2009-05-30 by Scott Deyo
Hi Dan! http://www.bridechamber.com/bridechamber.com/JH%20Tau%20Pipe.html Or, if you go to the Synth Modules page, the modules with the white dot next to them are available in DotCom format, and should have a pic on the linked page. Scott Deyo The Bridechamber contact@bridechambe
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-30 by Dan Lind
added some of my modularpanels in files "Shaeffer frontpanels" all in dotcom format, all built but the yusynt ffb. Be free to comment /Dan
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-30 by Dan Lind
--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Scott Deyo wrote: > > Hi Dan! > > http://www.bridechamber.com/bridechamber.com/JH%20Tau%20Pipe.html > > Or, if you go to the Synth Modules page, the modules with the white dot > next to them are available in DotCom format, and should have a pi
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-30 by John L Rice
Hi Dan, I believe he already has the DotCom panel shown, it's the bottom image. (Notice the mounting hole spacing difference between the two) Took me a while to figure it out myself. Probably would be helpful if they were labeled and also if the pictures were proportional (the Do
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-30 by Dan Lind
--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Scott Deyo wrote: > > I'd recommend matching DotCom as closely as possible. Mine are pretty > close to my eye, just a different font and tick marks, and I've hardly > sold any panels at all! > > Cheers, > Scott Deyo > The Bridechamber > contac
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-29 by Gordon Van Huizen
Well I'm looking forward to mine, Scott. :-) Gordon ----- Original Message ----- From: Scott Deyo To: dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 10:02 PM Subject: Re: [dotcomformat] MU format panel design. What is acceptable? I'd recommend matching DotCom as closely
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-28 by krisp
I like it Did you put the PCB the other way round :) how's she treating you ? cheers Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: karsteindjupdal To: dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:18 PM Subject: [dotcomformat] Re: Hi any interest in dotcom Oakley Nice ide
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-28 by karsteindjupdal
Nice idea. Seems like you could sell a few of the equinoxe phaser. I bought the phaser from Krisp1, and I think the Oakley modules are great. I was however annoyed with the different looking panel, so I recently made a dotcom panel myself. This is how it looks now: phase shifter
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-28 by krisp
I did thing about doing a Inverted MU type panel Silver with Black graphics for the Oakley panels , any one think this is a Totally bad Idea I will be using the Photo resist alloy print method Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: Zach To: dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thu
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-28 by Zach
The VCO and VC EG sound great. I like the silver color and so I wouldn't mind having a few in my setup.
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-28 by edgard_varese
--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "peng3002" wrote: > "VCO - Tri core. Outputs derived from VC waveshapers. There may be three different versions of this made available simultaneously (1MU, 2MU, alternative 2MU). reminiscent of Buchla 259 > VC EG - Misnamed for the moment. Can
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-27 by peng3002
Thanks to those who have responded so far. Your comments have been very helpful. See below for quote and replies: "Turned sides are a must, but it sounds like you're already up for that." "I don't think I would not buy a module because of the external styling (so long as it was s
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-27 by John Kraft
I don't think I would not buy a module because of the external styling (so long as it was size- and power-compatible; I do find myself avoiding MOTM modules because I'm too lazy to re-drill my cabinets and change the power connectors). Aesthetically, though, I'd prefer that it re
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-27 by peng3002
--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "John L Rice" wrote: > > I thought that MOTM is the same height as DotCom/Moog etc It's just the > MOTM mounting holes are farther away from the panel edges which causes the > problem. > MOTM and DotCom (here on referred to as MU) are the same
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-27 by John L Rice
I thought that MOTM is the same height as DotCom/Moog etc It’s just the MOTM mounting holes are farther away from the panel edges which causes the problem. I think Paul S at Synth Tech got out of the gate a year or two (not sure of the facts) before Roger A and Synth Tech offered
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-27 by Gordon Van Huizen
Taste is a rather subjective thing, but here's my view anyway. :-) Turned sides are a must, but it sounds like you're already up for that. As for other visual departures, I think it depends on the function of the module. If a module is exotic, it may be more acceptable (and indee
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-27 by Ross Totino
FPE looks badass in it's own way, but Metalphoto would look great. I don't mind different colored modules in my system. It's good for module makers to have a distinct look. I see my modular as a collection of instruments, and at the same time as a whole instrument. Actually with
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-27 by Scott Deyo
I'd recommend matching DotCom as closely as possible. Mine are pretty close to my eye, just a different font and tick marks, and I've hardly sold any panels at all! Cheers, Scott Deyo The Bridechamber contact@bridechamber.com http://www.bridechamber.com Jealous Edison Record Komp
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-26 by peng3002
Now that there is some activity here I would like to pose a question. I am getting ready to release some modules (VCF, VCO, Delay, VC EG, etc.), but I am not yet done with the panel design. The question is: If I go with a look that is very different than the Moog/DotCom style wil
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-26 by jon.sunnercrantz
Hi, I'm definently in for it as well, ass long as you are willing to ship to sweden. Do you have moog/dotcom style knobs and buttons aswell? best regards /Jon Sunnercrantz --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "krisp14u2" wrote: > > Hi to all on this group > My name is Paul Darlow
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-26 by John L Rice
I know Bride Chamber has done a few, but I keep thinking that if someone was to make DotCom style panels for ALL Synth Tech MOTM modules, it would be a simple matter in most cases (some of the modules with digital displays etc might be more involved) to just buy the desired MOTM
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-26 by Jeff Burgener
Yes... LFO, I would buy Jeffsynth >>> John Kraft 5/25/2009 5:29 PM >>> So I am proposing to make some Oakley Modules in the Dotcom format with ether power adapters or on the newer PCB's a Dotcom Type power connector as standard (this should be good news for Dotcom DIYers) So the
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-26 by Ross Totino
I purchased an Oakley Overdrive (MOTM format) for my dotcom from Krisp and was very satisfied with build quality and customer service. I use this module all the time! -Ross On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:29 PM, John Kraft jfk@uaudio.com > wrote: So I am proposing to make some Oakley M
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-25 by John Kraft
So I am proposing to make some Oakley Modules in the Dotcom format with ether power adapters or on the newer PCB's a Dotcom Type power connector as standard (this should be good news for Dotcom DIYers) So the big question, is this worth my while to invest in panels and adapters I
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-25 by Zach
I'd be interested too. Especially in the Triple Little LFO and Equinoxe. --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "krisp14u2" wrote: > > Hi to all on this group > My name is Paul Darlow AKA Krisp1 Some of you may know me but if not I run krisp1.com and build and sell Oakley Modules I
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-25 by krisp
I have been asked about the panel layouts in private mails as well as hear Most of the panel layouts are quite fixed due to the PCB mounting to the panel by the pots and pot brackets I would not want to change the PCB mounting arrangements as it works so well and the pots Im usin
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-25 by Pablo
Hello Paul , I like DIY so... will you sell PCBs with dotcom type power connector? The panels will be Dotcom type or will be only with dotcom size and dotcom type mounting holes? I would be interested in some Oakley modules ( Equinoxe, Triple VCA...) Pablo --- In dotcomformat@yah
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-25 by Steven Clements
I would be game for some Dot.Com specific Oakley modules. Steve --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "krisp14u2" wrote: > > Hi to all on this group > My name is Paul Darlow AKA Krisp1 Some of you may know me but if not I run krisp1.com and build and sell Oakley Modules In mostly
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-25 by peng3002
--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, "krisp14u2" wrote: > Is there a market for this or should I just keep on telling you guys who want Oakley that the MOTM format fits anyway so why worry > I too am gearing up to release modules in DotCom/MU format. I say go for it! You already
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-25 by krisp14u2
Hi to all on this group My name is Paul Darlow AKA Krisp1 Some of you may know me but if not I run krisp1.com and build and sell Oakley Modules In mostly MOTM format A few of my customers are Dotcom users and when I have talked to a few of you I get the feeling you guys are sick
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-16 by David Ryle
The Modcan A format QFPG modules did have the Buchla name on them. From what I understand Cynthia had a permission agreement to do so. I guess it was respect for the vactrol idea? -David --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Suit & Tie Guy wrote: > > On May 14, 2009, at 3:47 PM, D
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-16 by Suit & Tie Guy
On May 14, 2009, at 3:47 PM, David Ryle wrote: > PS - kind of strange that they left off the Buchla reference and > have "Channel One" on all four segments. a) IMHO putting the word "Buchla" or "Moog" anywhere on the front panel of a device not made by Buchla & Associates or Moog
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-14 by Erik Ribeiro
Well, the Sawtooth Animator got to me in a hurry. Communication was very good. But I also ordered the dotcom QLPG when the "wrong-graphics" paneled versions came up. I followed Cynthia's instructions. Still no word. I emailed her, and again, silence. I've been on the mailing list
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-14 by Cynthia
Hi Erik! I'm sorry to have missed your recent emails, I've delivered all but three Dotcom format Low Pass Gates so far, and ran short of parts and kind of lost track of what was missing as they all sold out so very quickly that I didn't really see it coming at me so fast, (not th
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-14 by Gordon Van Huizen
I purchased the LPG right before relocating my studio (I decided to strike while the iron was hot on the LPG...i.e. she had an inventory!). As a result, I haven't had time to really try it out yet. On the ZO, well I own two of them but I haven't been able to get my brain around t
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-14 by John Hammaren
The Saw Animators are awesome. Very fat even using one oscillator. As for the ZO, as many have said, there should be a 'Zeroscillator U.' unless you are willing to spend a great deal of time with it. Cynthia has said when I spoke you her that she'd be happy to spend some time goi
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-14 by Gordon Van Huizen
I have one, but I believe it was from the first run (a couple of months ago). It's one of two purchases that I've made from Cynthia, and I guess I've gotten lucky. Clear communications from her, and shipment in the expected time frame. Gordon On May 14, 2009, at 4:47 PM, David Ry
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-14 by John Kraft
I received mine a few weeks ago, roughly one month after I ordered it. I responded to the posting that Cynthia submitted around that time. I have to say that I've been very successful in my dealings with her. Of course, I've always only ordered when she explicitly stated that she
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-14 by John Hammaren
Well, I have two Sawtooth Animators and one ZO (Dotcom). I too have been to Frustration City on more than one occasion with this stuff. BUT, and this is the thing. She does eventually deliver, the stuff is top-notch, Cynthia is dedicated to her craft. I have a slightly different
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-14 by jon schatz
On May 14, 2009, at 1:47 PM, David Ryle wrote: > According to Cynthia they delivered the first run already. I was > told mine was to be delivered last week. Anyone have one yet? yep, got mine. they are indeed shipping. > PS - kind of strange that they left off the Buchla referenc
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-14 by David Ryle
OK thanks. BTW how do you like it? I too am certain it will all happen, but since I'm relatively new to the "current" modular marketplace, I've been spoiled to Arrick's bsuiness model. Order something and get it on time. I've been building and using modular synths since the 80's
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-14 by David Ryle
I've had one on order for 7 weeks and can't seem to obtain delivery. http://www.cyndustries.com/info.cfm According to Cynthia they delivered the first run already. I was told mine was to be delivered last week. Anyone have one yet? I don't mean to sound alarmist, but I've had two
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-09 by frank.hettlich
Just to add: I am looking for an empty cabinet! > > I am looking for an original QCS44 44-Space Tilted Walnut Studio Cabinet from synthesizers.com, preferably located in Europe. > > Trades with synthesizers.com or other moular brands modules are welcome. > > Frank >
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-05-09 by frank.hettlich
I am looking for an original QCS44 44-Space Tilted Walnut Studio Cabinet from synthesizers.com, preferably located in Europe. Trades with synthesizers.com or other moular brands modules are welcome. Frank
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-04-30 by Jeff Burgener
Likewise. Jon Schatz delivered on time, packaged great. Will do business with him any time. Jeff Burgener >>> jon schatz 4/30/2009 11:42 AM >>> jeff was a pleasure to deal with; i'd definitely sell to (or buy from) him again! thanks, -jon "There are no differences but differences
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-04-30 by jon schatz
jeff was a pleasure to deal with; i'd definitely sell to (or buy from) him again! thanks, -jon "There are no differences but differences of degree between different degrees of difference and no difference." - James, William. "Subjective Effects of Nitrous Oxide." Mind. 1882; Vol
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-04-22 by Suit & Tie Guy
On Apr 22, 2009, at 1:37 PM, jon schatz wrote: > the 909 has din sync in but it doesn't output sync (if you have the > older version firmware this is the only way you can get the 909 to > slave to external gear; the midi sync on firmware broken). i haven't even tested to see if M
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-04-22 by jon schatz
On Apr 22, 2009, at 11:18 AM, Mark Rauch wrote: > Howdy, > > The TR-909 has a "sync" output that pulses whatever you program the > "wood block" sound to. that's a trigger output (+5V i think?). > I'll have to look and see if there is din. For sure there is DCB. the 909 has din sy
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-04-22 by Mark Rauch
Howdy, The TR-909 has a "sync" output that pulses whatever you program the "wood block" sound to. I'll have to look and see if there is din. For sure there is DCB. Rig --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, michael stein wrote: > > > Not a drum machine but, the future retro Mobius
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2009-04-22 by feedkidstosatan
The Roland TR-606 can still be bought relatively cheaply, especially when compared to the 808. The plus side is that it's small and compact, not to mention a hell of a lot of fun! Emil --- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, Gordon Van Huizen wrote: > > I sync (ugh) that the inabili
Thread view
Attachments: 0