples to make > >you buy both? ;-) > > That would be great. But see

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Fwd: New TKB approach

2004-09-17 by ilanode

Hi, I'm overjoyed that the TBK is back. Yes, release it the way it is (or even the original design) and I'll buy it. Yes, Dieter's delaying tactics have made me compliant. However, since posting the new concept opens up the discussion again: my 2 cents but keep in mind it's not m

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Fwd: New TKB approach

2004-09-16 by pela_gius

I hope that the controllers willl be thin enough that they can be built into a custom standalone box or mounted on the small horizontal part of a buchla-style curved cabinet. Or squeezed into a portable suitcase synth. When I hear 19" rack I'm picturing a typical deep rackmount m

Thread view Attachments: 0

Fwd: AW: [Doepfer_a100] A-119 pdf. manual(PDF corrected!)

2004-09-16 by Bakis Sirros

--- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > To: "Bakis Sirros" > Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] A-119 pdf. manual > Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:01:33 +0200 > > > > > -----Urspr'ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Bakis Sirros > [mailto:synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com] > > Gesendet: Do

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Spam] [Doepfer_a100] Re: Case design - was: New TKB approach

2004-09-16 by Julian

> Julian, > > easiest solution is to have a front panel that's slightly higher so that > the sockets are not seen when rack mounted, would look good on a > freestanding unit as well I expect. Yeah, this i know, but the issue for me is not that i dont like looking a the cables sti

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Spam] [Doepfer_a100] Re: Case design - was: New TKB approach

2004-09-16 by David Salter

Julian, easiest solution is to have a front panel that's slightly higher so that the sockets are not seen when rack mounted, would look good on a freestanding unit as well I expect. David Salter Reuters Ltd UKI Project Management Tel. +44 207 542 2402 Fax. +44 207 542 2699 Email.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Case design - was: New TKB approach

2004-09-16 by Julian

My 2 pence.... I have a drehbank. I really like the way it can be racked or free standing, with the addition or removal of ears. I have used it in both ways, acocrding to situation. What i dont like, however, is the way i have to leave a gap on the top, when itw rackmounted, in o

Thread view Attachments: 0

For Sale,: Doepfer 108 filter

2004-09-16 by cuari7

Mint condition, but I replaced its boring light-gray knobs with bakelite ones, with spun aluminum caps. If you want the original knobs I'll send them (but I lost/misplaced one, though). Want $120 + s/h. Contact me at jesus.diaz@jax.ufl.edu cuari7

Thread view Attachments: 0

Fwd: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re:New TKB approach(doepfer's comments)

2004-09-16 by Bakis Sirros

--- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > To: "Bakis Sirros" > Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Fwd: New TKB > approach > Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:10:41 +0200 > > > -----Urspr'ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: levka0 [mailto:levka@dds.nl] > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Sept

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] A106

2004-09-16 by Bakis Sirros

hello pierre, i would recommend to get an a107 too! it is a very beautiful filter with lots of capabilities. you can create a million sounds with it. buy two a106's AND the a107! bakis. --- Pierre Zeeman wrote: > Thanks very much to Ingo for the clips. I am > *totally* sold on th

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] A-119 pdf. manual

2004-09-16 by Antonio Tuzzi

I have a working copy... if you want I can send it to you. Antonio Tuzzi On Giovedì, set 16, 2004, at 08:29 Europe/Rome, controlexsanguinate wrote: > > Hello, > > I tried to download the A-119 (English version) pdf. but it seems to > have an error while trying to open it. I was w

Thread view Attachments: 0

latest news about the TOUCH/NORMAL KS MODULES!

2004-09-16 by Bakis Sirros

dieter says: "Our idea is to make the housing 19" but without fixed 19" mounting flanges. The mounting flanges will be separate and at the housing will be different threads so that the keyboard can be mounted in different angles and distances in the 19" rack (e.g. horizontal, 15/

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] A-119 pdf. manual

2004-09-16 by Bakis Sirros

could you correct this, please, dieter? thanks, bakis --- controlexsanguinate wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to download the A-119 (English version) pdf. > but it seems to > have an error while trying to open it. I was > wondering if anyone has > a pdf of this manual that will open

Thread view Attachments: 0

A106

2004-09-16 by Pierre Zeeman

Thanks very much to Ingo for the clips. I am *totally* sold on this module - I just love characterful filters. I was going to get an a107 but from the other clips Ingo posted it sounds a little bland to me. So now I think I will get two of these instead :) _______________________

Thread view Attachments: 0

more a107 examples wanted? (was an A106 thread formerly)

2004-09-16 by selfoscillate

hello pierre, maybe i should also do some more a107 examples to make you buy both? ;-) i agree that the a106 sounds more radical, but the a107 has it's own quality and can sound radical too. as said before, it is difficult to show the capabilities of the a107 in just a few simple

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: A-119 pdf. manual

2004-09-16 by selfoscillate

the file seems to be broken, i couldn't open it too. you should report this to doepfer. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "controlexsanguinate" wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to download the A-119 (English version) pdf. but it seems to > have an error while tryin

Thread view Attachments: 0

A-119 pdf. manual

2004-09-16 by controlexsanguinate

Hello, I tried to download the A-119 (English version) pdf. but it seems to have an error while trying to open it. I was wondering if anyone has a pdf of this manual that will open properly? Thanks for your time. Take care, Thomas

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Fwd: New TKB approach

2004-09-15 by Bakis Sirros

hello, i guess that the minijack inputs for clock start, stop, step and reset will be included for sure, as they are essential for any analogue sequencer. bakis. --- levka0 wrote: > Hi all > My initial thoughts on this; > > I would prefer the controller to be in a seperate > self

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: a106 examples with patched feedback loop

2004-09-15 by levka0

Very nice indeed Ingo ! Especially the 2nd clip tickels my senses kind Regards Joost --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" wrote: > > hello all, > > here are some more a106 examples, this time > with additional modules patched into the > feedback loop. > > again th

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Fwd: New TKB approach

2004-09-15 by levka0

Hi all My initial thoughts on this; I would prefer the controller to be in a seperate self-contained 19" rack enclosure, eg 2-3 U high, rather than as a "module" for G3 or G6 racks Regarding the polyphonic mode; Could the four CV/gate signals maybe made available also on 8 sepera

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Fwd: New TKB approach

2004-09-15 by Bakis Sirros

hello shawn, yes! an angled rack for the keyboard anc control section modules would be great!!! otherwise it won't be very practical to play this (normal or touch) keyboard in a vertical position. plus it would look great for sure! please, dieter, release an angled rack for the T

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Fwd: New TKB approach

2004-09-15 by Modular Fan

hello, > I agree. And what would really be superb is some sort of slanted industrial rack where the tkb below could be angled. Imagine a large Doepfer system with 3-4 tkbs throughout, triggering various things. That'll save quite a bit of space (+ look cooler) than traditional ke

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Fwd: New TKB approach

2004-09-15 by Bakis Sirros

hello matthew, yes, i agree. as for the various features included, all the suggestion made in the doepfer page will be very helpful for most of us, i think! so, it would be best if ALL of the different modes were included, as the user can easily navigate thru the different modes

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Fwd: New TKB approach

2004-09-15 by shm1400

Once again, good ol' Dieter Doepfer has come up with an idea that is actually better than all the suggestions we were throwing at him. This idea is brilliant. It would be probably the best synth controller out there, and I would definitely buy it in exactly the form he has presen

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Fwd: New TKB approach

2004-09-15 by mritenburg

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros wrote: > > --- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > > > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > > To: "Bakis Sirros" > > Subject: New TKB approach > > Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:15:16 +0200 > > > > We started a new TKB approach. For details please > > look at

Thread view Attachments: 0

Fwd: New TKB approach

2004-09-15 by Bakis Sirros

--- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > To: "Bakis Sirros" > Subject: New TKB approach > Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:15:16 +0200 > > We started a new TKB approach. For details please > look at our web site > www.doepfer.de/a100tkb.htm > Maybe this time we will come to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Doepfer and Analogue Systems modules/power adaptor for sale

2004-09-15 by Modular Fan

hello, Before I start...those a-106 ms-20 filter mp3s sound great!! Can't wait for that module. OK- my apologies to the people that get this message on multiple lists. I just thought I'd try to sell some various used modules to help fund an upcoming "purchase". If I listed a modu

Thread view Attachments: 0

a106 examples with patched feedback loop

2004-09-15 by selfoscillate

hello all, here are some more a106 examples, this time with additional modules patched into the feedback loop. again the same drumloop was used as in my previous examples. the drumloop coming from an a119 was fed into the a106. the envelope follower output was used to modulate th

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Doepfer rack

2004-09-14 by stuadh

Good point, I'm forgetting that I'm scrounging some bits and pieces from work. That said, the context of the original question was that there was no need to buy and additional PSU. I'm Interested in the further interference issues, even with the Power-One PSU. I think you read my

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.