Re: [motm] Delay talk
2000-04-20 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 04/20/2000 9:01:52 AM, synth1@airmail.net writes: Wow! Time flies while you re busy
Messages
Browse messages
Page 585 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Re: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?
2000-04-20 by Ben Vehorn
Agreed--analog delays in general tend to be noisier than their digital counterparts. Many flangers and phasers tend to derive their whoosh sound from the
Re: [motm] Delay talk
2000-04-20 by Paul Schreiber
... of ... Reticon is out of business, period. About 1983. ... that ... Mitsubishi chips that are designed specifically for them. Small delays, clocks
Delay Module
2000-04-20 by Tkacs, Ken
How feasible is this idea of creating an analog delay using digital RAM? Is that an oxymoron, or is this a legitimate concept? The good points of course are
Re: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?
2000-04-20 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 04/20/2000 7:44:13 AM, ben@amazon.com writes:
RE: [motm] "What's the Frequency, Kenneth?"
2000-04-20 by Tkacs, Ken
I too would rather have a quantizer that s precisely set. MUCH faster to use than squinting at the display on a frequency counter (mine by the way has at least
Re: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?
2000-04-20 by Ben Vehorn
I have a Marshall Time Modulator and there is absolutely no noticeable noise whatsoever. The spec sheet rates the signal to noise ratio at 90dB or something
Re: [motm] Delay Module.. flangers too
2000-04-20 by Ben Vehorn
Is this the same ensemble effect that is on the PS series? That is the lushest, thickest chorus I have ever heard, although I wish it had control over more
Re: [motm] Delay talk
2000-04-20 by Tony Allgood
... Now this is my opinion but I think the BBD sucks. Horrible mushy nasty distorted noisy, and just horrible to use. Sorry! It is quite possible that the
Re: [motm] "What's the Frequency, Kenneth?"
2000-04-20 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-04-20 01:11:33 EDT, you write:
Re: [motm] "What's the Frequency, Kenneth?"
2000-04-20 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-04-20 01:11:33 EDT, you write:
Re: [motm] Delay talk
2000-04-20 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 4/20/00 1:20:54 AM, synth1@airmail.net writes:
Delay talk
2000-04-20 by Paul Schreiber
Well, all I can say is probably by the time I get around to looking at it, Panasonic will discontinue all the MN300x series parts and as Baretta said, That s
Re: [motm] "What's the Frequency, Kenneth?"
2000-04-20 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... Freedom s just another word for, I can t get this thing in tune! ... I got my TKB in maybe 1985 or 86. The problem I described is not horrendous (like a
Re: [motm]Speaking of pedals...
2000-04-20 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-04-19 23:33:49 EDT, you write: ivan, well, it was my first ring modulator so i
Re: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?
2000-04-20 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-04-19 23:31:02 EDT, you write: ivan, i haven`t seen one of those in years ! they were pretty neat,
Re: [motm]Speaking of pedals...
2000-04-20 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 04/19/2000 11:27:39 PM, davevosh@aol.com writes:
Re: [motm] "What's the Frequency, Kenneth?"
2000-04-20 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-04-19 21:36:23 EDT, you write:
Re: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?
2000-04-20 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 04/19/2000 10:40:17 PM, davevosh@aol.com writes:
Re: [motm]Speaking of pedals...
2000-04-20 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-04-19 20:26:20 EDT, you write: ivan, way, way back when i was about 18, i had the maestro ring
Re: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?
2000-04-20 by davevosh@aol.com
In a message dated 00-04-19 20:21:51 EDT, you write:
Re: [motm] Panel drilling template
2000-04-20 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... What he said! I can check locally if you d like, but I will get one barring that. JB
Re: [motm] "What's the Frequency, Kenneth?"
2000-04-20 by jwbarlow@aol.com
... I m not sure you re frequency counter will have the resolution to really hone in on each particular frequency across the audio spectrum. I know my one
Re: RE: RE: [motm] Delay Module.. flangers too
2000-04-20 by Elliott
i don t say very much, but we need to add this one! -elliott ... being ... flanger ... grouped ... -- ... --
Re: RE: RE: [motm] Delay Module.. flangers too
2000-04-20 by Elliott
i don t say very much, but we need to add this one! - elliott ... being ... flanger ... grouped ... -- ... --
RE: RE: [motm] Delay Module.. flangers too
2000-04-20 by The Old Crow
... Sure, just a matter of the clocking rate and feedback profile. The venerable, and still one of my favorite programmable-preset machines, the Korg Polysix,
cool link...120 years of electronic instruments
2000-04-20 by jmw
There s some crazy gear on this site - *real* vintage... http://www.obsolete.com/120_years/ jmw
Bob Pease column
2000-04-20 by J. Larry Hendry
... BTW, I met Michael at the AHMW gathering. He is a heck of a nice guy who knows his way around both the electronics side and the black and whites. I am
Re: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?
2000-04-20 by Thomas Hudson
... Yes. I guess the trick is using a high enough sample rate on the top-end to compensate for the low end. The RPS-10 has a rotary switch for choosing between
Re: RE: RE: [motm] Delay Module.. flangers too
2000-04-20 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 04/19/2000 8:03:15 PM, ken.tkacs@jer.com writes: Multiple taps please.
Re: RE: [motm]Speaking of pedals...
2000-04-20 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 04/19/2000 7:58:09 PM, kpeek1@prodigy.net writes:
Re: RE: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?
2000-04-20 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 04/19/2000 6:52:18 PM, ceres@sirius.com writes:
Re: [motm] Panel drilling template
2000-04-20 by J. Larry Hendry
Dave, If you would like a competing bid, I know a shop that might be interested. If you send me the specs that you have so were are comparing exactly the
RE: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?
2000-04-20 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
Do you suggest that the module use digital memory with an analog VC-controlled clock? That sounds interesting to me, albiet perhaps a bit tricky. I wonder
Re: [motm] Delay Module.. flangers too
2000-04-20 by Thomas Hudson
... Does anyone remember an article by Craig Anderton about using a second delay line to delay the original/non-flanged signal to compensate for the fact that
Re: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?
2000-04-20 by Thomas Hudson
Duh. All my previous rambling had a point I never made. I wonder the best of both worlds (or good parts from each) couldn t be had if you designed a digital
RE: RE: [motm] Delay Module.. flangers too
2000-04-20 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
Would it be redundant if I raised my hand? ;) --PBr
RE: RE: [motm] Delay Module.. flangers too
2000-04-20 by Kevin Peek
Cool!!! Anyone else interested in such a module? ... From: Tkacs, Ken [mailto:ken.tkacs@jer.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 7:45 PM To: motm@egroups.com
RE: [motm]Speaking of pedals...
2000-04-19 by Kevin Peek
Oberheim filter pedal: http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=312892080 $400.00 reserve not met yet. Is this crazy?
RE: RE: [motm] Delay Module.. flangers too
2000-04-19 by Tkacs, Ken
I would love to see a full-featured MOTM analog delay module. ... From: Kevin Peek [mailto:kpeek1@prodigy.net] Sent: Wednesday, 19 April, 2000 8:00 PM To:
RE: RE: [motm] Delay Module.. flangers too
2000-04-19 by Kevin Peek
I have an ADA flanger which is a pedal with a CV input. I think it (CV input) was made for the ADA CV pedal. I love the sound. Would it be possible to make a
RE: RE: [motm] Delay Module.. flangers too
2000-04-19 by Tkacs, Ken
A flanger is just a delay line with a relatively short delay that s being modulated by an LFO and mixed back in with the dry signal, so sure! ... From: Kevin
RE: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?
2000-04-19 by David Bivins
I don t understand--a delay without signal degradation? What would that be used for? ... I love analog. Even PICs give me the creeps. But I ll keep an open
Re: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?
2000-04-19 by Thomas Hudson
Most of the DDL s I have are expensive multieffect packages. I do have one early model delay that I treasure more than any other. The Boss RPS-10 Pitch
Re: RE: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?
2000-04-19 by Doug Pearson
... to ... Good choice. I was about to answer the what s so great about analog delays? query with the rhetorical question, ever heard an STD-1 or
Re: RE: [motm] Delay Module.. flangers too
2000-04-19 by ivancu@aol.com
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=311689148 These were cool old rack-mount voltage-controlled flangers. I know the guy who used to run
Re: RE: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?
2000-04-19 by ivancu@aol.com
It seems to me that analog lends itself more to voltage control, and continuous control as compared to digital. I ve got an assortment of delays, old and
RE: [motm] Delay Module.. Digital bad?
2000-04-19 by Kevin Peek
I must third the motion for an analog delay. I have used many, MXR, Boss DM-2, DM-3, Memoryman. All are different. Some are deeper, some are noisier, and some
RE: [motm] Panel drilling template
2000-04-19 by CHRIS PARKER
Dave, Count me in for one! Let me know when and in what form you need payment and I ll have it sent to you ASAP. Thanks!!! -CRP- ... Update - I wasted 2
RE: [motm] Panel drilling template
2000-04-19 by Dave Bradley
Update - I wasted 2 weeks screwing around with one machine shop, only to be finally blown off today, so I just came back from another one. They will be making