2003-06-26 by klamb000
Ahh... the Schumann custom stuff. I hear it's very nice stuff. Regards, Kevin --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "ps_minor" wrote: > hey that sounds nearly identical to my new favorite device, a box a friend of > mine has put into production recently, called simply the PLL. it'
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by ps_minor
hey that sounds nearly identical to my new favorite device, a box a friend of mine has put into production recently, called simply the PLL. it's an amazing thing.. mine will have CV added soon, and an arpegiator for cycling through harmonics. it has germainium overdrive circuits
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by Bakis Sirros
--- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > To: "Bakis Sirros" > Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Fwd:dieter's comment > on vu-meter module! > Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 19:21:24 +0200 > > Bakis, please forward ... > > > > A VU with LED display would be no problem as > > > su
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by Andreas Lindholm
Whoooezzzch... brakes on I take that back. The A133 looks like a very good attenuator to me. Could be better but it will do the job for me... the only thing I don't get is that the LEDs are supposed to show if it boosts or lowers the signal. I would prefer the LED to show if the
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by Hans Greuber
Hi all; I have an A-127 triple resonance filter ,only used a couple of times,mint that I would like to trade for the A-104 Formant filter. Very serious person ,lots of refences available. Hans _________________________________________________________________ Charla con tus amigos
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by Andreas Lindholm
I feel a bit like saying "I told you so" since I have all along favoured an LCD meter and always seen it as a tuner for cv use, but of course if it also works as a normal cromatic tuner that would indeed be to my liking. /Andreas ----- Original Message ----- From: "klamb000" To:
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by Andreas Lindholm
That sounds interesting to me although I don't completey grasap it, but the wobbling and inaccuracy in this case could be more advatageous as an effect than a pure VCO it seems to me... when did this module come up on the agenda? I didn't even know it was something Doepfer had in
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by Andreas Lindholm
I like the A172 very much its a very simple useful and slim design - perfect. Now I just want an attenuator and I am a happy camper! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bakis Sirros" To: "Doepfer_a100 group" Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 7:19 PM Subject: [Doepfer_a100] new A149-1 SO
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by Bakis Sirros
dieter says: "a PLL and it's application is not very easy to understand. I will try to write an explanation and publish it on our web site as soon as we publish the preliminary page for the PLL module (no A-100 number so far). Here is a simplified explanation: A PLL is a linear r
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by unknown freak
Oops! I misread Doepfer's statement. You're right. Breezing through, I thought he'd said they searched extensively, when he was in fact saying the opposite. In the context of what I thought he'd said, your concerns surprised me. Sorry 'bout that. I hope this is an issue that Doep
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by unknown freak
If anything, the statement that they'd researched an extensive list of sources for the meters shows genuine interest in meeting the customers' wishes. > -----Original Message----- > From: selfoscillate [mailto:synaptic_music@yahoo.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:58 AM > To
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by Joe Buechler
> I guess personally though I wouldn't hinge my plans for 4 rows of > modules on the meter issue if there seemed to be a homebrew > solution to meters not too far out of reach, but that's me. Perfectly valid point, but frustration leads to these kind of reactions :-) I would hing
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by unknown freak
You jest, I trust. > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Buechler [mailto:buechlerjoe@toadmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:36 AM > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Fwd:dieter's comment on vu-meter module! > > > > > A VU with LED display
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by Florian Anwander
Hi nutrafx > an lcd would be nice if the module doubled as a basic tuner This is a great idea!!!! Lets hope it is not too expensive to develope a tuner. Florian
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by klamb000
The more I think about it, the more I like the idea of an LCD meter, and you might as well throw in a tuner (which shouldn't be too expensive, especially since the Korg CA-20 tuner is around the $30 mark). By using an LCD, it could also be configured as a multi meter. Regards, Ke
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by Joe Buechler
Charles, I look up to you and admire you a great deal, but I don't see how "So far we did not find a supplier but we have not yet searched very intensively" is a statement that they'd researched an extensive list of sources for the meters. The last time the subject came up, the r
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by selfoscillate
hello joe, you know that dieter is very busy developing so many modules at the same time. i would not say that he isn't interested. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Joe Buechler" wrote: > > > A VU with LED display would be no problem as > > suitable integrat
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by Joe Buechler
> A VU with LED display would be no problem as > suitable integrated LED display > driver circuits are available on the market. But we > have to find a > manufacturer of suitable moving coil VU meters - > maybe with backlight. So > far we did not find a supplier but we have not y
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by nutrafx
an lcd would be nice if the module doubled as a basic tuner it could add a new dimension to patches played via theremin or ribbon controller --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "klamb000" wrote: > Although I like the look of moving coil meters, an LCD one (like Korg > uses on it
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-26 by Bakis Sirros
yes!i agree...we need the a154 now. bakis. --- Brandon wrote: > 6/25/2003 6:55:07 AM, "Joe Buechler" > wrote: > > > > >> ANY COMMENTS???? > >> bakis. > > > >- Seems like the A154 should go as is, otherwise > it, and all the > other > >modules behind it, will get delayed. > > I ag
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by ringmod45
Now that the SOU modules are in the pipeline, do you not see a need for first and last step cv in's on the A154. I know it might delay the release date, but think of the options for greater control. More control equals more power. RM --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Joe Buec
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by klamb000
Although I like the look of moving coil meters, an LCD one (like Korg uses on it's CA-20 tuning meter) would be more than excellent. Regards, Kevin --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros wrote: > > --- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > > To: "Bakis Sir
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by Bakis Sirros
me too, bakis. --- ps_minor wrote: > i'm w joe & kevin. > -psm > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "klamb000" > wrote: > > Yeah, what Joe said. > > > > Regards, > > Kevin > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Joe > Buechler" > > wrote: > > > > > > > ANY COMMENT
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by Bakis Sirros
--- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > To: "Bakis Sirros" > Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: some new info from > dieter...about everything... > Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 19:01:23 +0200 > > > -----Urspr'ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Bakis Sirros > [mailto:synth_freak_
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by Bakis Sirros
--- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > To: "Bakis Sirros" > Subject: > Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 19:01:22 +0200 > > > > We will even test a modified version of > > > the A-138a/b. The difference is a jumper for the > first > > > potentiometer so that it could be used a
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by unknown freak
Very well put. > -----Original Message----- > From: jfm3jfm3jfm3 [mailto:jmik@nbcs.rutgers.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 2:47 PM > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] FS: Schaltwerk > > > I need to sell my schaltwerk! > > Because the look of the sch
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by Brandon Daniel
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, unknown freak wrote: > Do you think, in other words, we're wrecking our own credibility? Not necessarily, but modular users in general tend to consider money and time to be low priorities, and have never seen a feature they wouldn't like. This is especially t
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by unknown freak
Do you think, in other words, we're wrecking our own credibility? > -----Original Message----- > From: Brandon [mailto:bdu@fdiskc.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 1:09 PM > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: some new info from > dieter...about
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by pela_gius
Thanks Florian and Kevin for the responses, it makes a little more sense to me now. I've been sick a couple of days so I'm just catching up with this and I'll give it a try tonight. I don't have an inverter but I'm going to try to trigger an EG instead to give an acoustic instrum
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by klamb000
I agree with Brandon insofar as the modular community consists largely of feature-junkies who mostly don't consider the cost factor or business sense when requesting another bell and/or whistle. I feel that Dieter is quite gracious in encouraging user input in the form of polls,
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by Brandon
6/25/2003 6:55:07 AM, "Joe Buechler" wrote: > >> ANY COMMENTS???? >> bakis. > >- Seems like the A154 should go as is, otherwise it, and all the other >modules behind it, will get delayed. I agree completely. Dieter should know by now that if he says a feature is possible these ya
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by jfm3jfm3jfm3
I need to sell my schaltwerk! Because the look of the schaltwerk was important in my application, I carefully removed all black printing from the front face of the unit. It looks much nicer this way! This schaltwerk has OS v1.10. It is in excellent condition. It comes with the or
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by Bakis Sirros
hi joe, ooops....yes, you are right!i want one of these!:-) i'll ask dieter if a vu-meter module will be released in the near future. bakis. --- Joe Buechler wrote: > > > ANY COMMENTS???? > > bakis. > > - Seems like the A154 should go as is, otherwise it, > and all the other > mo
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by Florian Anwander
Hi Ethan > Please excuse my ignorance regarding PLL. > Can someone describe how this would be used > in a musically interesting way? On the Audioside - Highspeed VCO using a sequencer as grafic oscillator - Non harmonic parallel tuning (harder than soft sync but not hard sync) -
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by David Salter
Go for the A154 as is then. No point holding up dev work on every thing else. I'll still buy it. David Salter Tel: +44 20 7542 2402 Mob: +44 7990562402 Fax: +44 20 7542 2699 -----Original Message----- From: Bakis Sirros [mailto:synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com] Sent: 25 June 2003 13:54
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by Analogueman
* > snip > We are also about to design a prototype for a PLL > module. But I have no details so far. As soon as we > have a rough idea regarding the controls I will put a > front panel sketch and a short description on our web > site. A PPL module... mmmmm... Been waiting a long
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by ethanzer0
> > We are also about to design a prototype for a PLL > module. But I have no details so far. As soon as we > have a rough idea regarding the controls I will put a > front panel sketch and a short description on our web > site. Please excuse my ignorance regarding PLL. I am assum
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by selfoscillate
--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros wrote: > dieter says: > "thank you for the poll results. We will try to meet > all the requests but we have to discuss the details. > E.g. for the A-154 the suggestions of non-Yahoo group > members are completely different, especi
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by Bakis Sirros
dieter says: "thank you for the poll results. We will try to meet all the requests but we have to discuss the details. E.g. for the A-154 the suggestions of non-Yahoo group members are completely different, especially no CV inputs for first/last step. For the other new suggested
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by ps_minor
i'm w joe & kevin. -psm --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "klamb000" wrote: > Yeah, what Joe said. > > Regards, > Kevin > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Joe Buechler" > wrote: > > > > > ANY COMMENTS???? > > > bakis. > > > > - Seems like the A154 should go as is, oth
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by klamb000
Yeah, what Joe said. Regards, Kevin --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Joe Buechler" wrote: > > > ANY COMMENTS???? > > bakis. > > - Seems like the A154 should go as is, otherwise it, and all the other > modules behind it, will get delayed. > > - Sorry to see no discussion of t
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-25 by Joe Buechler
> ANY COMMENTS???? > bakis. - Seems like the A154 should go as is, otherwise it, and all the other modules behind it, will get delayed. - Sorry to see no discussion of the meter module, even though Dieter mentioned it in the recent interview posted here. Joe
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-24 by Joe Buechler
Thanks, Florian and Kevin, for the discussion. I've been "getting my feet wet" with a MAM VF11 vocoder, and your advice to use compression made a dramatic improvement for me. Next A100 cabinet will definitely have a vocoder susbsystem. Joe --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Flo
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-24 by Florian Anwander
> > That said, there's no reason at all to include the A176 and mixer > > if all one wants is compression. I understood you. Very nice is to combine the compressor with an Expander controlled by the same Signal and to feed the both VCAs with a frequency split signal ExtIn CV-out
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-24 by Florian Anwander
Hi Kevin (and pelagius) > Basically, the patch uses the lower half of the A170 Slew Limiter, > which allows for variable attack and release times. Otherwise, it's > a fairly straightforward affair. Just make sure you don't overload > the A119, and tweak gently until you get the f
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-24 by klamb000
Correction: > That said, there's no reason at all to include the A176 and mixer > if all one wants is compression. I meant to say "limiting". Sorry. Regards, Kevin
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-24 by klamb000
Florian, The only reason for the A176 and mixer is to simulate compression (i.e. giving a dynamic floor), and to add one more level of control. Also, by adding the two modules and using the lower half of the A170, variable attack and release times can be achieved, which gives har
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-23 by klamb000
I've put a diagram of a simple limiter patch in the Files section. It's called "Variable_Limiter.JPG", and the link is: http://a4.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/gJT3PvVTpNCFtmyw6buRx6NcZdapl4j9TY1fDjSgk ezQUqbjGYTHbhef4OiTRZHeNeARPg10W2dSRbOYTtu_SbGzgEM/variable_limiter.jp g Basically, the p
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-23 by pela_gius
--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Florian Anwander wrote: > For non-speech signals the compressor may be built > with the Ext.Signal Input, Inverter, Slewlimiter and VCA. For speech I use > my external tube compressor. How would you patch up a compressor anyway? I was trying t
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2003-06-23 by Florian Anwander
Hi selfoscillate > i find that the a129/3 attenuators are a "must". sometimes it is > necessary to have control over the amplitudes of the separate > filterbands to prevent distortions. I feed the modulator signal over a compressor before I send it to the 129/1 (the analysis sect
Thread view
Attachments: 0