Yahoo Groups archive

Dotcomformat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:20 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 8 of 27 · 1314 messages matched

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: MU format panel design. What is acceptable?

2009-05-30 by Scott Deyo

Hi Dan! http://www.bridechamber.com/bridechamber.com/JH%20Tau%20Pipe.html Or, if you go to the Synth Modules page, the modules with the white dot next to them are available in DotCom format, and should have a pic on the linked page. Scott Deyo The Bridechamber contact@bridechambe

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: MU format panel design. What is acceptable?

2009-05-30 by Dan Lind

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Scott Deyo wrote: > > Hi Dan! > > http://www.bridechamber.com/bridechamber.com/JH%20Tau%20Pipe.html > > Or, if you go to the Synth Modules page, the modules with the white dot > next to them are available in DotCom format, and should have a pi

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [dotcomformat] Re: MU format panel design. What is acceptable?

2009-05-30 by John L Rice

Hi Dan, I believe he already has the DotCom panel shown, it's the bottom image. (Notice the mounting hole spacing difference between the two) Took me a while to figure it out myself. Probably would be helpful if they were labeled and also if the pictures were proportional (the Do

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: MU format panel design. What is acceptable?

2009-05-30 by Dan Lind

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Scott Deyo wrote: > > I'd recommend matching DotCom as closely as possible. Mine are pretty > close to my eye, just a different font and tick marks, and I've hardly > sold any panels at all! > > Cheers, > Scott Deyo > The Bridechamber > contac

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] MU format panel design. What is acceptable?

2009-05-29 by Gordon Van Huizen

Well I'm looking forward to mine, Scott. :-) Gordon ----- Original Message ----- From: Scott Deyo To: dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:02 PM Subject: Re: [dotcomformat] MU format panel design. What is acceptable? I'd recommend matching DotCom as closely

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Hi any interest in dotcom Oakley

2009-05-28 by krisp

I like it Did you put the PCB the other way round :) how's she treating you ? cheers Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: karsteindjupdal To: dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:18 PM Subject: [dotcomformat] Re: Hi any interest in dotcom Oakley Nice ide

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Hi any interest in dotcom Oakley

2009-05-28 by karsteindjupdal

Nice idea. Seems like you could sell a few of the equinoxe phaser. I bought the phaser from Krisp1, and I think the Oakley modules are great. I was however annoyed with the different looking panel, so I recently made a dotcom panel myself. This is how it looks now: phase shifter

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: MU format panel design. What is acceptable?

2009-05-28 by krisp

I did thing about doing a Inverted MU type panel Silver with Black graphics for the Oakley panels , any one think this is a Totally bad Idea I will be using the Photo resist alloy print method Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: Zach To: dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thu

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: MU format panel design. What is acceptable?

2009-05-28 by edgard_varese

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "peng3002" wrote: > "VCO - Tri core. Outputs derived from VC waveshapers. There may be three different versions of this made available simultaneously (1MU, 2MU, alternative 2MU). reminiscent of Buchla 259 > VC EG - Misnamed for the moment. Can

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: MU format panel design. What is acceptable?

2009-05-27 by peng3002

Thanks to those who have responded so far. Your comments have been very helpful. See below for quote and replies: "Turned sides are a must, but it sounds like you're already up for that." "I don't think I would not buy a module because of the external styling (so long as it was s

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] MU format panel design. What is acceptable?

2009-05-27 by John Kraft

I don't think I would not buy a module because of the external styling (so long as it was size- and power-compatible; I do find myself avoiding MOTM modules because I'm too lazy to re-drill my cabinets and change the power connectors). Aesthetically, though, I'd prefer that it re

Thread view Attachments: 0

MOTM to MU conversion

2009-05-27 by peng3002

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "John L Rice" wrote: > > I thought that MOTM is the same height as DotCom/Moog etc It's just the > MOTM mounting holes are farther away from the panel edges which causes the > problem. > MOTM and DotCom (here on referred to as MU) are the same

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [dotcomformat] MU format panel design. What is acceptable?

2009-05-27 by John L Rice

I thought that MOTM is the same height as DotCom/Moog etc It’s just the MOTM mounting holes are farther away from the panel edges which causes the problem. I think Paul S at Synth Tech got out of the gate a year or two (not sure of the facts) before Roger A and Synth Tech offered

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] MU format panel design. What is acceptable?

2009-05-27 by Gordon Van Huizen

Taste is a rather subjective thing, but here's my view anyway. :-) Turned sides are a must, but it sounds like you're already up for that. As for other visual departures, I think it depends on the function of the module. If a module is exotic, it may be more acceptable (and indee

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] MU format panel design. What is acceptable?

2009-05-27 by Ross Totino

FPE looks badass in it's own way, but Metalphoto would look great. I don't mind different colored modules in my system. It's good for module makers to have a distinct look. I see my modular as a collection of instruments, and at the same time as a whole instrument. Actually with

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] MU format panel design. What is acceptable?

2009-05-27 by Scott Deyo

I'd recommend matching DotCom as closely as possible. Mine are pretty close to my eye, just a different font and tick marks, and I've hardly sold any panels at all! Cheers, Scott Deyo The Bridechamber contact@bridechamber.com http://www.bridechamber.com Jealous Edison Record Komp

Thread view Attachments: 0

MU format panel design. What is acceptable?

2009-05-26 by peng3002

Now that there is some activity here I would like to pose a question. I am getting ready to release some modules (VCF, VCO, Delay, VC EG, etc.), but I am not yet done with the panel design. The question is: If I go with a look that is very different than the Moog/DotCom style wil

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Hi any interest in dotcom Oakley

2009-05-26 by jon.sunnercrantz

Hi, I'm definently in for it as well, ass long as you are willing to ship to sweden. Do you have moog/dotcom style knobs and buttons aswell? best regards /Jon Sunnercrantz --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "krisp14u2" wrote: > > Hi to all on this group > My name is Paul Darlow

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [dotcomformat] Re: Hi any interest in dotcom Oakley

2009-05-26 by John L Rice

I know Bride Chamber has done a few, but I keep thinking that if someone was to make DotCom style panels for ALL Synth Tech MOTM modules, it would be a simple matter in most cases (some of the modules with digital displays etc might be more involved) to just buy the desired MOTM

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Hi any interest in dotcom Oakley

2009-05-26 by Jeff Burgener

Yes... LFO, I would buy Jeffsynth >>> John Kraft 5/25/2009 5:29 PM >>> So I am proposing to make some Oakley Modules in the Dotcom format with ether power adapters or on the newer PCB's a Dotcom Type power connector as standard (this should be good news for Dotcom DIYers) So the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Hi any interest in dotcom Oakley

2009-05-26 by Ross Totino

I purchased an Oakley Overdrive (MOTM format) for my dotcom from Krisp and was very satisfied with build quality and customer service. I use this module all the time! -Ross On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:29 PM, John Kraft jfk@uaudio.com > wrote: So I am proposing to make some Oakley M

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Hi any interest in dotcom Oakley

2009-05-25 by John Kraft

So I am proposing to make some Oakley Modules in the Dotcom format with ether power adapters or on the newer PCB's a Dotcom Type power connector as standard (this should be good news for Dotcom DIYers) So the big question, is this worth my while to invest in panels and adapters I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Hi any interest in dotcom Oakley

2009-05-25 by Zach

I'd be interested too. Especially in the Triple Little LFO and Equinoxe. --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "krisp14u2" wrote: > > Hi to all on this group > My name is Paul Darlow AKA Krisp1 Some of you may know me but if not I run krisp1.com and build and sell Oakley Modules I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Hi any interest in dotcom Oakley

2009-05-25 by krisp

I have been asked about the panel layouts in private mails as well as hear Most of the panel layouts are quite fixed due to the PCB mounting to the panel by the pots and pot brackets I would not want to change the PCB mounting arrangements as it works so well and the pots Im usin

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Hi any interest in dotcom Oakley

2009-05-25 by Pablo

Hello Paul , I like DIY so... will you sell PCBs with dotcom type power connector? The panels will be Dotcom type or will be only with dotcom size and dotcom type mounting holes? I would be interested in some Oakley modules ( Equinoxe, Triple VCA...) Pablo --- In dotcomformat@yah

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Hi any interest in dotcom Oakley

2009-05-25 by Steven Clements

I would be game for some Dot.Com specific Oakley modules. Steve --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "krisp14u2" wrote: > > Hi to all on this group > My name is Paul Darlow AKA Krisp1 Some of you may know me but if not I run krisp1.com and build and sell Oakley Modules In mostly

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Hi any interest in dotcom Oakley

2009-05-25 by peng3002

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "krisp14u2" wrote: > Is there a market for this or should I just keep on telling you guys who want Oakley that the MOTM format fits anyway so why worry > I too am gearing up to release modules in DotCom/MU format. I say go for it! You already

Thread view Attachments: 0

Hi any interest in dotcom Oakley

2009-05-25 by krisp14u2

Hi to all on this group My name is Paul Darlow AKA Krisp1 Some of you may know me but if not I run krisp1.com and build and sell Oakley Modules In mostly MOTM format A few of my customers are Dotcom users and when I have talked to a few of you I get the feeling you guys are sick

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Anyone own a Cyndustries LPG in DotCom format... yet?

2009-05-16 by David Ryle

The Modcan A format QFPG modules did have the Buchla name on them. From what I understand Cynthia had a permission agreement to do so. I guess it was respect for the vactrol idea? -David --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Suit & Tie Guy wrote: > > On May 14, 2009, at 3:47 PM, D

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Anyone own a Cyndustries LPG in DotCom format... yet?

2009-05-14 by Cynthia

Hi Erik! I'm sorry to have missed your recent emails, I've delivered all but three Dotcom format Low Pass Gates so far, and ran short of parts and kind of lost track of what was missing as they all sold out so very quickly that I didn't really see it coming at me so fast, (not th

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Anyone own a Cyndustries LPG in DotCom format... yet?

2009-05-14 by David Ryle

OK thanks. BTW how do you like it? I too am certain it will all happen, but since I'm relatively new to the "current" modular marketplace, I've been spoiled to Arrick's bsuiness model. Order something and get it on time. I've been building and using modular synths since the 80's

Thread view Attachments: 0

Anyone own a Cyndustries LPG in DotCom format... yet?

2009-05-14 by David Ryle

I've had one on order for 7 weeks and can't seem to obtain delivery. http://www.cyndustries.com/info.cfm According to Cynthia they delivered the first run already. I was told mine was to be delivered last week. Anyone have one yet? I don't mean to sound alarmist, but I've had two

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: WTB: QCS44 44-Space Tilted Walnut Studio Cabinet

2009-05-09 by frank.hettlich

Just to add: I am looking for an empty cabinet! > > I am looking for an original QCS44 44-Space Tilted Walnut Studio Cabinet from synthesizers.com, preferably located in Europe. > > Trades with synthesizers.com or other moular brands modules are welcome. > > Frank >

Thread view Attachments: 0

WTB: QCS44 44-Space Tilted Walnut Studio Cabinet

2009-05-09 by frank.hettlich

I am looking for an original QCS44 44-Space Tilted Walnut Studio Cabinet from synthesizers.com, preferably located in Europe. Trades with synthesizers.com or other moular brands modules are welcome. Frank

Thread view Attachments: 0

good trader: jeff burgener <jeff-b@transwestern.com>

2009-04-30 by jon schatz

jeff was a pleasure to deal with; i'd definitely sell to (or buy from) him again! thanks, -jon "There are no differences but differences of degree between different degrees of difference and no difference." - James, William. "Subjective Effects of Nitrous Oxide." Mind. 1882; Vol

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Analog Drum Machines

2009-04-22 by Suit & Tie Guy

On Apr 22, 2009, at 1:37 PM, jon schatz wrote: > the 909 has din sync in but it doesn't output sync (if you have the > older version firmware this is the only way you can get the 909 to > slave to external gear; the midi sync on firmware broken). i haven't even tested to see if M

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [dotcomformat] Re: Analog Drum Machines

2009-04-22 by jon schatz

On Apr 22, 2009, at 11:18 AM, Mark Rauch wrote: > Howdy, > > The TR-909 has a "sync" output that pulses whatever you program the > "wood block" sound to. that's a trigger output (+5V i think?). > I'll have to look and see if there is din. For sure there is DCB. the 909 has din sy

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Analog Drum Machines

2009-04-22 by Mark Rauch

Howdy, The TR-909 has a "sync" output that pulses whatever you program the "wood block" sound to. I'll have to look and see if there is din. For sure there is DCB. Rig --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, michael stein wrote: > > > Not a drum machine but, the future retro Mobius

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: To sync or not to sync

2009-04-22 by feedkidstosatan

The Roland TR-606 can still be bought relatively cheaply, especially when compared to the 808. The plus side is that it's small and compact, not to mention a hell of a lot of fun! Emil --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Gordon Van Huizen wrote: > > I sync (ugh) that the inabili

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.