EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

Where can you order Xtreme Analog.
I'm having a hard time finding it online or in the stores.

thanks
tom

--- In exs-users@y..., Tom Hammer <hammeremail@y...> wrote:
> Where can you order Xtreme Analog.
> I'm having a hard time finding it online or in the stores.
> 
> thanks
> tom

I have the es1 and will have the es2 soon (I hope!), would there be 
much point in me buying the Xtreme Analog library? 

Thanks

G.

Yes, it sounds amazing! Very different from the other synths because of the
incredible saw wave forms.

> From: "gordonmurrison" <gordon.murrison@...>
> Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 09:58:51 -0000
> To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [exs] Re: Xtreme Analog
> 
> --- In exs-users@y..., Tom Hammer <hammeremail@y...> wrote:
>> Where can you order Xtreme Analog.
>> I'm having a hard time finding it online or in the stores.
>> 
>> thanks
>> tom
> 
> I have the es1 and will have the es2 soon (I hope!), would there be
> much point in me buying the Xtreme Analog library?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> G.
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 
>

> I have the es1 and will have the es2 soon (I hope!), would there be
> much point in me buying the Xtreme Analog library?

Plus:
- The EXS24 filter has a different sound compared to ES1 (and probably ES2).
It's an addition to your sound palette
- The Xtreme programs are partly made of heavy layered fattened waveforms.
When you want to achieve this realtime with virtual analogs it will cost ya
*much* more CPU power.

Minus:
Don't do it to save CPU. Extreme Analog also takes considerable CPU (because
the EXS-filters has to do a steady job). Although i'm told that ES2 takes
even more, but that's no more than speculation at this moment.

Interesting detail: Pro52 needs much less CPU power to do his thing with the
same amount of voices.

Eppo Schaap
Galbatron Epic Symphonic Electronica
www.galbatron.com
music: www.ampcast.com/galbatron

yes! its such fun watching the cpu crap out on two notes of 
polyphony!

andy

--- In exs-users@y..., "gordonmurrison" <gordon.murrison@t...> 
wrote:

> I have the es1 and will have the es2 soon (I hope!), would there 
be 

> much point in me buying the Xtreme Analog library? 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> G.

What are you talking about?

> From: "highlandsource" <ythan@...>
> Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 13:44:02 -0000
> To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [exs] Re: Xtreme Analog
> 
> 
> yes! its such fun watching the cpu crap out on two notes of
> polyphony!
> 
> andy
> 
> --- In exs-users@y..., "gordonmurrison" <gordon.murrison@t...>
> wrote:
> 
>> I have the es1 and will have the es2 soon (I hope!), would there
> be 
>> much point in me buying the Xtreme Analog library?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> G.
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 
>

This makes no sense to me. Do you have problems with drum kits, etc? I often
run 5 or 6 EXS with 75 samples-per-kit, some of them long. The Xtreme CD
should use a fraction of the memory since it is a single, short wave form.
What CPU are you running? Honestly, it sounds like your problem may be
caused by something else... Jer

> From: "highlandsource" <ythan@...>
> Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 15:26:04 -0000
> To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [exs] Re: Xtreme Analog
> 
> 
> sounds great but i find i can barely get any polyphony out of it
> before it falls over. one part, a few notes, and thats about it. im
> noticing around 50% of the sounds are this way and are
> unusable out of the box in an actual arrangement here.  sure, we
> users can modify the filter etc to make it less cpu hungry, but errr,
> is that really any kind of solution? its a bit ike buying a car and
> having to modify the gas tank so i can drive more than ten miles!
> 
> in short, the sounds languish on my hard drive, unused and
> unloved.....sigh, another romance over.
> 
> andy
> 
> --- In exs-users@y..., <HELP@M...> wrote:
>> What are you talking about?
>> 
>>> From: "highlandsource" <ythan@b...>
>>> Reply-To: exs-users@y...
>>> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 13:44:02 -0000
>>> To: exs-users@y...
>>> Subject: [exs] Re: Xtreme Analog
>>> 
>>> 
>>> yes! its such fun watching the cpu crap out on two notes of
>>> polyphony!
>>> 
>>> andy
>>> 
>>> --- In exs-users@y..., "gordonmurrison"
> <gordon.murrison@t...>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I have the es1 and will have the es2 soon (I hope!), would
> there
>>> be 
>>>> much point in me buying the Xtreme Analog library?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> G.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>> exs-users-unsubscribe@e...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 
>

sounds great but i find i can barely get any polyphony out of it 
before it falls over. one part, a few notes, and thats about it. im 
noticing around 50% of the sounds are this way and are 
unusable out of the box in an actual arrangement here.  sure, we 
users can modify the filter etc to make it less cpu hungry, but errr, 
is that really any kind of solution? its a bit ike buying a car and 
having to modify the gas tank so i can drive more than ten miles!

in short, the sounds languish on my hard drive, unused and 
unloved.....sigh, another romance over.

andy

--- In exs-users@y..., <HELP@M...> wrote:
> What are you talking about?
> 
> > From: "highlandsource" <ythan@b...>
> > Reply-To: exs-users@y...
> > Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 13:44:02 -0000
> > To: exs-users@y...
> > Subject: [exs] Re: Xtreme Analog
> > 
> > 
> > yes! its such fun watching the cpu crap out on two notes of
> > polyphony!
> > 
> > andy
> > 
> > --- In exs-users@y..., "gordonmurrison" 
<gordon.murrison@t...>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> I have the es1 and will have the es2 soon (I hope!), would 
there
> > be 
> >> much point in me buying the Xtreme Analog library?
> >> 
> >> Thanks
> >> 
> >> G.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > exs-users-unsubscribe@e...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

> > 
> > 
> >

i dont have any problems with lots of samples at all. drums are 
just fine, cpu-wise. its a bit limited in the amount of parts i can 
get (virtually) firing at any one time. the biggest hassle to me 
seems to be polyphony. theres no doubt judging by my cpu 
monitor that a bunch of the sounds on xtreme analog EAT my 
cpu - those big pad sounds? im lucky to have a 4 note chord 
move into another four note chord without the audio stuttering to 
a halt, and even thats only possible with just that one audio 
instrument part happening! (how retro is that? a monotimbral 
synth!) im using a pb pismo 500, with the emi2/6 (im not 
impressed with the asio driver!) ive tweaked and trimmed my 
system as much as possible. mostly the area which trips me up 
is the balance between latency and roomy cpu. my ears cant 
handle the latency which some people seem to be ok with, so i 
have no option but to get the latency settings down as far as 
possible, which of course means less power being allocated to 
cpu efficiency. (why such a powerful collection of technology that 
is the pb 500/logic audio/exs combo cant outperform a dedicated 
hardware synth is beyond me) regardless of the time, energy, 
and ingenuity i throw at this system i have a daily hassle with 
interrupted workflow and plain old untogether grooves...grrr.

andy

--- In exs-users@y..., <HELP@M...> wrote:
> This makes no sense to me. Do you have problems with drum 
kits, etc? I often
> run 5 or 6 EXS with 75 samples-per-kit, some of them long. 
The Xtreme CD
> should use a fraction of the memory since it is a single, short 
wave form.
> What CPU are you running? Honestly, it sounds like your 
problem may be
> caused by something else... Jer
> 
> > From: "highlandsource" <ythan@b...>
> > Reply-To: exs-users@y...
> > Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 15:26:04 -0000
> > To: exs-users@y...
> > Subject: [exs] Re: Xtreme Analog
> > 
> > 
> > sounds great but i find i can barely get any polyphony out of it
> > before it falls over. one part, a few notes, and thats about it. 
im
> > noticing around 50% of the sounds are this way and are
> > unusable out of the box in an actual arrangement here.  sure, 
we
> > users can modify the filter etc to make it less cpu hungry, but 
errr,
> > is that really any kind of solution? its a bit ike buying a car 
and
> > having to modify the gas tank so i can drive more than ten 
miles!
> > 
> > in short, the sounds languish on my hard drive, unused and
> > unloved.....sigh, another romance over.
> > 
> > andy
> > 
> > --- In exs-users@y..., <HELP@M...> wrote:
> >> What are you talking about?
> >> 
> >>> From: "highlandsource" <ythan@b...>
> >>> Reply-To: exs-users@y...
> >>> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 13:44:02 -0000
> >>> To: exs-users@y...
> >>> Subject: [exs] Re: Xtreme Analog
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> yes! its such fun watching the cpu crap out on two notes of
> >>> polyphony!
> >>> 
> >>> andy
> >>> 
> >>> --- In exs-users@y..., "gordonmurrison"
> > <gordon.murrison@t...>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> I have the es1 and will have the es2 soon (I hope!), would
> > there
> >>> be 
> >>>> much point in me buying the Xtreme Analog library?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> 
> >>>> G.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >>> exs-users-unsubscribe@e...
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > exs-users-unsubscribe@e...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

> > 
> > 
> >

Sounds like hell. I don't have these problems, however I recently moved from
a laptop to a dual G4. There is a big difference in DSP.

> From: "highlandsource" <ythan@...>
> Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 17:28:09 -0000
> To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [exs] Re: Xtreme Analog
> 
> i dont have any problems with lots of samples at all. drums are
> just fine, cpu-wise. its a bit limited in the amount of parts i can
> get (virtually) firing at any one time. the biggest hassle to me
> seems to be polyphony. theres no doubt judging by my cpu
> monitor that a bunch of the sounds on xtreme analog EAT my
> cpu - those big pad sounds? im lucky to have a 4 note chord
> move into another four note chord without the audio stuttering to
> a halt, and even thats only possible with just that one audio
> instrument part happening! (how retro is that? a monotimbral
> synth!) im using a pb pismo 500, with the emi2/6 (im not
> impressed with the asio driver!) ive tweaked and trimmed my
> system as much as possible. mostly the area which trips me up
> is the balance between latency and roomy cpu. my ears cant
> handle the latency which some people seem to be ok with, so i
> have no option but to get the latency settings down as far as
> possible, which of course means less power being allocated to
> cpu efficiency. (why such a powerful collection of technology that
> is the pb 500/logic audio/exs combo cant outperform a dedicated
> hardware synth is beyond me) regardless of the time, energy,
> and ingenuity i throw at this system i have a daily hassle with
> interrupted workflow and plain old untogether grooves...grrr.
> 
> andy
> 
> --- In exs-users@y..., <HELP@M...> wrote:
>> This makes no sense to me. Do you have problems with drum
> kits, etc? I often
>> run 5 or 6 EXS with 75 samples-per-kit, some of them long.
> The Xtreme CD
>> should use a fraction of the memory since it is a single, short
> wave form.
>> What CPU are you running? Honestly, it sounds like your
> problem may be
>> caused by something else... Jer
>> 
>>> From: "highlandsource" <ythan@b...>
>>> Reply-To: exs-users@y...
>>> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 15:26:04 -0000
>>> To: exs-users@y...
>>> Subject: [exs] Re: Xtreme Analog
>>> 
>>> 
>>> sounds great but i find i can barely get any polyphony out of it
>>> before it falls over. one part, a few notes, and thats about it.
> im
>>> noticing around 50% of the sounds are this way and are
>>> unusable out of the box in an actual arrangement here.  sure,
> we
>>> users can modify the filter etc to make it less cpu hungry, but
> errr,
>>> is that really any kind of solution? its a bit ike buying a car
> and
>>> having to modify the gas tank so i can drive more than ten
> miles!
>>> 
>>> in short, the sounds languish on my hard drive, unused and
>>> unloved.....sigh, another romance over.
>>> 
>>> andy
>>> 
>>> --- In exs-users@y..., <HELP@M...> wrote:
>>>> What are you talking about?
>>>> 
>>>>> From: "highlandsource" <ythan@b...>
>>>>> Reply-To: exs-users@y...
>>>>> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 13:44:02 -0000
>>>>> To: exs-users@y...
>>>>> Subject: [exs] Re: Xtreme Analog
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> yes! its such fun watching the cpu crap out on two notes of
>>>>> polyphony!
>>>>> 
>>>>> andy
>>>>> 
>>>>> --- In exs-users@y..., "gordonmurrison"
>>> <gordon.murrison@t...>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I have the es1 and will have the es2 soon (I hope!), would
>>> there
>>>>> be 
>>>>>> much point in me buying the Xtreme Analog library?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> G.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>>>> exs-users-unsubscribe@e...
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>> exs-users-unsubscribe@e...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 
>

Hm, the most CPU intense demo song of the CD (Arpeggiator) takes up like 15%
of my CPU, the "Interactive Sequence Demo" is using like 10% and I can
really play loads of voices with almost any patch.
Athlon 1gHz here.
Make sure "32bit float" is selected in your EXS preferences.

Regards,
Sascha

hmm, and possibly aha! the 32 bit float is a mac preference? i 
was under the impression it needed to be set before 
conversion?..see, i know about the 32 but float situation, but id 
converted everything before i knew! i mean EVERYTHING!
i was waiting for v5 and os x to sort that out. perhaps i should do 
it now, if indeed it needs to be done?

andy


--- In exs-users@y..., "Sascha Franck" <saschafranck@s...> 
wrote:
> Hm, the most CPU intense demo song of the CD (Arpeggiator) 
takes up like 15%
> of my CPU, the "Interactive Sequence Demo" is using like 10% 
and I can

> really play loads of voices with almost any patch.
> Athlon 1gHz here.
> Make sure "32bit float" is selected in your EXS preferences.
> 
> Regards,
> Sascha

highlandsource wrote:
> hmm, and possibly aha! the 32 bit float is a mac preference? i
> was under the impression it needed to be set before
> conversion?..see, i know about the 32 but float situation, but id
> converted everything before i knew! i mean EVERYTHING!

This preference setting has got nothing to do with converting.
The EXS's internal processing is allways going on in 32bit float, so every
loaded sample has to be converted. If you're using "source" quality this has
to happen on the fly => using up more CPU power.
If you are however using "32bit float" samples will be converted when the
EXS loads them into your RAM. This of course means a bit more RAM will be
used (double amount if the source is 16bit, 1/3 more if it's 24bit), but
you'll get quite some better performance with it (I'd even buy some more RAM
to get the benefits of saving up CPU power).
Just give it a try!

Regards,
Sascha

haha! i bought a new 512 meg chip just 2 days ago, i wasnt sure 
why really, just its cheap right now...now i know:)

ill give that a go

thanks

andy

--- In exs-users@y..., "Sascha Franck" <saschafranck@s...> 
wrote:
> highlandsource wrote:
> > hmm, and possibly aha! the 32 bit float is a mac preference? 
i
> > was under the impression it needed to be set before
> > conversion?..see, i know about the 32 but float situation, but 
id
> > converted everything before i knew! i mean EVERYTHING!
> 
> This preference setting has got nothing to do with converting.
> The EXS's internal processing is allways going on in 32bit 
float, so every
> loaded sample has to be converted. If you're using "source" 
quality this has
> to happen on the fly => using up more CPU power.
> If you are however using "32bit float" samples will be converted 
when the
> EXS loads them into your RAM. This of course means a bit 
more RAM will be
> used (double amount if the source is 16bit, 1/3 more if it's 
24bit), but
> you'll get quite some better performance with it (I'd even buy 
some more RAM

> to get the benefits of saving up CPU power).
> Just give it a try!
> 
> Regards,
> Sascha

Eppo Schaap wrote:
> Interesting detail: Pro52 needs much less CPU power to do his thing with
the
> same amount of voices.

Uhm yeah. Just fooled around with that and the new FM7 on a friends
machine - I must say that those N.I. folks really know their shit. Both
synths seem to be extremely CPU friendly. And they sound just great!
Admittedly I like the EXS (and ES1) filter better, but it's not allways
about that.
Seems that I need to get my hands on these.

Cheers,
Sascha

hi peeps

after a few hours of messing around with the 32 bit float option...i 
can now play two SIX note polyphony chords before my cpu goes 
south! heh..
thanks for the tip though, it has made a difference. perversely, its 
really only the emagic sounds which harrass my cpu so much. i 
had read that switching out the filter helps (it does, of course) but  
all that seems to result in is a bunch of nasty, fizzy pseudo 80's 
casio type tones!

andy

highlandsource wrote:
> after a few hours of messing around with the 32 bit float option...i
> can now play two SIX note polyphony chords before my cpu goes
> south! heh..

Hm, time for a CPU update, no?
I have just been playing back 40 voices (5 EXS instances all playing 8
notes) of some rather CPU intense patches (all stereo, filter allways on) -
no problem at all.

Earlier EXS tests showed that I can play up to 85-90 voices with the filter
and around 190 without. Not bad if you ask me, especially that these days
some people allready would call my machine outdated.

> i  had read that switching out the filter helps (it does, of course) but
> all that seems to result in is a bunch of nasty, fizzy pseudo 80's
> casio type tones!

Yeah, most patches don't sound well with the filter switched off, but some
almost sound identical - looks like Peter Krischker (the programmer) had the
filter switched on all the time, just in case he'd need it.

Regards,
Sascha

--- In exs-users@y..., "Sascha Franck" <saschafranck@s...> 
wrote:
> 
> Hm, time for a CPU update, no?

quite possibly! thing is, i have little option but to have a mobile 
setup so laptop is the only way for me...would i notice a 
significant improvement with a g4 powerbook?

andy  *shuddering at the potentially looming expense*

I did fine with my Bronze PowerBook G3 400. It easily handled more than what
you are describing. Perhaps you should seriously consider rebuilding your
hard drive from the ground up. Backup, Zero All Data, Reinstall OS, Install
Essential Music Apps (Logic), run Norton or Techtool from the CD, test
Logic, backup HD at this point, add all other items you use, test, revert to
previous build if necessary. Watch for extension conflicts when adding
additional apps, watch for processes running in the background that might
interrupt Logic's process. Get peek-a-boo, or something similar to view
hidden processes (you can find these on http://download.cnet.com (or
downloads--I forget) and search utilities. As a preliminary test, you can
turn off all non-essential extensions, but I don't think this would prove
much. Good luck... Jer

> From: "highlandsource" <ythan@...>
> Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 11:52:47 -0000
> To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [exs] Re: Xtreme Analog/32 bit float
> 
> --- In exs-users@y..., "Sascha Franck" <saschafranck@s...>
> wrote:
>> 
>> Hm, time for a CPU update, no?
> 
> quite possibly! thing is, i have little option but to have a mobile
> setup so laptop is the only way for me...would i notice a
> significant improvement with a g4 powerbook?
> 
> andy  *shuddering at the potentially looming expense*
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 
>

Get a Hammerfall Multiface if you're mostly concerned about latency. It has
the lowest with the highest DSP push.

> From: "highlandsource" <ythan@btinternet.com>
> Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 20:08:06 -0000
> To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [exs] Re: Xtreme Analog/32 bit float
> 
> $"?1Ú4$# 4xs-users@y..., <HELP@M...> wrote:
>> I did fine with my Bronze PowerBook G3 400. It easily handled
> more than what
>> you are describing. Perhaps you should seriously consider
> rebuilding your
>> hard drive from the ground up
> ------
> i pretty much did all of that a little while ago. and i run minimal
> apps and extensions. at this point im tending to suspect the emi
> asio driver. i insist on the lowest latency settings always and it
> just isnt up to it. i notice i get lots more cpu headroom using mac
> av only. 
> 
> andy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 
>

$"?1Ú4$# 4xs-users@y..., <HELP@M...> wrote:
> I did fine with my Bronze PowerBook G3 400. It easily handled 
more than what
> you are describing. Perhaps you should seriously consider 
rebuilding your
> hard drive from the ground up
------
i pretty much did all of that a little while ago. and i run minimal 
apps and extensions. at this point im tending to suspect the emi 
asio driver. i insist on the lowest latency settings always and it 
just isnt up to it. i notice i get lots more cpu headroom using mac 
av only. 

andy

--- In exs-users@y..., <HELP@M...> wrote:
> Get a Hammerfall Multiface if you're mostly concerned about 
latency. It has
> the lowest with the highest DSP push.
---
thats been my plan for some time, the emi was always a 
stopgap measure -  the multiface is in somewhat short supply 
meantime though.....(call back in a couple of weeks, etc....)

andy

Hi,
I can't install xtreme analog cd on my panther system
because it's a cd for OS9 ( i bought it and now it
doesn't work!) if you can help me that wolud be cool.

Thanks,

Julio D'Santiago

Hi Julio,

On Oct 5, 2004, at 12:42 AM, M Guerrero wrote:

> I can't install xtreme analog cd on my panther system
> because it's a cd for OS9

Actually you don't need any installer app to make it work. All you need to
do is:

1. Move the "Xtreme Analog" folder from the "Sample Instruments" folder on
the CD to "Sample Instruments" folder inside your Logic folder;
2. Move the "Xtreme Analog" folder from the "EXS Samples" folder on your CD
to the respective folder on our sample HD;
3. In addition to that if you want to use the presets from your plug-in
settings menu instead of EXS program menu, move the "Xtreme Analog" folder
from the "Plug-In Settings" folder on your CD into "Plug-In Settings/EXS24"
folder inside your Logic folder (you need to create the "EXS24" folder if it
doesn't exist already, and AFAIU it probably doesn't).

HTH,

Andy